By Chris Talgo
Given the state of affairs in Ukraine and the Middle East and the rise of China as a chief U.S. adversary, one would assume that the Department of Defense has its hands full combating real threats to U.S. national security. One would also assume that under the fraught geopolitics of the current world, the Department of Defense (DoD) would be harnessing its precious resources toward identifying future menaces that literally pose an existential threat to the security of the United States.
Climate change does not constitute a current threat to U.S. national security. However, the leaders of the DoD think otherwise. In fact, the DoD believes that the climate crisis is a “national security priority.”
On December 11, the DoD announced it is very concerned with climate change in Africa because “climate-stressed areas are a recruiting opportunity for terrorist groups.” Accordingly, the DoD declared, “The consequences of inaction on climate will be severe, and our allies and partners will face growing security challenges as a result.”
Tragically, this is only the latest example of the DoD being sidetracked fighting climate change.
More concerningly, this is part of a much larger effort to reorient the primary focus of the nation’s military from preventing real-world threats to abating the nonexistent threat of climate change.
In September of 2021, the DoD released its Climate Adaption Plan, which states, “The Department of Defense (DOD) has identified climate change as a critical national security issue and threat multiplier and top management challenge… [and] must take bold steps to accelerate adaptation to reduce the adverse impacts of climate change.” As expected, the 32-page plan outlines in intricate detail how the DoD must “integrate climate change adaptation and climate resilience across agency programs, management of real property, public lands and waters, and financial services.”
One month later, the DoD released its Climate Risk Analysis, which explains that, “Climate change is reshaping the geostrategic, operational, and tactical environments with significant implications for U.S. national security and defense. Increasing temperatures; changing precipitation patterns; and more frequent, intense, and unpredictable extreme weather conditions caused by climate change are exacerbating existing risks and creating new security challenges for U.S. interests.”
Soon after, the DoD announced that the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, and U.S. Air Force had all created “Action Plans” to mitigate the so-called climate crisis. Here is a brief snippet from the Navy’s Action Plan: “The Department must reduce its greenhouse gas emissions and draw greenhouse gases out of the atmosphere, stabilize ecosystems, and achieve, as an enterprise, the nation’s commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050.”
In case you’re wondering, the other two branches of the military have also pledged to be “net zero” by 2050 under their Action Plans.
Of course, the DoD’s pivot to fighting climate change rather than ensuring that U.S. national security is its ultimate priority comes courtesy of the Biden administration.
As Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin wrote, “On January 27, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14008, Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, making it administration policy that climate considerations will be an essential element of U.S. foreign policy and national security.”
Fortunately, the Biden administration will be gone soon. Unlike Biden, President-elect Donald Trump understands that the attention of the U.S. military should be laser-focused on protecting the nation from viable threats instead of reducing its carbon footprint.
In 2017, Trump eliminated the term “climate change” from the list of worldwide threats in his National Security Strategy. Rather, Trump made it clear that his administration would focus on Russia, China, and other nation-states that pose a critical danger to U.S. interests.
Moreover, Trump pointed the finger at previous presidents who put “American energy under lock and key” while articulating that he “embraces a future of American energy dominance and self-sufficiency.”
During Trump’s first term, American energy dominance was achieved as the United States became a net oil exporter for the first time in 75 years. Unfortunately, much of this progress was undone by Biden, who “mobilized a whole-of-government effort” to fight climate change.
However, what Biden undid Trump can redo. When Trump returns to the Oval Office on January 20, 2025 he will do everything in his power to ensure that the U.S. military is solely focused on protecting U.S. national security. He will also unleash the American energy sector like he did during his first term, which will further cement U.S. hegemony. The days of the DoD being preoccupied with fighting the weather are over. Going forward, the United States and the world writ large will be safer.

Chris Talgo (ctalgo@heartland.org) is editorial director at The Heartland Institute.
Originally posted at American Thinker
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Because you don’t often suffer casualties from clouds, it’s a forever war, and the funding is readily available.
Salute!
Old war planner here comments on military versus climate.
My impression is that the U.S. military is NOT FOCUSED on climate change other than to parrot the mantra from high above.
Planning ahead requires considering many factors, and some aspects of the pissant climate changes we are seeing and even predicting that are not catastrophic but still require a certain amount of planning, primarily for mitigation and adaptation, not changing the global temperature a 5th of degree. I once had to develop a plan at one station to account for poor weather we would normally see in late winter. As a training unit, we had weather restrictions that the normal operational units did not. But in no way did we do anything intended to change the climate, only to adapt and overcome.
The coastal and very low swamp bases DID look at trends and such like sea level up/sea level down, flood history, etc. as our jets did not like to taxi or takeoff in a foot of water! So civil engineering folks were tasked to plan for sea level rise at certain bases. Big deal! Other bases like mine planned for heavy snowfall, while those on the coast planned for hurricane evacuation and such.
The good news, looking at current events, indicates our planning for climate in a month from now will revert to the considerations of weather such as what I dealt with years ago. Think so?
Gums sends…
“Why is the DoD focused on fighting climate change?”
Because the only people they want to hurt is US?
(They took that old Pogo comic strip quote a bit to seriously, “We have met the enemy and they are us.”)
RIF a few select officers. Anyone who is enough of a suckup to approve of such folly is incompetent generally.
Really ?
Weather satellites, methaneSAT, ARGO buoys, and such programs are just fronts for worldwide military surveillance….Climate Change Concern Crap just allows the “military-industrial complex” much more funding without calling its”military” spending. Heed Eisenhower’s warning…
Oh, weather reporting and surveillance in general are worthwhile. I am not reflexively antimilitary.
Because the military is a top-down bureaucracy. And bureaucrats live by rules, not mission (guaranteeing financial mismanagement). This is one reason the founders wanted no standing army. An Army must be top-down obedience; hence must be a money-wasting entity.
The current administration has made DEI & Climate Change Mitigation Army rules. Different soldiers have different rights, some are more equal than others. WE got ORDERS from our Commander in Chief, Biden.
That’s been the Method of Operation for decades.
Infiltrate the leadership of organizations.
Lead the followers down the garden path.
They got the USA with Obama. Hilary was supposed to be the round-house blow.
(If I remember correctly, wasn’t it Hilary that insisted the military personnel on duty in The White House NOT be in uniform?)
That didn’t happen.
The purpose of the US military isn’t to make people “feel good about themselves” but to make the enemies of the USA, and freedom, fear if they cross the USA.
This is good news we have the documents and the names of those who are responsible for the documents. We know who to fire January 20th.
This is one reason why Pete Hegseth will soon be SecDef.
Is a reason why Trump campaigned using the DI scenes from Full Metal Jacket.
Is why DoD DEI ‘warriors’ will soon be retired ‘warriors’. Like the 4 star Army Material Command general just canned for intervening in the failed promotion of his LtC ‘squeeze’ mentee.
Is why the USPS ‘order’ of 63000 EV mail vehicles mandated by Biden will be cancelled 1/20/25 for non-performance. Oshkosh has delivered 63 to date, all faulty.
Trump may never fly in the ‘new’ AF1s he contracted in 2017. Negotiated a fixed delivery $2.8 billion price with Boeing, for delivery 2024. Boeing is so screwed up, delivery may not be until 2029—at the earliest. And they are already $2.8 billion in the hole.
And in a final irony today, the much touted Chinese 20 MW typhoon proof experimental floating wind turbine just had all three blades sheer off—without a typhoon.
We got a lot of fixing to do. The 125th Army Navy game is just a start.
Maybe like a motorcycle helmet that saved someone’s life needs to be immediately replaced with a new helmet, the typhoon proof turbine needs to be immediately replaced after it survives a typhoon.
Yep.
“Nothing ‘green’ ever works properly”
There is one unique character flaw for the Chinese. Oh, it “looks” the same so we can sell it. Shortcuts and substitutions will defeat the Chinese military and also the typhoon proof floating wind towers.
CO2 can’t fight back?
Not on its own, but it’s one of mother natures children, you cross her at your peril.
Chris Talgo wrote, On December 11, the DoD announced it is very concerned with climate change in Africa because “climate-stressed areas are a recruiting opportunity for terrorist groups”.
Not just Africa …
In the fall of 2016, under the cover of darkness, Jessica Reznicek had a singular focus: to halt the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. At valve sites across America’s heartland, she snuck through security fences, set fire to equipment, and used chemicals to burn holes in the pipeline itself.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/climate-activists-fight-terrorism-sentence-impact-future-protests/story?id=84345514
Since it is the same kind of activity a non-US terrorist might engage in, the same kind of punishment is proper. Destroying other people’s property is not a speech activity.
This will do a complete about face on Jan. 20, 2025.
and hopefully, the 2025-28 handling of defense will be continued by 45/47’s successors into 2032 and beyond.
“climate-stressed areas are a recruiting opportunity for terrorist groups.”
This is perhaps one of the stupidest rationales I have ever read, ever.
Exactly what is the mechanism here? A farmer has five crop failures in a row and so pledges allegiance to Al Qaida?
How many articles have we seen about crop failures blamed on “climate change”? I’ve read dozens from all over the world. They hype every negative detail they can find, magnify threats real and imagined, elevate them to harbingers of global disaster. Ecosystem collapse, economic collapse, climate refugees, mass migration, dogs sleeping with cats!
I have not seen a single article hyping damage from “climate change” referencing the rise of jihadists as a result.
Actually this is amusing in its own way. Fake climate change causing fake terrorists. A military response using fake soldiers firing fake guns is in order. All very expensive of course, we need a budget increase that’s not fake.
They are just getting around to jihadists, they have done gay goldfish, gay frogs, etc
takes time to come up with all this stuff
lies take time
Climate Change policy is creating major international instability. Countries in Africa view it from two sides: a hope that they can leverage the COP process to be paid large sums, and a rising frustration that those who they think will pay them simply offer them solar panels instead. The result is a sense of enormous frustration and a ready willingness to bring in others who might be more prepared to contribute more meaningfully.
France has now been thrown out of most of their former colonial possessions, losing access to the key uranium mines in Niger. The Russians now have the mine output. Islamic forces are replacing the former Western aligned administrations (at least in the sense of not being complete adversaries) in many countries. China is also using its Belt and Road policies to bribe its way into access to key resources (coal cobalt copper oil and gas etc.), building necessary infrastructure in the process, and lining up naval bases of the future. Around the Horn of Africa piracy dominates the seas, forcing shipping to go Cape laden and ballast for security instead of via Suez.
That is the climate in Africa that DoD and the rest of the West need to be thinking about.
It all started with Obama. Global Warming (then), DEI, LGBTQ, WOKE, treating criminals like victims. Like all other Marxist narratives they were introduced stealthily from the top down. The goal is to make the USA dysfunctional. People who complied were rewarded and those that didn’t were axed.
There are lots of roots, one predicted malaise or worse by academic “old salts” two generations ago from the Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity OXYMORON program. Precursor of DEI–Devolution, Exclusion, and Insepsis. It was the showcase of bigotry towards those deemed inadequate and we can help you. Happened to see this link, one billion spent on DEI, not that much on AA/EO, from what I experienced it was sort of unfortunately tolerated probably because other more imminent problems were on the horizon.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/madelineleesman/2024/12/14/parents-defending-education-report-n2648965
The American DoD is run by bureaucrats and political generals. To paraphrase Jack Nicholson’s Joker, “the Pentagon needs an enema.”
It is a sibboleth for screening out politically unreliable types.
The military’s job is to be prepared to fight wars wherever they may occur, especially to defend our shores. Climate change is not a concern when someone else is trying to blow you up or has a rifle pointed at you. No one will give a shit about smoke, smog, or anything else in the atmosphere when immediate death is in your face.
Can you imagine trying to run on batteries on the battlefield?? Insane.
The military’s focus should be on destroying the enemy with as much capability and expediency as we can muster. Anything else is misguided leadership from the top down.
“It is not your job to die for your country. It is your job to make that other poor SOB die for his.”
One word: readiness.
In 2015 Angela Merkel invited millions of migrants into Europe. The spike reached a peak in Sept/Oct of that year. The turmoil in the source countries is the “push” that causes this flight. Note that Israel is in the same climate-band and does not experience sustained out-migration.
Now the U. S. has had the Biden administration follow Merkel’s lead. Again, the push is self-induced chaos in the source countries. Note that Venezuela has the same climate it had when, in the early 1500s, Charles V gave the Augsburg banking family “Little Venice”.
“In fact, the DoD believes that the climate crisis is a “national security priority.””
While ignoring the drones being seen by a lot of people in NJ and other states. Not that I think it’s a national security issue but the DoD should give it more attention if for no other reason but to calm those folks down.
Poverty due to a lack of ff is a bigger recruiting opportunity for terrorist groups.
Exactly.
And the African terrorist gangs are mostly humping around $20 1960s AK-47s, and wreaking havoc on innocents.
Anyone think these poor people are fretting about climate shit?
If all the $billions/trillions being squandered on “the climate crisis” was re-allocated to military resources and actions to assure safe and healthy lives in places like Africa, the world would have something to be grateful and pleased about.
Amazed at the changes that have occurred in the past 5 weeks all around the world, can’t wait to see what happens Jan 21.
i wish this 2.5 month anachronism would go away, no need for such a long transition time, Biden could be a girl by then.
[snip]
I know what you are saying here and I’m calling you out.
https://www.ajc.org/translatehate/echo
If I get a bunch of down-votes for pointing this out I will be proud to take them.
If these threats were real it should be obvious that adaption of strategy, tactics, and materials would be far less expensive and far more effective. Any fool can see that those “enemies” are not taking the net zero approach to anything, thus US achievement of same will be meaningless and totally ineffective.
Any problem with potential terrorists groups arising in African countries, or anywhere else where that might endanger the US is the job of the CIA, not the military.
From a readiness perspective, ask yourself why Trident II submarine commanders would want to have thicker sea ice to have to surface through.
Q: Why is the DoD focused on fighting climate change?
A: Because they were told to be by the Dementia Hitler regime? Cheers –
DoD forgot about stabilising LoD (length of day) oscillations.
Another cheap shot at the US armed forces by a useless journalist. All of you focused on your petty cause should be ashamed of yourselves.
In good times, our military stands the line. In bad time, they are shooting down missiles and drones flying towards innocent people not carrying a weapon.
The situation in the Red Sea and Middle East have demonstrated their laser focus and how we work with other navies. I was also impressed with the navy of India.
If you are wondering about the Chinese navy, they stayed in port. They are doing a good job creating new allies for the US in Southeast Asia.
What is great about the US, a commanding officer of a ship can disagree with POTUS and not disappear. In a brilliant political move Trump was critical of replacing proven steam catapults on the newest carrier. Trump got sailors to yell steam.
I love steam. I fell in love the first time I spun the throttles on a WWII vintage ship.
When the CO explained to Trump why he was wrong. Trump listened.
Just a distraction from their real failures.