Need some help…. looking for description of the mandate for IPCC which I believe used to be ..to confirm (or similar words) the Co2 or human link to global warming. It appears to have been changed to a more balanced version of coordinating science papers to determine influences on climate change
Trump wants to give Ukraine Tomahawk missiles, 2500 km range, to fire at targets deep in Russia to get Putin to the negotiating table.
The missiles cost $1.3 million each, are complex, require trained military US personnel to operate the launcher located in Ukraine.
The US will use its satellites to determine the vulnerable targets in Russia to hit, such as oil refineries. Ukraine personnel essentially are observers.
.
This whole situation is totally nuts.
What gives the US the right to fire missiles into Russia?
Was not the US the main instigator of the violent Coup d’etat in Kiev in 2014?
Victoria Nuland said the US spent $5 billion on that coup.
.
The US/EU/UK-instigated/financed, illegal Coup d’Etat in Kiev in 2014, violently ousted a Democratically elected President, and caused 116 dead, plus 184 with gunshot wounds, plus 760 with bodily injury
.
What if Putin said, you fire such a missile into Russia, we will fire a similar missile to a target of our choice into the US, or a US facility elsewhere?
Need some help…. looking for description of the mandate for IPCC which I believe used to be ..to confirm (or similar words) the Co2 or human link to global warming. It appears to have been changed to a more balanced version of coordinating science papers to determine influences on climate change
Trump wants to give Ukraine Tomahawk missiles, 2500 km range, to fire at targets deep in Russia to get Putin to the negotiating table.
The missiles cost $1.3 million each, are complex, require trained military US personnel to operate the launcher located in Ukraine.
The US will use its satellites to determine the vulnerable targets in Russia to hit, such as oil refineries. Ukraine personnel essentially are observers.
.
This whole situation is totally nuts.
What gives the US the right to fire missiles into Russia?
Was not the US the main instigator of the violent Coup d’etat in Kiev in 2014?
Victoria Nuland said the US spent $5 billion on that coup.
.
The US/EU/UK-instigated/financed, illegal Coup d’Etat in Kiev in 2014, violently ousted a Democratically elected President, and caused 116 dead, plus 184 with gunshot wounds, plus 760 with bodily injury
.
What if Putin said, you fire such a missile into Russia, we will fire a similar missile to a target of our choice into the US, or a US facility elsewhere?
Whee!
Global Sumud Flotilla creates over 100 tons of pollution | The Jerusalem Post
Oh, right, Marxists praise contradictions (dialectic logic). 😉