The Baltic Eagle Gas Hub (US-to-EU LNG to the Rescue)

From MasterResource

By Robert Bradley Jr.

Ed. Note: This post reproduces an advertisement in the Wall Street Journal (April 30, 2026) by central European energy company Orlen, titled “The Baltic Eagle Gas Hub Is Emerging as Europe’s Energy Firewall.” It documents how changed prices and profit opportunities have and will demote the Strait of Hormuz for petroleum and LNG transportation “as if led by an invisible hand”.

“By linking regional markets with global ones, the Baltic Eagle Gas Hub is emerging as part of a new energy-security architecture in Europe—one based not only on diversification of supply, but also on flexibility, regional cooperation, and the ability to respond quickly to shifts in the global environment.”

Rising geopolitical tensions are rippling through global energy markets, with fuel supplies increasingly used as instruments of influence. Countries are responding by diversifying where they buy energy to reduce dependence on any single source. In Central and Eastern Europe (CCE region), U.S. LNG and the developing Baltic Eagle Gas Hub are beginning to anchor that shift.

Energy security has moved to the foreground. Once defined largely by price and reliability, it now turns on resilience to geopolitical disruption and control over critical infrastructure. Natural gas has long been part of that equation—and at times a tool of political pressure. In Europe, that dynamic was most visible in Russia’s role as the continent’s main supplier before its invasion of Ukraine. The CEE region, shaped by history, remained structurally dependent on Moscow for decades.

Access to diversified gas supplies, storage capacity, and cross-border interconnectors now defines how resilient a system is. Together, these elements give transmission networks flexibility and allow countries in the region to respond more effectively to supply shocks, limiting external pressure. Poland moved early to build that flexibility. It developed the subsea Baltic Pipe, linking gas fields on the Norwegian continental shelf with its domestic network, and expanded the LNG terminal in Świnoujście, which now has regasification capacity of 8.3 billion cubic meters a year.

A floating terminal (FSRU) near Gdańsk, with capacity of 6.1 billion cubic meters annually, is under construction, and a second unit with potential capacity of 4.5 billion cubic meters is under consideration. Poland has also expanded cross-border links with neighboring countries, increasing the number of routes through which gas can flow.

Poland’s gas consumption stands at close to 20 billion cubic meters a year and could rise by as much as 10 billion cubic meters over the next five-to-six years. ORLEN is the main supplier to the domestic market while also exporting gas across the region.

The company is expanding production, primarily in Norway and Poland, where it currently produces about 8 billion cubic meters. Over that period, the EU has significantly reduced its dependence on Russian hydrocarbons.

According to the European Commission, the EU imported about 290 billion cubic meters of gas in 2025, including 140 billion cubic meters of LNG. The United States accounted for nearly 58% of LNG imports. Poland is among the countries relying on that supply. In 2025, 62 cargoes from the U.S. were delivered to the Świnoujście terminal. Qatar ranked second, with 17 deliveries, while smaller volumes came from Trinidad and Tobago and a terminal on the border of Senegal and Mauritania.

These flows underscore the importance of U.S. gas for the region. Energy ties between the U.S. and Europe now extend beyond trade, strengthening economic and political links while reducing exposure to supply pressure.

Building the Baltic Eagle Gas Hub

ORLEN is developing the Baltic Eagle Gas Hub to serve gas demand across Central and Eastern Europe, including in countries without direct access to maritime routes. The hub rests on a combination of infrastructure: the Baltic Pipe bringing gas from the north, the Świnoujście terminal, the future FSRU in Gdańsk and a network of cross-border interconnectors.

The company has also secured capacity at the Klaipėda terminal, with regasified LNG transported to Poland through the GIPL
pipeline. Taken together, this infrastructure—combined with ORLEN’s own production—allows Poland to meet domestic demand with a surplus of more than 50%. Additional FSRU capacity will further expand a year, with volumes expected to reach 12 billion cubic meters by the end of the decade. ORLEN also imports gas purchased from external suppliers.

A Regional System Takes Shape

Lithuania has followed a similar path. Its floating LNG terminal in Klaipėda, launched in 2014, gave the country direct access to global markets, strengthening energy independence and increasing price competition. The decision effectively ended decades of Russian monopoly. The terminal’s capacity stands at about 4 billion cubic meters a year. The GIPL interconnector, completed between 2020 and 2022, links Poland and Lithuania and connects the Baltic states to the EU gas system through Poland. It provides access to the Świnoujście terminal and other European sources of supply.

As a result, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Finland are now integrated into the EU transmission network. ORLEN also uses the Klaipėda terminal, and gas has become a connector across markets in the region.

U.S. LNG as a Stabilizing Force

ORLEN has experience trading gas both in Europe and globally, including with markets such as Japan, China, Thailand, and Egypt. It also supplies gas to Ukraine. At the end of 2025, the company signed an agreement with Ukraine’s Naftogaz to deliver more than 300 million cubic meters of U.S.-sourced LNG in the early months of 2026. Total exports to Ukraine this year could reach 1 billion cubic meters.

To maintain flexibility and efficiency in logistics, ORLEN has chartered eight LNG carriers for 10 years, with options to extend. Each vessel can transport about 70,000 tons of LNG, equivalent to roughly 100 million cubic meters of gas. The ships were built in South Korea by Hyundai Heavy Industries and Hanwha Ocean. Each vessel can complete 8–9 voyages annually on the U.S.–Europe route and is equipped with gas re-liquefaction systems and dual-fuel engines capable of operating on both natural gas and diesel.

The United States has become one of Europe’s main LNG suppliers in recent years, particularly after 2022, when Russia lost its position as the continent’s dominant exporter. The expansion of U.S. export capacity and a flexible trading model—based on Free on Board contracts, which allow buyers to redirect cargoes—has made American LNG a key stabilizing factor during supply disruptions.

The scale of U.S. reserves, and their continued growth, means additional volumes can be brought to market as needed, making the U.S. a key source of supply for Europe. The European Union is now the world’s largest LNG importer. The biggest buyers include France, Spain, the Netherlands, Italy, and Belgium. Between 2023 and 2024, LNG import capacity in the EU increased by 70 billion cubic meters, with more than 60 billion cubic meters expected to come online between 2025 and 2030.

A System Built for Resilience

The scale of ORLEN’s operations, combined with Poland’s infrastructure and cross-border connections, positions the country to function as a regional Baltic Eagle Gas Hub for Central and Eastern Europe. The hub is built on a combination of LNG terminals, cross-border interconnectors, storage capacity and a growing fleet of LNG carriers. Together, these elements strengthen the independence of countries in Central and Eastern Europe, reducing exposure to political pressure linked to fuel supplies.

By linking regional markets with global ones, the Baltic Eagle Gas Hub is emerging as part of a new energy-security architecture in Europe—one based not only on diversification of supply, but also on flexibility, regional cooperation and the ability to respond quickly to shifts in the global environment.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 6 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
39 Comments
Ruhaan Pilani
July 1, 2026 2:20 pm

for the people here who believe that carbon dioxide will increase Earth’s temperatures, but think that is a good thing:

I visit India regularly and the temperatures there are already incredibly hot. Its also very humid, and due to poverty, many people are forced to work outside during 8 hour days. Because its humid, the human body struggles to cool itself down via sweating. This segment of the population cannot afford air conditioners that work properly, or do not have a job that allows them to be near one. what do you think happens to them when temperatures rise?

Additionally, the main problem with coal and gas isn’t that they harm the environment. its that they will eventually run out. Global oil and natural gas will run out in the next 50 years based on current consumption rates. in the next 20 years, our population will increase, lowering our gas and oil supplies even more. And this is if we use every last bit of oil and gas. The thing about renewables isn’t that they’re perfect. its that, we don’t have to worry about running out of them. we don’t have to fully exhaust our supplies of LNG and oil and coal for it to be impractical. we just have to use enough so that prices rise to the point where lower and middle class citizens can’t afford it anymore.

Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 1, 2026 2:43 pm

Not true. Under the North Sea there are huge coal seams, enough to fulfil our needs for centuries and make Britain an energy giant. Difficult to recover in solid form maybe, but the technology exists to ‘gasify’ it in place.

https://deepresource.wordpress.com/2015/04/07/fracking-is-for-amateurs/

07 Apr 2015
Enormous Coal Reserves Found Under the North Sea

“Scientists have discovered vast deposits of coal lying under the North Sea, which could provide enough energy to power Britain for centuries.
Experts believe there is between 3 and 23 trillion tonnes of coal buried in the seabed starting from the northeast coast and stretching far out under the sea.
Data from seismic tests and boreholes shows that the seabed holds up to 20 layers of coal – much of which could be reached with the technology already used to extract oil and gas.

In comparison: so far the world extracted ‘merely’ 0.135 trillion tons of oil, a small fraction of the coal reserves located beneath the North-Sea.”

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/now-king-coal-set-rule-6923421

“A trillion tonnes of coal could be lying under the sea off Wales” – according to scientists who say the vast deposits would be enough to keep the lights on for hundreds of years. Scientists made the discovery after studying data from seismic tests and boreholes made for oil and gas exploration. Instead they used it to build up a picture of coal deposits. Dr Harry Bradbury is chief executive of Five Quarter, the firm behind the discovery. He said: “Off Wales as a whole, there is in all likelihood, more than one trillion tonnes of reserves as yet untouched. Not all of this would be usable or accessible, but it is still very large scale.”

Off the UK he estimated there was between three and 23 trillion tonnes. Five Quarter is planning to sink its first boreholes in the North Sea as early as autumn. But, as yet, it has no plans for Wales.
“In the North and Irish Sea there is much more coal than anything we have on shore,” he said.
“When you look at the raw data I can’t even enunciate the biggest number because it has got so many zeros.”

The firm’s work revealed up to 20 layers of coal extending from the coast far out into the sea.
“We can say there are at least three trillion tons of coal sitting in the sea,” Dr Bradbury said.
“There is coal in Wales in Swansea Bay and in Liverpool Bay coming into Wales.” There are also reserves off Anglesey. “Certainly in Swansea Bay you have a billion to a billion-and-a-half tonnes of coal sitting out there,” Dr Bradbury said. “Two billion tonnes of coal is, in energy terms, the amount of energy we have extracted from the totality of North Sea gas since exploration began. That gives you some sense of what you can do with three trillion tonnes. It is not all in the right places. Some may be too shallow and some too deep,” Dr Bradbury said. He insisted anyone “who says we should leave this stuff in the ground” would have to answer to their grandchildren for the economic state of the country.”

How are you going to mine, refine, process and transport the materials for you ‘renewables’ fantasy without using coal, oil and gas? The transition to ‘green’ energy is, simply put, impossible. There are not enough known reserves of the required materials to complete even the initial application, let alone any subsequent replacements as the machinery wears out. Dr Simon Michaux explains:

Ruhaan Pilani
Reply to  Right-Handed Shark
July 1, 2026 2:57 pm

what about other countries that are not Britain???

MarkW
Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 1, 2026 3:10 pm

Fossil fuels are fungible. No matter where they are discovered, everyone is better off.

cotpacker
Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 1, 2026 4:00 pm

The four corners region of the US has high quantities of hard coal, as does Australia. I would imagine that there must be deposits in Africa, as well as the North Sea deposits mentioned above.

India and Africa need air conditioning for health and safety.

I expect energy generation to shift toward nuclear (including thorium based technology), and I would expect ground heat exchanger to be part of newer building codes, along with active geothermal generation as materials technology catches up with those very hot and corrosive requirements. Maybe fusion will even become practical.

Oil, gas and coal will likely increasingly be focused on petrochemical feedstock uses over the next 50-100 years.

Reply to  cotpacker
July 1, 2026 5:23 pm

Crude oil is indispensable for diesel and kerosene ( jet fuel) for which there are presently no substitutes for ag, mining, forestry, and aviation.

Reply to  Rud Istvan
July 1, 2026 7:26 pm

Not true. At some price point (maybe $150/BBL?) it becomes economic to make diesel and kero from either coal or gas via Fischer–Tropsch. Shell is doing this now in Qatar.

Dave Andrews
Reply to  cotpacker
July 2, 2026 8:00 am

At least 11 countries in Africa have reasonably large reserves of coal with South Africa leading the continent with the 8th largest reserves in the world.

Reply to  Right-Handed Shark
July 1, 2026 5:20 pm

The truly vast Haltebanken deep sea coal deposits off Norway are well known. In fact, they are the ‘source rock’ for some of Norway’s offshore natgas production. But there is no presently known way to produce useful terrestrial energy from them. They cannot be ‘mined’, and coal ‘gasification’ does not work at those low temperatures and high pressures. So Dr. Bradbury concerning Wales is speculative ‘hype’.

Fact is, terrestrial UK sits on vast natgas shale reserves. We know how to extract them by fracking, but UK won’t allow it (yet).

MarkW
Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 1, 2026 3:08 pm

First off, since H2O absorbs almost all the frequencies that CO2 does, and a lot more,
Wherever it’s humid, their is no IR left for CO2 absorb, making more CO2 in that atmosphere meaningless.
Regardless, do you really believe a few tenths of a degree is going to start killing people?
As you state, the problem is poverty. The solution therefor is to attack poverty, instead of making it worse the way you want to do.

The problem with renewables is that they simply don’t work. They don’t result in any decrease in fossil fuel usage, and they make energy much more expensibe.

Phillip Chalmers
Reply to  MarkW
July 1, 2026 6:26 pm

Humankind is born into poverty automatically.
The total carrying capacity of the earth for H, sapiens as forager, hunter/gatherer was overwhelmed by about 5 thousand years ago.
Money was not even invented then, but those who grew crops and kept domesticated animals created wealth as in sufficient AND surplus food for all in the family group or tribe. That could be shared, stored, stolen, destroyed or bartered.
Nowadays, ALL wealth is based upon production and enterprise and as usual it is generated by a minority of people. There are and always have been childbearing women, children, the disabled and the elderly to feed, clothe, shelter and cherish.
First, 1st, enough must be produced and then distributed.
Governments PRODUCE nothing, nada, zilch and so must be secondary and dependent upon those who do. That means all government must be humane and representative of the best of humanity, not the wealthy, rich and powerful.

Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 1, 2026 4:32 pm

interesting post. so may i ask if you are in favor of nuclear for electricity generation?

Ruhaan Pilani
Reply to  joe x
July 1, 2026 7:08 pm

yea I am. i think that because nuclear is more energy efficient, we shouldn’t have to worry about running out of nuclear fuel

Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 1, 2026 10:45 pm

So instead of suggesting so-called renewables, push for nuclear to provide plentiful, reliable electricity.

Phillip Chalmers
Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 1, 2026 4:33 pm

Whatever you say regardless of topic, know you do not even have the dignity of being the Court Jester, you are the ignorant class clown.
Anywhere else, you would be blocked as a troll but seeing that you represent the pig ignorance of the ordinary misinformed very average person in the crowd you either intensely annoy many of us but for the well-informed you provide topics which they can use to repeat data based facts from the real world.

Ruhaan Pilani
Reply to  Phillip Chalmers
July 1, 2026 7:11 pm

Good to know. Its kind of like the same way you intensely annoy me, isn’t it?

Ruhaan Pilani
Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 1, 2026 7:12 pm

“but for the well-informed”

buddy, u ain’t one of them
like you are not him.

MarkW
Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 1, 2026 7:15 pm

Reality is offensive to those who don’t believe in it.

Mr.
Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 1, 2026 5:35 pm

So Ruhaan, you have no faith in the adaptive human ingenuity that’s brought our evolution to the incredible technology and life-enhancing conditions we have today?

I was 21 when Neil Armstrong stepped on to the surface of the moon.

Just 2 years earlier, a live human heart was successfully transplanted into another living human being.

These days, just ~ 55 years later, both these and other kinds of historically unimaginable achievements are mundane, ho-hum.

In 55 years time, we won’t be using coal, gas, wind, or solar for our energy needs.
We’ll probably have harnessed neutrinos or gravity or the like for our energy needs, who knows?

The incapacity for rational thinking based on indisputable developments & observations by people captured by ideology is somewhat incomprehensible.

Don’t be one of these people, Ruhaan.

Ruhaan Pilani
Reply to  Mr.
July 1, 2026 7:10 pm

I have faith in human ingenuity, but not all of the world is catching up at the same time. do the poor living in South Sudan have a good enough hospital nearby to get a heart transplant? its not that we wont adapt, its that some are not in a position to adapt, they already struggle to survive

Ruhaan Pilani
Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 1, 2026 7:13 pm

in addition, we have a lot less than 55 years to adapt.

Mr.
Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 1, 2026 7:56 pm

and you know this how, Ruhaan?

MarkW
Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 2, 2026 8:09 am

How much adaptation does one or two tenths of a degree take?

Mr.
Reply to  MarkW
July 2, 2026 6:00 pm

S.F.A. really.

MarkW
Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 1, 2026 7:17 pm

Sudan’s problem is their government. Fix that, and they will have a chance to advance. Live under corruption or under socialists (same thing really) and you are condemned to a life of poverty. Unless you are one of those people running the asylum.

Mr.
Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 1, 2026 8:14 pm

Ruhaan, human tribes have never in all history been at the same levels of enlightenment at the same time, even to this day.

However, that won’t stop the more rational cohorts from continuously advancing technology, health, engineering and all other aspects of human evolution.

Always remember that Nature is always intent on replacing all living things with more surviving versions of the species.

So humans must harness all available resources to assure survivability and ongoing evolution.

Reverting to ~ 15th century sources of energy in the current era however (unreliable wind & sunshine), is not advancing the prospects of continuing human evolution.

Think about it.

Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 1, 2026 10:51 pm

There are more issues with a lack of clean water across the globe than a lack if electricity.

Take India, a place you’ve travelled to often, according to WHO 700,000 Indians dies each year for a lack of clean water, 400,000 of them being children.

Climate worriers ignore this, preferring to talk about supposed issues far off into the future than preventing the needless deaths of people that happens now.

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
July 2, 2026 4:21 am

“Global oil and natural gas will run out in the next 50 years based on current consumption rates.”

Absolute bullshit. Google for known proven reserves and do the arithmetic yourself. This is 100% a lie.

MarkW
Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
July 2, 2026 8:12 am

Closer to 400 years for oil and gas and 1000 years for coal.

Due to technological advances, a company in the Gulf of America recently opened a well in a formation that until now wasn’t drillable.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
July 1, 2026 2:56 pm

Competition is good in any market.

MarkW
Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
July 1, 2026 7:18 pm

The only thing that stops competition is government. Usually in the name of making the economy “more fair”.

Phillip Chalmers
July 1, 2026 4:43 pm

On topic. This is a good example of Western Civilisation not yet defeated. Invested capital in the hands of competent and responsible entrepreneurs assessing a market need and working intelligently and diligently to fulfil that need.
Elected representatives of the populations involved have only to keep their hands off and impose minimal constraints while reserving the option to reign in exploitation and profiteering. Minimal necessary government which include refusing to ratify the tyranny of non-elected and non-representatives such as the United Nations and its bastard spawn.

ResourceGuy
July 1, 2026 5:08 pm

Better watch out for Russian drone subs in those waters. Ivan doesn’t respect anyone.

Dave Andrews
Reply to  ResourceGuy
July 2, 2026 8:34 am

On 10th April 2024 the Energy Ministers of Lithuania, Denmark, Estonia,Finland, Germany, Latvia, Poland and Sweden signed the Vilnius Declaration committing to protect offshore and subsea infrastructure against “activities that may put energy assets and supply in jeopardy”

Shortly before this Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Netherlands, Norway and the UK signed a joint declaration to cooperate on protection of critical underwater energy and telecommunication infrastructure.

Bob
July 1, 2026 5:11 pm

Europe needs to get off its backside and develop its own resources. They are being stupid.

Rod Evans
Reply to  Bob
July 1, 2026 11:35 pm

Lessons in stupid is now mandated in every school. Governments across the European continent have been promoting false history false science and false social rules to the children for the past generation.
Energy policy is being pushed at children such that my six year old grandchild casually said during a conversation we were having about fizzy water, that Co2 is bad isn’t it!
The task we have is to establish why dumbing down and false science is being promoted by state authorities. What is their objective? If it is a dumber population the policy they are progressing is moving along well.
We have got to return to sane well educated political leaders and stop voting for ignorant know nothings that all too often see politics as their optimal career option. Think Al Gore…..

ResourceGuy
July 1, 2026 5:25 pm

Meanwhile a Russian LNG project in the Arctic fell through.

MarkW
Reply to  ResourceGuy
July 2, 2026 8:13 am

Can you give details as to why?
Not economic?
Technology problems?
Political interference?

Jerry Stutterd
July 2, 2026 12:56 am

All of this Hydrocarbon v wind v photovoltaic v nuclear rhetoric is just a roundy roundy discussion to no where…. as is Net Zero. The point is that human endevour for energy has hit a wall. We’ve reached the upper end of our intellect and knowledge base. There is free energy out there….. we are just not technologically advanced enough to have found it yet. It’s a pretty naive of us to think that we humans are the sole and most advanced beings in the universe. Meanwhile technology in this world is advancing exponentially…. some of it without the necessary guardrails…. AI……………… It could be our energy savior…… or it could decide that we cockroaches are an impediment. Interesting times indeed.