Voting is open closed: ‘Climate Duplicitist of the Year’ award

Readers surely recall: Nominations are open for the first annual ‘Climate Duplicitist of the Year’ award.

The top nominations are in, now you can vote.

(poll is closed per original rules, result will posted Sunday night)

 

Only one vote per person, vote stuffing attempts are minimized by the design of the poll software.

Trenberth was added as  bonus option, even though he’s been relatively quiet recently. I recognize that readers had many more suggestions for nominations, but these are the ones most numerous in comments.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
122 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
KNR
March 27, 2014 12:42 pm

Has to be Lew roll really , not many can out ‘nasty’ Mann but currently is doing just that.

David L.
March 27, 2014 12:48 pm

I feel bad for the contestants running against Mann, they really don’t stand a chance. I know they all try so hard, but there’s simply no contest as long as Mann is in the running.

March 27, 2014 12:48 pm

I am surprised at how far behind Gore is (my pick). Of the people on the short list:
Gore has made millions by promoting CAGW alarmism, and;
Gore has made millions by investing in oil and gas, and;
Is that not the very embodiment of duplicity?
All Mann has going for him on that metric is some fake science.

David L.
March 27, 2014 12:55 pm

BTW, may I commend the people posting to this topic today. The wit and hilarity are off the charts! I’m thoroughly enjoying this thread!

James Ard
March 27, 2014 12:55 pm

How do you get more duplicitist than holding the position of ethics guru at a major science organization than stealing an identity and forging a document?

JBirks
March 27, 2014 1:13 pm

I only regret that I have but one vote to cast for Mikey Mann. Uh, oh, he’ll probably sue me for that…

March 27, 2014 1:14 pm

I just voted. I kept in mind that this was for just the past year.
Many of you are more aware of who doo-d what this past year than I am.
So, as far as I am aware, that narrowed it down to Turney, Mann, and the Lew.
I also kept in mind that it was for duplicity and not stupidity.
That left out Turney.
Lew or Mann?
I only know of one big Lew doo.
Mann has at least two so I went with Mann because of his “Little White Lie-n” and his refusal to expose his data and emails in his various lawsuits.
(Wouldn’t disclosure quickly show that he’s not a fraud or, at worst, reasonably wrong?…. unless……)

Bad News Quillan
March 27, 2014 1:20 pm

Where is Baruq Obama? Where is John F’n Kerry?
–Bad News

Leslie
March 27, 2014 1:42 pm

I voted for Turney for his Antarctica misadventure. Was it science, climate propaganda, an expensive vacation? Paying passengers referred to as science volunteers?

March 27, 2014 1:43 pm

Mark Hladik says:
March 27, 2014 at 11:09 am
Maybe we could call it the ‘Gore Hanson Lifetime (mal-)Feasance Award’ ?

=======================================
Maybe the Putz-er Prize?

Richard D
March 27, 2014 1:46 pm

Let’s give it to Mann.
To stick it to Mann, let’s also support Mark Steyn’s 30 million dollar countersuit vs. Mann.
I was more than skeptical about the whole thing, but Steyn’s more than capable and has a pair, in addition to great lawyers. http://www.steynonline.com/

u.k.(us)
March 27, 2014 1:47 pm

Bad News Quillan says:
March 27, 2014 at 1:20 pm
Where is Baruq Obama? Where is John F’n Kerry?
–Bad News
==============
Wrong site.
Weak attempt anyway.

Scarface
March 27, 2014 1:49 pm

The results so far have created a …………….. hockeystick!
Unprecedented!

Editor
March 27, 2014 2:03 pm

John Cook is probably annoyed that he’s not on the list.
OTOH, Cook would probably be annoyed if he were on the list.

March 27, 2014 2:15 pm

creating a worldwide policy based on a few dozen trees and fudging the data.
suing those who disagree.
mann.

Chris D.
March 27, 2014 2:42 pm

Yikes! It’s not even April yet. Maybe it should be called Climate Duplicitist of the Year-to-date, as I’m sure 2014 will see many more contenders! Ah, such a target rich environment.

March 27, 2014 2:46 pm

Chris D. says:
March 27, 2014 at 2:42 pm
Yikes! It’s not even April yet. Maybe it should be called Climate Duplicitist of the Year-to-date, as I’m sure 2014 will see many more contenders! Ah, such a target rich environment.

==================================================================
Elections are approaching.
Time for Hyperdrive!

March 27, 2014 3:06 pm

Gleick’s acts of forgery, mendacity, and hypocrisy were by far the most spectacular, breathtaking actually, but his flame burned like the Sun only for a short time. Mann’s grandiosity, shamelessness, and inability to STFU is the gift that keeps on giving. Dogged persistence deserves to be rewarded. That’s why Mann gets my vote.

Troubador
March 27, 2014 3:13 pm

Agree with an earlier commenter. Mann isn’t duplicitous… all that whining is from diaper rash. It’s Big Lew that truly puts the DUPE in duplicitous!!

March 27, 2014 3:15 pm

Al Gore is most OBVIOUSLY duplicitous… as DavidMHoffer and Alan Robertson say. More money – absolute highest Carbon footprint, Selling out and making money from oil, which he is stated as being against, the CO2 Temperature graphs which are full of bunk. The evil one who’s done more damage to create awareness of a hoax which many people think is a reality is Gore – He’s the winner!
But alas, not everyone agrees with my sentiment –yet

hum
March 27, 2014 3:19 pm

I vote for Bob Ward

Mark Hladik
March 27, 2014 3:21 pm

Gunga Din: I LIKE it!!!!!

March 27, 2014 3:26 pm

@Gunga Din: Your reasoning is timely and makes perfect sense. I thought about it (timeliness) – and retroactively gave the award to Gore…

March 27, 2014 3:40 pm

Campaigning 4 Da Mann!
http://youtu.be/gI94zKYk5q0

Michael Malone
March 27, 2014 3:41 pm

Perhaps this might be more honestly described as Hated Climate Alarmist Of The Year. If it was so described I might cast a vote myself. But as it is, as if only the opposition were capable of duplicity, I can only consider it suitable for thirteen year olds or other imbeciles. This is the first such poll? Have some sense. Make it the last as well.