From the University of Massachusetts at Amherst
High mountains warming faster than expected
UMass Amherst climate scientist and international team call for extra attention

AMHERST, Mass. – High elevation environments around the world may be warming much faster than previously thought, according to members of an international research team including Raymond Bradley, director of the Climate System Research Center at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. They call for more aggressive monitoring of temperature changes in mountain regions and more attention to the potential consequences of warming.
“Elevation-dependent warming is a poorly observed phenomenon that requires urgent attention to ensure that potentially important changes in high mountain environments are adequately monitored by the global observational network,” say members of the Mountain Research Initiative Working Group in the current issue of Nature Climate Change.
High mountains are the major water source for large numbers of people living at lower elevations, so the social and economic consequences of enhanced warming in mountain regions could be large, the researchers add. “This alone requires that close attention be paid to the issue. In addition, mountains provide habitat for many of the world’s rare and endangered species, and the presence of many different ecosystems in close proximity enhances the ecological sensitivity of mountains to environmental change.”
Lead author Nick Pepin of the University of Portsmouth, U.K., says, “There is growing evidence that high mountain regions are warming faster than lower elevations and such warming can accelerate many other environmental changes such as glacial melt and vegetation change, but scientists urgently need more and better data to confirm this. If we are right and mountains are warming more rapidly than other environments, the social and economic consequences could be serious, and we could see more dramatic changes much sooner than previously thought.”
UMass Amherst’s Bradley adds that without substantially better information, there is a risk of underestimating the severity of a number of problems, including water shortages and the possible extinction of some alpine flora and fauna.
He says, “We are calling for special efforts to be made to extend scientific observations upwards to the highest summits to capture what is happening across the world’s mountains. We also need a strong effort to find, collate and evaluate observational data that already exists wherever it is in the world. This requires international collaboration.”
Records of weather patterns at high altitudes are “extremely sparse,” the researchers found. There are very few weather stations above 14,700 feet (4,500 m), and long-term data, crucial for detecting patterns, doesn’t yet exist above 16,400 feet (5,000 m) anywhere in the world. The authors say the longest observations above this elevation are from the summit of Kilimanjaro, which have been maintained for more than a decade by Douglas Hardy of UMass Amherst.
For this study, Pepin, Bradley and colleagues reviewed elevation-dependent warming mechanisms such as loss of snow and ice, increased latent heat release at high altitudes, low-elevation aerosol pollutants that increase the difference in warming rates between low and high elevations, plus other factors that enhance warming with elevation in different regions, and in different seasons.
They discuss future needs to improve knowledge of mountain temperature trends and mechanisms via improved observations, satellite-based remote sensing and model simulations. Noting that “many factors make it extremely difficult to determine the rate of warming in mountainous regions,” the team reports the most striking evidence that mountain regions are warming more rapidly than surrounding regions comes from the Tibetan plateau, where temperatures have risen steadily over the past 50 years and the rate of change is accelerating.
This research team with members from the U.K., U.S., Switzerland, Canada, Ecuador, Pakistan, China, Italy, Austria and Kazakhstan, came together as part of the Mountain Research Initiative, a mountain global change research effort funded by the Swiss National Foundation.
###
Note: The name of the paper wasn’t included in the press release, so I took the liberty of looking it up.
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v5/n5/full/nclimate2563.html
Elevation-dependent warming in mountain regions of the world
Nature Climate Change5,424–430(2015) doi:10.1038/nclimate2563
Mountain Research Initiative EDW Working Group
Abstract
There is growing evidence that the rate of warming is amplified with elevation, such that high-mountain environments experience more rapid changes in temperature than environments at lower elevations. Elevation-dependent warming (EDW) can accelerate the rate of change in mountain ecosystems, cryospheric systems, hydrological regimes and biodiversity. Here we review important mechanisms that contribute towards EDW: snow albedo and surface-based feedbacks; water vapour changes and latent heat release; surface water vapour and radiative flux changes; surface heat loss and temperature change; and aerosols. All lead to enhanced warming with elevation (or at a critical elevation), and it is believed that combinations of these mechanisms may account for contrasting regional patterns of EDW. We discuss future needs to increase knowledge of mountain temperature trends and their controlling mechanisms through improved observations, satellite-based remote sensing and model simulations.
Since they seem to be focused on the Tibetan Plateau, one wonders if this isn’t just another hyped up claim like Himalya-gate. The langage in the PR seems similar, worrying about “…there is a risk of underestimating the severity of a number of problems, including water shortages and the possible extinction of some alpine flora and fauna.”.
From what I can tell, they are using GHCN data for high elevation stations, such as the one from the Sulphur Mountain Weather Observatory, in Banf, Alberta. In 1903, a meteorological observatory building was completed on Sanson Peak, named in 1948 in honour of Norman Bethune Sanson, the observer who tended the recording equipment for nearly 30 years. There is also a nearby cosmic ray monitoring station.
Elevation: 2283m (7490 ft)

The GISS plot of the GHCN data doesn’t seem to show much in the way of recent warming though. In fact, even though the record is incomplete, the most recent data segment looks to be a bit cooler.
Though given that such places tend to attract the curious, who want to climb the mountain to be close to the science…
…one wonders if similar weather observatories in Tibet aren’t simply seeing the effects of increased tourism, resulting in land use modification.
After all, Al Gore’s claim of warming on Mount Kilimanjaro:
Mount Kilimanjaro. Mr. Gore asserted that the disappearance of snow on Mount Kilimanjaro in East Africa was expressly attributable to global warming; “Within the decade, there will be no more snows of Kilimanjaro.” That was in 2005 in his movie An Inconvenient Truth.
…turned out to be nothing more than land use change around the mountain, resulting in less evapotranspiration, less snow, and therefore a lower albedo, which tends to make the mountaintop warmer with all that exposed rock. Yep, it’s the trees.
And now, the snow is coming back to Kilimanjaro.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



Give me a cash grant! I want to go hiking in remote mountainous areas also…. but I have to work for a living!
What utter balderdash!
South America has endured (or enjoyed, if you’re a skier) record cold & snow since at least the rare Atacama Desert snowfall of 2011. Good for the water supply. Every year since has been colder & snowier, if not before, than “normal”. Even the SH summer was so severe that a recent annual expedition to the Pine Island Glacier, Antarctica had to be called off.
No observable warming in the Andes station record.
BTW, there’s now a WX station on the South Col of Everest. Or was. Don’t know if it’s still there or not. If still there, expect its readings to be heavily adjusted.
Global warming-induced record cold kills 250,000 Peruvian alpacas:
http://conservativehideout.com/2013/09/01/record-cold-peru-250000-alpacas-persih-global-warming-blame/
My brother is a llama rancher & former Bolivian alpaca importer.
I.e. it may not be a solid, proven fact, that high mountains are warming faster than expected, but they are expected to warm faster than expected.
What a gem of logic!
“Elevation-dependent warming is a poorly observed phenomenon that requires urgent attention to ensure that potentially important changes in high mountain environments are adequately monitored by the global observational network,”
Translation: I need millions of dollars in grants, right now!!!
If if makes you feel better they are very unlikely to go to the top of these mountains , after all ‘climate models ‘ can give them all the ‘proof’ they need without any nasty messing around with unreliable reality.
If they are using the Sulfur mountain data, did they take in to account that the top of Sulfur mountain is a major tourist location? There are gondolas running daily up the mountain ( http://www.albertaeh.ca/gallery/var/albums/Rocky-Mountain-Region/Banff-Alberta/Sulfur-Mountain/gondola20090720_17.JPG?m=1399744507 ), there is a resteraunt and observation building at the top ( https://cdn2.gbot.me/photos/DW/mR/1284957027/Sulfur_Mountain_Gondola-Banff_Sulphur_Mountain_Go-3000000000777-500×375.jp ) and there are stone and cement walkways providing easy access to the door of the monitoring station ( http://www.websitesbyjudy.com/canadianrockiespicts/banffsulfurmoutaintop.gif ). I would think all of those warm bodies walking around it day in and day out would have some effect on the temperature readings?
The weather station is at a different location from the restaurant and tourist activity… in fact, that picture is the weather station from the tourist center. The weather station is upwind of the tourist center in almost all weather situations.
Using Sulphur mountain for a weather station isn’t very telling, though, and I would say that whether it supported warming or cooling conclusions.
I live an hour away from there, and have been in and around that area my whole life. One thing that everyone should know is that Banff has uncommonly variable weather. It’s the leading edge of where Chinooks hit. It’s a highly trafficked area because of the spectacular view. It’s not uncommon to experience 60-100 MPH winds up there. Because of its location at the end of a mountain pass the Pacific flow slams it regularly, bringing weather that doesn’t match the surrounding area.
I actually climbed that mountain on foot, on a whim, with no preparations, water, or food when I was 18, and it’s a good thing they gondola everyone down because there’s no way I could have walked down it. At the bottom of the mountain is a world-famous hot springs, which has changed over the last few decades (there’s a lot of geothermal heat there).
the third picture lik is a close up of the weather station and all the people around it and it’s ease of access for tourists, unlike the pictures above. Have been up there a few time my self.
Of course, this is so important ( = “urgent”). Otherwise the “social and economic consequences” … umm don’t bear thinking about. I see the alpine meadows and slopes are intensively developed and heavily settled. They’re also covered with lush forest and dense growth, without exception.
If alpine species can’t adapt to slightly warmer temperatures and become extinct, then there is an alternative lower temperature habitat for the “endangered” poly-bear. Only vegans need apply.
Or will that mean polar bears in the back yard, pilfering, pillaging, and plundering our domestic rubbish bins?
The polar bears are sending urgent messages to send many more scientists to study them and for these to please not bring any guns. And dress in grey gear so they look more like seals would be greatly appreciated.
A lot of the data just doesn’t support their “assumptions”:
12 October 2014: …But in the mountainous Karakoram region of Asia — home to K2, the second-highest peak on Earth — the glaciers aren’t melting. If anything, some are expanding – Ref:
http://m.livescience.com/48256-asia-karakoram-glaciers-stability.html
Snow slowly building on Mount Kilimanjaro:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/03/21/kilimanjaro-regaining-its-snow-cap/
Hubbard Glacier is the largest of eight calving glaciers in Alaska that are currently increasing in total mass and advancing. Hubbard Glacier begins on a Mount Logan ridge at about 18,300 feet. Hubbard is the largest tidewater glacier in North America. Status: advancing:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs-001-03/
It looks like the largest tidewater glacier of the Patagonian ice field is also advancing. From Wikipedia: “Brüggen Glacier, also known as Pío XI Glacier, is in southern Chile and is the largest western outflow from the Southern Patagonian Ice Field. The glacier’s source begins at Mt. Cordon Mariano Moreno Elevation: 3490 m / 11450 ft Now about 66 km (41 mi) in length, it is the longest glacier in the southern hemisphere outside of Antarctica.” – Status: advancing.
Taku Glacier of the Juneau Ice field (the largest glacier in that Ice field) is advancing, as opposed to the much smaller glaciers from that same ice field (Taku Glacier) is advancing. Recognized as the deepest and thickest glacier known in the world, the Taku Glacier is measured at 4,845 feet (1,477 m) thick. (outside of Greenland and Antarctica I would assume) The glacier begins at an altitude of between 6 to 7,000 ft. The advance is due to a positive mass balance; that is, more snow accumulates than snow and ice melt. Status: advancing.
Mt Blanc, the tallest mountain in the Alps increases in height because of growing glaciers:
http://iceagenow.info/2007/10/mont-blanc-glacier-doubles/
& http://iceagenow.com/Mont_Blanc_Glaciers_Refuse_to_Shrink.htm
There was a weather station on Mt McKinley just south of Denali Pass at an elevation of nearly 19,000 feet from 1990 to 2007, but the data is noted as “unreliable”:
http://www.iarc.uaf.edu/mt_mckinley/mt_mckinley_weather.php
“without substantially better information, there is a risk of underestimating the severity of a number of problems”
Wouldn’t it follow that without substantially better information, there is a risk of OVERestimating the severity of a number of problems?
Shhh – not so loud… someone might hear!
The air holds damn little heat at altitude . Even here at 2500m ( 8200ft ) the diurnal variance year round is close to 20c compared to about 8c at sea level in NYC .
http://cosy.com/Science/NY_WPtemps.jpg
Right now the snow line on Pikes Peak is below the tree line , the sharpness of which I’ve recently wondered about . Here’s a picture from May a couple of years ago . It could have been taken last week . Now the lowland snow is only in the woods .
http://cosy.com/images/y13/FrostyMay100743crop1024.jpg
Anybody who’s climbed to even the 4300m ( 14,000ft ) of Colorado’s mountains knows the air doesn’t hold enough heat to for any change in composition to make it substantially warmer .
One point often neglected in calculating daytime temperatures at these altitudes is the large amount of unabsorbed 5800k radiant energy density when the sun is out . If it’s sunny , it’s warm ; if it’s not , it’s not .
I’d be interested in the temperature records for the Tibetan plateau , an enormous area all at 4000m .
Top of Pikes Peak live webcam:
http://www.keno.org/colorado_web_cams/pikes_peak_cams.htm
Although Mt. Washington (the highest mountain in the NE North America – USA) is not in a glacier area, it has been recording weather/climate since 1935. From its analysis from 1935 t0 2003 here are the results:
“An analysis of the 1935-2003 temperature data (Grant et al. 2005) showed a statistically significant warming of 0.32ºC (0.58ºF) in annual average temperature. During this 69 year period the winter and spring average temperatures warmed more than the annual average, 0.71ºC (1.3ºF) and 0.80ºC (1.4ºF) respectively. Summer and fall had no significant trends. The difference between daily minimum and maximum temperatures has decreased during this period (Figure 1). These results are consistent with temperature observations across New England. ”
Not sure why the data hasn’t been updated to 2015, but the results show a decade warming of 0.0457 C increase per decade. Maybe since the “pause”, it doesn’t show warming, but cooling. Not sure why.
Reference is from here – according to their graph in figure 1, I don’t see where they get their statistics in the above paragraph after looking at the temperature graph::
https://www.mountwashington.org/research-and-product-testing/past-projects/airmap.aspx
Looking at the data on temp increase from fig 1., it looks like about a 0.4 C increase over a a 7 decade period from 1935 t0 2003 (conservatively).
Does anyone see something different??
Next he will tell us that the deserts are warmer than they thought!
The post says, “…turned out to be nothing more than land use change around the mountain, resulting in less evapotranspiration, less snow, and therefore a lower albedo, which tends to make the mountaintop warmer with all that exposed rock. Yep, it’s the trees.
And now, the snow is coming back to Kilimanjaro.”
If the snow is coming back are you saying…it wasn’t evapotranspiration from land use changes either?
Synopsis of this article: “Give us more money. The end.”
Whoa! I remember climbing those stairs…over 10 years ago. Already?! Time flies. Thanks for bringing back memories.
“…we could see more dramatic changes much sooner than previously thought.”
So was it actually warmer or was it just their “thought” that was wrong?
Thanks for the picture Anthony. Many great memories.
CodeTech I have many pictures of those steps. In 2010 I took my 8 and 6 year old grand children UP the Gondola and walked DOWN the trail but I was very impressed by a few folks we met that were actually RUNNING up that trail. Made me feel rather ancient.
As for warming, I am going skiing for a few days next week just one valley west:
http://www.skibanff.com/
I predict there will be snow on the ground and Sunshine and Lake Louise will be open for skiing until May 10 this year … although I did rake my pastures today and farmers are tilling and planting but there is still decent snow on the mountains with more in the forecast.
“There are very few weather stations above 14,700 feet (4,500 m), and long-term data, crucial for detecting patterns, doesn’t yet exist above 16,400 feet (5,000 m) anywhere in the world”.
Exactly how much of the entire world is above 4,500 m? The highest mountain in Australia is only half of that. Can I have a research grant to build a mountain?
@ur momisugly Robber, you are not thinking big enough, you should ask for a grant to raise your whole continent of Oz. The money would flood in.
Well thank goodness someone has found the missing heat.
It was hiding in the mountains like desperadoes in spaghetti westerns who are on the run from the the law.
“Don’t worry kind town folk, we’ll get that missing heat and put it back where it belongs, in CCJ, Climate Change Jail. You betcha.”
Observations of the HISTALP projectare showing that highere regions in the alps are warming faster than
Especially the “Thawing days” at Junfraujoch station show a trend supporting the article mentioned.
Observations of the HISTALP projectare showing that highere regions in the alps are warming faster than the valleys.
You can dive in here:
http://www.zamg.ac.at/histalp/
And here some observation data: from 3850m a.s.l. in the Alps
Especially the “Thawing days” at Junfraujoch station show a trend supporting the article mentioned.
http://www.nccr-climate.unibe.ch/news/images/monitoring_climate.pdf
The Tibetan plateau has seen a dramatic increase in Chinese “development” between 1961 and 2012. Not exactly your standard high elevation situation on Earth.
Actually if we posit that CO2 does have some effect on temperature and that lapse rate controls the temperature profile throughout the troposphere we can make the following argument which supports the present paper. Because warmer surface temperatures means higher absolute humidity near the surface, which means a decreased lapse rate, so that as you descend from the mountaintop elevation to the surface water vapor increases so lapse rate decreases. Above the mountaintop there is little water vapor so lapse rate remains the same (the dry lapse rate). More CO2 causes the effective emissions height to increase so that the temperature of the effective emissions height (-18C) is found at a higher level and the mountaintop temperature increases accordingly since the dry lapse rate has not changed. But below the mountaintop the humidity of the air increases so that the lapse rate in this range of altitudes decreases. This negative feedback effectively slows the rise in surface temperature, potentially completely bringing it to a stop. Frankly, I consider the positive water vapor feedback mooted by the “climate consensus” to be nonsense.
Ironic since they’ve specially dropped high altitude and remote stations from their datasets?
One can laugh at their supposed demonstration that rising temps on the Tibetan plateau represent global warming. Rising pressure show on the contrary that stronger anticyclones are reaching the zone and that the gradient pole/equator is becoming bigger.