Heat, Not Just Rainfall, Plays into New Projections

Increasing heat is expected to extend dry conditions to far more farmland and cities by the end of the century than changes in rainfall alone, says a new study. Much of the concern about future drought under global warming has focused on rainfall projections, but higher evaporation rates may also play an important role as warmer temperatures wring more moisture from the soil, even in some places where rainfall is forecasted to increase, say the researchers.
The study is one of the first to use the latest climate simulations to model the effects of both changing rainfall and evaporation rates on future drought. Published this month in the journal Climate Dynamics, the study estimates that 12 percent of land will be subject to drought by 2100 through rainfall changes alone; but the drying will spread to 30 percent of land if higher evaporation rates from the added energy and humidity in the atmosphere is considered.
An increase in evaporative drying means that even regions expected to get more rain, including important wheat, corn and rice belts in the western United States and southeastern China, will be at risk of drought. The study excludes Antarctica.
“We know from basic physics that warmer temperatures will help to dry things out,” said the study’s lead author, Benjamin Cook, a climate scientist with joint appointments at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. “Even if precipitation changes in the future are uncertain, there are good reasons to be concerned about water resources.”
In its latest climate report, the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warns that soil moisture is expected to decline globally and that already dry regions will be at greater risk of agricultural drought. The IPCC also predicts a strong chance of soil moisture drying in the Mediterranean, southwestern United States and southern African regions, consistent with the Climate Dynamics study.
Using two drought metric formulations, the study authors analyze projections of both rainfall and evaporative demand from the collection of climate model simulations completed for the IPCC’s 2013 climate report. Both metrics agree that increased evaporative drying will probably tip marginally wet regions at mid-latitudes like the U.S. Great Plains and a swath of southeastern China into aridity. If precipitation were the only consideration, these great agricultural centers would not be considered at risk of drought. The researchers also say that dry zones in Central America, the Amazon and southern Africa will grow larger. In Europe, the summer aridity of Greece, Turkey, Italy and Spain is expected to extend farther north into continental Europe.
“For agriculture, the moisture balance in the soil is what really matters,” said study coauthor Jason Smerdon, a climate scientist at Lamont-Doherty. “If rain increases slightly but temperatures also increase, drought is a potential consequence.”
Today, while bad weather periodically lowers crop yields in some places, other regions are typically able to compensate to avert food shortages. In the warmer weather of the future, however, crops in multiple regions could wither simultaneously, the authors suggest. “Food-price shocks could become far more common,” said study coauthor Richard Seager, a climate scientist at Lamont-Doherty. Large cities, especially in arid regions, will need to carefully manage their water supplies, he added.
The study builds on an emerging body of research looking at how evaporative demand influences hydroclimate. “It confirms something we’ve suspected for a long time,” said Toby Ault, a climate scientist at Cornell University, who was not involved in the study. “Temperature alone can make drought more widespread. Studies like this give us a few new powerful tools to plan for and adapt to climate change.”
Rainfall changes do not tell the whole story, agrees University of New South Wales researcher Steven Sherwood, in a recent Perspectives piece in the leading journal Science. “Many regions will get more rain, but it appears that few will get enough to keep pace with the growing evaporative demand.”
The authors have made all their data and calculations public available on a supplementary website.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
How can ‘more California’ be a bad thing? 😉
Surely we already have 30% dry country.
Univ of NSW, launchers of the Ship of Fools.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/01/12/ship_of_fools_in_the_antarctic_121200.html
Another Ship of Fools day joke.
“We know from basic physics that warmer temperatures will help to dry things out,” said the study’s lead author, Benjamin Cook
Yes, except in the UK, where warmer temperatures in accordance with basic physics means increased rainfall, clogged rivers and flooding. It is all down to increased warmth you see. It makes it impossible to dredge.
You don’t believe me? Ask anyone in Somerset, its been so hot its been impossible to dredge for the last 20 years. That’s why its been flooding, that and basic physics meaning that warmer temperatures help wet things right through.
They have still not learnt how to model clouds and their influence on the climate. Until they do, all modeling is futile.
Here are my thoughts on th upcoming earth day:
http://lenbilen.com/2014/03/29/in-preparation-of-earth-day-2014-cause-of-climate-change-is-still-up-in-the-air/
“May”, “Could”, “if” escape IPCC keywords..In Ireland we say “If mee aunt had b###s she’d be mee uncle”. Typical warmist drivel
Wake me up when global warming arrives to Canada. I fear I may be dead and gone before it ever comes.
Fascinating how higher temperature can dry out soil, yet not evaporate more moisture from the oceans to increase rainfall. How come during the higher temperatures of the Jurassic the dinosaurs are shown standing ass deep in a swamp.
What goes up must come down.
One good way of creating a drought situation of course, would be to chop down rainforest in order to grow crops for biofuel, in order to cut down use of the dreaded “fossil fuels”. But man could never be that stupid.
More water in the air, coupled with higher CO2 which makes plants use water more efficiently leads to more drying. The premise is so stupid it has to be an April fools joke.
Nothing could make a more drying earth than the return of continental ice sheets in North America and Eurasia.
Published this month in the journal Climate Dynamics, the study estimates that 12 percent of land will be subject to drought by 2100…
And me stupid thought since schooltime, that already 30% of landmass are deserts.
Tsk, tsk, tsk…
Who funds them for that nutty study?
So exactly how does CO2 “trap” heat?
Why isn’t the historical record being closely scrutinized?
It was. H.H. Lamb’s book, “The Climate History of the Modern World” goes into this in great detail. The bottom line, yes there is drying in some areas like in western North America, but North Africa and the middle east benefit. Ever wonder why the desert region of what is now Israel an the Levant was called “the land flowing with milk and honey”? Well that was the climate there up until about 2800 years ago.
The driest place on earth at the present time is Antarctica. I think the authors of this paper are a bit confused about some very basic concepts.
In Californiaenvisaged in the heavy rainfall this week. Are you prepared?
Is this with or without an amplification of greenhouse effect by increased water vapor?
Ok, now for the last 10 years at least we have the most up to date and current climate data from all over the global, is there even one model that explains what has happened in the last 10 years? In this current model, if I input the data starting in 2004, will it give me the results year by year until now? If not, the model is not relevant. Where in any field could you make a prediction for future events, say physics, or chemistry or medicine, not get the same results and be taken seriously? Can you imagine running a model for a new drug that differs from actual experience then giving it to people, or a chemical process in a plant that differs from the actual result? They call that science?? That’s why this is still a debate, and no, the science isn’t settled. Being able to repeat something and it proving to be useful and true is the hallmark of a Theory becoming a law. If you have a law for gravity, and every time you calculate where an object will be in space and time, and it isn’t, it isn’t a very good law is it?
Bring something more to the table than a shaman’s guess of the future, otherwise let’s go back to breaking bones to see which way they crack. Save us a ton of money.
From the article:
“It confirms something we’ve suspected for a long time,” said Toby Ault, a climate scientist at Cornell University, who was not involved in the study. “Temperature alone can make drought more widespread. Studies like this give us a few new powerful tools to plan for and adapt to climate change.”
Brilliant. Why would anyone think that temperatures would increase without changing any other factors that could mitigate the consequences of “temperature alone”?
Off-topic but interesting,
The kids over at Skeptical debunking have been hacked again. This time it was their “Widget” site.
The Delphic Oracle in ancient Greece had a better batting average than today’s computer models forecasting climate change… and no, the Oracle did not try and forecast climate… even people living back 3,500 years ago knew better than to try and prddict something more fickle than even their gods.
Hale cycle modulates hydrology but NOT evaporation
WJR Alexander et al. found strong evidence for the 21 year Hale solar modulating runoff in the Southern African region with data extending > 100 years. However, he found that there was NO corresponding variation in evaporation. See WJR Alexander et al., Linkages between solar activity, climate predictability and water resource development* JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, Vol 49 No 2, June 2007, Pages 32–44, Paper 659
Alexander provides all of his massive hydrology data collection on CD for the asking. Alexander, W J R 2006. Climate change and its consequences – an African perspective. Technical report, 474 pp (available on CD).
Further verification and validation is needed of IPCC models and projections against historic data.
Temperature is never alone. It always causes things, like higher humidity, which reduces drying. Higher humidity causes more rain, which prevents drought.
Basic physics, and basic data, both of which our alarmist rent seeking friends seem to stay away from as much as possible.