
Auroras are the most visible manifestation of the sun’s effect on Earth, but many aspects of these spectacular displays are still poorly understood. Thanks to the joint European Space Agency and NASA’s Cluster mission combined with data from a past NASA mission called the Imager for Magnetopause-to-Aurora Global Exploration, or IMAGE, a particular type of very high-latitude aurora has now been explained.
Known as a theta aurora — because seen from above it looks like the Greek letter theta, an oval with a line crossing through the center — this type of aurora sometimes occurs closer to the poles than normal aurora. While the genesis of the auroral oval emissions is reasonably well understood, the origin of the theta aurora was unclear until now. A paper in the Dec. 19, 2014, issue of Science shows that hot plasma funneled into near-Earth space from the sun helps cause these unique aurora.
“The possibilities have been debated since the first satellite observations of the phenomenon were made in the 1980s,” said Robert Fear of the University of Southampton in the U.K. (formerly at the University of Leicester), and lead author of the Science paper.
Although separated by some 93 million miles, the sun and Earth are connected by what’s known as the solar wind. This plasma – electrically charged atomic particles – streams from the sun and travels across the solar system, carrying its own magnetic field along for the ride.
Depending on how this interplanetary magnetic field is aligned in relationship to Earth’s magnetic field, there can be various results when the solar wind arrives at near-Earths space. At the point where the two fields meet, Earth’s magnetic field points north. If the interplanetary field points in the opposite direction — south — then something called magnetic reconnection occurs, causing magnetic field lines pointing in opposite directions to suddenly realign into a new configuration.
The realignment opens the door so that solar wind material can funnel into the magnetosphere – the giant magnetic bubble surrounding Earth. This is what leads to the aurora, which is produced when the particles funnel down along Earth’s magnetic field lines and strike atoms high in the atmosphere. The interaction with oxygen atoms results in a green or, more rarely, red glow in the night sky, while nitrogen atoms yield blue and purple colors. Normally, the main region for this impressive display is the auroral oval, which lies at around 65-70 degrees north or south of the equator, encircling the polar caps.
But when the interplanetary magnetic field points northward, auroras can occur at even higher latitudes, sometimes resulting in theta aurora. Prior to the recent work, scientists suspected that theta aurora had something to do with the particles observed in the lobe regions of the magnetosphere. The plasma in the lobes is normally cold, but previous observations suggested that theta auroras are linked with unusually hot lobe plasma – but just how was unclear.
“It was unclear whether this hot plasma was a result of direct solar wind entry through the lobes of the magnetosphere,” said Fear. “Or if the plasma is somehow related to the plasma sheet on the night side of Earth. One idea is that the process of magnetic reconnection on the night side of Earth causes a build-up of trapped, hot plasma in the higher latitude lobes.”
The mystery was finally solved by studying data collected simultaneously by the Cluster and IMAGE spacecraft on Sept. 15, 2005. While the four Cluster satellites were located in the southern hemisphere magnetic lobe, IMAGE had a wide-field view of the southern hemisphere aurora. As one Cluster satellite observed uncharacteristically energetic plasma in the lobe, IMAGE saw the arc of the theta aurora cross the magnetic footprint of Cluster.

The team found that the energetic plasma appeared on high-latitude magnetic field lines that had been closed by the process of magnetic reconnection driven by the northward pointed fields. This in turn caused the plasma to become relatively hot. Such observations support the idea that theta aurora are due to plasma trapped inside the magnetosphere, rather than material being directly pushed in from the solar wind.
“Solving the question of the origin of the theta aurora required Cluster’s high inclination orbit that sweeps over the region where the aurora are generated together with the imaging capability of IMAGE, which is no longer functioning,” said Melvyn Goldstein, Cluster project scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. “Hopefully, future missions will give comparable capabilities to view the polar regions of the magnetosphere.”
Cluster consists of four satellites flying in formation around Earth. The data presented in this report were collected by Cluster-1. The Cluster mission was launched in 2000 and is still operating. IMAGE was launched in 2000 and concluded operations at the end of 2005. The data presented in this report were collected by the satellite’s far-ultraviolet Wideband Imaging Camera.
###
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
It would seem that the significance of these data indicates that there is an Electrical component to the dynamic of the Universe….. I also see the scientific “language” beginning to reflect this, where once it was taboo.
I am not forming an opinion or making a statement, I am simply remarking upon my observations.
There is no Electrical Component. Electric currents can be generated locally as needed in response to changes of magnetic fields, but do not have any large-scale organization.
Leif Would the hydrogen atom exist without the electrons wising around the proton? I see the electrons purpose is to create separation (fission) And electric potential is what space is.
Atoms are neutral entities consisting of a positively charged nucleus surrounded by a ‘cloud’ of negative electrons. Hydrogen atoms are rare in the Universe as most are disassociated into their nucleus [called a proton] and the electron. Electrons don’t have a ‘purpose’. Invest in a book about elementary physics [there are many] and learn a bit in a more organized way than using this forum.
Leif Thanks for the interaction. I will take your advice and stop frustrating you with my questions and go read some more . Cheers and I hope you and your family have a happy Christmas
Sorry if I upset you it wasn’t my intent
Asking questions is always worthwhile, but is also not very efficient. Much better is to study a good book, and THEN ask questions about problem areas. You did not upset me the least.
Leif have you read this book
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=0hzDN81ei5cC&pg=PA173&lpg=PA173&dq=atmospheric+heat+electrons+and+microwaves&source=bl&ots=cLRLKS7Wsq&sig=1yhQcbzhihVjII2TrivMfcVTIio&hl=en&sa=X&ei=8LhjVPSdJqXLmwXAg4CABw&ved=0CDcQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=atmospheric%20heat%20electrons%20and%20microwaves&f=false
It’s about AIR
No, but the effects are well-known. I don’t think the technical level is suitable for you. There are many much better ones, e.g. http://www.amazon.com/The-Space-Astronomy-Astrophysics-Library/dp/3540769528
Leif I think the link to that book is very important when trying to understand this .
http://climateviewer.com/2014/03/26/cloud-ionization-electric-rainmaking-laser-guided-weather-modification/
Undoubtedly. However, I think your understanding will not be furthered by the high level of technical details given.
Leif please check out the facts on Ionospheric Heaters here: http://climateviewer.com/haarp/ and a details research timeline on magnetospheric and ionospheric modification here: http://climateviewer.com/space-weather-control/
Why should I do that? Do you have a specific problem you need help with?
Knowledge is power friend. I would think you would be interested in the facts behind men altering our planet’s forcefield… little known history.
I am interested as I have been a small part of this …. working on communicating with submarines by modulating the power grid … but mankind has been altering our planet for thousands of years… nothing new.
rezn8d and Leif I wounder if America and Canada under attack from this weather altering process .
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/file/index/docid/316449/filename/angeo-16-1212-1998.pdf
A cold war springs to mind America put sanctions on Russia and Russia’s response alter the jet stream.
Leif
When the sun is in a weak phase and doesn’t supply enough energy to earth’s core and it cools not by much does the planet shrink a bit . The result would be slight sea level rise , earth quakes , volcanoes going off and foul weather because more low pressure systems form . I see the earth like a capacitor, when the solar wind is strong earth stores energy and we get more high pressure systems and good weather. And when it’s weak earth releases energy low pressure and what we see is more foul weather .
The Sun doesn’t heat the Earth’s core significantly and any variation with time is completely damped out anyway as heat slowly, slowly makes its way inwards, so no geo effects are to be expected and certainly not on any time scales we care about. Time you read some of them books… 🙂
“I am interested as I have been a small part of this …. working on communicating with submarines by modulating the power grid …”
I think Dr S may be speaking about the ZEVS 82 Hz ELF transmitter. It requires a very large antenna. Location Murmansk. The Russians can communicate with subs all over the world.
Why don’t you all behave.
Australia plays it part in global surveillance and sub communications http://www.colinandrews.net/HAARP.html
I think there are plenty of websites where you can talk about that. Aren’t there, jmorpuss?
Here, it is against site policy; and also, if you stop to think about it, it is not very considerate since AW is on a trip, and has allowed a free comment system.
Actually, I was working on an American system…
In ELF using the grid?
Not much can be revealed. We were suggesting using PG&E’s California grid back then some 40+ years ago
You cannot discuss your success. Or lack of it.
There are ELF frequencies in Europe which sound like robotic, cow, owl, and siren signals, but they do not occur out in the country side. They only near pipe grids, etc. etc. I genuinely thought they could be naturally occurring. Well that is a mystery.
Sad but true, it all started at Wardenclyffe and ended with New York’s hungry pigeons.
At some stage Zeke the truth will come out. And Anthony’s site is about relaying the truth not like some other propaganda sites like the jokers over at Skeptical Science
Propaganda is information that is not impartial and used primarily to influence an audience and further an agenda, often by presenting facts selectively to encourage a particular synthesis, or using loaded messages to produce an emotional rather than rational response to the information presented.
Leif,
If you are still hanging around here I want to thank you for your links in a comment above. As a result I have been doing a lot of reading.
I don’t know the answers to a lot of things I’ve read but I appreciate the discussions presented on this thread.
One question that I have though. Has anyone considered that as the Earth has a magnetic and gravitation field and as with the case with the sun, could there be a similar case with something deeper “in space” that has not been quantified/qualified? The elliptical orbit of the Earth would suggest a strong possibility of a gravitational force “out there” somewhere. Magnetic fields and associated electrical fields have been discussed on this thread as well as elsewhere. Perhaps gravitational attraction/fields are all possibly related in some manner.
So many questions, and so little time from a limited perspective in one man’s lifetime.
Merry Christmas to all here and I look forward to your contributions in the New Year!
I wish to know more about the reason for the (+) charge on the dawn side of the magnetosheath vs the (-) charge on the dusk side. I am referring to the most interesting paper by you dated 1973 http://www.leif.org/research/Geomagnetic-Response-to-Solar-Wind.pdf I am currently looking at figure 4 (a) and (b).
Some questions: 1) Is this entirely the result of the solar wind and why? 2) Does the effect of the Earth orbit around/through the sun’s interplanetary magnet field cause/affect this polarization of the charge? Please elaborate to resolve where you may feel I am losing the plot here if that may be the case. There are others but I just wanted to get this post out before the thread closes. I have spent a week trying to fully grasp what’s happening.
Section 1 of http://www.leif.org/research/suipr699.pdf explains how the charges are distributed. The Earth’s orbit has nothing to do with the process that relies only on the solar wind interacting with the Earth’s magnetic field.
‘What is light’ has been explained many times. Google the question and you will see.
Leif,
Thank you for responding. With regards to the structure of the charge in the magnetosphere, the question that I haven’t been able to grasp is: why is the positive charge located at the dawn side of the earth?
As far as the light issue, the more I read the more it seems no one else really knows. I’m still stuck on a spiral trajectory of particles or energy packets. With spiral trajectories and those possibly overlapping/interlocking (in a sense, think spiral wound springs meshed together or in very close proximity with the spiral of the spring being the trajectory of photon) between individual rays could possibly explain the ability of light seeming to bend around an obstacle as particle repulsive charge/energy after passing a barrier may be the mechanism for that. Hell I don’t know, just a thought that keeps bouncing around in my head for years.
Charged particles [solar wind] traveling through a magnetic field [Earth’s] are deflected, positive charged one way and negative charges the opposite way. Given the directions of the solar wind and the Earth’s magnetic field leads to positive charges being deflected towards the dawn side [Figure 1 of my link]. A much more technical explanation can be found here: http://www.leif.org/EOS/JA078i031p07292.pdf
Light does not travel in a spiral [except near a black hole]. And light is a well-understood phenomenon. [Please] read up on the subject.
Thanks for the link. I’ll need to read it again when time allows.
Leif,
I have been following the link you offered to http://www-spof.gsfc.nasa.gov/Education/Intro.html . It is an excellent source and so many related links within leading to others and that has kept me occupied for a week.
So many links and then ‘google’ expansions has somehow led me to the question I have of “What is light?” I have followed many ‘google’ links and currently have 7 open tabs on the subject. There seems to be some question as the whether light is a particle or if it is a wave. I have some idea that it is both. Perhaps particles traveling in a spiral trajectory being influenced by forces of gravity, magnetism, and charge attraction and repulsion all at the same time. Is there a good source to review the discussion/research on this? Note that I’m way past the discussion of the spectrum of wavelengths.
The question of “what is light” has plagued me for years so any help answering this would be greatly appreciated.
“What is light “? Photons
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon
Thanks for your reply and link. I have read about half way thru and can see that following related links are going to take more time than this thread will be active. Hope another thread here will activate this discussion on light.
For now, I have only a couple of days to fill the freezer with venison so I gotta eat.