January 2017 Projected Temperature Anomalies from NCEP/NCAR Data

I know how Learch felt. It’s like opening the door to some unpleasant thing. Ugggg. Ever month this **** comes out. What have they done Now?

I find the first figure confusing. I have no idea what its point is. I find the second figure wrong because it shows warming where cooling exists. This one is easy to explain because UAH satellite records show a cooling of 0.1 degrees Celsius in the decade from 2002 to 22012 which your figure 2 shows as warming. Clearly their temperature data source shows non-existent warming there. There are several points that clearly show exaggerated warming throughout. To start with, the bgeginning hump of the twenty-first century is shown as being 0.28 degrees Celsius higher than the super El Nino of 1998 is. In actual fact the superr El Nino towers over that hump by o.45 degrees Celsius. This much of an error in a wel-known temperature region is simply inexplicable for professional climate scientists. Mine are satellite figures which I advise you to use also in place of their falsified mishmash. It gets even more unbelievable when we look at the 22016 El Nino in their graph. It is shown as being 0.63 degrees higher than the 1998 super El Nino is. Bear in mind here that a majority of El Ninos have a total height about half a degree to 0.6 degrees Celsius. That temperature chart of theirs must be considered a complete fake. And it does not even show the beginning of tyhis fakery because it is left off the chart on purpose. It all started with the hiatus of the eighties and nineties. Never heard if t? That is because their fakery goes that far back ,being parallel to James Hansen’s time at GiSS. NOAA, GISS, and the Met Office all got together and changed the eighties and nineties temperatures into a non-existent warming. But I I had already used the original data in my figure 15 in the book “What Warming?” and protested. I was totally ignored so I put a note about it into the preface of my book. In an 18 year stretch of the eighties and nineties they raised the temperature by 0.18 degrees Celsius which amounts to 1 degree Celsius per century. More That in less than two decades, when the claimed warming for the entire twentieth century is o.8 degrees. It would not surprise me if their success with the eighties and nineties did not go to their heads and make them want to continue that warming for the rest of the twenty-first century. This would explain the excess heat in the period that follows, including the extreme height of that El Nino in 2016.However, long-term exaggerated warming we are dealing with makes it likely that the warming was simply increased to get rid of that cooling. The steady rise which their twenty-first century shows is illusory and will need much explication from those fake warming advocates. Since you need to use satellite data to see the cooling their temperature scale must be considered compromised. I advice that this temperature source should not be used to derive any scientific conclusions about global temperature.,Right now, the cooling has been temporarily blocked by the 2016 El Nino, a temporary source of warming. Once that is over we will see global temperature drop to the values we have not seen since the twentieth century. That conclusion itself follows simply from extrapolating the cooling section linearly. And, oh, I forgot that these three temperature wizards had their file ends polished by a common computer device. It left high spikes in the exact same places in all three data-sets. You can see one of them sitting right on top of the super El Nino of 1998 in the second figure above, on its left shoulder. There are around ten or more of these around and you can pick them all out by comparing their temperature curve with satellite temperature curves.

Any data on this Reuters/ Climate Research Program claim?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/antarctica-record-warmth-1.4004443