Claim: groundwater depletion releases ‘significant’ carbon dioxide

From the AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION and the “giant sucking sound” department:

Groundwater depletion could be significant source of atmospheric carbon dioxide

WASHINGTON D.C. — Humans may be adding large amounts of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere by using groundwater faster than it is replenished, according to new research. This process, known as groundwater depletion, releases a significant amount of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere that has until now been overlooked by scientists in calculating carbon sources, according to the new study.

The study’s authors estimate groundwater depletion in the United States could be responsible for releasing 1.7 million metric tons (3.8 billion pounds) of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere every year.

Based on these figures, groundwater depletion should rank among the top 20 sources of carbon emissions documented by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). This would mean the carbon dioxide emitted through groundwater depletion is comparable to the carbon generated from aluminum, glass, and zinc production in the United States, according to the study’s authors.

“We were somewhat surprised that this hasn’t been accounted for in the literature and in the [EPA and IPCC] evaluations,” said David Hyndman, a hydrogeologist at Michigan State University in East Lansing, Michigan and co-author of the new study accepted for publication in Earth’s Future, a journal of the American Geophysical Union.

Groundwater depletion’s impact on carbon emissions is significant yet relatively small compared to the leading contributors, according to the authors. For example, scientists estimate fossil fuel combustion in the United States is responsible for releasing more than 5 billion metric tons (11 trillion pounds) of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every year, close to 3,000 times the amount released from groundwater depletion. Still, the study authors argue that understanding all sources of carbon dioxide emissions is important for making accurate climate change projections and finding solutions.

“It’s not going to change the way we think about global climate change. It’s just another factor involved that we need to consider,” said Warren Wood, a hydrogeologist at Michigan State University and co-author of the new study.

“This is an idea that a number of us have knocked around a little bit, but I think the approach here is really novel,” said Bill Simpkins, a hydrogeologist at Iowa State University in Ames, Iowa who was not involved in the study. “[Groundwater depletion] is certainly not a documented source that people feel obligated to put in their climate estimates.”

Groundwater’s carbon cycle

Rain falling from the sky contains the same amount of carbon dioxide as is present in the atmosphere. But soil carbon dioxide levels are up to 100 times greater than carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere, because soil microbes degrade organic carbon into carbon dioxide. When rainwater hits the ground and percolates through Earth’s rocks and sediments, the water dissolves extra carbon produced by these microbes.

If left to its own devices, this carbon-rich water remains below ground for hundreds to thousands of years before surfacing in oceans or freshwater bodies. But humans are now extracting groundwater at an unprecedented pace to sustain a growing population. The United States alone sucks up nearly 80 billion gallons (303 billion liters) of water from the earth every day to supply drinking water and irrigate crops, enough water to fill Utah’s Great Salt Lake five times every year.

Analyzing depletion’s impact

Wood’s research has largely focused on the hydrogeology of arid areas, but he recalls suddenly coming up with the concept for the new study one morning after coffee. “It came to me at about 9:30 a.m. and by 11:30 a.m. I had the first draft of the manuscript done,” Wood said.

In the new study, Wood and Hyndman analyzed groundwater depletion and groundwater carbon chemistry data from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to calculate how much carbon dioxide is likely transferred from groundwater to the atmosphere each year.

USGS scientists estimate that the United States annually depletes 25 square kilometers (9.7 square miles) of groundwater, which contains roughly 2.4 million metric tons (5.2 billion pounds) of bicarbonate. Wood and Hyndman then conservatively assumed that half of the released bicarbonate is converted to atmospheric carbon dioxide.

From this information, Hyndman and Wood estimated the U.S. releases approximately 1.7 million metric tons (3.8 billion pounds) of carbon dioxide a year into the atmosphere from groundwater depletion. This is more than the amount of carbon dioxide produced by the generation of electricity used to power 250,000 households in the United States each year.

Scientists know less about groundwater depletion on a global scale, but Wood and Hyndman predict groundwater depletion releases 9.7 to 13.5 million metric tons (21.4 to 29.8 billion pounds) of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere each year globally.

“This linkage between subsurface water and the atmosphere is a very creative and original synthesis. I’m not aware of anyone who has even suggested this in the past,” said Lenny Konikow, a scientist emeritus at the U.S. Geological Survey who was not involved with the study.

The researchers note that this study is still just a preliminary step, but they hope their study will provoke in-depth research on the role of carbon dioxide from groundwater depletion.

“If we can understand how humans are having an effect, hopefully we can take that next step and try to mitigate some of these effects,” said Hyndman.

###

The paper: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2017EF000586/abstract

Ok, let’s put the numbers in perspective.

The study says groundwater depletion produces 1.7 million metric tons of CO2 in the USA every year. Sounds huge, right?

The EPA says that 6,587 million metric tons of CO2 were released in the USA from all sources in 2015.

That’s 0.0258 % of the total CO2 releases for the USA in 2015. That’s also likely below the measurement error band for the EPA data, making it insignificant.

Color me unconcerned.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
69 Comments
November 16, 2017 4:07 pm

Claim: groundwater depletion releases ‘significant’ carbon dioxide

Significant?
Significant to what?
Most of the water plants in the US (not sure about the rest of the world) are ground water plants.
The “War on Coal” wasn’t enough (an is loosing traction) so they open a “War on Water”?

PS Are they going to shut down Perrier? (Probably not. Too close to Paris.)

Non Nomen
Reply to  Gunga Din
November 16, 2017 11:40 pm

The “EU” intends to ban CO2 from Champagne, sparkling wines and other beverages for the sake of Gaia?

Reply to  Gunga Din
November 17, 2017 2:40 pm

Just to be clear.
When I said, “Most of the water plants in the US (not sure about the rest of the world) are ground water plants.”, I did not mean that most of the US population gets it’s water from ground water plants.
Most water plants in the US are ground water plants but the populations they serve are small.

Michael Jankowski
November 16, 2017 4:08 pm

“…Wood and Hyndman then conservatively assumed that half of the released bicarbonate is converted to atmospheric carbon dioxide…”

How about some actual data instead of a magical “50%” and claiming it is “conservative?”

November 16, 2017 6:00 pm

Don’t breathe.

Don’t drink.

Don’t have babies.

BUT FOR GOD’S SAKE, BUY BITCOIN !!!

Joey
November 16, 2017 6:46 pm

Isn’t it strange that everything connected to “climate change” is negative? I think that is the hallmark of propaganda.

Ellen
November 16, 2017 7:15 pm

Groundwater depletion is a bad idea, and New Orleans is the poster child. The CO2 is just another way for the warmists to say “anthropogenic”.

john harmsworth
Reply to  Ellen
November 17, 2017 7:21 am

It depends completely where the depletion is, what the recharge is likely to be and what use the water is put to. The water’s content of CO2 is a meaningless detail.

Steve Oregon
November 16, 2017 7:46 pm

“Humans may be…..”

The the absence of drought lessens the worry about depletion.
comment image?itok=_YETDLxz&hash=1442b093

JBom
November 16, 2017 8:18 pm

Just in from the Greatest Most Significant Human Being Ever Born Christine McEntee of the Gad Awful AGU. “Shitting In Water Causes Great Increase of CO2 And Is Irreversible!”

Oh! Well then.

Karl Baumgarten
November 16, 2017 8:50 pm

Groundwater recharge just puts it all back in the ground.

Non Nomen
November 16, 2017 11:36 pm

Just one of many attempts to come to fabricate pretences for taxing water heavily.

paqyfelyc
November 17, 2017 2:41 am

Well, at least this dumbo allowed a couple good jokes, including

BallBounces
Any society that doesn’t promise to be water-free by 2050 is anti-science.

tadchem
OMG! Perrier is killing the planet!

And really, this is all this stuff deserves. Ridicule.

michael hart
November 17, 2017 7:25 am

Rain falling from the sky contains the same amount of carbon dioxide as is present in the atmosphere.

Not necessarily. The statement is probably wrong for both kinetic and thermodynamic reasons. The interconversion of carbonate and CO2 is far slower than a diffusion-controlled chemical reaction. This is why all of creation uses carbonic anhydrase to speed up the reaction ~10,000,000 fold.

And what I defy any person to show me, is the solubility of CO2 in supercooled water particles in clouds at, say, -30 Celsius. Yes, that is way below the freezing point of water, and the solubility of CO2 starts rising hugely as the temperature approaches zero degrees. It probably means that rainfall scrubs CO2 from the atmosphere more efficiently than the models assume, if they treat the matter at all.

Oakwood
November 17, 2017 8:08 am

I just saw this posted on LinkedIn. As I work in the environmental sector, many of my contacts are also in that field. Too many of them are communicators and ‘thought leaders’ rather than doers. Many post up any climate change doom story they come across. As long as the headline says ‘CC is worse than we thought’, it fits the bill. They think they are so clever for keeping up with the news! I really have to grit my teeth to not post a reply. In my sector, if I don’t keen stum with my real thoughts on CC alarmism, it would damage my work prospects.

getitright
November 17, 2017 12:01 pm

“It’s not going to change the way we think about global climate change….”
He said while attempting to change the way we think about climate change.
Fortunately for me, to no avail.

November 17, 2017 2:17 pm

so tired of published studies with no conclusions. pan handling “science”.

Every single flipping “muh CO2” paper has no conclusions, just mights and maybes

Junk science, science is in crisis, too many hacks in all fiellds

Reply to  Mark - Helsinki
November 17, 2017 3:02 pm

Maybe a bit too strong.
Lot’s of scientist, theologians, engineers, etc. get something wrong. Honestly.
What makes them a “hack” is selling out to the big $green$ carrot. (Or selling out to ideology. “The end justifies the means.” kind of stuff.)
But, yes, there are too many hacks in all fields. Some in those fields are just victims of the “hackers”.
Be skeptical. Return to the source.
(As far as a theologian goes,
Acts 17:11 These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.
Not a bad approach whatever field you are in.)

November 17, 2017 9:04 pm

IIRC, a research project on the other side of the world a couple of years ago came to the opposite conclusion; Ground water use took a large amount of CO2 from the atmosphere.

Michael Darby
November 18, 2017 4:02 am

The more carbon dioxide the better. Every little bit helps