In an astro-engineering approach to climate change mitigation, researchers calculate how dust could be fired from the Moon into space to attentuate the Sun’s rays

Peer-Reviewed Publication

PLOS

IMAGE: SIMULATED STREAM OF DUST LAUNCHED BETWEEN EARTH AND THE SUN. THIS DUST CLOUD IS SHOWN AS IT CROSSES THE DISK OF THE SUN, VIEWED FROM EARTH. STREAMS LIKE THIS ONE, INCLUDING THOSE LAUNCHED FROM THE MOON’S SURFACE, CAN ACT AS A TEMPORARY SUN SHADE. view more 
CREDIT: BEN BROMLEY, CC-BY 4.0 (HTTPS://CREATIVECOMMONS.ORG/LICENSES/BY/4.0/)

In an astro-engineering approach to climate change mitigation, researchers calculate how dust could be fired from the Moon into space to attentuate the Sun’s rays.

#####

Article URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000133

Article Title: Dust as a solar shield      

Author Countries: USA

Funding: The University of Utah Office of Undergraduate Research provided a stipend to co-author SHK through the Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program (http://our.utah.edu/research-scholarship-opportunities/urop/). The funder(s) had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


JOURNAL

PLOS Climate

DOI

10.1371/journal.pclm.0000133 

ARTICLE TITLE

Dust as a solar shield

ARTICLE PUBLICATION DATE

8-Feb-2023

COI STATEMENT

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

From EurekAlert!

Here is the Abstract

Abstract

We revisit dust placed near the Earth–Sun L1 Lagrange point as a possible climate-change mitigation measure. Our calculations include variations in grain properties and orbit solutions with lunar and planetary perturbations. To achieve sunlight attenuation of 1.8%, equivalent to about 6 days per year of an obscured Sun, the mass of dust in the scenarios we consider must exceed 1010 kg. The more promising approaches include using high-porosity, fluffy grains to increase the extinction efficiency per unit mass, and launching this material in directed jets from a platform orbiting at L1. A simpler approach is to ballistically eject dust grains from the Moon’s surface on a free trajectory toward L1, providing sun shade for several days or more. Advantages compared to an Earth launch include a ready reservoir of dust on the lunar surface and less kinetic energy required to achieve a sun-shielding orbit.

HT/Frazier

1.5 18 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

77 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
son of mulder
February 14, 2023 2:07 pm

Help me, when will I wake up from all this madness? I assume they modelled the process…aargh!!They’ll need a pretty big vacuum cleaner if they got it wrong.

February 14, 2023 5:07 pm

A plan to be held in reserve for about a billion years.

February 14, 2023 8:21 pm

Their problem is the market. To get such a story published in the old fashion way they first need to convince a publisher that their story will sell, then it actually has to sell once the book hits the shelves, then maybe they get some money. This way they just have to convince a clueless grant administrator.

Paul Redfern
February 14, 2023 8:57 pm

A better use of moondust is to bring it down to earth and extract the helium 3. The helium 3 can be used in a special fusion reactor that is safe and efficient. This would provide clean energy for thousands of years.

lanceman
February 14, 2023 10:28 pm

If even a small percentage of this dust lingers near lunar orbit couldn’t it pose a debris problem for spacecraft traveling at a couple thousand miles per hour?

David Blenkinsop
February 15, 2023 2:47 am

Reading these objections to putting extra dust anywhere near the Earth, suggests to me that any really ambitious solar power satellite schemes or comparable space colony schemes could also create unacceptable risks to our planet. Think of the effects, if really large satellites might be diverted to burn up in the atmosphere, or if heavily radiation shielded space stations, massing maybe a million tonnes or more per station, could possibly fall on us as well!

If really heavy asteroid material use, say, is to be possible and beneficial, it would maybe help to do such things well away from our planet? The orbital space around planet Venus comes to mind here, as a possible future industrial “ring” of accumulated material. For instance, imagine bringing in chunks of asteroid material, and using Venus’ heavy atmosphere for aerobraking such chunks into a stable orbit. In such a situation, were anyone to deliberately, or inadvertently, divert something heavy our way, at least we’d have a planetary situation far enough away from the Earth to allow a timely response.

Anyway, maybe that’s a somewhat different topic from moon dust ‘sunshades’. I’m just trying here for a ‘mega engineering’ idea that might be worth pursuing at some point (as opposed to the patently silly idea of throwing a bunch of moon dust around).

edfix
February 15, 2023 5:15 am

Why not use nukes to blow up the moon into dust and rubble and be done with it? Make dust, not war!

February 15, 2023 9:41 am

This is Bond-villian level of crazy…

Kpar
February 15, 2023 9:48 am

I clearly recall some dweebs suggesting putting into orbit a giant “sunshade” to reflect solar energy away from the Earth, with no speculation about the possible (extremely likely) negative effects,

This proposal just goes to show how, no matter how bad an idea is, someone can make it worse.

JBP
February 15, 2023 6:22 pm

Well…..

hahahahahahahahahaha

stupid people. with power given to them by other stupid people. what could ever go wrong

Gumnut
February 15, 2023 10:39 pm

It is counter-intuitive that those that worship Lucifer, Lord of Light, want to block out the light.

But not if one understands their viewpoint on life.