Air conditioning trends in the USA

9 07 2007

Lately, it seems that I’ve been finding air conditioners juxtaposed with temperature sensors for USHCN climate stations of record all over the USA.

Bainbridge, GA USHCN Climate Station of Record

That got me to wondering; what sorts of trends are there for air conditioners in the United States? And, could there possibly be any correlation between surface temperature measurements to the number of air conditioners in use in the USA?

Some research led me to a Dept. of Energy’s “Energy Information Administration” (EIA) website which had some interesting facts, some of which I’ve graphed to show trend.

The EIA website only had data as current as 1997 for some reason, but it did go back to 1978, though apparently surveys weren’t done every year.

By 1997, nearly three-quarters (72 percent) of all American households had air-conditioners. 47 percent of all households had central air-conditioning systems and 25 percent had window/wall air-conditioners. 1 percent had both central and window/wall air-conditioners. I would expect that number to be at 80 percent or higher by 2007, in part due to the availability of very inexpensive a/c units manufactured in China, Taiwan, and Korea, some of which can be had for about $100 US.

By 1997, over nine-tenths (93 percent) of the households in the South Atlantic Census Division had air conditioners. Over half (54 percent) of all the households in the division had air conditioners and used them all summer.

From 1978 to 1997, the total amount of electricity used in the residential sector increased from 2.47 quadrillion Btu in 1978 to 3.54 quadrillion Btu. Over the same period, electricity used for residential air-conditioning rose from 0.31 quadrillion Btu to 0.42 quadrillion Btu. Among the reasons air-conditioning electricity use did not rise more is the increasing efficiency of air-conditioning equipment. You can see the electric use trend in the graph below:

AC-energyuse.png

This correlates somewhat with the number of cooling degree days, but surprisingly, the trend went downward over the last few years of the study:

AC-coolingDD.png

The gap between the “haves” and the “have nots” when it comes to air conditioning has been steadily closing. Interestingly, the trend of households with a/c units looks similar to some of the surface temperature trends that have been published:

AC-totalUShousholds.png

But it makes you wonder, what effects do the millions of air conditioners dumping waste heat into the near surface atmosphere have on temperatures measured at about the same elevation as the waste heat is dumped? Is there enough atmospheric mixing to distribute it so that it becomes part of the entire UHI bias, or does it dwell in “pockets”? Sounds like a start for a study for somebody.





How not to measure temperature, part 19

9 07 2007

In traveling around California and Nevada to look at NOAA USHCN climate
monitoring weather stations I’ve seen some odd things. I’ve seen temperature
sensors near asphalt and concrete, sensors placed within feet of buildings and
cars, sensors placed near air conditioner exhausts, and sensors that had
barbeque grills in the vicinity.

Last Friday June 6th, I traveled to Santa Rosa, CA to the Press Democrat
Newspaper, a wholly owned subsidiary of the New York Times, which according to
NOAA, has the climate station of record for Santa Rosa.

SantaRosa_Press_Democrat_Building.JPG

I figured it would be a fairly straightforward survey, and that I’d probably
find the temperature sensor near the back of the building by the parking lot, as
I’ve found many others placed. I figured it would look a lot like our local
newspaper, the Chico Enterprise Record (owned by Media News Group), weather station. It is in the rear, in a bit of
disrepair, missing some slats and part of its roof assembly, but otherwise ok.
It is seen below:

ER-wxstation.JPG

But nothing prepared me for what I was about to find at the Santa Rosa Press
Democrat.

When I arrived, I couldn’t locate the NOAA MMTS sensor anywhere around the building, but I
did see a tower on the roof of the building, and in the rear of the building
they had a Davis Vantage Pro2 weather station on a pole. I knew that wasn’t
the official climate temperature sensor provided by NOAA. So, after doing a
perimeter search twice, I went inside to inquire within. Everything in the lobby said
"go away". I guess it was the bullet proof glass, and the cameras, and the
security guard. After getting a name of the person resonsible for their weather
page from the front desk, I called on my cell
phone, no answer.

Undeterred, I decided to try looking outside again. It was then I noticed the
5 level parking garage about a block north.

From the top of the parking garage a quick scan with my binoculars located the NOAA MMTS
temperature sensor. It was there, about 8-10 feet above the roof, surrounded by
a sea of air conditioners and exhaust vents!

Here is what I saw from my binoculars:

SantaRosa_Press_Democrat_MMTS.JPG

And here is a panorama of the entire rooftop of the Press Democrat. Click on
the image to get a full sized view with panning functions:

SantaRosa_PressDemocrat_rooftop_panorama.JPG

A complete photo essay is available on my surfacestations.org website.

An independent check of aerial photos that I had access to confirmed the
placement of the sensor in the middle of several air conditioning units.

 SantaRosa_Press_Democrat_aerialview.JPG

 I’ve seen some poorly thought out places to measure temperature, but
this one takes the cake. Not only do we have the sensor above a sea of air
conditioners with warm air exhausts, there are two rooftop building exhausts,
plus the roof and building itself, and then lets not forget that the Press
Democrat itself is in a sea of buildings in downtown Santa Rosa, all of which to
contribute to the Urban Heat Island (UHI) the thermometer is exposed to.

Yes folks, this is an official USHCN Climate station of record. The data from
this station goes into the national climatic database. But given the absurd and
irresponsible placement of this NOAA MMTS thermometer, is it any wonder at all
that the graph of temperature at Santa Rosa looks like it does?

SantaRosa_GISS_station_plot.gif

This isn’t a case of gradual encroachment by localized site changes that happened around the thermometer, like what happened in Marysville. This is a deliberate placement of an official thermometer in the worst possible measurement scenario. Somebody had to choose this location, the building and air conditioners did not grow up around it.