Hold the front page! DeSmog reports that the U.K.’s Energy and Net Zero Minister Claire Coutinho has taken a donation from a “climate science denial funder”. Lord Michael Hintze is alleged to have given £2,000 to the minister’s local constituency – a sum that should keep local volunteers supplied with paper clips and instant coffee for a short while. A pathetic smear, of course, simply blowing imaginary smoke where no fire exists. The donation is legal and without such local fund-raising political parties would cease to exist. But curiously missing from DeSmog’s reportage is any note of its own funding where, needless to say, the usual list of green billionaires are to be found.
DeSmog is an unpleasant operation noted for running a ‘blacklist’ of scientists who stick to the scientific method and discuss the causes of climate change with reference to empirical evidence. Called the ‘Climate Disinformation Database’, it lists many of the scientists who dispute the notion that humans control the climate thermostat and society must de-industrialise around a collectivist Net Zero agenda to avoid thermageddon. As part of a global political campaign, billionaire foundations are currently pouring hundreds of millions of dollars every year into organisations that can lobby for ‘green’ causes, as the Daily Sceptic has noted in a number of previous articles. Unsurprisingly, DeSmog is funded by some of these sources that seek to exert influence in all forms of media, politics and academia..
DeSmog is “predominantly” funded by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, the Polden Puckham Charitable Foundation, the Climate Emergency Collaboration and the Minor Foundation. Interestingly, the Board of Directors of DeSmog includes a representative from ClientEarth, a fund supported by the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation and the European Climate Foundation (ECF), both groups heavily funded by Extinction Rebellion paymaster Sir Christopher Hohn. Also listed in this group is the Grantham Foundation, a green billionaire fund known for pumping money into British universities. This latter operation also helps fund the Imperial College-based World Weather Attribution which uses computer models to state with unassailable conviction that humans cause individual weather events. Another board director works for Climate Outreach, a lawfare outfit funded by ECF, along with IKEA and Joseph Rowntree. Sitting on a research advisory board of Climate Outreach is Saffron O’Neill, a geography lecturer from Exeter University who in the past has speculated on the need for “fines and imprisonment” for those heretics expressing scepticism about what she calls “well supported” science.
If all of this was oil money, we would never hear the end of it from the Guardian – $12 million from Bill Gates over the last decade and counting – as noted by the investigative journalist Ben Pile. “But climate change is a fig leaf,” he continues. “It allows corporate, big business and billionaire lobbying to go unchecked, despite the obvious consequences for democratic control of policymaking.”
Recently, DeSmog teamed up with the Guardian to state that 16 of the 31 presenters at the fast-growing GB News channel “attacked” U.K. climate policies including the Net Zero 2050 target. The Guardian reported that 10 of the presenters made statements rejecting or challenging “widely accepted scientific findings” about how humans are affecting the climate and the role the climate crisis plays in extreme weather events.
Neil Oliver, whose Saturday evening monologue is a social media hit, was singled out for criticism. In December 2022, he is said to have asserted that polar bears are “doing fine”, and the ice in Antarctica is getting thicker every year. In fact, polar bears are doing fine with surveys suggesting their numbers are at recent highs. Meanwhile, a paper in Nature noted that over the last seven decades, the Antarctica sea ice area has “modestly expanded”, and warming has been “nearly non-existent”. Terminally silly Brighton green MP Caroline Lucas noted the “truly toxic misinformation” on GB News, adding: “Ofcom cannot allow these statements to go unchallenged and un-investigated.”
Both GB News and the rival Murdoch-owned TalkTV allow journalists to discuss and consider all the facts and opinions surrounding climate change and Net Zero. But care needs to be taken with Ofcom. Any loon can talk about ‘global boiling’ and ‘climate collapse’ on the BBC and nobody bats an eyelid. But Ofcom seems to require ‘balance’ whenever anyone departs from the set text. For some inexplicable reason, no ‘settled’ climate science practitioners will debate their findings in public with critical interviewers, so both GB News and TalkTV are reduced to ‘balancing’ their coverage by platforming Armageddon hysterics.
Ben Pile has had practical experience of appearing on the 10 minute ‘debate’ slots and observes that over the last year he has appeared with a grown man wearing dungarees and plaits in his beard calling himself a “professor”, weather bloke Jim Dale, fire-and-brimstone eco-zeolot Donnachadh McCarthy and Dale Vince. “The Green Blob does not send out its best and brightest to fight its cause,” concludes Pile. “This is because it is not a movement that is founded on the best and brightest. It has no culture of debate, democracy or science, and it eschews these things, requiring only obedience and emotion from its adherents.”
Which brings us nicely back to DeSmog, with its factitious stories about piddling constituency donations, nasty attempts to destroy the reputations and employment prospects of eminent scientists, half-baked attacks on genuine, questioning journalists and sources of funding from agenda-driven green billionaires.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Google doesn’t like you, and won’t load your page unless I sneak in by clicking on “Comment”.
Just type “www.wattsupwiththat.com” in the address field at the top instead of any search box – don’t let them filter your desired pages.
You could also try “https://wattsupwiththat.com” to force it to heel and then save it as a bookmark and even pin it to your new tab page, or even drag it to your desktop to make it a shortcut, or the equivalent to put it on your screen.
Its been in my “blogs” list of bookmarks for years!
Same here – this sh1t started about a week ago – I do what PCman999 suggests.
I have Google suppressing other sites that it doesn’t like – such as Katie Hopkins.
If it gets worse, I guess I’m just going to dump Google as my default.
I’ve used Duck Duck Go for years. It’s now got an associated browser.
I use Duck Duck Go to get my email then click on the email link.
Despite that the link can take several minutes.
There could be something else going on
Even DuckDuck is sus.
But it isn’t as bad as Google.
You can’t say Algorithm without saying Al Gor[e]
Have you tried the BRAVE browser?
DDG seems to be acting as a front end for Bing these days. Maybe it offers better privacy to you as a searcher, but it seems to throw up the same search results, and is therefore by default submitting to their link censorship.
I get gmail addys bounced regularly due to my server being unapproved by some security scan theyre running now.
my email provider when contacted knows nothing (and does nothing)
Hmmm. When I put Katie Hopkins in my Google search bar, her Wikipedia page and personal website come up first.
Katie Hopkins links appear in DuckDuckGo (DDG)
Funnily enough, I’m no fan of Google or the Parliamentary dictatorship.
I type in “WUWT” using Googoo, and this site is first on the list..
Maybe it is country specific ?
Actually, that comes as a “MS Bing” search..
So I check using Firefox, Googoo brings this site first in the list, too.
Have you tried the BRAVE browser? I read somewhere that Gmail is manipulative.
so lose the gurgle and get a decent search engine like startpage or firefox
I use DuckDuckGo. Type wuwt; and this site is the first hit.
However, as mentioned by others — I have WUWT as a bookmark.
Google doesn’t like you, and won’t load your page unless I sneak in by clicking on “Comment”.
Same here.
Neil Oliver’s show is pretty much the only thing I watch on GB News.
It promised so much and it failed to deliver.
You were expecting anything different in a totally hostile media arena where the presenters are the subject of daily ‘complaints’ to Ofcom? It’s a wonder they’ve managed to survive at all frankly. They’re still going and growing despite a concerted campaign to bring them down – if they can keep weathering the storm of abuse then who knows what they can do in the future. Blame the established MSM for the ‘failure to deliver’ and be grateful they’re even delivering anything at all.
Slightly off topic – why are the article addresses so incredibly long – given the alfa numeric permutations (400 characters ???) there would be enough for an address to each and every subatomic particle in a googolplex of universes – seems excessive.
Only Reform UK is off message. Got to be worth a punt given what’s on offer.
Off message?
The ‘message’ being the CAGW narrative being pushed by the MSM and other political parties here in the UK. So far Reform, Reclaim and UKIP are the only 3 parties not pushing the CAGW message in their policies.
Any Scientist that will not listen to, and not undertake an analysis of, views against their own beliefs, is not a Scientist. The scientific process demands introspection, because, a certain amount of what we believe is correct we have wrong. Building an opinion on wrong idea foundation does not produce a correct opinion. Disclaimer: however there is this aspect: in golf if you read a putt correctly and mis-hit it you miss, if you read a putt wrong and hit it correctly you miss, but if you mis-read a putt AND mis-hit it, you have a chance.
Or it shoots straight off the green into a bunker.
or… check your Premise! (credit to Ayn Rand)
________________________________________________________________
Been going on for a long time. Over ten years ago John Stossel hosted a debate between Roy Spencer and Gavin Schmidt where Schmidt refused to actually appear in the same room with Spencer. Here’s that old You Tube:
Puerile, nay, childish stuff from Schmidt
Mickey Mann is pretty much the same sort of coward, as are many of the “big” climate names.
THEY KNOW ITS ALL ONE BIG CON !!
Bill McKibben was brave enough to debate Alex Epstein several years ago and Alex mopped the floor with him. It’s on YouTube.
Perhaps that is one reason “we will not debate”.
Well yes. They are not the sharpest minds, on the whole. They managed to seize an opportunity to push their ideology onto the world but the only way they can keep it there is by making sure nobody else can contradict them. If they had to compete in a scientific forum, adhering to the scientific method against actual scientists then they know it’ll be all over for them, the gravy train will come to a screeching stop and they’ll all be out of work.
Judith Curry takes the position that if you have an attack page at TheSmog then you’ve made it. Because it proves that you are a real, genuine scientist. Wear the badge with pride.
Story tip… lol !
Clowns in Davos
CLOWN WORLD ARRIVES IN DAVOS (youtube.com)
Clown is clearly the new slang term for an utter moron.
OK, what game are they playing now?
This is the new, ‘acceptable’ face of the Antifa fascist thugs.
Seems like 15 minute Gotham cities are in the works.
‘Agents of Chaos?’
Google has the DeSmog list built into its search algorithm. Search on a listed skeptic and the 14 year old DeSmog dossier appears among the first hits. I just did Anthony Watts and DeSmog was third.
It is seventh for me. Eighteenth on DuckDuckGo.
Wikipedia trashes folks that are not ClimateCult™ members. I ignore the requests for donations because of this. Occasionally, like now, I mention this but the Wiki boss {Jimmy somebody} seems not to care, or has never gotten my message.
While green goons take money from many sources, such as Tides Foundation.
Vivian Krause documented the money trail
Just revealed is people being paid for protesting against Israel, in Vancouver BC.
(Same people as climate, I believe, Marxists at root.
Hypocrites who push flexible gender and rights for females yet evade that Totalitarian Islam kills homosexuals and oppresses females.)
The guardianistas playing whack-a mole with them sneaky deniers-
YouTube making money off new breed of climate denial, monitoring group says (msn.com)