University of Cincinnati researchers have developed a more efficient air-cooling system for power plants
University of Cincinnati researchers say they have found a solution to one of the biggest environmental problems facing the energy industry: water consumption.

Power plants in the United States need as much water each year as all of the nation’s farms combined — an estimated 133 billion gallons per day, according to federal numbers. This poses an enormous strain on water resources and has a detrimental environmental impact.
But Raj Manglik and Milind Jog, professors of mechanical engineering in UC’s College of Engineering and Applied Science, say they have developed a new air-cooling system for power plants that uses no water but is nearly as effective as water-cooled systems.
“At some point this will be a water crisis — and it will be rather soon,” Manglik said. “That was the primary motivation. Can we make air cooling significantly more viable so that companies would adopt it regardless?”??
The project was funded by a $3.4 million grant from the U.S. Department of Energy.
Most power plants in the United States are built alongside bodies of water to meet the demands of their cooling systems. Some water is lost through evaporation in cooling towers. In other cases, warmer water is pumped back into lakes, rivers or bays, which can raise the ambient temperature, killing fish and other aquatic organisms and creating toxic algae blooms. Scientists call this “thermal pollution.”
“The water around power plants can be significantly warmer than the rest of a river or lake,” Manglik said. “This adversely impacts fish and plants and destroys the ecosystem.”
The two researchers used their backgrounds in experimental heat transfer, computational modeling and fluid dynamics to design a better air-cooled condenser for power plants. Like the radiator of a car, the condenser has a meshwork of metal fins specially designed by UC’s researchers to draw heat away in the circulated air.

CREDIT Joseph Fuqua II/UC Creative Services
UC’s researchers developed enhanced metal fins with a unique geometric design that favorably alters the air flow over them. This provides far better heat convection for cooling steam in the air-cooled condenser.
“The flow of air gets disrupted with more mixing and more efficient heat transfer compared to traditional fins used on these air-cooled condensers,” Jog said.
Manglik said there was no single “Eureka!” moment but rather deliberate improvements over time.
“We use carefully controlled experimentation coupled with computational modeling,” Manglik said. “Modeling helps us understand the physics. Experiments give us the results that can be used to optimize design.”
Shedding more heat increases the efficiency of the power plants, which means they can produce more electricity. And since the cooling system is more effective, it doesn’t have to be as big and costly to build, they said. Laboratory scale tests suggested the researchers’ system can reduce the cooling temperature from today’s 140 degrees to as low as 115 degrees.
UC doctoral students Kuan-Ting Lin and Dantong Shi tested a small prototype in an engineering lab. Now UC is partnering with Taneytown, Maryland, company EVAPCO on a large-scale prototype test of the design at the company’s labs.
But UC’s engineers didn’t stop with condenser fins. They also are working on a solution to one of the energy industry’s biggest conundrums. In the summer, electricity demand typically peaks during the hottest part of the day when a plant’s cooling systems are least efficient.
Professors Jog and Manglik are developing a better system to precool the circulated air using a heat sink that captures cooler temperatures at night.
“The second part we’re developing is an air precooler coupled with thermal energy storage,” Jog said. “So at night when the temperatures are low, the system ‘stores’ the cold. And that is used during the peak times to cool the air before it goes to the condenser.”
UC’s researchers also are working with Babcock & Wilcox, in Lancaster, Ohio, which in 2016 acquired the Italian company SPIG specializing in power plant cooling systems.
Manglik said air-cooled power plants will become increasingly valuable in arid parts of the world in the face of growing industrialization and climate change.
“There is already a water shortage, exacerbated by the global need for energy,” Manglik said. “We will need a substantially large number of new power plants if the rest of the world begins to consume energy at the rate we do in the United States.”
The UC researchers have been working on patenting their ideas since submitting their grant proposal in 2015. Manglik said their results of the full-scale experiments will have to be persuasive.
“The inertia in engineering systems is mind-boggling. You go to an oil refinery or a petrochemical plant, and some of the technologies being used are 40 or 50 years old,” Manglik said. “Efficiency is not always a measure that matters.”
The two researchers have collaborated on diverse research projects at UC over the past decade.
“Dr. Jog has special talents in computational physics and modeling,” Manglik said. “I add to that experimental insights. I don’t mind getting my hands dirty — literally.”
“I think that synergy makes it work,” Jog said.
###
From Eurekalert PUBLIC RELEASE:
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Molten salt reactors might not need water but the steam turbine system that drives the alternators does.
What will be the size of these radiators, to be most efficient they’re going to take up a lot of acreage. what is the cost. and do you have to have fans to move air across the fins, or will it be natural convection,
Technology is evolution.
It is made to sound like the water is consumed not just used.
We always fished below the power plant in Williamsport Md because the fish love warm water. Same thing at Lake Anna in Virginia. I would guess any ‘harm’ (speculation?) is more than offset by benefits. An engineer from Louisiana once told me that for fishing in the Gulf they head straight to the oil drilling platforms because that is where the fish are. I wonder if these guys know what they are talking about.
And what about all those manatees in Florida that cluster around the Florida nuke plants to keep warm?
developed a more efficient air-cooling system for power plants
This is complete ignorance. Closed-cycle water-cooling for western power plants has already been the norm for decades (re-uses the same water over & over). That’s what the dang cooling towers are for…..
Fin fans! Already being used at small scale in updated refineries. Only DOE would give 3.4 million to study scaling the idea up, I suppose.
It was largely concerns over water usage that led to evaporative cooling towers in the 1960s.
Heat transfer engineering is already far past the content of this article. Any heat transfer engineer knows his/her extended area and turbulence enhancement stuff already….and a lot more.
“If Successful” 95% of science writing is pure speculation. 5% reports successful research being implemented in the real world.
The obvious low carbon power technology – molten salt nuclear reactors are air cooled – they
do not need a body of water for cooling. Two problems solved in one tehnology.
Do we want electricity, or hot air?
Fishing was always good by the electrical generating plant on Lake Erie near Cleveland, Ohio. Fish seemed to like that warmer water.
If the new cooling system works it would indeed be a great improvement.
Using cooling water from the river/seas affects the fish [here at Koeberg many types of fish could not take the heat]. Not to speak of the fact that raising the temperature of waters ultimate raises the RH around which causes global warming …
not so?
Click on my name to go and figure.
Excerpted quote from article:
Well now, …… relying primarily on conduction and convection to attain maximum “heat” dispersal is all well and good, ….. but, …… ignoring the potential of heat radiation is not all well and good.
Heat will transfer or migrate across the surface of a smooth object, … but will radiate from the surface if it encounters a “sharp” corner or projection on said surface.
Thus, the “cooling” fins on a “radiator” not only provides a greater surface area for conduction of heat to the air molecules making “contact” with said, ….. but also greatly enhances the radiation of heat from said “radiator”, …….. which gives reason for its name. 😊
How about price competitive natural gas generation without emissions. https://www.netpower.com/
I can’t actually find a “down-side” to this idea – assuming it works. They are right, private industry often just keeps using a proven technology unless there is some external force (regulations, costs) to push them into developing a new idea. It is quite possible that “cooling technology” has not kept up with the pace of scientific discovery. I’ll give them this point.
So, using a better manifold design you could maximize surface area that is in contact with moving air. Using new materials you could optimize heat transfer. It might be too expensive to have used these in a car’s radiator, but might actually be cost effective in a large industrial setting, especially if a rising cost is being realized in water use. Again, I’ll give them this point.
The third change that is not discussed, is that heat transfer will increase in efficiency the greater the heat difference between the source and the sink. This means another improvement would be in being able to operate power generation at a higher temperature. This would also reduce the effect of trying to cool the generator down during a hot day… If the generator runs at say 1,500 degrees (F) and the air temperature is 100 degrees (F), then your delta is 1,400 (F). If instead your could run that generator at 2,000 (F), the delta is 1,900 (F) and more efficient heat transfer could be achieved. (of course, your generator might be melting at this temperature, it is only a thought example, not a real case)
Another possibility (maybe a 4th option) is to build the cooling elements further off the ground. Not only would this allow you to build bigger heat exchangers (vertical) but should contact more wind at a cooler temperature.
(and now for a little humor) The obvious place to build such heat exchanges would be right next to temperature sensing stations. This would help to facilitate the necessary global warming needed to validate AGW. So now we can get the Greens behind this effort.
😂😃😁
It may be a good idea if the economics work, however, 90% of water withdrawn for cooling is returned to the lake or river from which it came.
The hysteria over killing fish is way overstated.
Writing as an Engineer that has worked in the power industry for over 35 years. There are very few once through cooling systems remaining in service at power plants in the U.S.. Most of the plants that did still have one after the mid to late 80s were used as peaking units. Those were older plants and since then many have been retired. Almost all power plants that were operating in the 80s and 90s were retrofitted with cooling towers to dissipate the heat generated by the plants. Some cooling ponds were used but they are land intensive and tend to fill up with stuff reducing their effectiveness. This reduces the thermal impact on the surrounding waterways and reduces the water usage at power plants.
In the early 2000s there was a drive to eliminate the plume emitted from standard cooling towers. The use of dry cooling utilizing air cooled condensers were developed and used at many new power plants. Some retrofits were done near cities where visibility was an issue. These have been around for a fairly long time and one of the benefits is that they do tremendously reduce water usage. These are also used in many arid areas due to the water savings.
A power plant with an air cooled condenser system will typically have reduced plant efficiency and output in the hotter part of the year when the power demand is at it’s highest. Thermodynamics gets in the way again. However some of the air cooled condensers are equipped with water sprays to enhance the performance of the condenser during those hot times.
In my mind these gentlemen are just refining and improving a technology that has been around for a while.
‘Scientists call this “thermal pollution.”’
Fishermen call them “hot spots.” As in great places to fish. The stupid fish like these terrible places.
If this can be scaled to be commercially viable (and I see this as a BIG if), it could be useful for France where their nuclear power stations are river cooled and have had to reduce output when river temperatures get too high for their regulations.
https://www.reuters.com/article/france-nuclearpower-heatwave/french-nuclear-production-reduced-by-3-1-gw-due-to-heatwave-rte-idUSL5N1UU5JG
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/aug/12/france.nuclear
Then again, Macron seems hell bent on shutting down the French nuclear fleet…
This is old news and definitely not a new invention. Saudi Aramco has been using fin-fan condensers/coolers for many decades. Saudi arabia can’t use endless amount of water for cooling in desert oil/gas separation/fractionation and compression facilities. It seems that we’re recycling old news and inventions all over again. Give me a break
Engineer with 12 years of power plant experience here. The reason that closed cycle cooling uses boring and inefficient tube exchangers is that eventually the inner surfaces will foul. They will then need cleaning to gain back their original efficiency or at least a good fraction of it. This can be done with chemical cleaning to a certain extent. Sooner or later you need to physical lay scrape out the “gaak” lining the walls of the exchanger.
From the pictures at the top of the article these exchangers would be problematic to clean. They would most likely run with a heavy fouling factor which would rob them of their advantage over tubes. My opinion only.
not much fun at World Economic Forum in Davos 2019:
https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-samsung&ei=wthcXIP6DdCakwX01KLoBw&q=not+much+fun+at+World+Economic+Forum+in+Davos+2019&oq=not+much+fun+at+World+Economic+Forum+in+Davos+2019&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp.
What IS true – there’s drought years when rivers levels fall that low that on some spots fish can’t no more leave the spots*. And die.
* and there’s no bleading hearts nature preserving NGO’s walking along the rivers freeing the isolated fish.