Forget polar bears and global warming, witness the terrible tragedy of stunted shrub growth

Dracophyllum on Campbell Island, New Zealand.From the University of Washington and the Department of Pointless NSF Grants, comes this: Shrub growth decreases as winter temperatures fluctuate up

Many have assumed that warmer winters as a result of climate change would increase the growth of trees and shrubs because the growing season would be longer. But shrubs achieve less yearly growth when cold winter temperatures are interrupted by temperatures warm enough to trigger growth. 

“When winter temperatures fluctuate between being cold and warm enough for growth, plants deplete their resources trying to photosynthesize and end the winter with fewer reserves than they initially had. In the summer they have to play catch up,” said Melanie Harsch, a University of Washington postdoctoral researcher in biology and applied mathematics. She is lead author of a paper on the subject recently published in PLOS One.

The roots are especially sensitive to temperature fluctuations, Harsch said. Warming winters result in higher root respiration, which uses up carbon reserves as plants make and release oxygen, leading to less carbon available during the regular growing season.

 

Harsch and her colleagues studied two species of shrubs on Campbell Island, an uninhabited UNESCO World Heritage site in the southwest Pacific Ocean about 375 miles south of New Zealand’s mainland. They studied two large shrubs, Dracophyllum longifolium and Dracophyllum scoparium, which are evergreen broadleaf species that can grow up to about 15 feet tall and live up to 240 years.

Researchers found that while warmer, drier winters helped seedlings get established, it adversely affected growth of older plants.

“For growth to occur you need sufficient precipitation and temperature and nutrients. Growth should only happen during the summer on Campbell Island when temperatures are above 5 degrees Celsius,” Harsch said. Five degrees C is about 40 F. “On Campbell Island most winters are cool and below this 5 degrees Celsius, so the plants are not active. The plants we studied are evergreen and there is little snow cover, so they are sensitive to changes in temperature.”

In this study, researchers cut out discs, called “cookies,” from just above the shrubs’ root collar, and measured the width between each ring to determine growth. They found that plant growth decreased as winter temperatures went up.

“On Campbell Island the snow is ephemeral, so the plants usually are not covered,” Harsch said. “If we’re going to see an effect in changing winter conditions, we’re going to see it at Campbell Island decades before we see it at, say, Mt. Rainier, where there is a lot of snow and winters are colder.”

Discs cut from just above the shrubs' root collar were studied to determine growth.

Harsch said plants in areas like Campbell Island may eventually adjust to warmer winters, but the transition period will be tough as temperatures bounce above and below what plants need to stay dormant, causing the plants to draw down their resources.

“It may eventually be warm enough in the winters so that plants can photosynthesize and grow year round, like they do in the tropics,” she said. “It’s this transition part that plants are not adapted for.”

Harsch plans to do a follow-up study that would measure the microbes and carbon reserves in the soil, and manipulate snow packs to see how it affects establishment and growth.

“How much of this can our tree species withstand?” Harsch said. “Will summer growth eventually compensate for these hard winters, or is this some sort of extra stressor on trees that will be one more nail in the coffin? If you think of all the different factors of increasing vulnerability in climate change, is this really significant? We just don’t know.”

Co-authors are Matt McGlone and Janet Wilmshurst at Landcare Research in New Zealand. Harsch started the work while pursuing her doctorate at Lincoln University in New Zealand and finished the analysis at the UW. The work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation.

# # #

For more information, contact Harsch at harsch.melanie@gmail.com or 253-365-1555.

NSF grant: DEB-1103734.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

65 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mike M
May 21, 2014 4:50 am

This is yet another case of, “We couldn’t find any information about what actually happened to shrub growth during other warmer times like during the Medieval so we’ll just make stuff up to score points and get some grant money.”

beng
May 21, 2014 5:55 am

Who knew — CO2 does everything including causing fluctuating temperatures…

urederra
May 21, 2014 6:07 am

David Ball says:
May 20, 2014 at 3:41 pm
“It’s worse than we thought”- The Shrubs

They are the canary in the coalmine. 😛

Pathway
May 21, 2014 6:23 am

The winter was so warm here in the high desert that two of my clematis died and the month of December had the lowest average temperature ever recorded. Spring was so warm that my garden froze in May. Bring on the warming.

DD More
May 21, 2014 7:03 am

“What doesn’t kill you, makes you stronger.” Works for plants too. So who cares if they have some odd years of less growth? It’s not like anyone is harvesting these shrubs and if they are not killed, it is just nature being natural.

Nik
May 21, 2014 7:10 am

How did the plants do in their 240 lifespan which included parts of the Little Ice Age? Funny there is no mention of that period.

May 21, 2014 10:16 am

But still, tree rings are good thermomiters?

Jeff
May 21, 2014 10:50 am

Speaking of Bushes and Texas, makes me think of Ladybird Johnson and her “Shroooobs”….
(goes back a ways, I know, sorry…).

Billy Liar
May 21, 2014 11:10 am

I wonder if these shrubs might benefit from some robust pruning every winter to discourage them from growing too quickly in the spring? I’m sure they could do a lot better with some proper management.

Tilo
May 21, 2014 11:34 am

Living in Colorado at high altitude we have temeratures swinging from well below frezeeing to well above freezing in cycles for a large part of the year. Our last snow this year was on May 12th. I see no problem for the shrubs and trees.
Also, a result she seems to ignore for the conditions that she describes is that the growing season will be longer for those shrubs and that should more than compensate for her transiations. Plus added CO2 and moisture in the air should also help.

L Leeman
May 21, 2014 12:23 pm

““How much of this can our tree species withstand?”
oh I dunno… how did the TEMPERATE RAIN FOREST of WASHINGTON survive the 2.5 km THICK ice that used to be normal for the area until about 6000 yrs ago?

Dave Bob
May 21, 2014 1:29 pm

Jeff,
My gosh, I remember that public service TV ad that Ladybird made in the 60’s.
“Plant a tree, a booosh, or a shruoooob. Help beautifaaahh America!”

catweazle666
May 22, 2014 10:17 am

“If you think of all the different factors of increasing vulnerability in climate change, is this really significant? We just don’t know.”
You don’t? Really?
[Excessive, not called for. .mod]

May 23, 2014 7:16 am

Col Mosby says:
May 20, 2014 at 4:10 pm
“Perhaps we should have them recite the names of species that have come and gone.”
They could start here:
BBC News – Snail, gecko and carnivore in ‘top 10 new species’ 2014
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-27511170

Philip Schaeffer
May 25, 2014 10:00 pm

catweazle666 said:
[trimmed. .mod]
That’s a piss poor attitude to science.