Significant new evidence has emerged of widespread and significant increases in plant vegetation across the Earth due to the recent rise of the trace gas carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Using what they describe as True Significant Trends – a workflow programme integrating sophisticated spatial and time-period data – a geographer and an agrobiologist in Spain found “robust quantitative evidence” of widespread global greening, describing it as “striking” – “with a significant portion of Earth’s terrestrial land surface showing measurable increases in vegetation cover over the last four decades”.
This is the CO2 story that dare not print its tale in the mainstream media. Recent dramatic world vegetation boosts are easily tracked by satellite, and estimates of growth range around 14-20% over just 40 years. Recent scientific work has found the rate of greening has actually been increasing since the turn of the century. Ask Grok for recent coverage of this important trend in the BBC and Guardian, and the answer comes back with none since 2016. Global greening heads a long list of taboo subjects for captured journalists promoting the political Net Zero fantasy. Also on the not-to-do list is the pause of the Arctic sea ice extent since 2007, the continued strength of the Gulf Stream, record growth for three years of coral on the Great Barrier Reef and North American wildfires in the last 100 years running at barely a quarter of those recorded back to 1600.
Global greening helps reduce world famine and reclaim desert areas but it is not of the slightest interest in the mainstream since it disrupts the fake claims of a climate in crisis due to humans burning hydrocarbons. It is easier to stick with the witch doctor attribution pronouncements of extreme weather and all the dodgy temperature data pumped out at unnaturally heat-ravaged measuring sites. To consider all the data that show extreme events are not getting worse, with or without human involvement, risks the punters concluding that a little extra warmth and CO2 in the atmosphere is probably a good thing. Perish the thought that the climate is currently in a rather pleasant and benign phase of Earth’s existence. If that is the uplifting take, cue, of course, the end of Net Zero and that would never do. Net Zero relies on fake science and much of the real stuff is fatal to the collectivist ambitions of its hard-Left promoters.
The Spanish researchers do not quantify the amount of new vegetation but conclude that 38% of the world’s land surface shows significant vegetation change. It was found that 76% of the change total showed more greening and, interestingly, those areas with more plant life showed higher rates of additional growth. The results help confirm global greening, with the researchers hoping their work incorporating addition relevant data will provide a clearer picture of what is going on. (Just don’t tell the mainstream press!)
These striking growth trends are replicated in recent scientific work. They should not be a surprise since plants on Earth have evolved to thrive in levels of atmospheric CO2 much higher than the current historically-sparse totals around 400 parts per million (ppm). Far from being a politicised ‘pollutant’, CO2 is rightly known as the gas of life. A group of American scientists recently highlighted 2020 as an “historic landmark” since it registered as the greenest year in the satellite record from 2001 to 2020.
Debate over the percentage of total global land greening and ‘browning’ is ongoing. The Spanish team suggests 38% greening but other work finds a greening change over at least 50% of the surface. A group of Chinese scientists noted there has been an “accelerated rate” of recent vegetation growth. Drought supposedly caused by climate change is a favourite fearmongering tactic with activists but the Chinese scientists also found that any water scarcity trend only slowed global greening and “was far from triggering browning”.
In fact some of the deserts across the world are reducing in size, particularly around areas prone to subsistence living. The map below shows recent greening south of the Sahara and in other famine-prone areas in eastern Africa. Considerable greening across Eurasia has also been found by many scientific teams.
Everywhere you look these days, the mainstream media are making themselves look stupid by putting a blind faith in the unworkable Net Zero agenda and turning a Nelsonian eye to the actual science around climate, including the benefits of CO2. The authors of a recent science paper, Charles Taylor and Wolfram Schlenker, recently found what they called a consistently large fertilisation effect of a 1 ppm increase in CO2, equating to a 0.4%, 0.6% and 1% higher yield for corn, soybean and wheat respectively. You don’t need Grok to tell you that the BBC and the Guardian are uninterested in reporting on the astonishing improvements in crop yields caused by extra enriching atmospheric CO2.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

Arghhh ! The plants are taking over the world.. panic panic ! 😉
Triffids!!! They Love CO2.
And human flesh apparently.
Especially gorgeous blonds. 🙂
It’s gonna be like that movie “Little House of Horrors” with the meat eating plant saying “feed me, feed me”. I never laughed so hard in my life as when watching that film. Of course I was under the influence. 🙂
Just so long as you weren’t over.
What is striking to me (and a lot of others), is how close Earth came to biosphere collapse ~21Kyr ago as paleo-records suggest that p[CO2] dropped to near 180 ppm.
That’s near extinction levels for most life on Earth.
Our current 430 ppm CO2 is just the beginning of a biosphere resurgence to optimum life conditions.
OK sample of one, I know, but in the fifty years I have been living on and off in this patch of Hampshire UK I’ be noticed an immense increase in herbage, overthrowing of bushes and trees etc. Anyone else?
The impact of greatest in those areas where water is scarce. I wouldn’t expect as large an increase anywhere in the UK. Add to that, slow changes are the hardest for humans to notice.
_____________________________________________________________
That’s not the only story that’s being suppressed, another one is methane.
All we ever hear from the media is how many times more powerful methane
is than CO2, but we are never told how much global warming methane will
actually produce. That’s because it’s so darn little that for practical purposes
it’s immeasurable, at about ~0.05°C by 2100*. The same is true for nitrous
oxide. But here were are feeding dairy cows Bovaer, 3-Nitrooxypropanol,
and dealing with the significant loss of Sri Lanka’s tea crop WUWT links
*If anyone says it’ any more than 0.05°C they
should pipe up with their work & references.
We need to stop this catastrophic man made global greening. The children just aren’t going to know what a desert is. Think of the children! The grass in our yard is in some cases, over 3′ tall. I mowed some paths in it a couple weeks or so ago, and now they are hardly noticeable. I haven’t been able to mow because we had an unusually wet, cool May, which has extended into June. We are being inundated with green stuff.
Same here in north east Wales. Not only the grass but almost everything growing at pace -particularly the things you don’t want!
A real problem. I suggest you invest in a goat or two, if predators allow. In a year or so, have a feast. If you have daughters, they can be part of the dowry. A real win, win.
Prince Rupert is a port city on the North Coast of British Columbia, Canada. It rains there a LOT: about 232 days out of each year, with the average annual rainfall for the past 15 years being 2057 mm (81 in). Back in 2001, they had 3052 mm of rain (120 in)!
So the second it stops raining, everybody in town heads outside to cut their lawn. Doesn’t matter that the lawn is wet – you might have to wait a week before you can cut it again, so out you go!
.
For 28 years I have been tending my amazing meadow of 3.5 acres plus1.0 acre cider orchard. As I have commented to many people, many of which have agreed with me, there is significant greater growth, one with more varieties appearing year on year (especially orchids), Lusher is perhaps the best term to use in my case. My trees are also showing greater spring growth than ever before.
One plant stands out for its height increase and its spread is the horsetail. I have some near to my spring, but the surprise is the colossal amount down alongside our road to the village where there is a stream. All I can say this must be the beginning of a reversion to the Carboniferous age!
The apple trees down by the road are getting a double dose. More water from the stream and more CO2 from the cars passing on the road.
I was intrigued by the final graphic illustrating ‘considerable greening across Eurasia’, and wanted to know the key to the colours. From the (helpfully referenced) source, this is what it says:
Fig. 2. Spatial distribution of trend and growth rate trend based on the mean of four LAI datasets. Yellow and blue indicate that LAI shows a positive trend, yellow indicates a negative trend in LAI growth rate, and blue indicates a positive trend in LAI growth rate; Red and green indicate that LAI shows a negative trend, red indicates a negative trend in LAI growth rate, and green indicates a positive trend in LAI growth rate.
LAI is ‘Leaf Area Index’. I think I can make sense of it.
As Carbon Dioxide Grows More Abundant, Trees Are Growing Bigger, Study Finds
https://e360.yale.edu/digest/carbon-dioxide-climate-change-bigger-trees
Yale Environment says trees growing faster and getting bigger. But of course it then has to say we should let all the forests grow to sequester carbon. Forestry bad! 🙂
“estimates of growth range around 14-20% over just 40 years“
I moved to my current place 36 years ago. While I am getting older, slower, and shorter, the riparian plants are doing the opposite. Relentless.
The riparian plants are ‘youthanizing’ like Merlin? 🙂
CO2 is a life-giving Gas; We Are in a CO2 Famine
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/we-are-in-a-co2-famine
.
Atmospheric CO2 ppm, human plus natural, it is near the lowest level in 600 million years.
Highly subsidized CO2 sequestering schemes and Net Zero by 2050 schemes are super-expensive, ineffective suicide programs that benefit the self-serving, moneyed elites, while impoverishing all others.
.
Crops in open fields, with CO2 at 420 ppm, require fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides and much machinery to have high yields/acre.
Crops in greenhouses, with CO2 at 1200 ppm, require minimal chemicals, have 2 to 3 times higher yields/acre
https://www.masterresource.org/carbon-dioxide/increased-plant-productivity-the-first-key-benefit-of-atmospheric-co2-enrichment/
.
Plants are on a starvation diet with CO2 at 420 ppm
The image shows plant growth at 420 ppm; at 420 +150; at 420 +300; at 420+450
.
Many plants have become weak or extinct, along with the fauna they support, due to CO2 at 420 ppm, or less.
As a result, many areas of the world lost resilience, became arid and deserts.
Current CO2 ppm needs to at least double or triple. Unfortunately, not enough fossil fuel is left over to make that CO2 increase happen.
Earth temperature increased about 1.2 C since 1900, due to many causes, such as long-term cycles, fossil CO2, and permafrost methane which converts to CO2.
.
CO2 ppm increase from 1979 to 2023 was 421/336 = 1.25, greening increase about 12%, per NASA.
CO2 ppm increase from 1900 to 2023 was 421/296 = 1.42, greening increase about 19%
.
Increased greening: 1) Produces oxygen by photosynthesis; 2) Increases world flora and fauna; 3) Increases crop yields per acre; 4) Reduces world desert areas
Using more fossil fuel may lead to a slightly greater CO2 ppm in atmosphere and slightly higher surface temperatures, but CO2 is an absolutely essential ingredient for creating: 1) increased green flora to support abundant fauna all over the world, and 2) increased crop yields to feed 8 billion people. What is not to like?
.
The slogan Net-zero by 2050 to-reduce CO2 is a super-expensive suicide pact, to increase command/control by governments, and enable the moneyed elites to become more powerful and richer, at the expense of all others, by using their foghorn of the government-subsidized/controlled Corporate Media to spread scare-mongering slogans and brainwash people.
.
I guess the key question is ‘was this greening based solely on nature taking its course, or did major planting programmes (e.g. huge reforestation in China) also contribute to it?
It’s very hard in my mind to ascribe this increasing green-ness solely to increased carbon dioxide. I personally think that the carbon dioxide increase makes existing vegetation photosynthesise more, but if there are more plants/trees on earth capable of photosynthesising and that is due to human policy actions, then that is also important.
Using Yale Univ and Wikipedia, Duck Assist says:
“ China’s reforestation program, particularly the Great Green Wall, has seen significant tree planting and increased forest cover, but many of the efforts have faced challenges, such as low biodiversity and high tree mortality rates. While some areas have benefited, overall effectiveness in combating desertification and climate change remains debated. “
Let us NOT forget that 70+% of the planet is ocean covered and half our oxygen comes from photosynthetic activity in the ocean.
ARGO measures oxygen concentrations in the top 1000 m of the ocean between 60N and 60S. Henry’s Law implies that CO2 in the ocean rises as the atmospheric concentration rises, all else being equal. Given nutrients plus sunlight, then, phytoplankton are doing very well since the measured oxygen concentration is high due to the photosynthetic activity. (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00807-z).
We have a wonderful, resilient planet!
Death by GREENING!
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/69258/