Climategate

Has there been a notice at this website yet that Michael Mann’s work has been completely cleared — twice now — against all allegations that he published false data. Same true for his British counterparts at East Anglia. The effort to politically attack climate scientists for publishing their findings is clearly losing. Charles Monnett is the latest victim of this kind of ideology fueled harrassment and intimidation. He, too, will be vindicated.

Also would like to correct Pat’. You mention that “Elizabeth I of England and James V of Scotland were 1st cousins. Henry VIII’s sister, Margaret Tudor, was married to James V of Scotland.” maybe it was a typo

This is just a suggestion, but don’t you think it is time to put on the “Climategate” Tab these gems?
Climategate 2.0 emails – They’re real and they’re spectacular! (Nov. 22 – Nov. 30, 2011 – Index to 50 Threads)
and
Climategate 2.0 emails – thread #2 (Nov. 30 – Dec. 6, 2011 – Index to 12 Threads)

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-03-15/climate-scientist-slams-orchestrated-assault-on/3892958?WT.svl=news4
Only fair that a response is available alongside your criticism, right?

Are the visitors to this site aware that WUWT’s Anthony Watts (NOT a climate scientist) has been bought and paid for by the energy industry. This site has absolutely no credibility and when you really start checking out the claims made you quickly realize they are false. Peace!
REPLY: Ah, the usual talking points fabrications from the usual anonymous idiots. I think I’d know if I’m getting checks from the energy industry. Kindly provide citations, or kindly STHU. – Anthony

Thanks for indulging me with your time Anthony, I didn’t mean to spend so much of yours or mine. I will be very interested in your Fakegate site. I can admit it when I am wrong and if you show me I am, I will admit it right here (you don’t stay married 27 years if you can’t admit when you are wrong…Doh!). For example, I said “energy companies” when I should have said “Heartland Institute”. It has been demonstrated and I believe you are still influenced by money from energy companies, polluters etc…perhaps not directly. The Heartland Institute is connected with ALEC neither of which has my, your, or the Earth’s best interest in mind.
As far as being locked out I honestly don’t know about that but do agree, it seems unfair on the surface to not be able to defend yourself. That being said though I don’t think everyone should be given the chance to rebut everything said about them. There is also way more information and citations on those pages than just the headlines, I’m not exactly sure what you meant by “headline thinking”. Feel free to provide citations demonstrating Scourcewatch’s agenda of denigration against you. Aren’t the denialists guilty of denigration too Anthony? Aren’t you? Isn’t that the number one tactic the Denialists use?
Is it easier to believe thousands perhaps tens of thousands of scientists (not to mention my own five senses), are involved in a global conspiracy to get research money or that the largest corporations in the world are lying to protect their profits? I know who I trust and it aint the guys that hired the same PR firms as Big Tobacco, It aint the Heartland Institute, CATO Institute or ALEC.
We can probably come to some middle ground here. Agree with AGW or not I have yet to see a real solution that isn’t motivated by profits.
Clearly we disagree but I do wish you Peace Anthony! I had too many years without it and I do wish it for everyone, honestly. I hope I am wrong about AGW, I really do. I just want to die without worrying about my new grandson’s future. Nothing would tickle me more than having to change what I honestly believe on this issue.
Thanks for your time again Anthony. Okay, okay no peace.
REPLY: I understand where you are coming from, because I used to be in the exact same position you are in. I was actually a climate activist in the early 1990’s, inspired by Jim Hansen. My path to 180 degrees was a long one, about five years, and comes from finding out myself why certain things didn’t add up. I agree money corrupts everything, but when you see what I’m doing, perhaps you’ll see it was money well spent – Anthony

Has anyone noticed that Britain’s bee (honey) industry is in trouble because the bees are having trouble surviving a cold, wet summer. The people who should know, the apiarists, are really concerned that yet another cold winter will decimate the bee population. For the ignorant, no bees doesn’t just mean no honey – it means no food for man or beast. (the rhetorical question is omitted so as not to insult the residual intelligence of any GW alarmists).
On another subject, Tim Flannery, who is Australia’s Climate Change Commissioner (appointed by Julia Gillard), is an actual, real scientist – a palaeontologist. Apparently the theory that the dinosaurs perished due to climate change qualifies him as an expert on all things climate. If anyone wants to check on how that’s working out, you can check out his alarmist predictions against actual outcomes. Just Google the man and his failed predictions to see how un-funny this joke is. The evidence suggests that the recent SE Queensland floods became the “natural” disaster it was because a flood mitigation dam was being used for water storage – Flannery predicted we wouldn’t get enough rain to supply our water needs and bad decisions were made as a result. Many bad water supply decisions have been made in recent years. There is a long list of failed predictions – check it. Here is one list of global warming alarmists’ failed or ridiculous predictions http://anhonestclimatedebate.wordpress.com/predictions/ .
Check out Australia’s $23/tonne “carbon tax” applied to coal, diesel (but not petrol), and methane (eg. From garbage dumps). There is no actual plan to reduce the amount of coal burnt. Check out the major businesses going bust and the extent of job losses, but of course there is no connection with the carbon tax.
I’m not a climate change sceptic. I know the climate is continually changing. The unproven hypothesis is that man’s contribution is making the difference and that by enabling the money-men to get richer via carbon taxes, carbon trading schemes and “green industries” is somehow going to fix it.

does generic diflucan look like diflucan 150 prima o dopo pasti [url=http://www.everyoneweb.com/utge/#diflucan-and-generic]diflucan sale no prescription[/url] how many fluconazole tablets can you take [url=http://www.everyoneweb.com/chillra/#diflucan-purchase-online]what is diflucan and where can i buy it[/url] what is diflucan 100 mg [url=http://www.everyoneweb.fr/chalkna/#retail-price-diflucan]buy diflucan without prescriptions[/url] can you buy diflucan over counter ireland [url=http://www.everyoneweb.fr/erfai/#diflucan-150-mg-quanto-costa]is diflucan generic[/url] diflucan 150 mg 3 days [url=http://www.everyoneweb.com/bungce/#diflucan-walmart-cost]diflucan 150 mg cost[/url] generic diflucan 150mg generic diflucan doesn’t work

I have the same issue as George, above. What happened to the CG3 thread? Why no mention of it anywhere? Have the UAE legal team succeeded in suppressing it?
No mentio of it on any other sceptic sites either..? Was I dreaming that it happened?

I have no idea if the man made global warming theory is true or not. I do know with 100% certainty that global biofuel production is the biggest scam and crime of the 21st century.
Global biofuel production has killed far more people worldwide than all wars and acts of terrorism combined during the 1993 to 2013 time frame. The higher the cost of food, the more innocent people die of malnutrition and related illness. The equation is that simple. Most biofuel victims have been children under the age of 12. Biofuels have skyrocketed the cost of fertilizer, farmland, and food all over the world, and have dramatically increased deforestation, greenhouse gas release, water pollution, and topsoil erosion. Half of America’s prime Midwest topsoil has already been lost to erosion. What will our grandchildren eat when the other half is gone?
Please see The Renewable Energy Disaster at:
http://renewable.50webs.com/

As I was putting the tree-ring calibrations into scrutiny, I grew more in the conviction that its real problem is not in any of the regular counter-armuments. The system is really robust. Its problem, however, lies in the very principal point of dating the samples. The selective attitude (or the copyright work as dubbed by Michael Billaie himself) is a suspected decisive element.
I did not have a smoking gun until I came by Climategate. It is as someone said a mushroom cloud
rather than a smoking gun 🙂
Case rest !
Deacon Basil (aka Christopher Mark)

For a well documented look at how our sun plays a major rule in earth climate, I highly recommend this web site: http://www.suspicious0bservers.org/cliemate/

Learn how to write evaluation literature.
Подробнее читайте здесь – официальный
сайт
What is overview of literature?
Writing the introduction
Writing your body
Writing concluding
What is evaluation literature?
The format of evaluation literature are vastly different from discipline to
discipline and from assignment to assignment.
A review could be a self-contained unit — a conclusion in itself — or even a preface to and rationale for undertaking
primary research. A review can be a required component of grant and research proposals and infrequently
a chapter in theses and dissertations.
Generally, the purpose of the review is usually
to analyze critically a segment of the published body of
info through summary, classification, and comparison of prior studies, reviews of literature, and theoretical articles.
Writing the introduction
In the introduction, you must:
Define or identify the overall topic, issue, or
section of concern, thus providing the right context for reviewing the literature.
Point out overall trends of what has been published about the
subject; or conflicts on paper, methodology, evidence, and conclusions;
or gaps in research and scholarship; or possibly a single problem or
new perspective of immediate interest.
Establish the writer’s reason (perspective) for reviewing the literature; explain the factors to be used in analyzing
and comparing literature plus the organization on the review (sequence); and, at the appropriate time,
state why certain literature is or possibly not included (scope).
top
Writing your body
In your body, it is best to:
Group studies and other varieties of literature (reviews,
theoretical articles, case studies, etc.) in accordance with
common denominators including qualitative versus quantitative
approaches, conclusions of authors, specific purpose or objective, chronology, etc.
Summarize individual studies or articles with as often or very little detail as each merits
based on its comparative importance from the literature,
remembering that space (length) denotes significance.
Provide you with strong “umbrella” sentences at beginnings of paragraphs,
“signposts” throughout, and brief “so what” summary sentences at intermediate points within the review to assistance with understanding comparisons and analyses.
Writing the actual final outcome
In the actual final outcome, you ought to:
Summarize major contributions of significant studies and articles to your body of information under
review, maintaining the target established within the
introduction.
Evaluate the actual “state on the art” for that
body of information reviewed, indicating major methodological flaws or gaps in research, inconsistencies the theory is that and
findings, and areas or issues pertinent to future study.
Conclude by giving some understanding of the relationship involving the central topic with
the literature review as well as a larger part of study
for instance a discipline, a scientific endeavor, or
even a profession.
top
For more information see our handouts on Writing a Critical
Review of any Nonfiction Book or Article or Reading a Book to Review It.
To find out about literature reviews, check out our workshop on Writing Literature Reviews of Published
Research.