Mother Jones: "Trump Effect" Undermining Support for German Green Energy

trump_shadow_scr

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Mother Jones thinks spillover from the US election is helping the rise of the German AFD, and undermining support for Green Energy. But perhaps the working class has simply grown tired of elitist left wing politicians and institutions ignoring working class priorities.

How the “Trump Effect” Could Undermine Germany’s Clean Energy Revolution

In Germany’s elections, the far right has a familiar anti-immigrant, pro-coal agenda.

AARON WIENERDEC. 29, 2016 6:00 AM

The world’s most advanced energy revolution has hit an obstacle: the Trump effect.

Germany has long been a clean energy pioneer. Despite the fact that the sun hardly shines there, the country was the world leader in installed solar capacity until it was finally overtaken last year by China, a vastly larger and sunnier country. By 2050, Germany aims to get 80 percent of its electricity from renewable sources and to cut its greenhouse gas emissions by as much as 95 percent. It currently derives about one-fifth of its power from wind and solar (and one-third from total renewables), compared to just 5 percent in the United States. Even though this dramatic energy transition—known as the Energiewende—has contributed to higher household electricity costs, 90 percent of Germans say they support it.

For years, Germany’s mainstream political parties have supported clean energy, too. But that broad consensus could soon face a significant test, another possible casualty of the resurgence of right-wing, nativist politics across the Western world. Unlike many of its neighbors, Germany hasn’t had a far-right party represented in its parliament since the Second World War. But that’s almost certain to change next year, when national elections could make the Alternative for Germany party (known by its German acronym, AfD) the second- or third-strongest faction in the government, if polling trends continue. The party, which began as a euro-skeptic movement, has built its success on stringent opposition to immigration and admission of refugees—and on inflammatory rhetoric that echoes the campaign of Donald Trump.

The AfD also opposes Germany’s clean energy policies. It’s calling for an end to the law behind the Energiewende and even questions the existence of human-induced climate change, stating on its website, “Scientific research on the long-term development of the climate because of man-made CO2 emissions is fraught with uncertainty.” Now, in an effort to slow the AfD’s rapid rise, the country’s mainstream parties could be poised for a step back in the fight against global warming.

Read more: http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2016/12/germany-clean-energy-coal-trump-effect

I’ve got a working class background, plenty of my friends are working class. Over the years I’ve watched as various left wing Labor and Democrat parties became the plaything of the urban elites, champaign socialists. I’ve watched the growing dismay and anger, as left wing elitist politicians supported fashionable green efforts to drive up the price of energy, and flood western countries with cheap immigrant labor, regardless of the pain these efforts inflicted on their increasingly disillusioned working class supporters.

Trump didn’t ignite the anger of the working class, he simply offered a solution to their problems, a new direction. The AFD didn’t ignite the anger of the German working class, they just pointed out the problems, and promised to fix them. The “Trump Effect” is simply the end of working class patience with privileged left wing politicians who have no idea of the pain their ignorant internationalist green posturing has caused to the people they claim to champion.

For Germany, the writing was on the wall long before Trump, as this hilarious video from 2014 demonstrates.

https://youtu.be/-e2U2cYcPro

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

196 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
wws
December 31, 2016 7:28 am

The age old cry of the ruling classes: “Sire, the Peasants are revolting!!!”

Robert of Ottawa
Reply to  wws
December 31, 2016 7:51 am

They still haven’t learnt. It wasn’t their bad policies or etitist arrogance, it was stolen; fake news; the Ruskies anything to avoid a little self-reflection.
I think the Germans have had enough with THEIR political establishment and are now ready to turf all of them and their corrosive policies.

James Francisco
Reply to  Robert of Ottawa
December 31, 2016 11:03 am

Robert. “Still they haven’t learned “. Let’s hope they never do. We shouldn’t help them learn because they will get better at faking that they care about the economy and the working persons.

Reply to  Robert of Ottawa
December 31, 2016 4:30 pm

Who said, “The most important thing in the world is sincerity…
If you can fake that, the rest is easy.”?

Reply to  Robert of Ottawa
January 1, 2017 6:44 am

Excerpt from the ML article:
“The party, which began as a euro-skeptic movement, has built its success on stringent opposition to immigration and admission of refugees—and on inflammatory rhetoric that echoes the campaign of Donald Trump.
The AfD also opposes Germany’s clean energy policies.”
This article employs the old trick of linking two unrelated issues in order to slime your opponent – the same tactic to when warmists tried to link climate skeptics to those who denied that smoking tobacco was harmful to human health.
Many Germans are correctly very concerned about immigration because Merkel has imported Muslim terrorists – the Christmas 2016 truck terror incident in Berlin is just the latest such event. Twelve dead and dozens injured… I know the location well – just in front of the Kaiser Wilhelm church ruins in downtown Berlin. I was first there in July 1989.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/22/berlin-terror-attack-tunisian-suspect-anis-amri-investigated/
Last year Merkel tried to cover-up the mass sexual assaults against about ~1200 German women by Muslim men in Cologne at New Year’s Eve one year ago.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/cologne-new-years-eve-mass-sex-attacks-leaked-document-a7130476.html
It is only a matter of time before there is a reaction to these Muslim terror incidents – probably an over-reaction, caused in part by Merkel’s attempted cover-up.
Green energy is a totally unrelated subject. The reality is that grid-connected green energy is not green and produces little useful energy. The fatal flaw is intermittency and this has been known for many decades. Most green energy is a scam – it feels good but it does not do good. Every true energy expert knows this.
Merkel is an East German who follows the classic tactics of the left – any lie is justified to achieve and hold power.
Regards, Allan

Mary Catherine
Reply to  wws
December 31, 2016 3:26 pm

“Sire, the Peasants are revolting!!!”
“Yes, aren’t they.”

HalfEmpty
Reply to  Mary Catherine
December 31, 2016 4:49 pm

Indeed, they stink on ice.

Auto
Reply to  wws
January 2, 2017 1:17 pm

And some here – Remoaners, maybe? – think the Germans have no sense of humour That was smashing. I laughed like a drain.
Auto

rapscallion
Reply to  Auto
January 3, 2017 4:45 am

I think you’ll find that the German sense of humour is no laughing matter !

Latitude
December 31, 2016 7:34 am

Which came first?….the anger?….or the Trump?
The left is going to blame everything from irritable bowels to termites on Trump.
Ask if they need a bigger shovel…………..

Mark from the Midwest
Reply to  Latitude
December 31, 2016 7:44 am

The left already has blamed Trump for all sorts of physical maladies, including nausea, depression, sexual dysfunction, panic attacks, and on and on … the links are too numerous to include here.

Phillip Bratby
Reply to  Mark from the Midwest
December 31, 2016 7:51 am

Surely they can’t blame Trump for the same things that they are already blaming on climate change, can they?

Duncan
Reply to  Mark from the Midwest
December 31, 2016 8:17 am

We’ve all been guilt shamed into following this ideological social experiment for decades – it has achieved some positive results but has now run its coarse. When all that’s left is fighting over gender neutral bathrooms, the movement has run out of ideas. The old guard needs to be replaced, policies are too entrenched to make an about face now. Trump was about this change (both Republican & Democrat), even with his imperfections, this plays to his benefit of that not being part of the establishment. Surely they will fight tooth and nail, unfortunately their synapses will take some time to rewire, the left cannot understand it yet. Is Trump the perfect politician, no. Is he an inspiration to the next 30 years of world policy direction, I’d say yes. The next fours years will bare witness.

wws
Reply to  Mark from the Midwest
December 31, 2016 8:39 am

You left out the Heartbreak of Psoriasis.

eyesonu
Reply to  Mark from the Midwest
December 31, 2016 8:45 am

Phillip,
They will most likely try. The new rally cry/whine will be “It’s worse than we thought ’cause of Trump.” It’s a never ending worse story.

Barbara Skolaut
Reply to  Mark from the Midwest
December 31, 2016 9:11 am

Of course they can, Philip Bratby – surely you don’t expect logic and consistency from these clowns?

ferdberple
Reply to  Mark from the Midwest
December 31, 2016 11:56 am

they can’t blame Trump
===============
Oh No! It wasn’t CO2 after all that caused climate change. It was Trump. He was born in 1946, in Jamaica Hospital Medical Center. The same time CO2 started increasing, so clearly he is the cause. And Jamaica isn;t even in the US. So like Obama, Trump clearly wasn’t born in America.
http://www.worldatlas.com/img/areamap/675607cbf50f5433ffcc621f73dfd117.gif

Tom in Florida
Reply to  Mark from the Midwest
December 31, 2016 12:31 pm

re: ferdberple December 31, 2016 at 11:56 am
Is there a pool on how long it will be until someone takes the bait?

Goldrider
Reply to  Mark from the Midwest
December 31, 2016 2:17 pm

People need to consider the source for this stuff; until recently, Mother Jones, Rolling Stone, Variety, Vanity Fair and such were all considered ENTERTAINMENT magazines. While lefty politics are bandied about in between the celebrity gossip and music reviews, they have never risen to the level of serious journalism let alone “news.” Mother Jones in particular was an organ of the hippie, countercultural radical Left.

Robert of Ottawa
Reply to  Latitude
December 31, 2016 7:52 am

Hey, it’s a break from “global warming” 🙂

jones
Reply to  Latitude
December 31, 2016 2:34 pm

I blame Brexit for everything…..

jones
Reply to  jones
December 31, 2016 2:35 pm

And Putin of course……

December 31, 2016 7:48 am

Happy New Year to all
(left right and centre, if you can work out who’s who)
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/imageserver/image/methode%2Ftimes%2Fprod%2Fweb%2Fbin%2F2a3f693a-cec8-11e6-90d4-32d09e9feb7c.jpg

RockyRoad
Reply to  vukcevic
December 31, 2016 8:02 am

I can see Trump and Puttin–I forget who the other guy is.

RockyRoad
Reply to  RockyRoad
December 31, 2016 8:03 am

*Putin.

ClimateOtter
Reply to  RockyRoad
December 31, 2016 8:05 am

And so will history.

radzimir
Reply to  RockyRoad
January 3, 2017 1:33 am
Janice The American Elder
Reply to  vukcevic
December 31, 2016 8:58 am

Clever. Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin hugging each other, and Mr. Obama in the middle getting squished. I love it!

Reply to  vukcevic
January 1, 2017 7:52 pm

I wonder what Putin has on Trump? I suspect it is something nasty.
Trump insults everyone he can possibly think of, except Putin, he fawns over him at every opportunity. He obviously loves him and Putin is currently dangling him on a string. Admittedly he owes Putin a vast debt of gratitude, a favour which Putin may one day wish repaid, and if Trump gets ideas of his own, Putin may show his hand.

rapscallion
Reply to  Gareth Phillips
January 3, 2017 4:51 am

So you suspect, but you actually have no proof. Did you see Trump insult the Deplorables – nah, me neither. If wanting to come to an agreement with Putin his fawning then I suggest you read up a tad on diplomacy. Still, you go on thinking like that – opinions with no basis in fact.

Phillip Bratby
December 31, 2016 7:49 am

The German policy of closing nuclear power stations whilst building coal-fired power stations is the policy of the green madhouse. Energiewende is green policy at its worst, with no thought for the implications on costs and whether it actually does what it says on the tin.

oeman50
Reply to  Phillip Bratby
December 31, 2016 8:43 am

Come now, Philip. it was important to protect the nuclear stations from all the tsunamis in Germany. Trying to garner votes by succumbing to the anti-nuclear crowd had nothing to do with it.

StephanF
Reply to  Phillip Bratby
December 31, 2016 9:02 pm

Part at fault was Chernobyl, that scared the Germans! I am German but live in the US since 1985. However the whole thing is insane, France is having many more nuclear power plants than Germany ever had then and the prevailing wind is of course from the west. So they convinced most of the German population that these dangerous plants had to be shut down, although Germany never had the type of nuclear reactor that blew up in Chernobyl.
When I was about to graduate with my diploma in high energy particle physics, there was the German spin-off of the ultra right ‘European Workers Party’, formed by Lyndon LaRouche’s wife that was active in Aachen, Germany and I engaged in a discussion with one of their young activist about fusion power plants. I told them that the instant they are turned on, they produce fast neutrons that would activate material in the immediate vicinity of the reactor. He said that this is all propaganda from the left and that fusion power plants would not produce any radiation! So funny.
Fusion reactors, even if they work, will have a hard time to produce the needed tritium. And not only do they have to produce their own tritium but also produce tritium for other, new fusion power plants to come online. I am not sure if this ‘tritium’ problem has been solved.
For reactors of the tokamak design like ITER there is about as much energy stored in the magnets as in the plasma (beta ~ 1). If an edge mode instability causes the hot plasma to pinch a hole in the superconducting coils, the collapsing magnetic field will have the effect of a sizable detonation and will blow an even larger hole in the vessel and tritium could escape from the breached vessel. We had a discussion about that several years ago with scientists from Albuquerque that work in this field. I read that the new Wendelstein reactor has a much more stable plasma confinement. But the tritium problem still persists.
In the foreseeable future we need to build more nuclear power reactors, and there are technologies available today to make them safe. Instead of wasting money on climate change we need to pour funding into nuclear reactor research to develop new types with passive safety. And we need to grow an army of nuclear scientists and engineers before the old ones that still know how to do it have left us for good. And we need these nuclear power plants to produce the needed tritium for future fusion power plants. Tritium has a half life of only 12.3 years.
Eventually the green pipedream will end, the warming will come to rest or reverse, and people also in Germany will wake up and they hopefully will build new nuclear power reactors with passive safety.
Stephan

IanH
Reply to  StephanF
January 1, 2017 3:08 am

Till and Chang who were Argonne labs engineers on the Integral Fast Reactor have written an accessible book on that technology. It appears to tie up the loose ends that dog thermal water moderated reactors; namely cost, intrinsic safety, and elimination by burning of long lived actinide waste.
One can only speculate on the effect of the integral program on carbon emissions , had John Kerry not shut it down under Clinton.
The book is freely downloadable in pdf form from the web (plentifullenergy.pdf).
I found the technical detail and elaboration of (for example) the pros and cons of metalic vs ceramic fuel fascinating. The reactor was tested under ‘station blackout’ conditions and rode it out without a hitch due to inherrent stability.
We have a huge amount of transuranic thermal reactor waste, some fast reactors such as the integral, burn it as fuel. They could achieve over 10% burnup between the cheap, onsite reprocessings.
A youtube video “Fast-neutron reactors: A wiser solution to spent nuclear fuel?” pushes the economic case for transuranic waste disposal by burning in fast neutron reactor vs geological storage.
No need for fusion, or Thorium quite yet. And the Moltex fast salt reactors are just simulations at present.
Meanwhile the Japanese have shut down their Monju reactor.

Reply to  StephanF
January 1, 2017 5:12 am

I’m curious Stephan, how would the the collapse of the magnetic field cause a sizeable detonation? The gas in the chamber of the tokamak gets squished down to make the plasma. When the field collapses, the gas expands refilling the chamber. I thought that was the idea behind nuclear fusion. (not being sarcastic in my questions here )
Going to the moon wasn’t a mining expedition ?
I think you are right on everything else though. Though I didn’t hear of any explosions at PPPL doesn’t mean there weren’t any. You don’t call 911 for those problems, lol.
Other than that, I thought maybe a good place to turn on a nuclear fusion reactor would be in a galaxy far, far, away. The other thought I had with the online operation of LIGO, was that they were looking how to produce a local gravity wave that would bring the plasma to critical. .. I haven’t kept up, but were there neutron releases from the limited fusion reactions so far ?
Previous to the funding being cut, they were close to breakeven. I had assumed, perhaps incorrectly, that fusion reactions were taking place.
Even though in the short term we have enough fossil fuels, with or without climate change, eventually we will need to produce all the energy we are producing now… and then some from a different source.

G. Karst
Reply to  StephanF
January 1, 2017 10:02 am

Heavy water moderated reactors are very efficient tritium producers. Only one thermalized neutron needs to be absorbed by deuterium to form tritium (as compared to 2 neutrons for light water). Canada processes their D20 and stockpiles the tritium in gas cylinders. Lots available. GK

StephanF
Reply to  StephanF
January 5, 2017 9:24 pm

Hi rishrac:
It is the back-EMF of the collapsing magnetic field. This energy has to go somewhere. The current in the interrupted superconducting coils wants to continue to flow, the voltage will rise between the broken wires causing arcing and formation of heat. It will be like an explosion. The stored energy of an inductor is 1/2*I^2 or one has to integrate over the magnetic field density B^2/2mu (this is also the magnetic pressure) to derive at the magnetic energy this way.
I found a source of the energy stored in the coils of the ITER tokamak:
https://www.iter.org/newsline/122/182
It is 4 GJ. 1kg of TNT has 4.6 MJ of energy, so the stored magnetic energy of ITER is about equivalent to 1 ton of TNT! The energy will be released according to the time constant of th coils tau = R*L. I am not sure how that works out but one can assume that a breach will only locally affect the superconducting coils, so for the rest of the coil, R is zero. The energy could be released in a split second. Since beta is about one, the plasma pressure and the magnetic pressure are about the same. So we also have the thermal energy of the low density but very hot plasma to be of similar order of magnitude.

nigelf
December 31, 2016 7:50 am

They certainly are aware of the pain they inflict, they just don’t care. Like Merkel now saying islamic terrorism is Germany’s biggest threat but continuing to import that very problem.
They’re just trying to delay their trip up the stairs to the gallows.

Warren Latham
December 31, 2016 7:52 am

An excellent article Eric ! Many thanks (as ever).
As for “green energy” (as they call it) there is of course no such thing.
The entire “language” that the socialist governments use is littered with misleading expressions.
Anyone up for a new list of BETTER expressions ?
I know a few here at WUWT who have pet hate words, so it will be interesting to see some sugestions.
I’ll start the ball rolling: “green-piss”.
Regards and Happy New Year to all,
WL

Reply to  Warren Latham
December 31, 2016 7:58 am

Wind energy blows not

R. Shearer
Reply to  John piccirilli
December 31, 2016 8:18 am

Yes, reality bites no matter how hard the green fanatics wish to believe.

Pablo an ex Pat
Reply to  John piccirilli
December 31, 2016 12:56 pm

If wind energy doesn’t blow then surely it must suck ?

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Warren Latham
December 31, 2016 8:33 am

“Green” energy = Virtue Signaling energy.

Sheri
Reply to  Warren Latham
December 31, 2016 9:15 am

Hunter/gatherer energy or energy from the past. Limbaugh calls it Energy from Weather, which is my favorite.

Reply to  Warren Latham
December 31, 2016 9:21 am

It is Dark Energy – when the lights go out.

Nigel S
Reply to  Warren Latham
December 31, 2016 9:36 am

The ghost of electricity (howls in the bones of her face)

Reply to  Nigel S
December 31, 2016 4:40 pm

“Where these visions of Johanna have now taken my place.”
BD

Leon0112
Reply to  Warren Latham
December 31, 2016 7:36 pm

Greenpeace and the Sierra Club are part of the anti-human movement.

Robert Warren
Reply to  Warren Latham
January 1, 2017 5:13 pm

“I know a few here at WUWT who have pet hate words, so it will be interesting to see some sugestions.”
The United Nations High Commission for Frightening the Simple-Minded

December 31, 2016 7:54 am

Can you imagine the outrage if the public knew the fantasy of agw and so called green energy And the lies of 97%, mann s hockey stick, the corruption of ipcc, climategate e mails, ag s
Going after exxon

Editor
December 31, 2016 7:59 am

Politics has always been like this. Right of Centre has tenure of office for a few years, then Left of Centre takes over and vice-versa. Career politicians rarely make good leaders, because they are so out of touch with ordinary peoples concerns and have an I know best attitude. The popular assumption has been that, the Left will dominate the political world for decades allowing Democrat governance in the US and Left wing governance in the UK and Europe. The writing on the wall was actually in May 2010, when the UK Conservatives formed a minority government with the Left of Centre Liberal Democrats. Nobody thought that Cameron would win an overall majority in 2015 and in 2016 we would vote to leave the EU. It took a little longer in the US, but you now have a Republican majority in the Senate and House of Representatives and Donald Trump will be your president in a three weeks.
The destruction of our economies by reliance on expensive, unreliable energy based on a bogus theory and by an unworkable principle of unfettered immigration is on hold, at least for the time being. Germany, ever fearful of the rise in N@zism, has always voted Left or (very) soft Right. France’s Left government faces annihilation and the split in the EU is growing. The time is right to challenge the AGW lie head on because the political will is being redirected to more urgent things such as East-West relations, !S!S etc and the people in the West are thinking more and more about political consequences.

Duncan
Reply to  Andrew Harding
December 31, 2016 9:09 am

If I could take some literary licence of history repeating itself, the current anger is similar to the rejection by the German people to the Treaty of Versailles. “Germany to accept the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage” during the war. This article, Article 231, later became known as the War Guilt clause. Reparations became excessive/counter productive and while debated, helped lead to the rise of the N@zi’s.
Fast forward to today’s Climate/Social Guilt, accepting of all the loss/damage done to Gaia and societies/religions less well off, it too is getting excessive and counter productive, so much so the people are stating to reject it as well. They are becoming nationalistic again to defend themselves against what is now unjust. While I do not believe we’ll see another Hitler, it seems ironic to me the same policies of guilt, isolation and excessive restitution are leading to the same results they are trying to prevent. A fact that is not lost on Mother Jones, “in an effort to slow the AfD’s rapid rise, the country’s mainstream parties could be poised for a step back in the fight against global warming.” In other words, the fire has been fanned, put less fuel on it.

Gerry, England
Reply to  Andrew Harding
December 31, 2016 2:02 pm

Cameron’s Tories were left of centre so formed a nice liberal coalition with the further left lib-dems. Cameron then hoped to carry that on and so was shocked and disappointed at winning a small majority. That meant not being able to blame the lib-dems for ignoring promises to deliver on anything remotely to the right of centre as well as having to see through his EU referendum promise. His arrogance did for him but then left us with a still centre left government.

richard verney
Reply to  Gerry, England
January 1, 2017 7:18 am

Save with the possible exception of the Thatcher government, there has not been a right of centre government since the war. The Tories are if anything left of centre. What else could be expected of Cameron who proclaimed himself as the heir to Blair.
It would be nice to see a slightly right of centre government that would cut back the size of government, get rid of all the quangos, cut back the size of the public sector, and reinstate welfare as a safety net, not a life style choice. With the money saved, one could return to free education for all through university (at least with respect to proper degrees) as a worthwhile investment in the future.
I remember watching a brilliant interview by Andrew Neil of an MP following an annoucement that about 24,000 army soldiers were to be laid off. Andrew Neil made the point that the Israeli Army spends about the same budget as does the UK on military hardware procurement and does this with a department of about 500 personnel. By contrast, there are about 25,000 personnel in Whitehall charged with military procurement. Andrew Neil asked the MP why not just get rid of 24,000 jobs in Whitehall and keep the armed service personnel the same? Of course, the MP had no good answer, and therein lies the problem with government waste; far too many people doing non jobs, or duplicating jobs which not only adds needlessly to expense but creates decision making problems.
The expenses scandal gave politicians a chance to reconnect with the voters, they did not take it. Brexit provides politicians with another chance to reconnect, but it is doubtful that they will take this chance either. Without a revolution is is difficult to see any meaningful change, and the Brits are too tolerant and apathetic to do anything. Just moan, shrug one’s shoulders and put up with it. Don’t expect to see any significant change any time soon.

Gerry, England
Reply to  Gerry, England
January 1, 2017 8:49 am

Agree with all of that. There is a yawning gap for a party to the right that would suit those like me who can’t stomach Blue Labour and could be home to those labelled as working class but with aspirations to do well for themselves. In other words, just like Margaret Thatcher did. Sadly with Ukip a shambles and looking like trying to replace Labour in the north, this will be a missed opportunity. It would be interesting if we were to have a Brexit election but I suspect there are hoards of Labour and not a few Tories who wouldn’t want that and could block the Act required to make it happen.

Ill Tempered Klavier
Reply to  Andrew Harding
January 1, 2017 10:31 am

…for they stood on the steps of the temple and did prophesy mightily unto the children of Israel, and, behold, those things came not to pass: So let them be stoned as false prophets.

December 31, 2016 8:10 am

The revolt against the watermelon people started at the ballot box in England.

Nigel S
Reply to  rishrac
December 31, 2016 9:41 am

And Wales, pity about Scotland and Northern Ireland (and Gibraltar but that’s a long story!).

JohnKnight
Reply to  rishrac
December 31, 2016 1:41 pm

Well, it first drew blood geopolitically speaking, with Brexit, rishrac . . and that’s certainly something worthy of a badge of honor, and a reserved Hoorah ; )

Pop Piasa
December 31, 2016 8:13 am

Since when is Trump “far right”? Republicans said he was too far left when the primaries started.
His win was not about left vs right anyway, it was about media indoctrination vs free and critical thought.

lawrence
Reply to  Pop Piasa
December 31, 2016 8:26 am

Anyone who disagrees with the ruling elite must be branded with a label that appears to make them look bad. Like the 52% in the UK who voted to leave the EU have all been branded ‘racists’

Reply to  lawrence
December 31, 2016 9:19 am

And don’t forget ‘white, uneducated working class’ (!)

Reply to  lawrence
December 31, 2016 12:26 pm

‘Uneducated’ meaning not subjected to 4 years of leftist indoctrination by ‘progressive’ (regressive?) professors while accumulating life-sucking debt.

Reply to  Dan Pangburn
December 31, 2016 2:13 pm

Isn’t that why the communist have re education camps ?

Reply to  lawrence
January 1, 2017 12:53 am

Lawrence
Recently I’ve been reading the history of WW2 by Anthony Beevor. Following the fall of France there was a division of opinion in Britain as to whether to acquiesce and start peace negotiations with Hit1er or to resist and fight on alone. This division of opinion existed both in parliament (Churchill’s leadership rival Halifax championed the surrender camp) and also in the population at large.
Beevor noted that among the British public, those favouring acquiescence to Hit1er included the wealthy elites and aristocracy, white collar managers and women. Conversely it was blue collar workers and men in general who favoured resistance and fighting on alone.
Curiously this division of opinion back in 1940 was almost exactly mirrored by the division of opinion between remaining inside or leaving the EU in 2016.

Reply to  lawrence
January 1, 2017 8:31 am

You can’t leave out “Deplorables”.

wws
Reply to  Pop Piasa
December 31, 2016 8:47 am

You have a point – the need to break everything down into this dichotomy of “right” and “left” takes the place of a lot of critical thing. For example, in terms of “right” and “left”, try and explain why both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump tapped into the same movement and in many cases, appealed to the same people. (no one wants to admit that about the Bernie movement, but it’s true)
“establishment” vs “anti-establishment” is a little bit better model to explain recent events.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  wws
December 31, 2016 9:03 am

Agreed about Sanders, saw it in my circles of friends.

Reply to  wws
January 2, 2017 6:01 am

Yes, you have it. This is not left/right politics, this is “kick the bums out”. Both Sanders and Trump were running on the same ethos. The problem for the Democrats was that they ran an establishment candidate. I don’t think the outcome would have been different, but I could be wrong on that, which would have put us on a different track. History turns on subtle things, that’s why it is interesting.

Reply to  Pop Piasa
December 31, 2016 8:05 pm

In the US, it is frequently stated that the country, on average, is to the right of the political center. Think about that. How should the political center be determined? Shouldn’t the center be defined by the average? Of course, the terminology was developed by those in the educational system who believe that their left-of-center views are the center, most reasonable position. That’s also why you will never see anyone described far-left, radical left, or alt-left.

richard verney
Reply to  Jtom
January 1, 2017 7:25 am

In the UK you do not see anyone described as ‘right’ wing, it is always far right. The same description is made of European political parties. Populist parties such as Le Penns are always labelled as far right, not simply right wing.
The descriptions are very unbalanced; as you say one never sees the label of far left being applied, and one always sees the label of far right being applied rather than merely right wing.

Ed zuiderwijk
December 31, 2016 8:14 am

Divine wind, devine wind mills, kamikaze mills. Like that.

Gary
December 31, 2016 8:23 am

The talent of the Left has always been to sell an emotionally pleasing idea such as a clean environment to the public while changing the subject behind the scenes. This is an exceptionally difficult tactic to defeat since people tend to think emotionally and are generally too busy with the routine and demands of life to pay attention until it’s late in the day. Then some get mad and rebel, but rebellions in democracies usually are short, dramatic flare-ups that settle back down in a short time. Then the cycle starts another round.

Bob Hoye
December 31, 2016 8:37 am

“Divine” comment.
I’ll add that the movement is another popular uprising similar to the one that took out Communism in 1989.
The Berlin Wall fell on November 9, 1989.
Results of the US election were concluded on November 9.

Hans-Georg
Reply to  Bob Hoye
December 31, 2016 9:01 am

And I am a German and was born on November 10th. And Elvis Presley sang about a cold, gray Chicago November morning. But fun aside, the great teeth gnashing over the US revolt against the global AGW industry is still going on. And China is involved as the world’s largest manufacturer of wind power plants and solar panels. Trump quickly recognized where the wind blew. From the gray, foggy (confused by Elvis Presley years ago with chicago) Beijing. Chinese people see their business model floating, which they had just peed off so beautifully and copied from Western inventions. Oh noe. Perhaps this should be a case for an investigation committee in the trump time. In the meantime, we are paying higher energy prices in Germany every year. The proud second place behind Denmark (it’s a bit lazy in the state of Denmark <), we have intermittently eternal with an enormous intermediate sprint. Only the goals of reducing CO2 emissions and reducing energy consumption have been far behind us. We could say we were running backwards from the starting line.

Pop Piasa
December 31, 2016 8:42 am

When the MSM becomes lopsided in its take on any issue, it is just cause for concern by its consumers. It has become very challenging for an individual to examine issues from all the angles, inside and out, which used to be in one objective report, free of buzzwords to spin perspective or stir emotion.
The blatant tunnel vision of the MSM makes me glad I changed my major from Journalism to Biology back in school. I would be very frustrated or completely brainwashed by now, I’m not sure which.

richard verney
Reply to  Pop Piasa
January 1, 2017 7:28 am

Or in poverty and out of a job if your morals survived intact.
You made the right choice for your soul.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  richard verney
January 1, 2017 10:55 am

Ironic, but I later chucked the whole degree thing for a job operating power plants, only to end up back at the university I had quit, as a facilities operator/stationary engr., until retirement.
I’m not that groovy at journalism anyway, I thought I wanted to get into TV newscasting until I had a talk with a St. Louis Radio personality my aunt knew and got a dose of the realities of that business.

Reply to  Pop Piasa
January 1, 2017 3:43 pm

Back in 1990 I met someone who wrote feature articles for a major newspaper. Her latest article was about a woman who had built a business based on healing pets by the laying on of hands. I asked, “how do you know she has this power?” The journalist looked at me in surprise and said “she told me!”
This was someone who was hardworking and honest, but simply didn’t have the concept that someone claiming a strange power might be untruthful or mistaken. Main-stream media.

Wharfplank
December 31, 2016 8:46 am

I am proudly banned for life from the Mother Jones website..if we could harness the warm and fuzzy I get from that we could mothball all the panels and pinwheels.

wws
Reply to  Wharfplank
December 31, 2016 8:51 am

heh – I know I got banned from the Ecowatch site, just for asking a few uncomfortable questions.

wws
Reply to  wws
December 31, 2016 12:07 pm

I just checked – I’m banned from Mother Jones too! And all I did was say something that mildly signaled that I wasn’t part of the Collective.

Robert Doyle
December 31, 2016 8:48 am

Trump wasn’t a presidential candidate when Germans began to boil.
Thanks to Pierre Gosselin at notrickszone.com!
http://notrickszone.com/2015/04/18/growing-unrest-german-trade-union-to-protest-co2-plan-that-threatens-100000-jobs-and-affordable-and-reliable-energy/#sthash.75CENv2X.dpbs
Growing Unrest: German Trade Union To Protest CO2 Plan That “Threatens 100,000 Jobs” And “Affordable And Reliable” Energy !
By P Gosselin on 18. April 2015
Germany’s powerful trade unions have long been major constituents of the country’s SPD social democrat party. But new CO2 reduction plans being drawn up by Germany’s Economics Ministry, headed by SPD chief Sigmar Gabriel, has the country’s mining, chemical and energy workers up in arms.
The IG BCE trade union representing a variety German energy employees is calling on its members to demonstrate in Berlin, on 25 April 2015.
The planned protests further puts a German government in an increasingly awkward position as it attempts to appease both the powerful environmental groups, and the country’s influential industrial trade unions.
100,000 jobs at risk, “social blackouts”
Coal power plants supply approximately 45% of the country’s electricity demands. German online daily Die Welt here reports that the Economics Ministry has produced a concept paper calling for capping emissions of older coal plants, and subjecting excessive emissions to hefty fees.
The 125-year old IG BCE union claims the plan threatens 100,000 jobs – in regions where economies are already strained. “Ultimately the social blackout of entire regions threaten,” the IG BCE warn. It also says that scaling back coal power “puts an affordable and reliable power supply at risk“.
The IG BCE announces large demonstrations outside Chancellor Angela Merkel’s office in Berlin on April 25:
The motto: “Enough, we oppose!”
“Unrealistic” figures
Die Welt writes that the IG BCE had investment bank Lazard check over the draft plan. Lazard found that it is based on “unrealistically high power prices” for the year 2020.The prices projected for 2020 by the government will in fact be much lower, and thus means the plan would result in 85 to 95 percent of the power plants being unprofitable. The cap would literally mean the end of Germany’s lignite-fired power plants.
IG BCE commenter Thomas Rohde writes he will surely be attending the demo, and comments:
For too long we have believed politicians that an affordable energy supply and good jobs were worth it. The gods of climate protection have blindly run and sacrificed the guarantors of prosperity and value creation at the altar of CO2 reductions, much to the joy of other EU and industrial countries.”

John Robertson
December 31, 2016 8:51 am

It is always the way of the criminal and con-artist to cast blame and accuse the messenger of their own crimes.
Gang Green revealed their true nature decades ago, but rational people doubted their own senses and required repeated evidence of the Eco-Loons madness.
Kipling’s poem:The wrath of the Saxon(?) sums up this aspect of human nature, as does the old :A lie is halfway around the world before truth starts to get its boots on.
The emotional ones have had their say, we listened and then asked the questions, they have not answered.
Meanwhile the fools and bandits infesting our governments have rushed to accelerate this wave of mass hysteria.So much for the prime directive of bureaucracy.
So the CAGW hysteria has blessed us in many ways, primarily in allowing the irrational and extremely gullible amongst us to expose themselves.
Perhaps we will learn to chose our “leaders” better.
Or accept the education we have so expensively had thrust upon us.

James Francisco
Reply to  John Robertson
December 31, 2016 11:28 am

John. I liked the “wave of mass hysteria ” part, the best of your very good comments. I looked into some mass hysteria articles a few years ago. They were very interesting. Unfortunately it is not a recient phenomenon.

BCBill
December 31, 2016 8:52 am

Here in Canada, the progressive parties fought NAFTA tooth and nail because it would cause job loss to Mexico, which it did. Now when Trump criticizes NAFTA, the progressives are suddenly in favour of it???? “Doublethink” is upon us.

polski
Reply to  BCBill
December 31, 2016 9:37 am

BCBill, make sure you fill up your vehicles today and any other unit that takes fuel since the carbon tax takes effect at the strike of midnight thanks to the new Liberal PM…I’m on my way right after I finish plowing all this global warming for the 8th time in 5 days!

Stephen Richards
Reply to  polski
December 31, 2016 10:40 am

In FRANCE AS WELL; All good socialist states. IDIOTS

MarkG
Reply to  polski
December 31, 2016 12:28 pm

Crap. I’d go and fill mine, but there’s far too much Global Warming in the driveway to want to get out of the house until I have to.

commieBob
Reply to  BCBill
December 31, 2016 9:41 am

NAFTA came into force under U.S. President Bill Clinton (Democrat) and Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien (Liberal). It coincides with the time when the Democrat party turned its back on the New Deal and the workers.
During the election, Chretien promised to abrogate NAFTA. Once he was elected with a comfortable majority, he betrayed the voters. link The Liberal party is reputed to run from the left and rule from the right … so no surprise there.
The Canadian New Democratic Party (NDP) seems not to think NAFTA is a problem any more. link That puts the party at odds with its supposed union supporters.

MarkG
Reply to  commieBob
December 31, 2016 10:59 am

You only get to be a career politician by doing what your masters tell you to. That’s why it took an outsider like Trump to break the globalist ‘elite’ stranglehold on US politics.

ferdberple
Reply to  commieBob
December 31, 2016 12:03 pm

Chretien promised to abrogate NAFTA
===============
what about GST? Wasn’t that another Chretien broken promise?

MarkG
Reply to  commieBob
December 31, 2016 12:05 pm

SJWs always lie. Hopefully The Boy King and all his failed promises are going to make the Liberals as unelectable as the Democrats after Obama.

garymount
Reply to  BCBill
December 31, 2016 11:39 am

It was the FTA between US and Canada that they fought against and yet when they won the federal election, they passed it into law.

nn
December 31, 2016 9:03 am

More like the green blight. The double-edged scalpel of environmentalist propaganda corrupts the climate and undermines a proper assessment on its merits.

C.E.Artus
December 31, 2016 9:04 am

Flaunting your working class credentials by using the wrong spelling for Champagne?

ferdberple
Reply to  C.E.Artus
December 31, 2016 12:04 pm

Only people from the Champaigne region can use the word “Champaigne”. Everyone else is legally required to use Champagne.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  ferdberple
December 31, 2016 2:58 pm

I’m closer to Bourbon than Champaigne.
http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/49044883.jpg

Reply to  ferdberple
December 31, 2016 7:10 pm

Au contraire. He used the word “champaign,” which is perfectly good English for flat and open country. “Champaign socialists” hail from the Midwest, but head for the coasts, where they can do more damage.

afonzarelli
Reply to  ferdberple
December 31, 2016 10:55 pm

Pop, i live in the french quarter. How come i ain’t never seen that sign? (hic…)

December 31, 2016 9:08 am

Some things will change quickly. Trump’s acting tough and putting together a cabinet that telegraphs its purposes has itself changed the world, and will cause abrupt about-faces on climate research and concerns, the functions of the UN, World Bank, Nato and other international institutions, changes in education directions away from knowledge-lite propaganda, reining in of the post normal excesses in universities (closure of dozens of wifty poofty faculties), repurposing of national and international scientific organizations, etc. Actors in the climate world will be throwing each other under buses to grab onto a 90% reduction in funding and jobs, etc. Retraining for productive work will be a massive industry in itself. Remember Raegan’s election alone released hostages from Iran and set the foundations of USSR crumbling. The entire Asian including Asia Minor, continent has been schooled to fear and respect strength (part of pearse foreign policy 101 some of you may have seen recently) – they are in for a big change, too.

December 31, 2016 9:11 am

There is no “Trump effect” a long simmering mistrust of the “post industrial” “new world order” by and for the academic, political, and financial elite is finding expression in an “almost anything but that” political resistance. I don’t know if Trump has the sophistication to understand the tiger he has by the tail but I do hope he will not be captured and bogged down by the “professional” politicians and civil servants. The Obama administration is very busy hanging as many booby traps and IED’s as they can on the way out the door in order to confine the political debate to the choice between impotent “progressive” verses “conservative” memes rather than a US policy revolution. I do not think I can recall a time since the Eisenhower warning about the “military industrial complex” when the white house has been poised to shrug off the “professionals” and set course in a new direction. I hope this is not just a deception and that we will have a Happy New Year!

Pop Piasa
Reply to  fossilsage
December 31, 2016 12:33 pm

I will toast to that, sir.
Cheers.

Mark
Reply to  Pop Piasa
January 1, 2017 3:25 am

It’s completely insane, and perfectly captures the insanity we are rebelling against.

Barbara Skolaut
December 31, 2016 9:14 am

Dang! At least some of the German people have changed since I lived there in the 1970’s. In a good way. 😀

Jan
December 31, 2016 9:19 am

What a wonderful video to use to cap 2016. I have sent it on to some friends of mine.
When I tire of reading the doom-and-gloom and hearing the heartbreak-of-uncomprehended-vote-failure, I will return and renew my ‘faith’ with this video.

MRW
Reply to  Jan
December 31, 2016 2:46 pm

I agree. It’s great.

December 31, 2016 9:23 am

If only people understood politics.
A Thermodynamic Explanation Of Politics
And a more recent update:
http://classicalvalues.com/2016/12/two-ecologies/

1 2 3
Verified by MonsterInsights