WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY
New research from West Virginia University biologists shows that trees around the world are consuming more carbon dioxide than previously reported, making forests even more important in regulating the Earth’s atmosphere and forever shift how we think about climate change.
In a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Professor Richard Thomas and alumnus Justin Mathias (BS Biology, ’13 and Ph.D. Biology, ’20) synthesized published tree ring studies. They found that increases in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere over the past century have caused an uptick in trees’ water-use efficiency, the ratio of carbon dioxide taken up by photosynthesis to the water lost by transpiration – the act of trees “breathing out” water vapor.
“This study really highlights the role of forests and their ecosystems in climate change,” said Thomas, interim associate provost for graduate academic affairs. “We think of forests as providing ecosystem services. Those services can be a lot of different things – recreation, timber, industry. We demonstrate how forests perform another important service: acting as sinks for carbon dioxide. Our research shows that forests consume large amounts of carbon dioxide globally. Without that, more carbon dioxide would go into the air and build up in the atmosphere even more than it already is, which could exacerbate climate change. Our work shows yet another important reason to preserve and maintain our forests and keep them healthy.”
Previously, scientists have thought that trees were using water more efficiently over the past century through reduced stomatal conductance – meaning trees were retaining more moisture when the pores on their leaves began closing slightly under rising levels of carbon dioxide.
However, following an analysis using carbon and oxygen isotopes in tree rings from 1901 to 2015 from 36 tree species at 84 sites around the world, the researchers found that in 83% of cases, the main driver of trees’ increased water efficiency was increased photosynthesis – they processed more carbon dioxide. Meanwhile, the stomatal conductance only drove increased efficiency 17% of the time. This reflects a major change in how trees’ water efficiency has been explained in contrast to previous research.
“We’ve shown that over the past century, photosynthesis is actually the overwhelming driver to increases in tree water use efficiency, which is a surprising result because it contradicts many earlier studies,” Mathias said. “On a global scale, this will have large implications potentially for the carbon cycle if more carbon is being transferred from the atmosphere into trees.”
Since 1901, the intrinsic water use efficiency of trees worldwide has risen by approximately 40% in conjunction with an increase of approximately 34% in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Both of these characteristics increased approximately four times faster since the 1960s compared to the previous years.
While these results show the rise in carbon dioxide is the main factor in making trees use water more efficiently, the results also vary depending on temperature, precipitation and dryness of the atmosphere. These data can help refine models used to predict the effects of climate change on global carbon and water cycles.
“Having an accurate representation of these processes is critical in making sound predictions about what may happen in the future,” Mathias said. “This helps us get a little closer to making those predictions less uncertain.”
The study is a product of the researchers’ seven-year research collaboration during Mathias’ time as a doctoral student. After graduating from WVU, Mathias joined University of California, Santa Barbara as a postdoctoral researcher.
“Since moving to California, my work has taken a turn from being in the field, collecting measurements, analyzing data and writing manuscripts,” Mathias said. “My new position is more focused on ecological theory and ecosystem modeling. Instead of measuring plants, I form hypotheses and seek out answers to questions using computer models and math.”
In the future, Mathias aspires to become a professor at a research university to continue these research pursuits.
“I would love to run my own lab at a university, mentor graduate students and pursue research questions to continue building on the work we’ve already accomplished. There’s been a lot of progress in our field. There are also an infinite number of questions that are relevant moving forward,” Mathias said. “I owe everything to my time and training from the people at WVU. My long-term goal is to be in a position where I can continue moving the field forward while giving back through teaching and mentoring students.”
###
So someone has finally figured out that the REAL world of biology works fine, and we are not doomed….? Just askin’.
OK, I will put away the “Doom On You!” t-shirts for now.
Just curious about the plant population coverage now, compared to the Carboniferous period, since we don’t have large herbivorous mammals roaming around (except for a couple of places, like Joe’s Bar & Grille – Tuskers Welcome), munching up all the green stuff.
” . . . since we don’t have large herbivorous mammals roaming around . . .”
Yeah, instead we have the human practice of clearcutting forests.
Yes, we do and I’m waiting to see just how much erosion of productive soil results from that practice, never mind hillsides and valleys. And it’s coming.
Instead of measuring plants, I form hypotheses and seek out answers to questions using computer models and math.”
Instead of growing crops, I draw them.
Hey, hey, hey! People can eat the paper it’s drawn on! /extreme sarcasm
But the EU and UK mantra is cut it, mash it, shred it, cube it, and burn it–preferably from North American forests after hauling it.
Plants take up and use CO2 — who knew?
Well, I knew and you knew, too, beng, so that means HE didn’t know.
So then what is the purpose of the 400+ biofuel forest cutting sites in the USA as exposed by Michael Moore’s film?
“We demonstrate how forests perform another important service: acting as sinks for carbon dioxide.”
–
Was I wrong to suppose that to be obvious?
But Al Gore said “The science is settled”.
Say, what ever happened to Al Gore anyway? Is he busy inventing new things or is the democrat party ignoring him on purpose?
“I would love to run my own lab in a University, completely insulated from the real world and soak up taxpayer grant money”. That’s what he should have said. Just another trough feeder. However, his grants might get cut if he keeps producing studies that don’t sound scary.
Mr. Mathias should concentrate on his measurements on plants, instead of becoming a research professor, disconnected from the real world.
His research is important, showing that the increase in CO2 concentrations in the air is making the earth greener.
But we’ve got to cut down the trees to feed the Drax power station. How else can we save the planet?
Their computer model “results” are nothing more than an extension of their hypothesis…if they even have one.