Online Rag Funded by Green Billionaires Peddles Cheap Smear About Tory MP and Shoots Itself in Foot

From THE DAILY SCEPTIC

BY CHRIS MORRISON

Hold the front page! DeSmog reports that the U.K.’s Energy and Net Zero Minister Claire Coutinho has taken a donation from a “climate science denial funder”. Lord Michael Hintze is alleged to have given £2,000 to the minister’s local constituency – a sum that should keep local volunteers supplied with paper clips and instant coffee for a short while. A pathetic smear, of course, simply blowing imaginary smoke where no fire exists. The donation is legal and without such local fund-raising political parties would cease to exist. But curiously missing from DeSmog’s reportage is any note of its own funding where, needless to say, the usual list of green billionaires are to be found.

DeSmog is an unpleasant operation noted for running a ‘blacklist’ of scientists who stick to the scientific method and discuss the causes of climate change with reference to empirical evidence. Called the ‘Climate Disinformation Database’, it lists many of the scientists who dispute the notion that humans control the climate thermostat and society must de-industrialise around a collectivist Net Zero agenda to avoid thermageddon. As part of a global political campaign, billionaire foundations are currently pouring hundreds of millions of dollars every year into organisations that can lobby for ‘green’ causes, as the Daily Sceptic has noted in a number of previous articles. Unsurprisingly, DeSmog is funded by some of these sources that seek to exert influence in all forms of media, politics and academia..

DeSmog is “predominantly” funded by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, the Polden Puckham Charitable Foundation, the Climate Emergency Collaboration and the Minor Foundation. Interestingly, the Board of Directors of DeSmog includes a representative from ClientEarth, a fund supported by the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation and the European Climate Foundation (ECF), both groups heavily funded by Extinction Rebellion paymaster Sir Christopher Hohn. Also listed in this group is the Grantham Foundation, a green billionaire fund known for pumping money into British universities. This latter operation also helps fund the Imperial College-based World Weather Attribution which uses computer models to state with unassailable conviction that humans cause individual weather events. Another board director works for Climate Outreach, a lawfare outfit funded by ECF, along with IKEA and Joseph Rowntree. Sitting on a research advisory board of Climate Outreach is Saffron O’Neill, a geography lecturer from Exeter University who in the past has speculated on the need for “fines and imprisonment” for those heretics expressing scepticism about what she calls “well supported” science.

If all of this was oil money, we would never hear the end of it from the Guardian – $12 million from Bill Gates over the last decade and counting – as noted by the investigative journalist Ben Pile. “But climate change is a fig leaf,” he continues. “It allows corporate, big business and billionaire lobbying to go unchecked, despite the obvious consequences for democratic control of policymaking.”

Recently, DeSmog teamed up with the Guardian to state that 16 of the 31 presenters at the fast-growing GB News channel “attacked” U.K. climate policies including the Net Zero 2050 target. The Guardian reported that 10 of the presenters made statements rejecting or challenging “widely accepted scientific findings” about how humans are affecting the climate and the role the climate crisis plays in extreme weather events.

Neil Oliver, whose Saturday evening monologue is a social media hit, was singled out for criticism. In December 2022, he is said to have asserted that polar bears are “doing fine”, and the ice in Antarctica is getting thicker every year. In fact, polar bears are doing fine with surveys suggesting their numbers are at recent highs. Meanwhile, a paper in Nature noted that over the last seven decades, the Antarctica sea ice area has “modestly expanded”, and warming has been “nearly non-existent”. Terminally silly Brighton green MP Caroline Lucas noted the “truly toxic misinformation” on GB News, adding: “Ofcom cannot allow these statements to go unchallenged and un-investigated.”

Both GB News and the rival Murdoch-owned TalkTV allow journalists to discuss and consider all the facts and opinions surrounding climate change and Net Zero. But care needs to be taken with Ofcom. Any loon can talk about ‘global boiling’ and ‘climate collapse’ on the BBC and nobody bats an eyelid. But Ofcom seems to require ‘balance’ whenever anyone departs from the set text. For some inexplicable reason, no ‘settled’ climate science practitioners will debate their findings in public with critical interviewers, so both GB News and TalkTV are reduced to ‘balancing’ their coverage by platforming Armageddon hysterics.

Ben Pile has had practical experience of appearing on the 10 minute ‘debate’ slots and observes that over the last year he has appeared with a grown man wearing dungarees and plaits in his beard calling himself a “professor”, weather bloke Jim Dale, fire-and-brimstone eco-zeolot Donnachadh McCarthy and Dale Vince. “The Green Blob does not send out its best and brightest to fight its cause,” concludes Pile. “This is because it is not a movement that is founded on the best and brightest. It has no culture of debate, democracy or science, and it eschews these things, requiring only obedience and emotion from its adherents.”

Which brings us nicely back to DeSmog, with its factitious stories about piddling constituency donations, nasty attempts to destroy the reputations and employment prospects of eminent scientists, half-baked attacks on genuine, questioning journalists and sources of funding from agenda-driven green billionaires.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

4.9 31 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

47 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
generalmilley
January 14, 2024 10:06 pm

Google doesn’t like you, and won’t load your page unless I sneak in by clicking on “Comment”.

Reply to  generalmilley
January 14, 2024 10:26 pm

Just type “www.wattsupwiththat.com” in the address field at the top instead of any search box – don’t let them filter your desired pages.

You could also try “https://wattsupwiththat.com” to force it to heel and then save it as a bookmark and even pin it to your new tab page, or even drag it to your desktop to make it a shortcut, or the equivalent to put it on your screen.

Reply to  PCman999
January 15, 2024 12:44 am

Its been in my “blogs” list of bookmarks for years!

Chasmsteed
Reply to  generalmilley
January 15, 2024 12:04 am

Same here – this sh1t started about a week ago – I do what PCman999 suggests.

I have Google suppressing other sites that it doesn’t like – such as Katie Hopkins.

If it gets worse, I guess I’m just going to dump Google as my default.

atticman
Reply to  Chasmsteed
January 15, 2024 1:35 am

I’ve used Duck Duck Go for years. It’s now got an associated browser.

lewispbuckingham
Reply to  atticman
January 15, 2024 2:28 am

I use Duck Duck Go to get my email then click on the email link.
Despite that the link can take several minutes.
There could be something else going on

strativarius
Reply to  atticman
January 15, 2024 2:29 am

Even DuckDuck is sus.

But it isn’t as bad as Google.

You can’t say Algorithm without saying Al Gor[e]

sturmudgeon
Reply to  atticman
January 15, 2024 12:03 pm

Have you tried the BRAVE browser?

Reply to  atticman
January 16, 2024 2:56 pm

DDG seems to be acting as a front end for Bing these days. Maybe it offers better privacy to you as a searcher, but it seems to throw up the same search results, and is therefore by default submitting to their link censorship.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Chasmsteed
January 15, 2024 4:29 am

I get gmail addys bounced regularly due to my server being unapproved by some security scan theyre running now.
my email provider when contacted knows nothing (and does nothing)

GregInHouston
Reply to  Chasmsteed
January 15, 2024 7:24 am

Hmmm. When I put Katie Hopkins in my Google search bar, her Wikipedia page and personal website come up first.

John Hultquist
Reply to  Chasmsteed
January 15, 2024 9:43 am

Katie Hopkins links appear in DuckDuckGo (DDG)

strativarius
Reply to  generalmilley
January 15, 2024 1:49 am

Funnily enough, I’m no fan of Google or the Parliamentary dictatorship.

Reply to  generalmilley
January 15, 2024 3:26 am

I type in “WUWT” using Googoo, and this site is first on the list..

Maybe it is country specific ?

Reply to  bnice2000
January 15, 2024 3:30 am

Actually, that comes as a “MS Bing” search..

So I check using Firefox, Googoo brings this site first in the list, too.

sturmudgeon
Reply to  bnice2000
January 15, 2024 12:06 pm

Have you tried the BRAVE browser? I read somewhere that Gmail is manipulative.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  generalmilley
January 15, 2024 4:27 am

so lose the gurgle and get a decent search engine like startpage or firefox

John Hultquist
Reply to  generalmilley
January 15, 2024 9:40 am

I use DuckDuckGo. Type wuwt; and this site is the first hit.
However, as mentioned by others — I have WUWT as a bookmark.

insufficientlysensitive
Reply to  generalmilley
January 19, 2024 10:08 am

Google doesn’t like you, and won’t load your page unless I sneak in by clicking on “Comment”.

Same here.

January 15, 2024 12:18 am

Neil Oliver’s show is pretty much the only thing I watch on GB News.

strativarius
Reply to  PariahDog
January 15, 2024 1:51 am

It promised so much and it failed to deliver.

Richard Page
Reply to  strativarius
January 15, 2024 7:41 am

You were expecting anything different in a totally hostile media arena where the presenters are the subject of daily ‘complaints’ to Ofcom? It’s a wonder they’ve managed to survive at all frankly. They’re still going and growing despite a concerted campaign to bring them down – if they can keep weathering the storm of abuse then who knows what they can do in the future. Blame the established MSM for the ‘failure to deliver’ and be grateful they’re even delivering anything at all.

Chasmsteed
January 15, 2024 12:33 am

Slightly off topic – why are the article addresses so incredibly long – given the alfa numeric permutations (400 characters ???) there would be enough for an address to each and every subatomic particle in a googolplex of universes – seems excessive.

strativarius
January 15, 2024 1:50 am

Only Reform UK is off message. Got to be worth a punt given what’s on offer.

Reply to  strativarius
January 15, 2024 7:22 am

Off message?

Richard Page
Reply to  Steve Richards
January 15, 2024 7:47 am

The ‘message’ being the CAGW narrative being pushed by the MSM and other political parties here in the UK. So far Reform, Reclaim and UKIP are the only 3 parties not pushing the CAGW message in their policies.

Ron Long
January 15, 2024 2:25 am

Any Scientist that will not listen to, and not undertake an analysis of, views against their own beliefs, is not a Scientist. The scientific process demands introspection, because, a certain amount of what we believe is correct we have wrong. Building an opinion on wrong idea foundation does not produce a correct opinion. Disclaimer: however there is this aspect: in golf if you read a putt correctly and mis-hit it you miss, if you read a putt wrong and hit it correctly you miss, but if you mis-read a putt AND mis-hit it, you have a chance.

Richard Page
Reply to  Ron Long
January 15, 2024 11:15 am

Or it shoots straight off the green into a bunker.

sturmudgeon
Reply to  Ron Long
January 15, 2024 12:09 pm

or… check your Premise! (credit to Ayn Rand)

January 15, 2024 2:55 am

For some inexplicable reason, no ‘settled’ climate science practitioners will debate their findings in public with critical interviewers…

________________________________________________________________

Been going on for a long time. Over ten years ago John Stossel hosted a debate between Roy Spencer and Gavin Schmidt where Schmidt refused to actually appear in the same room with Spencer. Here’s that old You Tube:

strativarius
Reply to  Steve Case
January 15, 2024 3:06 am

Puerile, nay, childish stuff from Schmidt

Reply to  strativarius
January 15, 2024 3:32 am

Mickey Mann is pretty much the same sort of coward, as are many of the “big” climate names.

THEY KNOW ITS ALL ONE BIG CON !!

Reply to  bnice2000
January 15, 2024 4:16 am

Bill McKibben was brave enough to debate Alex Epstein several years ago and Alex mopped the floor with him. It’s on YouTube.

sturmudgeon
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
January 15, 2024 12:16 pm

Perhaps that is one reason “we will not debate”.

Richard Page
Reply to  sturmudgeon
January 15, 2024 12:34 pm

Well yes. They are not the sharpest minds, on the whole. They managed to seize an opportunity to push their ideology onto the world but the only way they can keep it there is by making sure nobody else can contradict them. If they had to compete in a scientific forum, adhering to the scientific method against actual scientists then they know it’ll be all over for them, the gravy train will come to a screeching stop and they’ll all be out of work.

Ed Zuiderwijk
January 15, 2024 3:11 am

Judith Curry takes the position that if you have an attack page at TheSmog then you’ve made it. Because it proves that you are a real, genuine scientist. Wear the badge with pride.

January 15, 2024 3:24 am

Story tip… lol !

Clowns in Davos

CLOWN WORLD ARRIVES IN DAVOS (youtube.com)

strativarius
Reply to  bnice2000
January 15, 2024 3:44 am

Clown is clearly the new slang term for an utter moron.

Scissor
Reply to  bnice2000
January 15, 2024 5:57 am

OK, what game are they playing now?

Richard Page
Reply to  Scissor
January 15, 2024 7:58 am

This is the new, ‘acceptable’ face of the Antifa fascist thugs.

Scissor
Reply to  Richard Page
January 15, 2024 8:27 am

Seems like 15 minute Gotham cities are in the works.

Richard Page
Reply to  Scissor
January 15, 2024 8:40 am

‘Agents of Chaos?’

David Wojick
January 15, 2024 3:27 am

Google has the DeSmog list built into its search algorithm. Search on a listed skeptic and the 14 year old DeSmog dossier appears among the first hits. I just did Anthony Watts and DeSmog was third.

Curious George
Reply to  David Wojick
January 15, 2024 8:41 am

It is seventh for me. Eighteenth on DuckDuckGo.

John Hultquist
Reply to  David Wojick
January 15, 2024 9:53 am

Wikipedia trashes folks that are not ClimateCult™ members. I ignore the requests for donations because of this. Occasionally, like now, I mention this but the Wiki boss {Jimmy somebody} seems not to care, or has never gotten my message.

Rational Keith
January 15, 2024 7:44 pm

While green goons take money from many sources, such as Tides Foundation.
Vivian Krause documented the money trail

Just revealed is people being paid for protesting against Israel, in Vancouver BC.
(Same people as climate, I believe, Marxists at root.
Hypocrites who push flexible gender and rights for females yet evade that Totalitarian Islam kills homosexuals and oppresses females.)

observa
January 16, 2024 6:01 am

The guardianistas playing whack-a mole with them sneaky deniers-
YouTube making money off new breed of climate denial, monitoring group says (msn.com)

Verified by MonsterInsights