Hurricane expert: '#Irma should reach 200 mph winds'

Hurricane expert Dr. Ryan Maue says today:

Eye continues to warm now +20°C … if convection flares or clouds cool (more pink) then Hurricane should reach 200 mph.

190 mph is the record in the Atlantic, for Hurricane Allen in 1980:

Allen is the only hurricane in the recorded history of the Atlantic basin to achieve sustained winds of 190 mph (305 km/h),[nb 1] thus making it the strongest Atlantic hurricane by wind speed. Until Hurricane Patricia in 2015, this was also the highest sustained winds in the entire Western Hemisphere.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
164 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Halla
September 5, 2017 12:59 pm

Looks to be nasty.

Barbara
Reply to  Tom Halla
September 5, 2017 2:05 pm

Looks like a one-eyed monster !

Reply to  Barbara
September 5, 2017 3:34 pm

Here is a great 4.5 minute view of Irma as seen from the ISS. …https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EN1h89FYdvQ

BallBounces
September 5, 2017 1:03 pm

Al Gore released his movie a couple of months too soon.

afonzarelli
Reply to  BallBounces
September 5, 2017 1:09 pm

(“sore loserman” does have a knack, doesn’t he?)

September 5, 2017 1:04 pm

that should be Cat 7 ?

Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 1:44 pm

Turn it up to 11…
(I sincerely hope it doesn’t.) Been advising relatives who were due to start a cruise from Ft Lauderdale to Puerto Rico this weekend.

Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 2:52 pm

Vuk, the Saffir-Simpson scale was developed by US meteorologist Saffir in the 1960s based on ‘eyewall’ sustained 1 minute windspeed, then refined by US engineer Simpson in the 1970’s for 10 meter height (essentially three stories tall, the ~roofridge of most two story homes. The ratings are based on likely structural damage to ‘ordinary’ structures (think stick built homes) struck by the eye. A Cat 5 destroys these structures completely (google image Hurricane Andrew Homestead Florida damage for vivid examples). Hence there is no meaningful S-S Cat 6 except for scary PR purposes, no different than there is any tornado rated stronger than an Enhanced Fujita scale EF5 for the same reason. There is no meaningful damge number beyond total destruction.
For what its worth, if a cat 1 is 1x wind energy, a Cat 2 is 10x, a Cat 3 is 50x, a Cat 4 is 250x, and a Cat 5 is >500x. Hence my Wilma Cat 3 survived/derived evacuation rule of thumb: cat 2 we stay as the building is designed for minimum Cat 5 (post Andrew building codes). Cat 3 up, we are outa here.

Reply to  ristvan
September 5, 2017 3:22 pm

thanks Rud
makes sense when plotted,
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/HCat.gif

Reply to  ristvan
September 5, 2017 6:20 pm

I guess you could add categories like “removed 12″ of topsoil.”

James Loux
Reply to  ristvan
September 5, 2017 7:02 pm

Worse than the wind, the storm surge from a Cat 5 hurricane will take away 12” of topsoil along with everything that was above it or in it. When Cat 5 Hurricane Iniki hit the south shore of Kauai in 1992, 3 blocks of housing in Poipu totally disappeared, along with hotel swimming pools. We survived in a frame home in a housing area up on a hill, but the first block of houses were blown entirely apart, crashing their debris into the second block of houses, knocking them all to the ground. Fortunately for us, we were in the fifth block of houses. On an island there is no where to run. Pray for the folks in the path of Irma.

Robert B
Reply to  ristvan
September 5, 2017 9:07 pm

http://www.warwickhughes.com/blog/?p=811
Our Cat 5 storms are less intense but the damage done to towns that were hit by it were a lot less than what a Cat 4 could do in the 70s. I came across one example from a Cat 4 rated cyclone nearly 100 years ago that pulled up electricity poles out of the ground and threw them some distance, and this happened a few 100 kms inland. Lets hope that this is just an exaggeration so that “unprecedented” can be trotted out again.

September 5, 2017 1:14 pm

Steve Goddard‏ @SteveSGoddard 3h3 hours ago
Three of the ten deadliest Atlantic hurricanes occurred during the Revolutionary War. https://twitter.com/SteveSGoddard/status/905112205493911552

Sixto
September 5, 2017 1:15 pm

But will she strip bark off trees, like the Great Hurricane of 1780?

RWturner
September 5, 2017 1:16 pm

Are these measured or modeled wind speeds?

David A
Reply to  RWturner
September 5, 2017 1:24 pm

Measured at altitude, modeled to surface.

deebodk
Reply to  David A
September 5, 2017 2:01 pm

Wind speeds at altitude are irrelevant. Ground wind speeds are what does the damage. Ground wind speeds are what’s actually experienced by people and infrastructure on the ground. Hurricanes need to be rated based on measured wind speeds on the ground, not on modeled figures or readings at altitude.

Chad Irby
Reply to  David A
September 5, 2017 2:09 pm

The problem is that 200 MPH wind speeds are hard to measure, since the wind and debris tends to to awful things to standard weather equipment. And buildings.

deebodk
Reply to  David A
September 5, 2017 2:24 pm

Then we need to work on creating more robust measuring equipment to get accurate ground-level readings instead of relying on guesses or altitude measurements that don’t reflect what’s actually happening at the surface.

Rhoda R
Reply to  David A
September 5, 2017 2:38 pm

I think it’s a fair given that ground speeds will be much higher for a hurricane that’s got altitude wind speeds of 200 MPH than a hurricane whose altitude wind speed is 120 MPH. At a guess. This is a nasty storm and splitting hairs over whether it’s a Cat 5, 6 or 7 isn’t going to change that in the least.

Reply to  David A
September 5, 2017 2:46 pm

deebodk, there is one, it is ‘venturi tube meter’ (google it)

Reply to  David A
September 5, 2017 3:02 pm

Debodk, sort of true but very difficult. Don’t be too skeptical. The S-S definition is intentionally sustained winds just outside the eyewall, which is sometimes just 10 miles across. So a narrow measurement target. By the physics law of conservation of momentum, most hurricane measurements will be a significantly lesser windspeed. Your issue is actually with the S-S definition, not the Hurricane Hunter actual measurements and model extrapolations down to the surface. See also my comments upthread for more info.
WUWT is a great place to learn stuff you can then verify elsewhere. My late father commanded the 409th Typhoon Chasers off Guam 1948-1950 after getting military sponsored dual masters degrees in meteorology and electronics (early weather radar). I learned stuff at the kitchen table from him. Just passing some along.

Reply to  David A
September 5, 2017 4:01 pm

deebok is the kind of person who would demand you use a rule to measure the distance to the moon

Robert B
Reply to  David A
September 5, 2017 9:13 pm

“deebok is the kind of person who would demand you use a rule to measure the distance to the moon”
No. Like me, he/she wants people to be upfront when they compare modern “man-made” events with historical events. I’ve already heard that two Cat 4’s hitting the US is unprecedented but its very unlikely that if Harvey happened 100 years ago that it would be written down as greater than Cat 3.

Robert B
Reply to  David A
September 5, 2017 9:30 pm

And a quick check and two Cat 4’s did hit the US in 1915.

Gerry Parker
Reply to  RWturner
September 5, 2017 2:16 pm

My buddy at NASA tells me they are using satellites to measure multi-path radio signals which can be correlated to wave height (which they can then convert to wind-speed?). This second statement is subject to my not always reliable memory.
But I believe this is correct.
I’m sure the wave height part is correct, it’s the converting to wind-speed that may be subject to recall error…
My wife would caution you at length about my memory.
I can say it in a completely convincing way, though. If that will help.

Phil
Reply to  Gerry Parker
September 5, 2017 2:50 pm

From NOAA’s Our Mission Dynamics:

The Stepped Frequency Microwave Radiometer (SMRF) is a promising tool for direct measurement of surface winds. This instrument has flown aboard research aircraft for more than 20 years and has finally matured enough to transition to operations. It works by sensing the increase in apparent microwave brightness temperature of the water surface caused by more foam as the wind increases. Because rain in the air column between the airplane and the surface also produces a frequency-dependant contribution to the upwelling microwave radiation, the radiometer needs to look at several different frequencies to correct for the precipitation effect and to deduce rainfall rate as a byproduct.

Reference: Verification of Remotely Sensed Sea Surface Winds in Hurricanes, Uhlhorn and Black, 2003

jim hogg
Reply to  Gerry Parker
September 5, 2017 5:38 pm

Wave height also depends very significantly on “fetch”, and to a very slight extent on water temperature. . .

David A
Reply to  Gerry Parker
September 6, 2017 4:16 am

Yes, fetch, and the harmonics of the swell that fetch us flowing into.

September 5, 2017 1:16 pm

Impressive and scary for those in its path of the coming storm.

Rhoda R
Reply to  Sunsettommy
September 5, 2017 2:39 pm

Yes. The Florida Peninsula is in for a drubbing regardless of the track this monster takes.

September 5, 2017 1:19 pm
Greg
Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 2:01 pm

wow, that second image is impressive. You can really feel the raw power ripping down the eye wall. Glad it’s heading away from me.

Reply to  Greg
September 5, 2017 6:26 pm

Wouldn’t that be up the eyewall? I thought the eye was where the column of rising air was, and the air spiraled in at the bottom and then up and out the top.

Greg
Reply to  Greg
September 5, 2017 11:50 pm

I can’t see clear air on a photo, can you? I was commenting on what I can see.

MarkW
Reply to  Greg
September 6, 2017 6:42 am

James, you got that reversed, air is sinking in the eye, that’s why it’s clear.

richard verney
September 5, 2017 1:24 pm

It does look that it is shaping up to be a big one.
All the best to those caught in the path.

Reply to  richard verney
September 5, 2017 1:30 pm

Don’t hear much from our two Florida men, Rud Istvan and Tom in Fl.
Hope they are busy preparing for the emergency.
Best of luck gentlemen.

hunter
Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 1:35 pm

Yes, best wishes tovtheir plans ascwell as to their outcomes. May they and their families be safe, and their property secure.

Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 1:59 pm

Laid in supplies today. Water and bread shelves at Publix were already stripped bare. No matter to us, our go bag has a case plus 5 days of freeze dried meals and a small camping stove and cookware. If we stay and are in the path, we fill all the large kithen pots for drinking plus the guest bedroom bathtub for flushing. Gas the cars tomorrow. Make decision on stay/go Thursday night or Friday morning after the cone of uncertainty narrows. We stay if we will experience Cat 2 or less. So far, not even taking the precaution of bringing in balcony stuff, always a pain physically and because clutters the condo inconveniently. No need to do so if less than TS winds expected. The building management will make that call probably Thursday for Friday.
Each successive ensemble has the track a bit more west before turning north. CFAN (Judy Curry’s company) has the adjusted track even a bit west of ECMWF, which has a better track record than GFS. So if that holds, we may experience nothing at all except rain from outermost bands. But Naples, Sarasota, Fort Meyers, Tampa look to be in real trouble on Irma’s dirty side if CFAN is correct. Current CFAN track has Irma then recurving and hitting Orlando as a Cat 1-2 then Daytona Beach as a 1. CFAN called Harvey perfectly.
Keys are going to get clobbered with high certainty. Mandatory evacuation starting 7 am for tourists and 7pm for residents tomorrow with schools closed from tomorrow until further noice. They have to move 80000 people up US 1 (only way out), always a mess. Miami (65 miles south of Ft Lauderdale) will likely have at least TS conditions given Irma’s size. The mayor is already urging people to evacuate known flood prone areas starting Thursday.

Greg
Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 2:07 pm

Now if Trump wants to get one up on Pootun , he’d better get down to Mar-a-Logo and get ready to stand out in the rain ( without an umbrella ) !!

Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 2:08 pm

Rud, thanks for the update.
Good luck and keep safe.
p.s. my relatives with new Fort L. condo (first floor) are in Canada.

Gloateus
Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 2:11 pm

Rud,
Good luck to all. Maybe she’ll keep going west, skirting south FL, without turning. Right now the European model seems to show that, contrary to all others.
Where are you exactly? Sorry I don’t know.

Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 2:20 pm

Gloateus
Rud might be off line for a while, he is in Fort Lauderdale

Gloateus
Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 2:25 pm

Vuc,
Thanks. He just posted.
Irma is still days away from Florida. although tropical storm conditions of course will arrive sooner. If the US be lucky, that might be all we get.

Tom in Florida
Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 2:46 pm

Hi Vuk,
I am on the west coast, Venice to be exact, about 1 mile to the Gulf as the crow flies. As I already had my hurricane kit stocked in general I spent yesterday and this morning checking and adding anything I needed. The final prep will be to start adding additional water supplies and to make sure I have cash on hand, probably Thurs. Sat will put everything not tied down inside. Hurricane shutters will wait until Sun as late as possible, only takes about an hour. I am going on the assumption that the ECMWF model will prevail and that there is a very good possibility of a major hit to this area. My prep is focused on living for two weeks without electricity.
Rud is correct, stores are already bare but the big box stores have hurricane plans in operation and we expect there to be constant resupply through Sat. I will be staying home unless the eye wall with winds of over 130 mph are expected to make a direct hit on me. If that looks probable then it is off to the shelter.
Funny thing about Venice, it has never taken a direct hit from a hurricane. We are a little higher in elevation than surrounding areas, we are bordered on the south by a very warm Charlotte Harbor and to the north by a very warm Tampa Bay. Plus, this is an ancient Indian burial ground and supposedly protected by their spirits. Looking back at history, perhaps there is something to that after all.

Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 2:57 pm

Thanks Tom,
let’s hope that Venice is lucky again, but take good care.
all the best.
p.s. post hurricane : ‘Florida real estate with a great potential’

Latitude
Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 2:57 pm

two Florida men….
..and where exactly do you think I am?….I’m latitude 25….ground zero

Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 3:38 pm

Florida Keys Wild Bird Rehabilitation Center
Only joking. Evacuate and take good care of yourself.
Record some of your experience and other stuff just in case it happens to be greatest on the record.

Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 3:51 pm

Latitude, I empathise. Now, if we knew your longitude, We could have a lot more empathy. My latitude puts me in clear danger, my longitude likely doesn’t based on CFAN and ECMWF.

Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 4:48 pm

It’s pretty crazy up here in the panhandle. People are really panicking. My wife witnessed altercations today over fuel and water. Very sad, but people are easily scared by images.

Latitude
Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 4:50 pm

Rud, it’s the only place latitude 25 crosses this country…vuk got it….I’m right south of the Wild Bird Center…bayside

Latitude
Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 4:59 pm

Now the models have clustered up the east coast again…..comment image

Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 5:53 pm

Lat, got your coordinates now. Got lazy on google. You are now bookmarked Nd nevermore forgotten. Good luck with Irma. i think I have better luck than you or Tom. Joss, maybe wrong.

Latitude
Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 6:01 pm

Rud, read what I quoted from Masters, posted down some…
…we’ll see by Sat afternoon…it if crashes into Moron like the NHC has it….or not

Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 6:32 pm

Greg September 5, 2017 at 2:07 pm
Now if Trump wants to get one up on Pootun , he’d better get down to Mar-a-Logo and get ready to stand out in the rain ( without an umbrella ) !!

This just gave me a mental image of Trump, standing out in the wind and rain a la The Weather Channel, shaking his fist at the storm and shouting “Is that all you got?!”
Or maybe just Tweeting: “#hurricane_irma Is that all you got? Sad.”

Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 6:40 pm

Hey, Latitude, I did not know you were in the Irma targeted Florida Keyes. So here is a sincere WUWT offer. You evacuate close to Miami (mandatory) we will come pick you up to shelter in our cat 5 building. You get the guest bedroom, and we rearrange the balcony furniture to suit. AW has my private coordinates.
Just laid in plenty of food supplies. If We have to evac our ocean above level in Ft. Lauderdale, you have a free fuel, food, and home ride to our Georgia cabin and back. Least we can do. CtM and AW know how to reach us. Offer is very sincere. And remains open for days. Least we can do.

Reply to  vukcevic
September 5, 2017 8:12 pm

All the stores pretty much picked over here in Merritt Island too.
If this storm pulls a Donna and cuts across the state there wont be much point in going anywhere. Guess I will put up the shutters and wait,

Latitude
Reply to  vukcevic
September 6, 2017 5:07 am

Rud…..thank you! We’re waiting and watching…this morning it looks like a trip to Georgia! NHC is the outlier, all the models have it going up the coast…..but of course, NHC has me zeroed in again

Reply to  richard verney
September 5, 2017 4:30 pm

Interesting when you combine Harvey and Irma you get Harma.
Harma

dam1953
September 5, 2017 1:26 pm

I see no mention of Camille (1969). It is listed as having peak wind speeds of 175 mph*. The “*” indicates that the true wine speed will never be know because the storm “destroyed all wind-recording instruments across coastal Mississippi.”

hunter
Reply to  dam1953
September 5, 2017 1:34 pm

Keesler AFB, a credible source of westher data, recorded 200 mph on shore before the anemometer broke.

Eustace Cranch
Reply to  dam1953
September 5, 2017 1:44 pm

Camille was a Gulf hurricane, not an Atlantic hurricane.

Gloateus
Reply to  Eustace Cranch
September 5, 2017 1:51 pm

Gulf Hurricanes are considered North Atlantic hurricanes.
Camille in particular formed off the west coast of Africa and passed through the Caribbean before hitting the US. However, she didn’t reach hurricane force until leaving Jamaica.

Ron
Reply to  dam1953
September 6, 2017 12:47 am

Irma has recorded sustained speeds of 185 mph that is 10 mph greater than Camille. We do not know what the maximum sustained speeds of IRMA , anyone can speculate that it is 220 mph when no one was recording.

David A
Reply to  Ron
September 6, 2017 4:21 am

We will see the recorded ground speeds. Hopefully less the Camille.

bw
Reply to  Ron
September 6, 2017 6:54 am

Irma eyewall passed over NDBC station BARA9 with 102 knots sustained winds. That is Category 3.

Gareth Phillips
September 5, 2017 1:29 pm

The BBC is reporting a comment which states that The National Hurricane Centre in the US has named it the most powerful hurricane in the Atlantic basin ever recorded.

Editor
Reply to  Gareth Phillips
September 5, 2017 2:10 pm

The BBC say:
Irma now has sustained winds of 290km/h (180mph), making it the most powerful the Atlantic has seen in over a decade
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-41156051
Slight difference!

Ron
Reply to  Paul Homewood
September 5, 2017 5:30 pm

CNN stated 10 minutes ago it was the most powerful ever recorded in the Atlantic. I think they excluded the Gulf and the Caribbean in that.

Ron
Reply to  Paul Homewood
September 6, 2017 12:51 am

That is strange I got the headline HURRICANE IRMA – CARRIBEAN BRACES FOR EXTREMELY DANGEROUS STORM. Having read the acticle thoroughly I could not find your quotes. I suggest that you follow CNN which stated this is the highest winds peed recorded for a hurracane in the Atlantic. My understanding is that there has been one higher recorded in the Gulf.

hunter
September 5, 2017 1:33 pm

Excuse me but is Camille just being edited from history?

Eustace Cranch
Reply to  hunter
September 5, 2017 1:44 pm

see above.

Gloateus
Reply to  Eustace Cranch
September 5, 2017 1:56 pm
Reply to  hunter
September 5, 2017 2:07 pm

No. Irma is still in the Atlantic. Camille, like Katrina, strengthened only once in the Caribbean. That is a meaningful distinction for the NHC. There are hurricanes that form in the Carribean (Harvey) and Atlantic hurricanes that enter the Carribean (Camille, Katrina), and Atlantic hurricanes that do not (cat 5 Matthew last year tracked up the eastern Florida coast remaining at least 50 miles offshore, finally weakening, whacking and flooding the Carolinas as a Cat 1.

Poor Yorek
Reply to  hunter
September 5, 2017 2:33 pm

Not from my memory! We were evacuated from base housing to Kessler AFB in the afternoon.

September 5, 2017 1:41 pm

“Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.”

Timo Soren
Reply to  Scott Frasier
September 7, 2017 7:13 am

I am a professor. My students have no connection to your quote!!!! So over thanksgiving, I am going to have to start binge watching EVERY teeanage and up movie, with IMDB’s list of quotes and then figuring out the right context to modernize my “student connecting movie quotes”
Actually It is not real hard to watch just my wife gets bored out of her mind and leaves. Time to shelve: “Here’s Johnny, the holy hand grenade, I don’t know Ms Robinson, It’s just a flesh wound, what we have here is a failure to communicate, do you concur, show me the money, there’s no crying in baseball…”
SIgh….I have a sense of things passing out of time into the ol’ bin of history and me with it.

taxed
September 5, 2017 1:41 pm

As l suggested 6 days ago, it was Irma that was the one that needed to be watched.
lt looks like it will be hitting southern Florida hard. But l think there is better news for the rest of the SE of USA. The jet stream will be tracking much further south then normal, so leading to a stronger jet stream over the area. So once this hurricane moves into north Florida and further north. There is a good chance this hurricane will weaken quickly if the eye moves inland. But its likely to dump a lot of rain in the process.

rbabcock
September 5, 2017 1:42 pm

The thing is moving very slowly in perfect conditions (for a hurricane) over 29C+ water that is warm down to depth. Should be a great case study on hurricane development and technicals. Super Typhoons in the Pacific are typically stronger than Atlantic cyclones.

J. Philip Peterson
September 5, 2017 1:52 pm

I want to see actual wind speeds at landfall, not models or wind 500 ft in altitude…

Rhoda R
Reply to  J. Philip Peterson
September 5, 2017 2:45 pm

Good. Come to Florida and see all the ground speed hurricane force winds you want. I’ve had my fill and now need some place to part the pets.

Timo Soren
Reply to  Rhoda R
September 7, 2017 7:23 am

We should erect a deep foundationed lamp post near sea level that he has a couple loops in it so you can do a Bill Paxton and Helen Hunt moment being strapped to it and get to watch the eye pass over. Just that the movie Twister probably didn’t get the physical damage to the actors correct, and the hurricane will have surge..but … @J. Philip Petersen but you would then get to actually see wind speeds. Be sure to write your SSN on your arm (and leg and other leg and other arm and torso…)

Ron
Reply to  J. Philip Peterson
September 5, 2017 5:32 pm

I suggest that you go over there with your wind measuring gadget. I suspect that you will be going in the opposite direction to the rest of the population though.

garyh845
September 5, 2017 2:02 pm

Looking like it’s a bidding war (for public attention) by some to pick the greatest wind speeds.
If it stays on the forecast track and reaches the Florida Straits, the water there is warm enough that the already “intense” storm could become much worse with wind speeds potentially reaching 225 mph, warned Kerry Emanuel, an MIT meteorology professor.
Do I hear 250 mph?

Latitude
Reply to  garyh845
September 5, 2017 2:29 pm

It will be rubbing against PR, DR/Haiti, and then Cuba…..

Don K
Reply to  garyh845
September 5, 2017 2:56 pm

The 1700AST Forecast from the NHC has it skirting the coast of Cuba Saturday afternoon — which might weaken it a bit. It’s not going to be sponging up a lot of moisture on its South side if it follows that track. But you’re right, the question of where it goes and whether it gains strength if it passes through the Florida Straits and into the Caribbean seems a real concern. If it’s going to hit somewhere on the Gulf Coast, I should think that many folks in urban areas should be thinking about evacuating. I don’t know how long it takes to evacuate large parts of Tampa or even (much smaller) Mobile. But I suspect, it takes way more than 24 hours.

Gerry Parker
Reply to  garyh845
September 5, 2017 3:19 pm

251

eyesonu
Reply to  Gerry Parker
September 5, 2017 6:02 pm

I’ll take you 251 and raise you 25.

garyh845
Reply to  Gerry Parker
September 5, 2017 7:57 pm

Ha — Great. Charlie Rose or Chris Cuomo can’t wait to get you on air.

mike
Reply to  Gerry Parker
September 6, 2017 2:54 am

By, Jupiter, I’ve heard worse…

ren
September 5, 2017 2:04 pm

Is Irma hurricane enters the Caribbean Sea?
http://files.tinypic.pl/i/00930/hj6v9tqemstj.png

Reply to  ren
September 5, 2017 2:08 pm

See comment above. Probably just barely based on best current guesses.

Greg
Reply to  ren
September 5, 2017 2:13 pm

Florida can evacuate and be fairly well prepared. Spare a thought for those living in very basic conditions in carabean islands with very little protection and nowhere to run
This bitch is about to hit them full force.

Gloateus
Reply to  Greg
September 5, 2017 2:22 pm

Good comment.

Rhoda R
Reply to  Greg
September 5, 2017 2:47 pm

Yes. I’ve always pitied the islanders hit by one of these monsters. Especially places like Haiti that have stripped all of the natural vegetation and will face flooding and landslides after the winds leave.

Ron
Reply to  Greg
September 6, 2017 12:54 am

Agreed, Many have also much less support than in the States.

mike
Reply to  Greg
September 6, 2017 2:55 am

Gitmo could solve its inventory issues…

David
September 5, 2017 2:08 pm

What I am confused on is the last pressure I saw was 923 it might be lower now. I was always taught that pressure and wind speed were closely correlated. Gilbert, Wilma, Allen, and Mitch were lower in pressure and all but Allen had lower wind speeds. Just curious

Greg
Reply to  David
September 5, 2017 2:16 pm

Hurricane dynamics are complicated. Don’t expect to get simple linear relationships that explain one variable from another one and apply across the board.

Reply to  David
September 5, 2017 2:20 pm

It also depends on the diameter of the eye wall. Smaller eye, same pressure, higher max sustained wind (supposedly measured just outside the eyewall). Larger eye, same pressure, lower sustained wind. It is just the conservation of momentum (figure skater spin) physics on a large scale.

Latitude
Reply to  ristvan
September 5, 2017 2:31 pm

Exactly..it’s has a very small eye….25-30 miles across
Rud…have you seen any wind speeds 50 miles and 70 miles away from the eye wall?

Reply to  ristvan
September 5, 2017 3:35 pm

Latitude, not yet. I think the hurricane hunters measure including with dropsondes, but NHC does not report transect results except as to extent of hurricane and TS winds from the eye. Is mostly info for their tracking models. Typhoon chaser Dad always said that if you want to know a cyclone track, you flew two complete transects, one parallel to present track and one orthogonal. Differential windspeeds on the track side will predict path. Makes perfect physics sense.
A true additional anecdote for long time WUWT commenters, just for color. He once took off from Guam as command pilot on an instrumented (dropsondes out the converted bombbay) B29 very early ‘hurricane hunter’. He barely managed the landing 24 hours later because the typhoon violence had bent his B29 tail 18 degrees out of true. Plane was scraped then and there for parts.
WW2 surplus, of no other value.

Latitude
Reply to  ristvan
September 5, 2017 3:56 pm

Right now…the NHC’s center is a hair below EYW…..we’re about 85 miles north….”if” by some miracle the NHC is right…….that’s why I’m trying to figure wind speed 50-70 miles out
…and can’t find anything on surge either…If it follows that track, south of us…it will empty the bay first

garyh845
Reply to  ristvan
September 5, 2017 4:57 pm

If I recall — and I was looking up into it at one point — Landsea told me that Gilbert’s eye at one point was a clearly defined 5 miles in diameter. When it made landfall in Cozumel (where I was) it had developed a double eye-wall – which resulted in an extremely long time period of the max sustained winds . . . what ever they were.
This account says that it was 6 miles in dia, at this juncture. http://www.cmmap.org/learn/clouds/ho.html

Latitude
Reply to  ristvan
September 5, 2017 5:32 pm

This is what Masters says….
“As of 11 am EDT Tuesday, tropical storm-force winds extended out 140 miles from the center, and hurricane-force winds extended out 35 miles from the center.”
…so it has an extremely small eye

TomL
Reply to  ristvan
September 5, 2017 10:23 pm

ristvan, you got me beat. In 1968 we took a heavy cruiser(U.S.S. Boston) through super typhoon Elaine and came out with the bow bent out by 7 degrees. During the worst we had a lot of time to think about the U.S.S. Pittsburgh and wonder if we were going to come out in two pieces like she did in WWII.

Reply to  David
September 5, 2017 2:21 pm

926mb according to the latest advisory (#27).

Timo Soren
Reply to  David
September 7, 2017 7:27 am

In general the low the pressure the stronger/powerful the storm is. You can check a wiki on find hurricanes list by Barometric mb’s.

J. Philip Peterson
September 5, 2017 2:46 pm

Time for Key West to evacuate, like they did 4 times in 2005…

Rhoda R
Reply to  J. Philip Peterson
September 5, 2017 2:48 pm

They have no choice really. Either that or stay and be blown away.

Reply to  Rhoda R
September 5, 2017 8:58 pm

You don’t want to reenact the 1935 Storm.

September 5, 2017 2:53 pm

The temperature at the top of the cloud mass is minus 70˚C.
Water Vapour Convective Cooling in its most impressive form!

ren
September 5, 2017 2:54 pm

A line of thunderstorms shows where the current pushes the jet stream.
http://en.blitzortung.org/live_lightning_maps.php?map=30

taxed
September 5, 2017 3:06 pm

Living in the UK am more used to dealing with Atlantic lows rather then hurricanes.
But with Atlantic lows the strongest winds tend to be just to the south of the “eye of the storm”.
ls that the case with hurricanes as well ?.

Reply to  taxed
September 5, 2017 3:46 pm

The fastest winds and densest water saturation is to the NNW from what I have noted, …https://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/surface/level/orthographic=-58.62,18.68,3000/loc=-59.989,17.474

Bill Illis
Reply to  taxed
September 5, 2017 3:48 pm

Both these examples depend on which way the storm as a whole is moving.
Counter-clockwise hurricane (160 mph rotation), moving north (20 mph). Combined winds, therefore, on the eastern side of the hurricane, get up to 180 mph. Western side might be only 140 mph winds.
Counter-clockwise Atlantic low (30 mph rotation), moving east (30 mph). Combined wind on the south side is 60 mph. North side might be very low.

I Came I Saw I Left
September 5, 2017 3:27 pm

I read that Branson (Virgin) is refusing to evacuate his island that’s getting ready to take a direct hit.

USexpat
Reply to  I Came I Saw I Left
September 5, 2017 3:53 pm

Him or his employees? I’m guessing he’s somewhere nice and cosy with Obama

I Came I Saw I Left
Reply to  USexpat
September 5, 2017 4:03 pm
D. J. Hawkins
Reply to  USexpat
September 5, 2017 4:19 pm

Hope his will is up to date. Just saying.

Greg
Reply to  USexpat
September 6, 2017 12:15 am

Branson is not afraid of taking person risk as well as financial risks. He made several attempts to be the first to cross the Atlantic in an air balloon.
Plenty of British adventurer spirit, not a run-away and hide money man.

Greg
Reply to  USexpat
September 6, 2017 12:20 am

Mr Branson said Hurricane Irma was a sign of the effects of climate change on the world.
He said: “The damage caused by Harvey all over Texas is a tragic and costly reminder that our climate is changing and that we are not doing enough to tackle this enormous challenge.”

More balls than brains, apparently.

mike
Reply to  USexpat
September 6, 2017 4:21 am

High ground, reinforced concrete, he could easily have a bomb shelter good for 200 knots. He’s a billionaire and could afford an apocalyptic hurricane party. Probably showing Gone with the Wind at midnight…

Nashville
September 5, 2017 4:08 pm

NOAA bouy 41041 looks to be in the path

SteveS
Reply to  Nashville
September 5, 2017 6:52 pm

Irma is far past buoy 41041….Jose is headed that way

kramer
September 5, 2017 4:09 pm

Be fantastic to seed Irma suddenly swing north, head out to open sea, and dissipate…

clipe
Reply to  kramer
September 5, 2017 4:53 pm
John M
Reply to  kramer
September 6, 2017 9:42 am

“Be fantastic to [see] Irma suddenly swing north [east]”… Fish storm
Interesting idea “seed” to collapse the eyewall when it’s out in the Atlantic. I’m completely against the idea of hacking weather systems yet isn’t a hurricane off the coast of Africa a great opportunity to test the ability to collapse a potentially deadly weather event?
Hurricanes are low pressure systems feeding on water vapor from sea surface conditions?
Starve the fever or feed the cold?
Sorry, Sharknado comment yet interesting idea.

Ack
September 5, 2017 4:36 pm

I am glad all i have to worry about is some record cold tonight and tomorrow night.

September 5, 2017 4:55 pm

I’m surprised that no one has really mentioned that Irma looked like she was an annular hurricane today, which is unusual in and of itself, but particularly interesting given the atmospheric and oceanic conditions. The white papers I’ve read hinted that annular hurricanes typically form with colder air aloft and cooler sea surface temperatures than Irma is experiencing.

David A
Reply to  NavarreAggie
September 5, 2017 7:32 pm

Thanks Navarre, not good info though…
“Annular cyclones can maintain their respective peak intensities for extended periods of time unlike their asymmetric counterparts. Following peak intensity, such systems will tend to gradually taper off. This unusual intensity persistence makes their future intensities difficult to forecast and often results in large forecast errors. In an analysis of hurricanes in the East Pacific and North Atlantic between 1995 and 1999, Knaff and Kossin observed that the National Hurricane Center underestimated the intensity of annular hurricanes 72 hours out by 18.9 kn (35.0 km, 21.7 mph).[1]”

Reply to  David A
September 6, 2017 6:25 am

That sounds like one of the papers I read. However, I’m not sure how anything I’ve said contradicts the quotation. The quotation also states that annular hurricanes ‘can’ maintain peak intensity for extended periods of time, not that they ‘will’ maintain peak intensity.

David A
Reply to  NavarreAggie
September 6, 2017 6:32 am

Sorry, by not good information I meant the possibility of it maintaining greater then expected strength. Accurate info, just not good news, to clarify.

climatereason
Editor
September 5, 2017 5:04 pm

Stay safe Rud and others in the area.
I live on the south coast of England and our current sea temperature is only 17 Degrees C. Seems unlikely that would ever feed a hurricane, so having a very moderate climate (no snow in winter and usual max around 24C in summer) does have its advantages
tonyb

Reply to  climatereason
September 5, 2017 7:08 pm

Thanks, Tonyb. We will survive even though the weathef outcomes are yet to be dermined. No matter what, we were already prepared for the worst of all possible weather scenarios. Something most here learned before hit Cat 3 Willma 2005. As we did.

I Came I Saw I Left
September 5, 2017 5:08 pm

This is pretty neat. A top-down video of the eye. If it doesn’t show here you might have to click on the link
https://twitter.com/NOAASatellitePA/status/905173786223398914

SteveS
September 5, 2017 6:44 pm

With Irma”s eye roughly 85 mi from Barbuda, NOAA station BARA9 shows wind speed 19 kts, gusts to 31.1 kts. Should be interesting to watch as Irma is projected to go right over the station

EW3
Reply to  SteveS
September 5, 2017 7:57 pm

There are a lot of people monitoring these stations. Word is getting out.
The jig may be up for NOAA.

EW3
Reply to  SteveS
September 5, 2017 8:25 pm

Something interesting about BARA9, they show wind speed at 10M and 20M.
But the picture and details show only one anemometer at 9.7M.

clipe
September 5, 2017 7:18 pm
clipe
September 5, 2017 7:24 pm
clipe
September 5, 2017 7:26 pm
2hotel9
September 5, 2017 7:27 pm

Sorry, Anthony. This is your house and I am being profane in it, my apologies. I have to get my sh*t together and go south.

September 5, 2017 7:39 pm
Cam
September 5, 2017 8:08 pm

Has Maue and Weatherbell stopped the Accumulated Cyclone Energy page? I’ve been getting a 404 Not Found error since Sunday.

James Robbins
Reply to  Cam
September 5, 2017 10:06 pm

The Integrated Kinetic Energy of Hurricane Irma is tracked at https://twitter.com/hwind
Currently the IKE has dropped from 90TJ to 79Tj as of September 6 as islands are being approached. This is still about twice the energy of Harvey.

RACookPE1978
Editor
September 5, 2017 8:26 pm

The readers at http://www.freerepublic.com are most often political observers and comentors, but they are tracking Irma on this link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3583121/posts?page=1
The plethora of models are tracked on this link:
https://my.sfwmd.gov/sfwmd/common/images/weather/plots/storm_11
Note that, despite the millions of words from the experts, the majority of those tracks now are beginning to ease more easterwardly into the Atlantic off of the coast of Florida, rather than up through the middle of FL or up its eastern coast. Which is a good thing for wind damage, but it passes the hurricane’s strong winds and waves to the west after a long open ocean fetch. Which can increase waves and storm surge.

angech
September 5, 2017 8:53 pm

“entire Western Hemisphere.”??
Northern???

Greg
Reply to  angech
September 6, 2017 12:27 am

you can draw lines anyway you want. The WH is anything with a longitude that has a W in it 😉

angech
September 5, 2017 8:55 pm

Jose next??

erastvandoren
September 5, 2017 10:36 pm

Measured wind on Barbuda only Cat3 (103kts, gusts 135kts). Nowhere near proclaimed Cat5. Another lie by NOAA.

ren
September 6, 2017 12:15 am

The jet stream over the US pushes southeast. Thunderstorms over Houston.

Greg
September 6, 2017 12:31 am

Puerto Rico is a US territory and is next on IRMA’s hit list. Odd that no one in the US seems to be in the slightest bit interested.
Guam is a US territory and we never stop hearing at the non-existent risk of a fat man launching an empty missile to splash into the ocean somewhere in that area.
Despite Puertoricans getting a US citizenship , apparently they don’t really count.

Reply to  Greg
September 6, 2017 2:27 am

…. perhaps something to do with President Eisenhower’s farewell address to the nation.

arthur4563
Reply to  Greg
September 6, 2017 9:47 am

Apparently people think that missiles with nuclear warheads in the hands of a madman are a somewhat greater concern than a few people losing their homes in some tropical island.

September 6, 2017 5:12 am

Typhoon Haiyan in the Pacific ocean was stronger with 235 mph winds. It destroyed Tacloban city and killed over 6,000 people. Hopefully Irma will not be as destructive and deadly
http://img.gagdaily.com/uploads/posts/sad/2013/00010e87_big.jpg

Luc Ozade
September 6, 2017 9:34 am

Good luck to Rud, Tom and Latitude plus any others in FL. Thinking of you.

arthur4563
September 6, 2017 9:44 am

I just saw the projected wind speeds of Irma as it comes ashore in Miami – 145MPH, which
would be a Cat 4. Halfway up Florida, it looks to be 125 MPH and probably by the time it reaches the Carolinas it will be a Cat 2 or low Cat 3, barely achieving status of a major hurricane. It’s not even remotely close to the power of Camile 1969 (175MPH at landfall, gusts to 200MPH and pressure of 900MB.). Killed over 500 Americans.
Since records have been kept, only 3 made landfall in the U.S. as Cat 5 storms. Irwin will not join that group – it would have to have sustained winds of 157MPH to do so, and even that would make it a minimal Cat 5. storm. But, at least it is making landfall in the traditional way – hitting Florida.
They do call the University of Miami football team the Hurricanes, don’t they?

Dr Deanster
September 6, 2017 11:18 am

I guess I’m missing something. Was just looking at the NDBC sites closest to where Irma is now …. sustained speeds no greater than 55 knots, gust up to 78 knots …… none of which is anywhere near 185 mph according to the knots mph calculator. Storm at 2 pm AST … 18.5N 64.7w …. station at 18.34n 64.9.. which is only about 10 miles from the center of the storm.

2hotel9
Reply to  Dr Deanster
September 6, 2017 1:48 pm

Appears the eye is passing along north coast of PR, which isn’t really going to spare them much. Ground reports are oddly lower speed wind than NOAA and NWS, we have seen that with hurricanes before, though.

J. Philip Peterson
September 6, 2017 7:45 pm

Puerto Rico lucked out. It went north of them. The bad part is in the NE quadrant…they are in the southern quadrant. Some Islands in the Bahamas are going to be hit really hard – those in the NE quadrant.
Let’s hope that it stays off the east coast of FL.

J. Philip Peterson
Reply to  J. Philip Peterson
September 6, 2017 7:48 pm

I’ll stick with my landfall “prediction” of just south of Charleston, SC.