David Middleton
From the Climate Change Causes Everything Files:
SCIENCE —
We know Vikings as infamous raiders—was that merely a response to climate change?
Changing temps may have impacted the ability to farm, leading to new economic strategies.
K.N. SMITH – 8/6/2017
Beneath their still surfaces, the lakes of some Arctic islands may hide the story of the rise and fall of Viking chiefdom.
Historians still aren’t sure exactly what led to the centuries of Viking raiding and expansion, a period politely known as the Scandinavian Diaspora that ran from the late eighth century to the mid-11th. Population pressures and political rivalries probably played a role, but changing climate around the North Atlantic may also have given the Scandinavians a push.
So far, paleoclimate researchers have mostly focused on warmer climates in the Vikings’ destinations, like Iceland, which might have drawn people to settle there. But those who set sail may have been facing trouble with the crops back home thanks to changing temperatures. A team of researchers hope to find some answers in a new series of sediment cores from ancient lakebeds in a remote Norwegian island chain.
“There’s no doubt that there are climate changes that are occurring during that time. The questions are how much of an influence were they on the migrations and settlements at different locations, whether in Norway, Iceland, or Greenland?” said Nicholas Balascio, a paleoclimatologist at the University of William and Mary.
He and his colleagues spent the summer in the Lofoten Islands, a low-lying archipelago off the coast of Norway, well above the Arctic Circle. It’s the perfect place to study how Iron Age people responded to climate change. Lofoten is so far north that it’s on the edge of the farmable world, so small shifts in summer temperature make a notable difference in the growing season here.
[…]
Rest of story:ARS Technica
The late 8th to mid-11th centuries would be from roughly 775 to 1050 AD. This coincides with the second half of a ~500-yr period of global warming, which culminated in the Medieval Warm Period…


So… If climate change caused the Vikings to turn their plowshares into swords, abandoning their farms to become terrorists… the climate change would have been of the warming variety. I’m not a farmer, but it seems to me that global warming would have actually enhanced the Vikings’ ability to farm up around the Arctic Circle.
Back to the article:
Rise and fall of a Viking Chiefdom
In its Viking Age heyday, Borg was a center of wealth and power. Its chieftain lived in the largest Viking longhouse that’s ever been found in northern Norway, unearthed by archaeologists in the late 1980s. People caught cod by the boatload here, then dried the fish to create a highly portable, mostly non-perishable food product called stockfish. It doesn’t sound very appetizing today, but it was a major export to the coastal cities of mainland Europe—and a staple for Viking raiders and settlers.
“When the Vikings went on their various raids and travels out into the North Atlantic, they usually took with them stockfish as provisions,” said Stephen Wickler, an archaeologist at the University of Tromsø. Archaeological evidence reveals a booming trade in stockfish during the Viking age. Lofoten’s cold climate was perfect for air-drying cod without using expensive salt, and the growing demand for cheap protein-rich food would have given the chieftain of a prime fishery like Borg a lot of political and economic clout.
Yet Borg attained that wealth and power despite being almost too far north to make a living at all. The warm current of the Gulf Stream kept the islands warm enough for farming, but only barely. The people who lived in Lofoten would have grown grains—mostly barley—and raised livestock, but a slight shift in summer temperatures could spell failure for that year’s crops, forcing people to find another way to survive, move elsewhere, or starve. Because the local economy was so sensitive to small climate fluctuations, Columbia University geoscientist William D’Andrea and his colleagues think this might be the place to look for links between climate change and a shift in the islands’ Viking Age economy.
“The people who were living on Lofoten were living in the most marginal environment of all of the Viking Kingdoms throughout Scandinavia. They were living the farthest north, and they were spending a lot of time on boats because they were engaged in cod fisheries,” said D’Andrea. “I always think about the experience up there as maybe being representative of their exploration spirit. They were ready to go looking for new things, and they were ready to make a living in a marginal environment.”
But the prosperous chiefdom had basically collapsed by the early 12th century.
[…]
The early 12th century would have coincided with the sudden onset of a ~500-yr period of global cooling, which culminated in the Little Ice Age.
It will be interesting to see what they conclude from their core analyses. No doubt, they will find some way to transform the plight of the Vikings into a dire warning about capitalism being bad for the planet.
| Description |
English: Map in english of territories and explorations of the Vikings
Français : Carte en anglais des territoires et explorations des Vikings
|
| Date | 1 February 2008 |
| Source | own work made with inkscape from Image:Vikings-Voyages.png and Image:Worldmap wdb combined.svg |
| Author | Pinpin |
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Based on cAGW policies, those whose ancestors didn’t freeze to death at birth should be taxed harsher to cool the outside air. Why on Earth could that anger anyone in Scandinavia, eh?
Can’t wait to see the reasons why pirates became such a scourge in the 17th century. Although the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster does believe that pirates can control the weather and climate change is directly linked to the drop in the number of pirates.
Every time I hear someone disparaging my ancestors and heritage, and I can’t find a safe space to escape to, I tend to die a little bit inside. It’s sad, and hard to believe, that in this enlightened age some people are still this uncaring and unsympathetic.
Labeling us terrorists; Characterizing an entire culture as rapists and killers (and wearers of horned hats) wasn’t enough, we are now to be known as being descended from terrorists.
But, if there were indeed a few bad apples, at least we now know it wasn’t their (our ancestors’) fault … the fault lies within the warming. Their (and our) actions are just a function of our environment. The fault lies with Gaia and those individuals who misuse Gaia (ya, you know who you are).
(The Danes, on the other hand, were true bastards without alibi or justification for their devious & murderous ways. There is no excuse, except for their poor/evil genetic make-up. The only good Dane is a stoned Dane … this keeps ’em from going on their murderous rampages.)
Let me help out the researchers here. Exploration is expensive. Mars, Moon, Columbus, Marco Polo, etc. The only way the Vikings could afford to paddle their long boats to Canada is if somebody bought tons of fish to put on their boats (along with iron tools and other necessities). Exploration occurs during times of excess, not during times of want. Times of want lead to refugees begging to be allowed in.
Except the exploration was incidental to plunder, extortion and slave raiding. Followed by mass murder land grabbing. Iceland and Greenland offered empty land for outlaws, who stopped off in Ireland first to steal women.
The early raids might also have been religious revenge for Charlemagne’s destruction of Saxony and forcible conversion of its Nordic-Germanic pagans to Roman Christianity. In this bloody crusade, the Frankish army was abetted by Anglo-Saxon priests, whose speech was still somewhat intelligible to the German Saxons after 350 years of separate linguistic evolution.
Climate and history are inextricably bound together.
Look, let’s get history straight. The Vikings were peaceful fishermen and traders. The legend of the vicious Viking began when the drunken and licentious Irish priests who were stealing all the gold from the churches got an inspection from the Pope of Rome who asked were all the church gold had gone.
“Oh, that gold? Uh…., the Norwegians stole it!”
“You don’t mean those pathetic pacifists who let anybody come into their country and take over, do you?”
“No. They are fierce. We call them the Vikings!”
BTW, viking used to mean fisherman in Norwegian. QED.
No, Viking did not use to mean a fisherman in Norwegian. Somebody must have told you a tall story about their grandfather.
So is it now official that the MWP actually happened? These guys are going to be vilified by the mob for even suggesting that there was a natural warming back then, let alone 1000 years before that. Although my understanding is that the Roman was slightly warmer then the MWP the graph above seems to show that they were about the same.
Don’t expect too many more papers from these guys to be published.
As usual, scare mongers have it bass ackward. Warmth caused better crops, leading to surplus population. At the sane time, more trees meant more and better ships.
Norwegians attacked Scotland, Ireland and Cumbria, thence settled the Faroes, Iceland, Greenland and briefly Newfoundland. Danes invaded East Anglia, Northumbria and Mercia and raided the south coast of England. Swedes founded Russia.
Only someone not familiar with Scandinavia could get the idea that a warmer climate would cause agricultural problems. There is NO crop that can’t be grown anywhere in in Denmark, Norway, Sweden or Finland because it is to warm. The southernmost part of Norse territory (Haithabu in Slesvig) is at the same latitude as Prince Rupert and has about the same annual temperature as Vancouver. Anyone has any suggestions about any crop that will fail in Vancouver because of the heat?
When one of the core beliefs of your religion is that you need to die with a sword in your hand to enter “heaven” aka Valhalla, I seriously doubt you need any climate change related push to become violent.
How about this for a hypothesis.
The warming temps of the Medieval Warm Period lead to record crops and healthier conditions. This resulted in more children and more of those children survived to adulthood. This caused a severe population crisis as even with warmer conditions there was a limit on farmable land. So younger sons, who would not inherit much if anything, went adventuring to either plunder riches to buy land or to capture/settle new lands.
Bingo
Well, I always wondered what the English were doing in Asia, Oceania, Africa and America. In the meanwhile European population density map
http://imgur.com/jvhxb5L
And yet Belgium didn’t conquer the world. Except for the colony of its king, in which native Africans had their arms cut off for not doing as told.
Is your comment suppose to somehow be related to mine? Because if so I am missing it.
Major Viking raid periods on the UK, 792-850 AD, and 980-1012 AD. Looks like colder periods.
?w=720
Huh? While around 800 does show a trough it’s not among the deep ones and around 1000 looks like a peak.
My more detailed comment disappeared, so will just point out that Norse incursions were more or less continuous in the British Isles from the late 8th century to 1066.
The Great Heathen Army of AD 865-75 led to the Danelaw. Then, in the next century, Athelstan fought both Danes and Norwegians. Before losing to Duke William of Normandy, descended from Viking Rollo the Ganger, King Harold Godwinson of England, half Norse himself, beat King Harald Hardrada’s Norwegian invaders (and his brother) at Stamford Bridge in 1066.
After that time, Normans continued their ancestors’ practices, leading to invasions as disparate as Ireland, Sicily and the Holy Land.
Not to mention King Cnut, so often wrongly cited in climate discourse. Harold’s Danish mom was the sister-in-law of Cnut’s sister. Harold’s sister Edith was married to King Edward the Confessor of England, but they failed to produce an heir. Hence Harold v. Harald v. William for the crown. Harold won the semis in the North but lost in the final to William the Conqueror in the South.
… I’m not a farmer, but it seems to me that global warming would have actually enhanced the Vikings’ ability to farm up around the Arctic Circle….
You farm well – you get lots of wealth.
You get lots of wealth – you can afford a ship and a raiding band
With a ship and a raiding band, you have something to do during the summer months, when there isn’t much work on the farm…
The Vikings settled in:
• Islands off the coast of Scotland – Shetland, Orkney and The Hebrides.
• Around the north and north west coast of Scotland.
• Parts of Ireland – Dublin is a Viking city.
• The Isle of Man.
• Small parts of Wales.
• Northumbria (which included modern Yorkshire)
• East Anglia.
The Clan MacRae and our allies partied with the Vikings, led by King Haakon IV of Norway on the beach at the Battle of Largs in 1263 – apparently we were poor hosts because they never called back again. 🙂
The Norwegians from Dublin also dominated Cumbria.
The Danelaw covered not just Northumbria and East Anglia, but Middlesex, Essex, much of Mercia and the Irish Sea coast.
If you are in UK prog. ‘Viking World’ just started on BBC4, narrated by a Scottish archaeologist
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norse%E2%80%93Gaels
Clan of the Son of Torcadal, ie “Thunder God’s Kettle”: Cf. Thorkil.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clan_McCorquodale
Can’t say if this is true or not but what I’ve heard is that it is cooling that leads to invasions because a lot of people on marginal land had to find somewhere else to live. This caused the barbarian invasions at the end of the Roman Warm period and the Mongolians at the end of the middle ages warm period. It is when the current warm period ends that we are going to see massive numbers of climate refugees.
…and the North Koreans are driven by droughts and limited electric grid to develop ICBMs to point at you and you.
Please re-post updated article after you get 97% of historians to agree…!
If you read the Icelandic Sagas you will learn what the challenge was that they were facing back home. There was a change from what amounted to a warlord sort of society with regional strongmen to a strong central government with a strong King and Christianity was being adopted replacing the old Norse religious system. People who rebelled or found it difficult to get along with the new stronger central government were often exiled to places like Iceland.
As if Ragnar would have left the impregnated Queen Edith behind in Northumbria, rather then carrying her off as a hostage at best and sex slave more likely:
But still a great movie.
Calling the Vikings terrorists is just post normal idiocy and the worst kind of political correctness. The Euros are looking for white ‘terrorists’ as a way of saying, see, the islamists aren’t alone at this and even they are victims of global warming, too. The white Britisher who drove his van into Muslims leaving the mosque in the UK was a relief to May and gonzos like the authors of this drek because it gave weight to the policorrectal crowd.
The Persians invaded the Greeks, but an example like that gets no traction from the researchers nor does the Mongolians invading a whole bunch of places. Yeah, but they’re not as bad as the Norwegian white terrorists and it was CO2 and methane (all those horses and men) what done it.
Now the Women’s Studies gals will be researching that there was no glass ceiling in the Vikings camps and the Viqueens were also busy chopping body parts off with glee and the male warriors were saying I’m with her. .
Pray tell who wasn’t invading somebody or being invaded over the last 4000 yrs. Bloody Europe never stopped invading over its history until 1945. At least they had cojones then and not the ever so terribly concerned and guilty milquetoasty fainting fits of policorrectal goodness.
“The white Britisher who drove his van into Muslims leaving the mosque” this is a meme.
Check the position of the mosque and check the position of the incident. There is no possible way, by any stretch of the imagination, this could be called ‘outside a mosque’, except in a politically correct environment that required the event to have happened ‘outside a mosque’.
Invading continued in Europe after 1945, to include the USSR of Hungary and Czechoslovakia, Croatia and Serbia of each other and of Bosnia, Serbia of Kosovo, Russia of the Crimea and Ukraine and Russia of Georgia (OK, outside of Europe but invaded from Europe).
Granted, maybe Bosnia and Kosovo shouldn’t have been countries, but were in order to cater to their Mooslam populations.
“Historians still aren’t sure exactly what led to the centuries of Viking raiding and expansion,”
They got bored.
RoHa,
Boredom has caused terrible wars, to include World War I.
But, terrible though the Vikings were, their ravages by sea were far less horrific than those of Caesar in Gaul by land more than 800 years before.
I went to Alaska in 1965. The first teaching job I had was teaching PE. I give a section in boxing in December. When the section was through, I asked if anyone wanted to Box. I got to takers. When the days grew longer and longer in April, I walked into the gym and two boys were bowed up to each other. A fight was about to start. “Wait,” I said, “Let’s get the gloves on. They did. And then I spent the rest of the period tying gloves on. Everyone wanted to fight someone. When the days start getting notable longer after a long dark winter, there is something in the brain that makes you get pissed off. I well understand the Vikings. Global warming has nothing to do with it.
Were they really terrorists, or were they heroic liberators rescuing oppressed peasants from ruthless exploitation by church and nobility?
They killed fellow pagans with gleeful abandon so I don’t think they were really either.