An article in the Des Moines Register (DMR) titled Are you tired of yearly blizzards? Well, Iowa could see fewer blizzards in the years ahead, reports on a study from the University of Nebraska in Lincoln predicting that the Midwest, including Iowa, will likely see a declining number of blizzards due to climate change. While this result is uncertain, if true, the DMR should be reporting it as a benefit of climate change because blizzards cause millions of dollars in damage and hundreds of deaths every year.
The study used computer models projections to estimate a decline in blizzards, yet as Climate Realism has discussed numerous times in the past, the models themselves are unreliable, and thus of questionable utility for this purpose. Even the author Liang Chen admitted as much.
“[T]here is no study looking at how they [blizzards] will change in the future, based on climate simulations,” Chen told DMR. “The major reason is: It’s hard to quantify.”
Also the data that do exist provide no evidence for a declining trend in blizzards, despite modest warming. According to the study:
In this study, we analyzed historical blizzard occurrences using the observed storm event database, which shows that the Northern Plains, such as North Dakota, South Dakota, and Minnesota, had the most blizzard activities over the past 25 years. No significant trend in blizzard occurrence is found in those regions.
The DMR ignores the fact that were the prediction of fewer blizzards and a decline in extreme cold storms to prove true, this would be a benefit, rather than something to be bemoaned. More than 400 people die during blizzards in the United States, alone, each year. Also, as Climate Realism has pointed out repeatedly, here, here, and here, for example, cold weather kills far more people each year than hot weather. As the climate has modestly warmed, the number of deaths attributed to non-optimum temperatures has fallen dramatically.
Regardless, trying to tease a future trend in blizzards out of climate computer models for a relatively small geographic region, much less for the particular state of Iowa, is fraught with uncertainty, often no better than a coin flip. The world has been naturally and gently warming since the end of the little Ice Age in 1850. During that time no trend in blizzards was reported in the historical data. If a trend in blizzards for the Midwest did not emerge with over 150 years of warming, it is also unlikely to emerge in the future.
It seems that this is just another example of the media blindly reporting on climate science without fully understanding the uncertainties and full implications of the research they are writing about.
You really don’t understand how propaganda is supposed to work. Understanding and research is anathema to selling a hostile narrative.
I often use Iowa as an example. If high end projections of warming using implausible RCP8.5 were to occur, it would be the equivalent of moving from northern Iowa to southern Iowa.
Meanwhile, New York and New England retirees enthusiastically opt for 4x that amount of climate change by moving to Florida.
The media is going AI….
[The BBC] said in an AI strategy update that it plans to use the emerging technology in various ways throughout its many media arms, including the implementation of a “headline helper”, which the BBC said would “give journalists options of headlines to choose from”.
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/03/01/bbc-to-use-generative-ai-to-write-headlines-for-news-articles/
Put the coffee on and choose your narrative driven topic du jour
More popcorn, please 😀
Good job we’ve got record yields of corn – we’re going to need it
“It seems that this is just another example of the media blindly reporting on climate science without fully understanding the uncertainties and full implications of the research they are writing about.”
I don’t really expect journalists to know the full implications of the research they are writing about. But it seems reasonable to expect them to know what journalism is all about, including the part about challenging the basis of a claim being reported.
College and university Departments/Schools of Journalism stopped teaching such principles when I was a youth many decades ago. Now they focus on story telling to ‘change the world’.
That is so old school, last century
Good news is no news as far as modern journalism is concerned.
As long as they remain mute they don’t lie
No, this is a deliberate slant, a basic skill to “journalism.” Any news can be skewed or spun for the desired message. In the U.S. this was once taught in middle schools. There is nothing blind, unsophisticated, or ignorant about it.
Slant is created to order, specified by editors to suit publishers.
“The biggest storm of winter has begun blasting the Sierra Nevada and will continue into the weekend, with some areas expected to see 10 feet of snow.”
You’re right, Ireneusz, and anyone can search for “live cam Sierra Nevada” and see the blizzard in full tilt. The timing of this Des Moines report reminds me of the first rule in weather forecasting (given that climate change is weather writ large/long): before you make a weather forecast…look out the window.
https://youtu.be/MwHWDokyUhw
https://youtu.be/Gq1kM9PqNg4
Soda Springs, California, has already received 19.1″ of snow in the past 24 hours, and more is still to come!
Story Tip:
Activists build treehouses to protest Tesla’s plans to expand its plant near Berlin
Environmental activists are staging a protest in a forest near Berlin against plans to expand the grounds of electric carmaker Tesla’s first plant in Europe and are vowing to stay in place for weeks.
Activists occupy German forest to block Tesla expansion
Tesla wants to expand its factory in Gruenheide, southeast of the capital, by 170 hectares (420 acres) and boost production up to one million vehicles annually.
But the environmental group Robin Wood, one of the protest organisers, said the plans “threaten the drinking water supply for the entire region”.
They found a tree? 😉
Subsurface temperature decline of the tropical central Pacific.
http://www.bom.gov.au/archive/oceanography/ocean_anals/IDYOC006/IDYOC006.202402.gif
Any possible good news coming from ‘Global Warming/Climate Change’ will always be reported by the MSM as a definite disaster in the making. Meanwhile, retirees continue to move to warmer areas.
This 2021 study says that the number of cold-related deaths each year is about 4.6 million while the number of cold-related deaths is about 500,000.
Cold or cool air causes blood vessels to constrict causing blood pressure to rise and that causes more strokes and heart attacks during the cooler months.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(21)00081-4/fulltext
Oops. …the number of heat-related deaths is about 500,000.