Beauty and the Beasts – Hurricanes #Katia #Irma and #Jose in one spectacular image

It is not often that you get to see two Atlantic and one Gulf of Mexico hurricanes all at once on a single satellite image, but we live in “interesting times” and the remarkable imagery from the new GOES-16 spacecraft continues to impress the world.

Hurricane expert Dr. Philip Klotzbach says:

Currently have 3 hurricanes w/ 2 major hurricanes in Atlantic – 4th time on record we’ve had 3 hurricanes w/ 2 majors at same time. Other three years w/ 3 hurricanes & 2 major hurricanes in Atlantic were 1893, 1961 and 2010.

Here, I’ve taken several snips and made a hi-res composite image to show a half-disk view of the Western Hemisphere as seen by visible light by GOES-16. Dr. Roy Spencer commented on Facebook today that

“[the] current view from space is beautiful….”.

On that I agree, it’s also Nature’s deadliness on display. Like the famous “blue marble” image from 1968, this image too is a bit humbling, and a reminder that no matter how much we want to believe we can control weather/climate through our actions and lifestyle, Nature, when it so chooses, can squish us like a bug.

Click image for the hi-resolution version.

If there is any interest, I’ll make a poster available for sale in super-high-resolution, 20×30″

0 0 vote
Article Rating
43 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sixto
September 7, 2017 2:02 pm

Too bad there weren’t satellites in 1893 to catch an image of four Atlantic hurricanes at once.

Editor
Reply to  Sixto
September 7, 2017 2:10 pm

Yes, times were very interesting then as well!

Gloateus
Reply to  Sixto
September 7, 2017 3:23 pm

Five hurricanes formed then during eight days in August, the 13th to 20th. Four were active on August 22.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1893_Atlantic_hurricane_season#Hurricane_One
Three of those five were Cat 3, including that which hit New York.

David A
Reply to  Gloateus
September 7, 2017 5:08 pm

We have no idea what they were at their peak right?

Gloateus
Reply to  Gloateus
September 7, 2017 6:03 pm

We have an idea. Maybe some of their peaks were Cat 4, but probably not.

Gloateus
Reply to  Gloateus
September 7, 2017 6:11 pm

Hurricane Number Ten that year in September and October was however rated a Cat 4.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Category_4_Atlantic_hurricanes#1851.E2.80.931900

Reply to  Sixto
September 7, 2017 4:44 pm

Progress.

Stephen Richards
Reply to  Sixto
September 8, 2017 12:39 am

2005

USexpat
Reply to  Sixto
September 8, 2017 3:41 pm

How can you possibly believe there were that many back before AGW? Absurd. We all know that these modern events are completely unprecedented.

ren
September 7, 2017 2:19 pm

Here you can trace Irma. The jet stream in the southeastern US is weakening.
http://www.weatherplaza.com/en-US/sat/?region=southeast.ir

Richard Keen
September 7, 2017 2:21 pm

Also interesting is the smoke oner the NW USA, heading into Colorado (it’s been really smoky here the past week), and the dust storm from Africa chasing the heels of Jose.

Dinsdale
Reply to  Richard Keen
September 7, 2017 3:12 pm

Its been smoky in Colorado and other nearby states for awhile – not that the MSM knows about it since it doesn’t affect a coast…

September 7, 2017 2:26 pm

According to NOAA the top of the atmosphere is 100 km. I disagree. 99% of the atmospheric molecules are below 32 km. Below that distance normal conductive, convective, latent hot/cold/heat/energy apply. Above 32 km it’s all radiative and S-B totally applies.
Be that as it may – a meter is 3.28 feet. A km is 3,280 feet. A mile is 5,280 feet. A km is 0.62 miles. 100 km is 62 miles.
The distance from Colorado Springs to Denver is 68 miles. I drive it a lot. Picture that in your mind’s eye. I could shoot my Viper up through it in under 20 minutes. (Just kidding, don’t have a Viper.)
On a 12” diameter model globe, the model atmosphere at 100 km would be 0.094”, 3/32nd, thick.
All of this powerful weather energy take place in an atmospheric layer that is ludicrous thin.
*********
The genesis of the RGHE theory is an incorrect notion that the atmosphere/albedo warms the surface like a greenhouse (and surface is NOT the ground). Explaining the physical mechanism behind this erroneous notion/theory demands some truly contorted physics, thermodynamics and heat transfer, i.e. energy out of nowhere, cold to hot w/o work, perpetual motion, etc.
Is space cold or hot? There are no molecules in space so our common definitions of hot/cold/heat/energy don’t apply.
The equilibrium temperatures of objects in space, e.g. the earth, moon, space station, mars, Venus, etc. are determined by the solar radiation flowing past them. In the case of the earth, the solar irradiance of 1,368 W/m^2 has a Stefan Boltzmann black body equilibrium temperature of 394 K, 121 C, 250 F. That’s hot. Sort of.
But an object’s albedo reflects away some of that energy and reduces that temperature much like that shiny panel placed in the car’s windshield.
The earth’s albedo, which only exists because of the atmosphere, reflects away about 30% of the sun’s 1,368 W/m^2 energy leaving 958 W/m^2 to “warm” the earth. At an S-B BB equilibrium temperature of 361 K, that’s 33 C (394 – 361) cooler than the earth with no atmosphere/albedo.
The earth’s albedo/atmosphere doesn’t warm the earth, it cools the earth.

Reply to  nickreality65
September 7, 2017 4:52 pm

I could shoot my Viper up through it in under 20 minutes. (Just kidding, don’t have a Viper.)

Well just darn! Go get yourself one you lay about good for nothin’ spunk ball! 🙂
Or maybe not. Who can really tell? You might be someone everybody moves away from at the bar but maybe not?

Wight Mann
Reply to  nickreality65
September 7, 2017 4:54 pm

If on a 12 inch globe the atmosphere is only 1/32 of an inch that could mean one of two things…either the atmosphere is really thin…or people just don’t have any concept of how really big the Earth is. I favor the latter.

Reply to  nickreality65
September 7, 2017 5:33 pm

There is a basic physics problem in this post. The notion of temperature is related by Boltzmann’s statistical mechanics to vibrational average molecular energy in bulk classic physics. True. But it is also imputable to the equivalent wavelengths of electromagnetic quanta, aka photons. Shorter wavelengths of higher frequency have higher equivalent energy. So ignoringbthe equivalence is beyond problematic.

Myron Mesecke
September 7, 2017 2:39 pm

At least they are all spinning in the right direction.
(Reference Al Gore)

Steve Fraser
September 7, 2017 3:05 pm

Fabulous composite pic. I’d be very interested to see if the Hurricanes leave SST ‘Wakes’ after they pass.

Crispin in Waterloo but really in Ulaanbaatar
Reply to  Steve Fraser
September 8, 2017 2:19 am

They do. Significant cooling is in the trail of any hurricane. Thermographs were posted on WUWT some time ago.

nn
September 7, 2017 3:12 pm

Not to be pedantic, but Katia and Irma are feminine names, and Jose is quintessentially masculine. So, it is beauties and the beast.

Reply to  nn
September 7, 2017 5:07 pm

The difference between herricanes and himmicanes is small.

Crispin in Waterloo but really in Ulaanbaatar
Reply to  ristvan
September 8, 2017 2:26 am

Invoking German, if could be Herricanes and Hericanes, instead of the androgenous Hurricane.

September 7, 2017 3:21 pm

Man, I never thought the state boundaries would show up so good from space. Who are the unsung heroes who draw those lines? Never seen anyone doing it.

ReallySkeptical
Reply to  Joel Hammer
September 7, 2017 3:24 pm

They use cloud liners.

Reply to  ReallySkeptical
September 7, 2017 4:48 pm

Sky pencils.

DaveK
Reply to  ReallySkeptical
September 7, 2017 4:52 pm

Nah! It’s the Chemtrails… They run special flights just to make sure the borders are visible to the satellites!

michael hart
September 7, 2017 3:33 pm

Do my eyes deceive me, or does the scaling on that photograph seem unusually generous towards the area of the USA?

john
September 7, 2017 4:40 pm

Might be a fine night to stay up between 11 pm and 1 am or so. Look skyward to the north,
Space Weather Message Code: WARK07
Serial Number: 70
Issue Time: 2017 Sep 07 2257 UTC
WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 7 or greater expected
Valid From: 2017 Sep 07 2300 UTC
Valid To: 2017 Sep 08 0600 UTC
Warning Condition: Onset
NOAA Scale: G3 or greater – Strong to Extreme
NOAA Space Weather Scale descriptions can be found at
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation
Potential Impacts: Area of impact primarily poleward of 50 degrees Geomagnetic Latitude.
Induced Currents – Power system voltage irregularities possible, false alarms may be triggered on some protection devices.
Spacecraft – Systems may experience surface charging; increased drag on low Earth-orbit satellites and orientation problems may occur.
Navigation – Intermittent satellite navigation (GPS) problems, including loss-of-lock and increased range error may occur.
Radio – HF (high frequency) radio may be intermittent.
Aurora – Aurora may be seen as low as Pennsylvania to Iowa to Oregon.

john
Reply to  john
September 7, 2017 5:46 pm

Space Weather Message Code: ALTK08
Serial Number: 23
Issue Time: 2017 Sep 07 2350 UTC
ALERT: Geomagnetic K-index of 8
Threshold Reached: 2017 Sep 07 2350 UTC
Synoptic Period: 2100-2400 UTC
Active Warning: Yes
NOAA Scale: G4 – Severe
NOAA Space Weather Scale descriptions can be found at
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation
Potential Impacts: Area of impact primarily poleward of 45 degrees Geomagnetic Latitude.
Induced Currents – Possible widespread voltage control problems and some protective systems may mistakenly trip out key assets from the power grid. Induced pipeline currents intensify.
Spacecraft – Systems may experience surface charging; increased drag on low earth orbit satellites, and tracking and orientation problems may occur.
Navigation – Satellite navigation (GPS) degraded or inoperable for hours.
Radio – HF (high frequency) radio propagation sporadic or blacked out.
Aurora – Aurora may be seen as low as Alabama and northern California.

September 7, 2017 4:43 pm

Whattttttt??? This has happened before? But…but, but…:)

Gunga Din
Reply to  Aphan
September 7, 2017 4:59 pm

Back then then it wasn’t Man that caused it. It was Woman.
(Ducking back into my foxhole.)

Jones
Reply to  Gunga Din
September 7, 2017 5:50 pm

This seems….apposite….

richard verney
Reply to  Gunga Din
September 8, 2017 2:11 am

A classic.
Even though clearly a satire, I wonder whether, in these PC times we now live through, such a joke could even be done today. Snowflakes are so sensitive, and it is bound to be offensive to someone’s safe space..

Jones
Reply to  Gunga Din
September 8, 2017 3:07 am

Richard,
Quite.

September 7, 2017 5:16 pm

Yes, Nature can squish us like a bug, but the global warming/climate change crowd refuses to believe it. Maybe instead of “skeptics” battling them, psychologists should step in to deal with them.

Jones
Reply to  gloccamorra
September 7, 2017 5:52 pm

“psychologists should step in to deal with them.”
Here you go.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephan_Lewandowsky

Bill Illis
September 7, 2017 5:34 pm

Irma has taken a dip southward now and the eye-wall will miss the Turks and Caicos Islands which couldn’t afford to take a direct hit. The islands in the current path and in the forecast path are mostly uninhabited. As we have seen with this hurricane that the eye-wall is where the real damage is occurring. Outside of that, it is not so bad.
That means Miami is the next target on the forecast track as a strong Cat5 on Sunday morning. That will be a very bad day.comment image

Leo Smith
September 7, 2017 8:38 pm

Hurricanes are like buses: you wait for years and then three come along all at once…

richard verney
Reply to  Leo Smith
September 8, 2017 2:14 am

comment image

September 8, 2017 1:05 am

It should be interesting to see how wet we get in the UK from the eventual effects of these hurricanes as they cross the Atlantic. They won’t of course have the same force, but it looks like we’ll get a few weeks of miserable rain in Wales. ( no change there then )

richard verney
September 8, 2017 2:05 am

It would be interesting to review the before and after SST for the region to assess how much energy was hoovered up.

Matt
September 8, 2017 7:50 am

I hate to ask this, but could you do a version without the added text and state lines?

%d bloggers like this: