Claim: Climate is killing off the Reindeer

Strolling reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) in the Kebnekaise valley, Lappland, Sweden.
Strolling reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) in the Kebnekaise valley, Lappland, Sweden. By Alexandre Buisse (Nattfodd) – self-made (http://www.alexandrebuisse.org), CC BY-SA 3.0, Link

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Professor Bruce Forbes has speculated that increasing frequency of rain in the Arctic, which freezes to hard ice, is starving the reindeer by preventing them from breaking through to their frozen fodder.

80,000 reindeer have starved to death as Arctic sea ice retreats

By Andy Coghlan

It’s not just polar bears that are suffering as Arctic sea ice retreats.

Tens of thousands of reindeer in Arctic Russia starved to death in 2006 and 2013 because of unusual weather linked to global warming. The same conditions in the first half of November led to both famines, which killed 20,000 deer in 2006 and 61,000 in 2013.

Sea ice retreated and unseasonally warm temperatures contributed to heavy rains, which later froze the snow cover for months, cutting off the reindeer’s usual food supply of lichen and other vegetation.

“Reindeer are used to sporadic ice cover, and adult males can normally smash through ice around 2 centimetres thick,” says Bruce Forbes at the University of Lapland in Rovaniemi, Finland, who led the study. “But in 2006 and 2013, the ice was several tens of centimetres thick.”

This September saw the second-lowest level of sea-ice cover on record in the Arctic, and there is fear of another famine.

“If we see such events again this year, it could mean that they’re becoming more frequent,” says Forbes. “Now is the risk window, and if it happens again, it will be a major problem for traditional reindeer herders still suffering from losses in 2013.”

Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2112958-80000-reindeer-have-starved-to-death-as-arctic-sea-ice-retreats/

The abstract of the study;

Sea ice, rain-on-snow and tundra reindeer nomadism in Arctic Russia

Bruce C. Forbes, Timo Kumpula, Nina Meschtyb, Roza Laptander, Marc Macias-Fauria, Pentti Zetterberg, Mariana Verdonen, Anna Skarin, Kwang-Yul Kim, Linette N. Boisvert, Julienne C. Stroeve, Annett Bartsch

Sea ice loss is accelerating in the Barents and Kara Seas (BKS). Assessing potential linkages between sea ice retreat/thinning and the region’s ancient and unique social–ecological systems is a pressing task. Tundra nomadism remains a vitally important livelihood for indigenous Nenets and their large reindeer herds. Warming summer air temperatures have been linked to more frequent and sustained summer high-pressure systems over West Siberia, Russia, but not to sea ice retreat. At the same time, autumn/winter rain-on-snow (ROS) events have become more frequent and intense. Here, we review evidence for autumn atmospheric warming and precipitation increases over Arctic coastal lands in proximity to BKS ice loss. Two major ROS events during November 2006 and 2013 led to massive winter reindeer mortality episodes on the Yamal Peninsula. Fieldwork with migratory herders has revealed that the ecological and socio-economic impacts from the catastrophic 2013 event will unfold for years to come. The suggested link between sea ice loss, more frequent and intense ROS events and high reindeer mortality has serious implications for the future of tundra Nenets nomadism.

Read more: http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/12/11/20160466

It seems a bit premature to call the end of Reindeer. Reindeer evolved into their current form over half a million years ago, according to Wikipedia the earliest remnant was dated to 680,000BP – 620,000BP. Since then they have survived several interglacials, including the warm Eemian interglacial, a 15,000 year interglacial which was at least 1-2C warmer than today.

The climate has also likely been significantly warmer in the recent past, as the following Climategate email (0907975032.txt) demonstrates;

From: Rashit Hantemirov

To: Keith Briffa

Subject: Short report on progress in Yamal work

Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 19:17:12 +0500

Reply-to: Rashit Hantemirov

Dear Keith,

I apologize for delay with reply. Below is short information about state of Yamal work.

Samples from 2,172 subfossil larches (appr. 95% of all samples), spruces (5%) and birches (solitary finding) have been collected within a region centered on about 67030’N, 70000’E at the southern part of Yamal Peninsula. All of them have been measured.

Success has already been achieved in developing a continuous larch ring-width chronology extending from the present back to 4999 BC. My version of chronology (individual series indexed by corridor method) attached (file “yamal.gnr”). I could guarantee today that last 4600-years interval (2600 BC – 1996 AD) of chronology is reliable. Earlier data (5000 BC – 2600 BC) are needed to be examined more properly.

Using this chronology 1074 subfossil trees have been dated. Temporal distribution of trees is attached (file “number”). Unfortunately, I can’t sign with confidence the belonging to certain species (larch or spruce) of each tree at present.

Ring width data of 539 dated subfossil trees and 17 living larches are attached (file “yamal.rwm”). Some samples measured on 2 or more radii. First letter means species (l- larch, p- spruce, _ – uncertain), last cipher – radius. These series are examined for missing rings. If you need all the dated individual series I can send the rest of data, but the others are don’t corrected as regards to missing rings.

Residuary 1098 subfossil trees don’t dated as yet. More than 200 of them have less than 60 rings, dating of such samples often is not confident. Great part undated wood remnants most likely older than 7000 years.

Some results (I think, the temperature reconstruction you will done better than me):

Millennium-scale changes of interannual tree growth variability havebeen discovered. There were periods of low (5000-2800 BC), middle (2800-1700 BC) and high interannual variability (1700 BC – to the present).

Exact dating of hundreds of subfossil trees gave a chance to clear up the temporal distribution of trees abundance, age structure, frequency of trees deaths and appearances during last seven millennia. Assessment of polar tree line changes has been carried out by mapping of dated subfossil trees.

According to reconsructions most favorable conditions for tree growth have been marked during 5000-1700 BC. At that time position of tree line was far northward of recent one. [Unfortunately, region of our research don’t include the whole area where trees grew during the Holocene. We can maintain that before 1700 BC tree line was northward of our research area. We have only 3 dated remnants of trees from Yuribey River sampled by our colleagues (70 km to the north from recent polar tree line) that grew during 4200-4016 and 3330-2986 BC.]

This period is pointed out by low interannual variability of tree growth and high trees abundance discontinued, however, by several short (50-100 years) unfavorable periods, most significant of them dated about 4060-3990 BC. Since about 2800 BC gradual worsening of tree growth condition has begun. Significant shift of the polar tree line to the south have been fixed between 1700 and 1600 BC. At the same time interannual tree growth variability increased appreciably. During last 3600 years most of reconstructed indices have been varying not so very significant. Tree line has been shifting within 3-5 km near recent one. Low abundance of trees has been fixed during 1410-1250 BC and 500-350 BC. Relatively high number of trees has been noted during 750-1450 AD.

There are no evidences of moving polar timberline to the north during last century.

Please, let me know if you need more data or detailed report.

Best regards,

Rashit Hantemirov

Lab. of Dendrochronology

Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology

8 Marta St., 202

Ekaterinburg, 620144, Russia

e-mail: rashit@xxxxxxxxx

Fax: xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Whatever climatic variation is occurring in the present day, at least in terms of its impact on the Arctic, is insignificant compared to natural variation which occurred in past millennia of the Holocene, or even within the last 1000 years.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
77 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nash
November 16, 2016 7:43 pm

Will reindeer replace polar bear as the new mascot for the global warming movement? Since the polar bears didn’t die off as expected.

Jon
Reply to  Nash
November 16, 2016 8:12 pm

Nash that was because the insufferables were in power. Now the deplorables are in the White House, the modeleld dying of polar bears in the future will increase. Oops, sorry, MAY increase.

Reply to  Jon
November 16, 2016 8:27 pm

Nah, it’s Christmas; time to switch the mascot.

Mike McMillan
Reply to  Jon
November 17, 2016 3:42 am

Santa can use caribou. Plentiful in Canada, and nobody would know the difference.

EricHa
Reply to  Jon
November 17, 2016 8:36 am

DON’T PANIC
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3943286/Is-BIRD-POOP-helping-Arctic-cool-Researchers-say-vast-waste-altering-cloud-formation.html
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/11/16/19/00A1558E000004B0-0-image-a-1_1479324165494.jpg
PUFFINS TO THE RESCUE
Arctic bird droppings may help keep temperatures cool in the Arctic, researchers have found.
They say massive colonies of seabirds create an equally massive amount of waste.
This releases ammonia gas, which reacts with sulfuric acid and water vapor to form clusters of molecules in the atmosphere – which then affect cloud formation.

Dahlquist
Reply to  Jon
November 17, 2016 1:23 pm

And also, all that whitish bird poo on the rocks helps raise the libido… I mean albedo as well.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  Jon
November 17, 2016 2:02 pm

Reindeer are just like Polar Bears to most of the population. They have only seen them in Zoos and really have no knowledge of their habitat, food needs or anything else that is not ‘media provided’. They only see the spin that is applied to the picturesque and cuddly-looking creatures.

Reply to  Nash
November 16, 2016 8:13 pm

They did too die off, you denier! In 1970, there were about 5000 polar bears in the world. Today, there are only 25000 – 30000 left! ……… /sarc

Jer0me
Reply to  Kamikazedave
November 16, 2016 9:14 pm

Less all the time! There are less poley bears today than tomorrow, and yesterday there were less than today. It’s worser that we thought!

Greg
Reply to  Kamikazedave
November 17, 2016 3:24 am

Last thing I heard the Russian govt. was suggesting a massive kull of reindeer because they have been bred to the point where there are far too many for the land to support.
If they are dying of starvation it may be nature trying to redress human interference.
However, I’m sure that left-wing lierz at the Guardian and the rest of the media will manage to spin this into another “Christmas is cancelled” scare story for children : no presents will be delivered this year because all of Santa’s reindeer are DEAD !

MarkW
Reply to  Kamikazedave
November 17, 2016 7:42 am

I’m willing to bet that every polar bear that was alive in 1970 has died.

Reply to  Kamikazedave
November 17, 2016 10:21 am

They didn’t get the message – “It’s not just polar bears that are suffering as Arctic sea ice retreats”.

Jonah Varlik
Reply to  Nash
November 17, 2016 5:48 am

Let me understand this: We are all living normal, non-elitist lives, so we are creating more CO2 (which is a plant food). This (allegedly) makes the planet warmer, so that the ice melts. Where did the ice causing reindeer starvation come from? Aliens?
Oh well, soon the drowning polar bears can grab on to floating reindeer carcasses.

Hugs
Reply to  Nash
November 17, 2016 8:05 am

No polar bears at Rovaniemi. The reindeer is not threatened, but there are too many of them.
The number is controlled by human herders. Reindeer is an expensive meat product. Herding there is also a privilege of the natives, not Finns.
See https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fi&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hs.fi%2Fkotimaa%2Fa1416715302847
You probably need to copy paste the text to get it translated from Finnish.

Reply to  Hugs
November 17, 2016 10:00 am

Wait? Finns aren’t native to Finland?

Lawrie Ayres
Reply to  Hugs
November 17, 2016 6:33 pm

I think there are too many “scientists” trying to be published. Just imagine if 97% climate scientists went away.

Chimp
November 16, 2016 7:43 pm

Luckily for Alaskan caribou, the pipeline allows them to calve without their newborns freezing. Caribou population has exploded since the pipeline.

commieBob
Reply to  Chimp
November 16, 2016 8:02 pm

You are so right.

Reality: Thirty years later we can see the effects of the pipeline on the caribou. Walter Hickel, a former U.S. Secretary of the Interior and governor of Alaska, said that the caribou herd has not only survived, but flourished. In 1977, as the Prudhoe region started delivering oil to America’s southern 48 states, the Central Arctic caribou herd numbered 6,000; it has since grown to 27,128. Alaskas Department of Fish and Game Web site reports that in general, caribou have not been adversely affected by human activities in Alaska. Pipelines and other manmade objects have been built to accommodate caribou movements, and the animals have adapted to people and machines. link

The experts were wrong … again.

Chimp
Reply to  commieBob
November 16, 2016 9:41 pm

Not just the caribou have benefited from the pipeline, but the carnivores which feed upon them. Bears walk on the pipeline to keep their feet warm.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-TBnfZGrR_YU/Uqem0oh7LyI/AAAAAAAAACo/dU53NsiA0Ao/s400/bear+pipeline.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-J5Y1hAOZkAo/Uqel9nQAcdI/AAAAAAAAACg/ezsKjSl6D-w/s400/caribou.jpg

Tom Halla
November 16, 2016 7:47 pm

Weren’t these the same reindeer that died of anthrax? The earlier post and discussion on that subject got into the recent increase in the size of the herd, and discontinuance of anthrax immunization, etc. Further, Briffa and the notion a “treemometer” is something of a bete noir, or am I seriously mistaken?

Ian Magness
Reply to  Tom Halla
November 16, 2016 11:52 pm

I think you are right about the anthrax. Also, correct me if I am wrong, but aren’t these controlled, farmed herds of caribou? What effect does that have and have the wild herds suffered in the same way? Where is the duscussion and analysis of this? This really does look like a pile of reindeer scat.

Griff
Reply to  Ian Magness
November 17, 2016 4:05 am

Yes, anthrax has affected these same herds…
They aren’t farmed in the US or European sense…
They are moved about by nomadic herders over vast open areas/long distances.

tom0mason
Reply to  Tom Halla
November 17, 2016 2:24 am

The report on Anthrax outbreak is here —
http://www.globalmeatnews.com/Safety-Legislation/Massive-anthrax-outbreak-wounds-Russia-s-venison-sector
The numbers for the total numbers of deer in the Yamal is interesting when compared to the reported starved deer.

Reply to  tom0mason
November 17, 2016 7:53 am

700,000 in the Yamal penninsula. That’s a lot of reindeer! I wonder how many have red, light up noses? (Thats a joke Lief)

commieBob
November 16, 2016 7:49 pm

The email shows that in 1998 Briffa was clearly told there was no evidence of warming in the Yamal Peninsula. He then cooked up his thing.
I don’t understand why Briffa isn’t in jail.

pameladragon
Reply to  commieBob
November 16, 2016 8:25 pm

Finding it hard to understand why the entire Hockey Team is not in jail.
PMK

Reply to  commieBob
November 17, 2016 6:29 am

AND alluded to evidence of the Medieval Warm Period….
“Relatively high number of trees has been noted during 750-1450 AD.”

mikebartnz
November 16, 2016 7:56 pm

As soon as he mentioned the polar bears I figured it was BS.

Retired Kit P
November 16, 2016 8:03 pm

I thought Chernobyl contamination killed all the reindeer.

Retired Kit P
November 16, 2016 8:05 pm

Before climate change, it was radiation that was going to end civilization.

troe
Reply to  Retired Kit P
November 16, 2016 8:12 pm

Climate change or CO2 global warming is a continuation if yhe radiation narrative. One was used to slow nuclear power development. The other is the counter attack.

Jon
Reply to  Retired Kit P
November 16, 2016 8:13 pm

Before radiation it was dynamite, before dynamite it was sinfulness … same old, same old.

November 16, 2016 8:16 pm

80,000 reindeer have starved to death as Arctic sea ice retreats.
But no evidence that the reyreat of September sea ice extent in the Arctic is related to warming.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2869646

Reply to  chaamjamal
November 16, 2016 8:16 pm

Retreat

markl
November 16, 2016 8:18 pm

Add them to the list of catastrophes that either aren’t happening or never materialize.

Martin Moffit
November 16, 2016 8:18 pm

This announcement is just in time for the Christmas season. Facts don’t matter when you are trying to scare the little tots into supporting your agenda.

John Silver
Reply to  Martin Moffit
November 17, 2016 7:29 am

Meh, Santa rides a snow mobile these days anyway.

November 16, 2016 8:28 pm

It’s true that we are not living in our grandparents’ climate.
What they don’t mention is that our grandparents were not living in their grandarents’ climate.

Timo Kuusela
November 16, 2016 9:20 pm

I just hope that Greens take The Reindeer as a new Mascot. They would shoot their remaining leg off because here in Finland the real reason of reindeer problem is well known: There just are too many reindeers that eat everything in their path.Their population is already too big.

Alan Robertson
Reply to  Timo Kuusela
November 16, 2016 10:45 pm

That sounds like a clear signal to increase reindeer sausage production.
I don’t know anything about Finland’s reindeer issues. All I know about modern Finland is that they build fine Sako rifles and make Vihtavuori rifle powder and Lapua bullets and brass cases, all highly sought after, here in the USA. Looks like there might be a solution in there somewhere.

hunter
November 16, 2016 9:35 pm

Oh, my God! Now Santa won’t be able to deliver gifts, all because of Trump!

jmorpuss
November 16, 2016 9:40 pm

Is that why Santa now drives a SUV https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsKXJ6E7o5k

rogerthesurf
November 16, 2016 9:41 pm

Doubt that the author knows the difference between reindeer and caribou. 🙂

Alan Robertson
Reply to  rogerthesurf
November 17, 2016 12:06 am

Since the author didn’t even mention caribou, do you have some valid point to make?

Reply to  Alan Robertson
November 17, 2016 7:55 am

Oh Alan!

Mayor of Venus
Reply to  rogerthesurf
November 17, 2016 12:05 pm

The most important difference is caribou can’t fly.

November 16, 2016 9:41 pm

Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
The Forbes et al. reindeer study would not have made the esteemed pages of WUWT, nor received government funding and grants without prefacing the study with “climate change”.
I detect a (lucrative) pattern.
Nuff said.

Dodgy Geezer
November 16, 2016 10:14 pm

Climate change does seem to be correlated well with one phenomenon.
The more we are lied to, the more anti-establishment political decisions are being made…

Clive
November 16, 2016 10:30 pm

A few years back, that fraud, Suzuki, scared kids with a disgusting Christmas webpage that told kids to send money because the Noth Pole was melting and the elves and Santa were drowning.
Oh geez, now the fruit fly guy will be demanding money to save Rudolph and his buddies. 😊

Eyal Porat
November 16, 2016 11:59 pm

What caught my eye was the fact the rain later froze for months…
Maybe it isn’t all warming after all?

Jonah Varlik
Reply to  Eyal Porat
November 17, 2016 5:50 am

“Think” this through? ?????

Reply to  Eyal Porat
November 17, 2016 6:40 am

Simple answer:
Rain from a warmer region/warm air on cold ground makes ice.
Snow from a cold region/cold air on cold ground stay snow.

David J Wendt
November 17, 2016 12:38 am

“Tens of thousands of reindeer in Arctic Russia starved to death in 2006 and 2013 because of unusual weather linked to global warming. The same conditions in the first half of November led to both famines, which killed 20,000 deer in 2006 and 61,000 in 2013.”
From the Wikipedia entry on Reindeer
Rangifer tarandus by country
Russia
In 2013, the Taimyr herd in Russia was the largest herd in the world. In 2000, the herd increased to 1,000,000 but by 2009, there were 700,000 animals.[53][59] In the 1950s, there were 110,000.[60]
There are three large herds of migratory tundra wild reindeer in central Siberia’s Yakutia region: Lena-Olenek, Yana-Indigirka and Sundrun herds. While the population of the Lena-Olenek herd is stable, the others are declining.[60]
Further east again, the Chukotka herd is also in decline. In 1971, there were 587,000 animals. They recovered after a severe decline in 1986, to only 32,200 individuals, but their numbers fell again.[61] According to Kolpashikov, by 2009 there were less than 70,000.[60]
Almost by definition Reindeer habitat is some of least hospitable real estate on Earth. Even though many reindeer are parts of at least semi-domesticated herds, they are subject to a wide variety of highly variable survivability factors which has lead to their wildly various population numbers over the years. These clucks take to events and in the well established pattern of climate alarmism create a projection of inevitable extinction.
I don’t think so.

Dougal
November 17, 2016 1:28 am

When there is a lack of food and water for the kangaroos in the drier parts of Australia, they move towards the regions that have an ample suppl; the same goes for our emus. I suspect that the reindeer are equally intelligent creatures and will move to get a feed.
There are times when I have to get off the couch -due to a lack of fodder; and find myself with ample, just a short walk away. 🙂

Dougal
November 17, 2016 1:29 am

OOPS …supply

Marcus
November 17, 2016 1:58 am

The problem is, the Reindeer now “identify” as Polar Bears and are not quit sure which bathroom to use. !

tom0mason
November 17, 2016 2:13 am

Come on people, all the childish AGW advocates are after is to be able to point fingers and chant something nasty
….like….

You killed Bambi!

Are you prepared for the real imagined hurt that is going to cause?

November 17, 2016 2:47 am

Reindeer got themselves to blame, they produce lot of dung.
Arctic ice was supposed to disappear by the last September, but it didn’t.
Since all climate models show that should have been the case, there must be a good reason for it not doing so,
The cause is sh i t, yes birds’ sh i t
“A team of researchers with members from Canada, Sweden and U.S. has found that bird excrement may be playing a role in cooling the Arctic during its warmer months.”
http://phys.org/news/2016-11-bird-excrement-cooling-arctic.html

John Harmsworth
Reply to  vukcevic
November 17, 2016 7:06 pm

4 million sq miles of bird poop? What are doing mining fertilizer? Ridiculous!