China is the only country in the world that can seriously challenge America’s longstanding status as the globe’s top dog. And a rejuvenated United States is the only thing standing in the way of an ambitious China ascending to the peak of the heap. The reemergence of a bipolar world in the 21st century – replicating the old U.S.-U.S.S.R. rivalry of the Cold War era – is the no-longer-to-be-ignored reality of our time.
However, unlike the late Soviet Union – sometimes referred to as “Haiti with missiles” – China is an economic powerhouse, one that puts is technological prowess in the service of its geostrategic aspirations. ”China has roughly nine times as many engineers as the U.S. and perhaps as many as 15 times as many science and technology graduates,” George Gilder recently noted in the Wall Street Journal. This gives China a decisive edge in a world where rapid advances in technology have far-reaching economic and military implications.
There are, however, things that Trump and his team can do, and in some cases are already doing, that can turn the tables on Beijing. With the departure of the geopolitically inept Biden administration, Washington can now harness its considerable geological assets to the disadvantage of its rival in the Far East.
Beijing was quick to realize the importance of gaining control of both the mining and processing of rare earths and other critical minerals, which it had largely done by the time the U.S. and other industrialized countries embarked on their climate-driven green energy transition. Beijing was not so foolish; to meet its own energy needs, it built hundreds of coal-fired power plants. Abandoning fossil fuels, which the United States has in abundance, and embracing green energy, the supply chain for which is largely controlled by China, could benefit only one country. And for a while, China’s bet looked to be paying off.
But China’s dominance of such sectors as electric vehicles, batteries that power EVs and serve to backup intermittent wind and solar energy, and the raw materials in wind turbines and solar panels makes the Middle Kingdom vulnerable to Trump’s renewed embrace of “American energy dominance.” One of Trump’s Jan. 20 executive orders titled “Unleashing American Energy” includes directives revoking the EV mandate, freezing unspent funds for green energy, expediting approval of liquid natural gas (LNG) export facilities, and streamlining the permitting process for oil and gas leasing, exploration, development, and production. It also speeds up the approval process for new pipelines and other critical fossil-fuel infrastructure.
Another, less-reported section of Trump’s order focuses on the mining of critical minerals. It instructs federal agencies to identify all regulations, policies, and orders “that impose undue burdens on domestic mining and processing of non-fuel minerals and undertake steps to revise or rescind such actions.”
The geostrategic case for promoting the mining and processing of critical minerals in the U.S. is compelling. “China now produces 80-90% of the world’s rare-earth minerals, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. Yet China has only about 37% of the world’s estimated reserves,” notes Greg Walcher, president of the Natural Resources Group LLC. “Relying on China for critical minerals is obviously not smart, not safe, nor necessary.”
Known to the public for their unpronounceable names, rare earths – which are actually quite abundant – have a variety of commercial and military applications. They include smartphones, MRI equipment, satellites, jet engines, night-vision goggles, sonar on submarines and other naval vessels, and real-time imagery and targeting for surveillance and reconnaissance flights by unmanned aerial systems – just to name a few.
Taking rare earths and other valuable minerals seriously means upgrading the nation’s hollowed-out domestic supply chain for these natural resources. This is the purpose behind Trump’s order to eliminate “undue burdens on domestic mining and processing” of these strategically important minerals. That, of course, will be easier said than done, because Trump’s initiative will be challenged by lawsuits launched by activists determined to cripple America’s industrial base.
Trump’s desire to acquire Greenland from Denmark must be seen in this light. The icy island where the North Atlantic meets the Arctic abounds in mostly untapped mineral resources. In bringing the giant island under American jurisdiction, in whatever form, Trump can deny China (and Russia) access to Greenland’s riches while solidifying the U.S. presence in the Arctic.
Another Trump executive order temporarily halts offshore wind leases in federal waters and pauses approvals, permits, and loans for offshore and onshore wind projects. Aside from signaling to investors that putting their money into capital-intensive wind projects may not be a good idea, the order undercuts Beijing’s investment in raw materials used in wind energy.
“Wind farms require 10 times the amount of critical minerals as natural gas power plants and 1.6 times as much as nuclear power plants,” writes the Heritage Foundation’s Austin Gae.
China is the world’s leading supplier of raw materials that go into wind turbines, including in the U.S. Trump is deliberately shrinking the U.S. market for wind turbines and for the predominately Chinese-supplied raw materials that go into them. The goal is to play to America’s strengths, which lie in fossil fuels and a rejuvenated nuclear-power industry, while lowering our dependence on China by turning away from wind and solar power.
This is a winning strategy.
Bonner Russell Cohen, Ph. D., is a senior policy analyst with the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT).
This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Be afraid, Gang Green. Be very afraid.
“This is a winning strategy.”
No good to the UK, then. The Labour way is to kow tow.
“UK Foreign Office (FCDO) requested that a visit by former Taiwanese president Tsai Ing-wen be postponed to avoid provoking China ahead of David Lammy’s upcoming trip…
…
“We got a note from the FCDO via the Taiwanese representative to the UK,” said one person who had been involved in the discussions to host Tsai. “It said: ‘Please can you defer this for a while because the foreign secretary is about to make a “goodwill visit” to China and this would absolutely put the kibosh on it.’”
https://www.thatischina.com/2024/10/12/uk-government-kowtows-to-china/
“Reeves slammed for returning from China with ‘puny’ investment deal that makes Britain the ‘laughing stock of the world'”
https://www.gbnews.com/politics/rachel-reeves-slammed-china-investment-deal-britain-laughing-stock
They tried to rush the Chagos deal through before Trump was inaugurated and failed. The UK strategy is a winning strategy for China despite the set-back.
“How China has been allowed to takeover Britain’s energy industry in the name of Ed Miliband’s Net Zero dream” – The Daily Mail
I’m not a religious person, but…
We’re not in Kansa any more. Not a bad place to revisit once in a while.
We’re in la la land.
Re “We’re not in Kansas any more.[*] Not a bad place to revisit...”
Right! And just like Dorothy (& Toto), we all can put aside our fever-dreams of the Emerald-(Green)-City & its imperial faux-savior Wizard of Oz, in order to return all-the-wiser to our Kansas frontier home, i.e. to what was working, circa 2019 A.D.
For those of us in these U.S.A., that means, first-&-foremost, restrict the Feds to ‘only’ ~ $4-trn per annum — obscenely large as that seemed — from the truly deranged ~$7-trn of ’24-25.
—————
*Dorothy: [first words] “Toto, I don’t think we’re in Kansas anymore!”
[final words] “There’s no place like Home …”
That’s noble. I hope that we have the brains, heart and courage to do so.
Thanks!
Re “the brains, heart and courage…“,
You remember correctly (I believe) that Dorothy’s companions (Scarecrow, Tin-Man, Cowardly Lion representing the salt-of-the-earth farmhands of her childhood home) thought they lacked all those things… But as the Wizard (once exposed a ‘just an ordinary man’) counseled, those virtues are somewhat over-rated. Wasn’t it the ‘Good Witch of the North’ who finally stepped in and told her that she always had it in her power to return home, if only she truly believed and want it?
“if only she truly … want[ed] it?”
No doubt some here will think it’s silly to bring a fable like The Wizard of Oz into a serious discussion of the PRC-vs-USA. But, lest we forget, especially when dealing with the ‘rising generations’:
————
“Imagination is far more powerful than logic or reason. It colors our entire view of life and life’s possibilities.”*
————
We older folks, especially if trained in science & engineering, tend to think that we all can reason our way out of our society’s delusions, forgetting that the attractive power of those delusions can run much deeper than ‘logic or reason’.
What’s the remedy? IDK. But maybe it involves giving them something else [equally attractive] to think about?
Your thoughts on this matter?
Cheers, — RLW (still enduring the bitter cold)
————
*[Source of quoted above:] “Technology addiction and parental coddling aren’t the causes of mental-health problems in young people, but rather symptoms.
The real problem is the romantic corruption of imagination. Imagination is far more powerful than logic or reason. It colors our entire view of life and life’s possibilities. A well-formed imagination—one properly adjusted to reality—can adapt to life’s vicissitudes and see life steady and see it whole.
A malformed imagination is romantic. It is unbalanced and lacks proportion. It is oriented by an unrealistic, even utopian, vision of progress and a world altogether changed through human effort. This dreamy vision of a New Earth is made possible by the belief that “man is a naturally good being,” as the arch-romantic Jean-Jacques Rousseau declared in the 18th century. We must clear away the traditional religious and social norms hindering prosperity and instead heed the “cry of nature,” Rousseau argued.”
— Emily Finley
Lammy is a national embarrassment. Let him go to China, they can keep him. He’ll be happier there and we’ll be happier without him. It’s a shame Reeves came back from her grovelling visit.
Labour per se is a national embarrassment.
I’m not convinced there has been a UK politician since Thatcher who is/was not a national embarrassment and/or crook.
Outside of its first tier Potemkin cities, China has many problems of its own. First and foremost, ultimately, people don’t like to be slaves.
The one child policy seriously
fuc–– screwed China’s demographics. They have a growing elderly population, a relatively early retirement age, not enough younger works and an overbuilt real estate market.While a dictatorship, the CCP has to keep the population relatively happy. It helps if they can keep expectations low. Economic growth is slowing and the never-ending economic stimulus policies will have to end.
OTH, China is not replacing their workforce with cheap foreign labor. They are not importing replacement knowledge workers with lower-cost immigrants. Their high- tech workers are home grown. That’s a China-frst policy America should adopt.
We have too many highly-skilled American STEM graduates who are unemployed, underemployed or working in other fields. We need to Hire American. I’m hoping Trump and Vance will come around on this issue.
We have too many highly-skilled American STEM graduates who are unemployed, underemployed or working in other fields.
That’s the same in the UK.
To solve the problem, Rachel from accounts decides to make it more expensive to employ people.
Well done, Rach.
Hire American Workforce…Hmmm….my daughter can’t find an “American” youth to clean the corrals and tend the horses. Mexican youths…no problem…
China sure has its share of problems. China cannot change overnight from poverty to prosperity, it takes generations to grow up differently, acquire different mentality. Higher level of prosperity comes along with more freedoms.
Proverbial Potemkin villages were actually real villages built along Catherine’s route, where real people were settled to colonize the territory. Catherine was fully aware of this. The villages were not pretending to be something they were not. Chinese first tier cities are also real cities with real economies and infrastructure.
Golly. I wish I had faith that Trump has any plan at all.
All I see is random monkeys and a bull in a china shop. No doubt some good will emerge, but so too will be a lot of broken china. (sic!)
Subtlety is not one of the Great Leader’s virtues.
From the speed with which Trump nominated his team (Hegseth, Patel, Gabbard et al) and reversed essentially all Biden’s disastrous policies, all within a month, I would say he certainly had a plan which was carefully drawn up and put into place months before the election.
You don’t seem to be aware of Trump’s “America First” strategy that has been his driving agenda for more than a decade. You may not like it, but you certainly shouldn’t ignore it. Your “Bull in a China Shop” view simply ignores that the pace of the action is much faster than many are able to comprehend. The Spanish Bull Run is only confusing to slow runners. The only broken China are the sacred cows of the Left.
You could have started and finished your comment with “You don’t seem to be aware.” Leo only reads leftist rags and thus is unaware of the big picture.
That is the common view published so often in media and elsewhere.
There are a few who recognize that assigning motivations to Trump actions based on personal feelings is not going to have much success.
Trump intends to be disruptive. This has 2 benefits. It puts the opposition on their back foot and ties them up/divides them, and in order to make real change, one has to disrupt the status quo.
Tariffs did not land on Mexico or Canada and those nations are now upping their participation on controlling illegal drugs and immigration. Just as one example.
So, think beyond MSM and BBC. Consider the possibility that there is more to it that you are being let in on and discover credible alternative explanations for what is being reported.
Keep in mind there is still a high level of anti-Trump bias in the news.
What problems does Canada bring to the US that requires such coercion?
Canada is a well established import channel for precursor chemicals for making fentanyl and other synthetic opioids.
These are not proscribed products for importation into Canada.
They are then on forwarded to Mexico.
The RCMP says there are 100s of labs across the country making fentanyl and posting parcels into the US.
One “super lab” near Vancouver was described by the RCMP as something that would put Breaking Bad’s Walt & Jessie in the shade.
There are Canadian junkies on fentanyl. Trump sez equal tariffs….India has huge tariffs and the USAID gave IndiA MILLIONS TO PROMOTE FREE ENTERPRISE????? Biden World is a wondrous place.
What am I missing here. According to the government drug seizure site, 43 pounds of fentanyl were seized on the northern border in 2024.
RCMP says most fentanyl is sent in the mail.
Apparently, only about 1% of mail & packages are checked.
And in powder form small sachets, it weighs very little per envelope.
According to the drug seizure site, 698 pounds were seized in 2024 “internally” and that will include postage from all countries and even internally sent mail, not just that from Canada.
Compare that to the southern border where 21,100 pounds were seized in 2024.
Maybe the Southern border suppliers are not as proficient at their trade as their northern counterparts? 😀
Or maybe Sparta Nova 4 is dead on the money
Fentanyl is clearly not the reason for the tariffs so the question is, what is Trump trying to achieve.
If the tariffs do actually land in a couple of weeks, then I’d suggest Trump is planning to effectively tax the US citizens about 2-3% for oil usage through the tariffs on its oil imports from Canada and the whole thing is a diversionary distraction.
Same thing goes for the tariffs on Chinese imports but in that case the US citizens will be effectively taxed closer to the 10% on purchases since so much comes from China.
If it helps balance the budget then yay, the US certainly needs it. If the budget doesn’t improve at the rate expected for the additional tax then look out for where that money goes.
That’s all speculation of course, in line with Sparta Nova 4’s suggestion.
Well done.
I like to believe there are always possibilities…
— Spock
43 pounds of fentanyl is equivalent to 39 million overdose deaths.
Is that not significant?
Not compared to 21,100 pounds from the south. That’s not a reason to impose tariffs imo.
A meth lab was set up at a rental property in our community, found out by the RCMP. County bulldozed it flat within a couple of weeks as ordered by the department of health due to toxic chemicals. A serious deterrent to property owners possibly thinking about renting to tenants of dubious backgrounds….
It’s in the line you quoted. Drugs and illegal aliens.
Follow-up.
One of the things I have noticed is the responses to Trump’s seemingly outlandish comments.
Conversations have started back up again. Issues are being discussed. Alternative solutions are being proposed and evaluated. This is a change from passively accepting.
Getting everyone to start talking and thinking about the issues may be his unspoken true objective. A guess, of course, but not out of the realm of possibilities.
One of the things I have noticed is the responses to Trump’s seemingly outlandish comments.
Anyone who has read “The Art of the Deal” and/or watched him in business before he got into politics knows what he’s doing. It’s nothing new.
It will be interesting to see how Mark Carney pushes his Climate Change Emergency and WEF agenda while preparing to negotiate wth President Trump.
Dear Leo Smith of “I wish I had faith … any plan at all”,
Try using your imagination (in the positive sense of that word):
——————
The plan* may be simply “to return what was working, circa 2019 A.D. …
… in these U.S.-of-A., that means, first-&-foremost, to restrict the Feds to ‘only’ ~ $4-trn per annum — obscenely large as that seemed — from the truly deranged ~$7-trn of ’24-25.”
——————
Like Dorothy-of-Kansas, we also have a tendency to overthink things, but can come around eventually to the simplest path, which involved mainly a true desire to Return.
Cheers
— RLW, writing today from deep in the heart of the [freezing] Texas Republic
This has been the coldest winter that I recall in my part of Colorado in my 40+ years here. I do like the crunching sound driving in snow at these temperatures, but I don’t like getting out of the car.
Our most recent warmup begins this afternoon. I plan to test the slipping coefficients of snow tomorrow.
I see Trump finding and eliminating billions in government waste and taking the first steps in reducing the size of the government work force.
As in his first term, he’s charged his cabinet with finding and eliminating waste and unneeded regulations in their departments.
Those who believe that government has all the answers, naturally see this as a bad thing.
Winning bigly!
Oh that Trump’s approach would be adopted by Starmer. We would not be in the pitiful state we are
All resources are scarce. Free market capitalism via the market process of supply/demand/price relationship turns scarcity into abundance as it “forces” rationing of resources so that less and less are used per unit output. Eventually price signals “force” the search for alternatives.
Command and control economies – USSR, China – absent the “forced” rationing mechanism, turn abundance into scarcity because as output increases, this requires resource input to increase and no price signal to “force” switch to alternative. This is why China is busy in poorer Countries building roads and bridges in exchange for access to resources to plunder.
In the short term, China can serve the World and become a monopolist with high supply, low price output. But in due course as it uses up resources, scarcity will limit output and drive prices up. Inevitably the Chinese economy will collapse – like USSR for the same reason – and the World will be stranded without its own industries and lack of resources.
To what extent Trump understands this is unclear, but at least what he is doing will ensure resources will be available to the free market capitalist system and be rationed, and we shall keep our industries.
In economics theory, resources are either unlimited/infinite, or they are scarce.
Scarce resources are those resources where there is not enough to go around, and as a resort some type of rationing method is required.
Big government types believe that to be fair government should be the rationer of choice, since only government can make the distribution “fair”.
Free market types believe that the free market is the best rationer, in that those who want a resource the most, will be willing to pay the most.
History has shown that government is never fair, and that when government controls distribution, those with the most access to government officials, will always end up getting the most stuff.
The only true democracy is the free market.
People vote with their wallets.
“This is why China is busy in poorer Countries building roads and bridges in exchange for access to resources to plunder-”
at least China is actually giving the people of the countries they “plunder” something in exchange unlike the western countries.
Those evil Chinese are guilty of building roads and bridges. And they also bring the products of their manufacturing along these roads. Undoubtedly, it makes life in poorer countries even worse.
Speaking of China:
Schumer spotted posing for photo with CCP official as warnings swirl about China influence | Fox News
These article is full of bigotry and American superiority complex that clouds the writer’s thinking.
If it is OK for USA to bring Greenland under American jurisdiction because it benefits USA, what prevents any other nation to do the same with any other country? Is only USA allowed to act like this, or the whole world is given green light to change borders to satisfy national interests?
It’s sillier than that.
Denmark allowed US troops to garrison Greenland for their security. Denmark has long been an ally to the USA.
The resources of Greenland were always available to the USA.
But now?
Now the USA is seen as unreliable; It is threatening Denmark. It has surrendered to Russia over their former ally, Ukraine. It’s moving fast and breaking trusts.
Those resources are far more available to China, now. China are a far more attractive ally than Trump’s USA.
Another blunder from another senile President. The last guy got Putin and Zelensky mixed up. The new old codger can’t remember who invaded whom.
It’s going very well for China as they replace the collapsing USA.
By making territorial claims and threats Trump legitimizes any other regime that wants or currently acts to change borders.
The solution to Ukraine war is to fully integrate Russia, Ukraine and Belarus into European economy, but this would require a complete reversal of zero sum mentality of American elites.
I thought the authors zero sum ideals was also problematic. Personally think that the modern world would be a much happier place if competition was replace with co-operation at all levels amongst the major poles of power.
“And a rejuvenated United States is the only thing standing in the way of an ambitious China ascending to the peak of the heap.”
This is not true. Xi’s central planning bureaucracy is China’s biggest obstacle. Innovation requires independent thinkers, something dictators do not like.
I thought they were referred to as a gas station with nukes..
Why would anyone think becoming dependent on China for anything is be a good idea.
A good idea since it will force China to peddle all their wind power components to other developing world countries. Except if there are about 2400 coal plants currently operating in 79 countries, 189 more under construction and 296 pre-construction, those countries are well-aware that wind and solar can’ t come close to meeting the energy needs required for economic growth and poverty alleviation. So if China keeps looking for new customers for its wind production equipment, it may run out of takers very quickly without the US as one of them.
Vespas, Siemens, Nordex, GE are the biggest wind generator suppliers. You might notice they aren’t based from China. Maybe you’re confused with photovoltaic panels.
Goo’d. I only wish the moronic Australian Minister Chris Bowen had enough brains to understand the “why of this!