The Independent Refuses to Smell the Roses Regarding Winter Flowers and Climate Change

From ClimateREALISM

By Linnea Lueken

A recent article from The Independent claims that warming average temperatures in the UK are causing more plants to bloom during winter, which point towards “climate breakdown.” This is hyperbolic, there is no reason to fret over daisies blooming in winter. The Independent ignores the urban heat island effect on local temperatures, and is also ignoring the substantial benefits of a greening world, and the contribution of carbon dioxide itself to that greening.

The post, “Daisies and dandelions among plants blooming in winter due to climate change,” describes how a botanical study conducted by the Met Office found that “for every 1°C rise in temperature at a given location, an average of 2.5 additional plant species are observed in bloom,” during the wintertime. The overall count was large, with the study recording 310 native species in January, versus the 10 they would normally find. The Independent says the extra wintertime plants found in gardens across the UK is evidence of “climate breakdown.”

A “vegetation expert” at the Met Office told The Independent that the study’s results “underscore how rising temperatures and increasing climate extreme events are shifting the natural cycles of our plants and wildlife[.]”

There is one glaring issue here, and that is that it should be expected for plants in people’s urban and suburban gardens to struggle less in winter compared to those in the exposed countryside. Over time, the urban heat island effect causes developed areas to warm more, due to the heat-trapping properties of concrete and asphalt, metal surfaces and mechanical equipment. This is not a minor effect; temperatures in developed areas, especially at night when heat is released by hard surfaces, can be 10 degrees warmer or even more than that in certain environments. That could very well be the difference between freezing and thawing. The effect increases (to a point) as urbanization increases.

As outlined in the scientific study, “Urban heat island impacts on plant phenology: intra-urban variability and response to land cover,” plants sense temperature as a primary environmental signal to know when spring has arrived. The UHI effect results in consistently elevated temperatures in urban areas compared to surrounding rural regions, especially in the spring and fall. UHI boosted temperatures have three major impacts on plants: accelerated growth, heat accumulation leading to earlier flowering, and some plants which require a certain amount of chill hours during winter will be impacted.

Photosynthesis and cellular division speed up in warmer ambient temperature so long as those temperatures are still within the species’ optimal range. In other words, warmer temperatures speed up plant growth, it should be no surprise that this would be true particularly for winter temperatures.

UHI also traps and accumulates heat faster in the spring in affected areas faster than they would otherwise, which means plants experience the springtime bloom temperature signal earlier. 

A potential negative is the fact that some plants require a specific period of cold temperatures (known as vernalization) during winter to bloom in spring. Warmer winters associated with the UHI effect can sometimes disrupt this process. However, strong spring warmth often overrides this, still leading to an overall earlier bloom time for most species.

One good example of this is the early blooming of Washington DC’s famous cherry trees, covered by Climate Realism in “Sorry, ABC News, Early Cherry Blossom Bloom Is Due to Urban Heat Island, Not Climate Change.”  The urban heat island effect has a substantial influence over nighttime lows. It should be expected that a warmer year will also result in warmer UHI, which would protect flowering plants from freezing, or give them a chance to blossom in a temporary wintertime “Indian summer.”

It is certainly not a catastrophe, and the modest warming of the past decades is also part of a much longer warming trend that predates industrialization, especially for Europe. Temperatures in Europe have increased 2°C since the warming trend began around the mid-1800s as the planet recovered from lows set during the Little Ice Age. During that cold period, famine and death dominated.

A colder planet is a less friendly planet to plants and animals. One of the most substantial benefits to the world brought by the modest warming over time has been increased agricultural production and the increase in vegetation, or greening of the planet. This is also boosted by the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which helps plants resist droughts and grow larger. While The Independent worries about out of season daisies in their gardens, 2023 and 2024 were both world record global crop yield years, which means that more crops than ever were produced on less land than needed in past years. More people can be fed with less land being used for agriculture.

This year might have been warm for the UK, and it is unusual to have so many flower plants in deep winter, but it is hardly evidence of anything breaking down. Change is a natural part of the planet’s history, and a world that is friendlier to life is not alarming.

5 9 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Subscribe
Notify of
16 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Halla
January 7, 2026 6:10 pm

So? Camellias always bloom in the winter. I
used to live in Northern California, and a
cruel trope was that a drunk in Sacramento could pass out under a camellia tree in full bloom, and die of exposure.
Camellias are the decorative siblings of
tea trees. Or bushes, it varies.

Westfieldmike
Reply to  Tom Halla
January 8, 2026 6:35 am

Daphne only bloom in Winter. I have a large bush outside my ground floor bedroom window, highly scented too.

January 7, 2026 6:28 pm

I work for a British company during my career. I was there 4 times a year over period of more than 20 years. The office/lab I would visit was in a rural area near Reading. It was common to see blooms in early February

January 7, 2026 6:42 pm

Remarkable. Some people hate flowers. Who knew?

Not long ago the British Isles were covered by a continental ice sheet and no flowers grew in any season. The grinches at the Independent would have liked that. Normal humans, however, appreciate the beauty of nature.

John XB
Reply to  OR For
January 8, 2026 7:56 am

Great Britain as it is now, was connected to the Continent by a land bridge – Doggerland – over which the early Brythonic Celts migrated as the ice-sheet retreated. Doggerland was inhabited at a time when sea levels round about were 40 yds lower than today.

Over three to four thousand years, ice-melt raised sea levels, 6 000BC Great Britain became an island thankfully cut off from the Continent, and Doggerland now is off the North East Coast of England under the North Sea and known as the Dogger Bank – rich fishing grounds.

Compression of the land by the ice pushed it – GB – down into the sea particularly Scotland and tipping South East up. Post-glacial rebound has North GB tilting up, and SE GB tilting down. This sea levels in the South are “rising” caused by Man made climate change of course, but falling in the North.

January 7, 2026 9:22 pm

The Met Office can’t even conduct a viable temperature survey…

.. why would we expect any other survey to have any meaning.

James Snook
Reply to  bnice2000
January 8, 2026 12:24 am

Why is the Met Office even carrying out botanical surveys?

Reply to  James Snook
January 8, 2026 1:07 am

Cos they get paid on the amount of codswallop they produce….
Media exposure ensures they think they can stay relevant.
It’s simply group-think.
Met office is really another brand of British bollox corporations – ie. Rowlatt and others at the BEEB.

The Met Office doesn’t even rival pro-bollox meteo France in the drivel producing stakes and they have their owm self perpetuating drivel producing school..**

On French TV they call themselves meteo-climat, despite the fact they were unable to forecast the later arrival of winter and the current cold snap when it finally arrived.

sponsored by the dreaded – out of control “ministère de la transition écologique.”

Here 2 dismaying quotes:-

“Le climatLe climat mondial change sous l’effet des activités humaines. Le climat décrit les conditions atmosphériques sur la planète. Son équilibre est fragile“…

**L’ENM fait partie des écoles du ministère de la transition écologique. Elle a par ailleurs tissé des liens étroits avec un réseau d’entreprises sensibilisées aux thématiques liées à la météorologie, au climat et à l’environnement.

Reply to  pigs_in_space
January 8, 2026 10:41 am

Taking your word for it.

Reply to  bnice2000
January 8, 2026 1:45 am

They probably found a few flowers in a sheltered spot and extrapolated to a wider area the same way they do it with temperature.

January 8, 2026 1:41 am

Perhaps the 310 they found is normality and the 10 is abnormal. How many were flowering 5 or 6 hundred years ago?

January 8, 2026 5:46 am

OMG! Flowers in winter! A catastrophe!

Strange, but I started looking for wildflowers here in Wokeachusetts back in ’73 using a Peterson Field Guide. When I’d find a plant, I’d note in that book and the date. It was March 8th, ’73 and I noted several plants- and the weather of course must have been warm for that time of year. Ever since, I try finding some on that date- and haven’t in decades- too much snow on the ground.

Westfieldmike
January 8, 2026 6:33 am

If you are brave enough to dip into the comments section in the Independent, it’s like paddling in sewage.

Sparta Nova 4
January 8, 2026 7:22 am

A “vegetation expert” at the Met Office told The Independent that the study’s results “underscore how rising temperatures and increasing climate extreme events are shifting the natural cycles of our plants and wildlife[.]”

And this is bad, how?
Plants having longer growing seasons does not seem to reduce world food supplies.

abolition man
January 8, 2026 8:20 am

Thanks, Linnea, but I would have them stop and smell the crocuses; they do NOT deserve roses or hyacinths, or any fragrant flower thriving due to moderate natural warming and increased CO2!

January 8, 2026 2:14 pm

As flora are absorbers of CO2, the extra flowering must be taking CO2 from the atmosphere and reducing its concentration.

Surely this is a good result (although the bed-wetters never see good in anything)