
By WUWT Regular “Just The Facts”
As discussed last week, the Northern Stratospheric Polar Vortex appears to have been displaced in January and now it appears to be splitting into two discrete lobes, i.e. see the image above with two areas of blue / cold air descending within the funnels/lobes of the Polar Vortex at 10 hPa/mb – 31 km – 102K feet. What follows is succinct summary of Polar Vorticity, followed by various current observations. If you aren’t familiar with Stratospheric Polar Vortexes, you can get acquainted here, here and here.
Planetary Vorticity is “generated by the rotating earth”, it “is zero at equator”, is at it’s “maximum at pole (one revolution per day)” and “is always positive (cyclonic [counter-clockwise in the northern hemisphere])”, Lyndon State College Atmospheric Sciences i.e.:

Polar Vortices are “caused when an area of low pressure sits at the rotation pole of a planet. This causes air to spiral down from higher in the atmosphere, like water going down a drain.” Universe Today
“The polar vortex extends from the tropopause (the dividing line between the stratosphere and troposphere) through the stratosphere and into the mesosphere (above 50 km). Low values of ozone and cold temperatures are associated with the air inside the vortex.” NASA

Below is Northern Hemisphere Area Where Temperature is Below 195K or -78C, and it shows very cold air within the Polar Vortex descended from 10 hPa/mb – 31 km – 102K feet down to 250 hPa/mb – 10 km – 34K feet, twice during January, 2014.

“During extreme variability of the Arctic polar vortex termed a “weak vortex event,” anomalies can descend from the upper stratosphere to the surface on time scales of weeks. Subsequently the outbreak of cold-air events have been noted in high northern latitudes, as well as a quadrupole pattern in surface temperature over the Atlantic and western European sectors, but it is currently not understood why certain events descend to the surface while others do not.” “The subdivision of such events into vortex displacements and vortex splits has important implications for tropospheric weather patterns on weekly to monthly time scales.” “Using reanalysis data it is found that vortex splitting events are correlated with surface weather and lead to positive temperature anomalies over eastern North America of more than 1.5 K, and negative anomalies over Eurasia of up to −3 K. The corresponding signals are weaker during displacement events, although ultimately they are shown to be related to cold-air outbreaks over North America.” Mitchell et al. 2012 – Paywalled
Onto the observations. If you look at the following 4 National Weather Service – Climate Prediction Center Northern Hemisphere Temperature Analyses at 10 hPa/mb – 31 km – 102K feet showing the cold Northern Stratospheric Polar Vortex on January 7th and 11th, and February 7th and 8th, 2014 you can see the progression as the Polar Vortex was first displaced/squeezed and now spliting into two lobes:
Above you can also see an area of high pressure and warm air building between the lobes of the vortex. Polar Wind at 10 hPa/mb – 31 km – 102K feet clearly shows the two lobes of the Northern Stratospheric Polar Vortex spinning counter-clockwise (Click the Pic to Animate):

Also interesting is that Ozone Mixing Ratios at 10 hPa/mb – 31 km – 102K feet show the “Ozone Hole” within the Polar Vortex splitting:
The two lobes of the Polar Vortex aren’t just visible at 10 hPa/mb – 31 km – 102K feet, the funnels of the vortex also extend both up and down, as you can see in the following National Weather Service – Climate Prediction Center Height Analysis, which starts at 1 hPa/mb – 50 km – 164K feet and extends down to 100 hPa/mb – 15 km – 49K feet. The Vortex appears to split into two lobes/funnels at about 5 hPa – 35 km – 115K feet:
For those unfamiliar with the variation of pressure with height, this graphic may prove helpful:

So what is the result of this Polar Vortex behavior? “Large regions in northern Asia, Europe and North America have been found to cool during the mature and late stages of weak vortex events in the stratosphere. A substantial part of the temperature changes are associated with changes in the Northern Annular Mode (NAM) and North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) pressure patterns in the troposphere.” Kolstad et al. 2010
Here is Northern Hemisphere – Vertical Cross Section of Geopotential Height Anomalies and the Northern Annular Mode (NAM) or Arctic Oscillation (AO) Index, which shows large positive Height Anomalies and the AO swinging negative in January and early February:

And here is North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) Index for the prior 4 Months, showing a positive swing in mid-January and remaining there until present:

Lastly, the causes of this year’s weak vortex events were discussed in depth last week on this thread, however two key drivers of recent Polar Vortex behavior appear to be Eddy Heat and Planetary Waves. In terms of Eddy Heat, i.e. “strong negative fluxes indicate poleward flux of heat via eddies. Multiple strong poleward episodes will result in a smaller polar vortex, Sudden Stratospheric Warmings and an earlier transition from winter to summer circulations. Relatively small flux amplitudes will result in a more stable polar vortex and will extend the winter circulation well into the Spring.” NOAA
Here you can see that 10 day Averaged Eddy Heat Flux Towards The North Pole At 100mb is near a record daily maximum as it was in early January when the earlier weak vortex event began:

In terms of Planetary Waves “a vortex displacement event is associated with anomalously high wave number-1 planetary wave activity entering the stratosphere and is characterized by a vortex with a comma-like shape that is shifting equatorward. Often this shifting occurs ‘‘top down’’ and the vortex has a baroclinic structure. Subsequently the Aleutian high, a weak anti- cyclone, encroaches over the pole and is especially dominant at lower levels.”
“A vortex splitting event is associated with anomalously high wavenumber-2 planetary wave activity entering the stratosphere. During such an event the vortex barotropically splits into two ‘‘daughter’’ vortices that tend to align along the 90°E – 90°W axis, with one centered over Siberia and the other centered over northeastern Canada (Matthewman et al. 2009, hereafter M09).” Mitchell et al. 2011
Planetary Wave 1 activity can be see on this Zonal Wave #1 Amplitude Jan, Feb, March Time Series showing strong Wave 1 activity in January;

but in February we are seeing more Planetary Wave 2 activity:

So if the Northern Stratospheric Polar Vortex splits and does not break up, and if Mitchell et al. 2012 are correct, we should begin see “positive temperature anomalies over eastern North America of more than 1.5 K” and “negative anomalies over Eurasia of up to −3 K” in the coming weeks. We shall see.
For an array of real time Northern Stratospheric Polar Vortex graphs and graphics please visit the WUWT Northern Polar Vortex Reference Page.














Brant Ra says: February 9, 2014 at 2:03 pm
Did you even look at that paper I linked to?
Yes, it is literally one of thousands that attempt to identify a link between solar/geomagnetic activity and Earth’s climate leveraging correlations. We covered a number of them on this recent thread;
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/02/01/a-displaced-polar-vortex-and-its-causes/
and Leif and I debated this subject ad nauseam a few years ago:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/02/16/watch-sunspot-group-1158-form-from-nothing/#comment-614697
The basic mechanics of polar vorticity are reasonably well known and while variations in solar/geomagnetic activity might be variables, they are not primary drivers of the phenomenon.
The paper I linked to is observations of the polar vortex forming at the footprints of the magnetic field. Its convection activity is correlated with the proton flux, the ring current, ion activity at the poles, reconnection at the magnetotail, etc. They measured convection changes with each of these parameters on a time scale smaller than rotational changes.. There are other types of convection cells in the earths atmosphere but in this case at the poles ionic convection is driven by the solar wind and not rotation… It cant be any plainer. Read the paper and refute the points you think are incorrect.
Or show me where I misinterpreted the paper…
The paper is referencing occurrences in the ionosphere, the Polar Vortex occurs in the mesosphere and stratosphere, explain how convection in the ionosphere propagates downward into the mesosphere, when atmospheric pressure in the ionosphere is essentially nil.
If you are really interested in meteorological dynamics one of the best text books (and usually a standard in atmospheric physics) is “An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology” by James R. Holton. Is also has a chapter on Stratospheric dynamics, including sudden stratospheric warming.
Pamela Gray says:
February 9, 2014 at 8:54 am
—————————————
Well you peaked my curiosity and I looked.
Have a look at this.
http://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/surface/level/overlay=temp/orthographic=-90.56,93.76,454
Surface temps sfc and wind..
the cold ‘mass’ looks quite huge..
This mass appears to be missing something, like ionization, to give it a little lifting to be on its way or something..
http://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/surface/level/overlay=temp/orthographic=-90.56,93.76,454
Manley Roach says: February 9, 2014 at 2:10 pm
I notice we are well below average but I see ZERO ice being reported in the great lakes area, and I was under the impression that ice DOES form in them. Why is this ice not being counted ? If its because they are lakes that is fine. But shouldn’t ice be counted no matter where it is ? If the polar vortex went south into the great lakes region and added ice I think it should count or the ice numbers look WAY off. Just my 2c
As you said, most of them measure “Sea Ice”;
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_stddev_timeseries.png
http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/seaice/extent/Sea_Ice_Extent_v2_prev_L.png
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.anomaly.arctic.png
which the Great Lakes are not. We offer this US National Ice Center – Naval Ice Center – IMS Total Ice graph “Total IMS Sea and Lake Ice extent coverage calculations are based on all water bodies that have the majority of the surface covered at 4 KM resolution.” ” Values represent the entire area of ice covered water bodies over the entire Northern Hemisphere and are calculated in Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area Projection with a WGS84 Datum.”
http://www.natice.noaa.gov/ims/images/ims_data.jpg
however, for some reason “total ice coverages are only calculated from March – September of each year to capture the maximum and minimum values for the season.”
As such, unless you can find another source, you will need to wait until March to see Total Northern Ice Cover. However, Anthony did cover Great Lakes ice cover in an article on WUWT last week, which might be helpful to you
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/02/08/the-great-lakes-may-hit-record-ice-cover-this-year/
Carla, fascinating isn’t it. Notice the rotating pressure systems over water and not over land. Those oceans sure affect atmospheric systems do they not?
justthefactswuwt says:
The basic mechanics of polar vorticity are reasonably well known and while variations in solar/geomagnetic activity might be variables, they are not primary drivers of the phenomenon.
Consent. But solar activity is such as 100 years ago. Now it turns out, how has the impact on the climate.
http://www.solen.info/solar/images/comparison_similar_cycles.png
http://www.solen.info/solar/polarfields/polarfields.jpg
Yes it looks exactly the pressure distribution over the the polar circle. It is not beneficial for America.
http://oi57.tinypic.com/2nvcmma.jpg
Low pressure is in an area of high radiation.
M Courtney says:
February 8, 2014 at 3:08 pm
————————————–
That chart of the ‘Normalised GPH anomaly’ from Oct 9th to Feb 5th is an exact match for night time temperature shifts in the No California mountains were I live, about 70 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean.
Pamela Gray says:
February 9, 2014 at 10:12 am
Cyclemania and wriggle matching do not a science make. It is no better than palm reading without first excluding the null hypothesis. There are lots of things in nature and in the human-created world that can be found to observationally match seemingly unconnected oscillations or trends. To stay within the confines of observation is to not enter the realm of science.
William, your long response to me is not a scientific response. It is wriggle matching. A wizard who has set up shop to accept sacrifice to the gods did as much. You can do better. Follow the standard practice. Reject the null hypothesis first. Show me research on how natural intrinsic oceanic/atmospheric teleconnections has been shown to NOT be the source of our short and long term weather pattern variations within the present interglacial. Or at least refute the lowly master’s thesis I linked to. Surely you can pick holes in his work. Yes?
Pamela – what is a ‘teleconnection’? My understanding is that a teleconnection is a correlation without any known mechanism – or the matching of two wiggles. So you appear to be discounting ‘wriggle’ matching because of your ‘wiggle’ matching.
At another level, there is no reason why both internal variation due to oceanic currents and atmospheric effects and external solar magnetic /GCR effects could cause changes in the Earth’s climate. It does not have to be one or the other. Indeed, if these different cycles start acting together in the same ‘sense’ then perhaps more of an effect would be observed than if they were in antisense.
Ian W, please look at the temperature anomalies in the stratosphere. Whether they have an impact on the speed and course of the jet stream?
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/strat-trop/gif_files/time_pres_TEMP_ANOM_JFM_NH_2014.gif
Or do you be related to variations solar activity?
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/Ap.gif
Whether change of ozone in the stratosphere depend on solar radiation?
Experts in the United States should consider why there in October to shift the polar vortex, which continues today. In Europe, thanks to this it is very warm.
ren says:
February 10, 2014 at 3:08 am
Ian W, please look at the temperature anomalies in the stratosphere. Whether they have an impact on the speed and course of the jet stream?
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/strat-trop/gif_files/time_pres_TEMP_ANOM_JFM_NH_2014.gif
Or do you be related to variations solar activity?
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/Ap.gif
Whether change of ozone in the stratosphere depend on solar radiation?
Ren, It is quite probable that the changes in the Polar Vortex are due to Solar effects. What I was pointing out was that ocean currents and warming patterns may cause a reinforcement of the solar effects. These are two interacting chaotic systems.
Whether if this is the effect of magnetic fields of the Sun and the Earth, you may find that the anomaly will be repeated during the next winters?
Ian, you are mostly wrong about lack of mechanism associated with well-observed teleconnections. For example, the gulf stream has a well known teleconnection to -IE mechanized reason for- warmer air temperatures and milder weather wherever it happens to wander.
The following link lists the teleconnections of the North Atlantic Oscillation. The teleconnections are most often mechanized via known properties of the connections between oceanic warm/cold pool affects on atmospheric systems (such as the well-known Atlantic hurricane tracks and their association with Atlantic sea surface temperature and atmospheric pressure systems), the well-understood hydrologic cycle, and fluid dynamic theory applied to large scale atmospheric pressure systems and global “jet” streams. For more information about teleconnections please study meteorology. Teleconnections form the basis of weather system prediction, especially those associated with large bodies of water.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/teledoc/nao.shtml
Ian, you said: What I was pointing out was that ocean currents and warming patterns may cause a reinforcement of the solar effects. These are two interacting chaotic systems.
Please parameterize the solar part of your suggested driver as being “chaotic”. In what way do you see solar parameters being chaotic?
Or were you listing ocean currents and warming patterns as being the two chaotic systems? Your sentence mechanics makes it unclear to me. Or were you referring to the teleconnection -the interaction- between them which you have said is not mechanized?
Ian, there is plenty of data -now being corrected for inconsistencies between measurement systems over the decades- to help you determine if there is a connection between whatever you are using for a solar parameter, and the polar vortex. The polar vortex does all kinds of things and frequently. So if you believe there is a solar connection, you should be able to find it, even though the polar vortex changes much more often and to a far greater degree than your solar parameters do. Warning: the polar vortex is incredibly strong thus requires a great amount of energy to change it this way or that.
My hunch is that for whatever solar parameter you choose, the polar vortex will act in similar ways inbetween the “important level” of your solar parameter as it does when your solar parameter is at its “important level” (whatever that is in your thinking), therefore requiring you to affirm the null hypothesis. And that is the way you SHOULD be thinking anyway! All serious scientists must go about their research holding on to the null hypothesis as being “the way things are” to avoid bias. Do you so think?
ren says: @ur momisugly February 10, 2014 at 3:50 am
Experts in the United States should consider why there in October to shift the polar vortex, which continues today. In Europe, thanks to this it is very warm.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Europe may be warm but they are getting a lot of snow
Headlines from the last week:
Record snow in the Alps
Severe snowfall buries homes in Austria
Record snowfall in Italy traps people in their homes
Ice damages 40% of forests in Slovenia
Record snowfall (almost 7 ft) in northern Iran
I do not think any of these people want any more ‘GoreBull Warming’
link to actual articles
Gail Combs this is the reason. Look closely.
http://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/isobaric/70hPa/orthographic=23.77,82.83,482
Do you see a shift over the Atlantic?
Here you can see the effects.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/blocking/real_time_nh/500gz_anomalies_nh.gif
Gail Combs says:
February 10, 2014 at 9:53 am
————————————–
Croatia and Serbia had very heavy snowfalls, also. It makes sense that a bit of warming will lead to greater snowfall.
Please look at the graphics.
http://oi60.tinypic.com/mv6hc7.jpg
Just a mere 7 days later and the polar vortex instability is gone.. It has reorganized and is strengthening.
Bill H says:
Just a mere 7 days later and the polar vortex instability is gone.. It has reorganized and is strengthening.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/strat_a_f/gif_files/gfs_t100_nh_f168.gif