When Does A Displaced Polar Vortex Become A Split Vortex?

NOAA – National Weather Service – Climate Prediction Center – Click the pic to view at source

By WUWT Regular “Just The Facts”

As discussed last week, the Northern Stratospheric Polar Vortex appears to have been displaced in January and now it appears to be splitting into two discrete lobes, i.e. see the image above with two areas of blue / cold air descending within the funnels/lobes of the Polar Vortex at 10 hPa/mb – 31 km – 102K feet. What follows is succinct summary of Polar Vorticity, followed by various current observations. If you aren’t familiar with Stratospheric Polar Vortexes, you can get acquainted here, here and here.

Planetary Vorticity is “generated by the rotating earth”, it “is zero at equator”, is at it’s “maximum at pole (one revolution per day)” and “is always positive (cyclonic [counter-clockwise in the northern hemisphere])”, Lyndon State College Atmospheric Sciences i.e.:

Lyndon State College Atmospheric Sciences – Click the pic to view at source

Polar Vortices are “caused when an area of low pressure sits at the rotation pole of a planet. This causes air to spiral down from higher in the atmosphere, like water going down a drain.” Universe Today

“The polar vortex extends from the tropopause (the dividing line between the stratosphere and troposphere) through the stratosphere and into the mesosphere (above 50 km). Low values of ozone and cold temperatures are associated with the air inside the vortex.” NASA

PhysicalGeography.net – Click the pic to view at source

Below is Northern Hemisphere Area Where Temperature is Below 195K or -78C, and it shows very cold air within the Polar Vortex descended from 10 hPa/mb –  31 km – 102K feet down to 250 hPa/mb – 10 km – 34K feet, twice during January, 2014.

NOAA – National Weather Service – Climate Prediction Center – Click the pic to view at source

“During extreme variability of the Arctic polar vortex termed a “weak vortex event,” anomalies can descend from the upper stratosphere to the surface on time scales of weeks. Subsequently the outbreak of cold-air events have been noted in high northern latitudes, as well as a quadrupole pattern in surface temperature over the Atlantic and western European sectors, but it is currently not understood why certain events descend to the surface while others do not.” “The subdivision of such events into vortex displacements and vortex splits has important implications for tropospheric weather patterns on weekly to monthly time scales.” “Using reanalysis data it is found that vortex splitting events are correlated with surface weather and lead to positive temperature anomalies over eastern North America of more than 1.5 K, and negative anomalies over Eurasia of up to −3 K. The corresponding signals are weaker during displacement events, although ultimately they are shown to be related to cold-air outbreaks over North America.”  Mitchell et al. 2012 – Paywalled

Onto the observations. If you look at the following 4 National Weather Service – Climate Prediction Center Northern Hemisphere Temperature Analyses at 10 hPa/mb –  31 km – 102K feet showing the cold Northern Stratospheric Polar Vortex on January 7th and 11th, and February 7th and 8th, 2014 you can see the progression as the Polar Vortex was first displaced/squeezed and now spliting into two lobes:

Above you can also see an area of high pressure and warm air building between the lobes of the vortex. Polar Wind at 10 hPa/mb –  31 km – 102K feet clearly shows the two lobes of the Northern Stratospheric Polar Vortex spinning counter-clockwise (Click the Pic to Animate):

Cameron Beccario – Global Forecast System – NCEP / National Weather Service / NOAA – Click the pic to view animated at source

Also interesting is that Ozone Mixing Ratios at 10 hPa/mb –  31 km – 102K feet show the “Ozone Hole” within the Polar Vortex splitting:

The two lobes of the Polar Vortex aren’t just visible at 10 hPa/mb –  31 km – 102K feet, the funnels of the vortex also extend both up and down, as you can see in the following National Weather Service – Climate Prediction Center Height Analysis, which starts at 1 hPa/mb – 50 km – 164K feet and extends down to 100 hPa/mb – 15 km – 49K feet. The Vortex appears to split into two lobes/funnels at about 5 hPa – 35 km – 115K feet:

For those unfamiliar with the variation of pressure with height, this graphic may prove helpful:

Nordian Aviation Training Systems – Click the pic to view at source

So what is the result of this Polar Vortex behavior? “Large regions in northern Asia, Europe and North America have been found to cool during the mature and late stages of weak vortex events in the stratosphere. A substantial part of the temperature changes are associated with changes in the Northern Annular Mode (NAM) and North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) pressure patterns in the troposphere.” Kolstad et al. 2010

Here is Northern Hemisphere – Vertical Cross Section of Geopotential Height Anomalies and the Northern Annular Mode (NAM) or Arctic Oscillation (AO) Index, which shows large positive Height Anomalies and the AO swinging negative in January and early February:

NOAA – National Weather Service – Climate Prediction Center – Click the pic to view at source

And here is North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) Index for the prior 4 Months, showing a positive swing in mid-January and remaining there until present:

NOAA – National Weather Service – Climate Prediction Center – Click the pic to view at source

Lastly, the causes of this year’s weak vortex events were discussed in depth last week on this thread, however two key drivers of recent Polar Vortex behavior appear to be Eddy Heat and Planetary Waves. In terms of Eddy Heat, i.e. “strong negative fluxes indicate poleward flux of heat via eddies. Multiple strong poleward episodes will result in a smaller polar vortex, Sudden Stratospheric Warmings and an earlier transition from winter to summer circulations. Relatively small flux amplitudes will result in a more stable polar vortex and will extend the winter circulation well into the Spring.” NOAA

Here you can see that 10 day Averaged Eddy Heat Flux Towards The North Pole At 100mb is near a record daily maximum as it was in early January when the earlier weak vortex event began:

NOAA – National Weather Service – Climate Prediction Center – Click the pic to view at source

In terms of Planetary Waves “a vortex displacement event is associated with anomalously high wave number-1 planetary wave activity entering the stratosphere and is characterized by a vortex with a comma-like shape that is shifting equatorward. Often this shifting occurs ‘‘top down’’ and the vortex has a baroclinic structure. Subsequently the Aleutian high, a weak anti- cyclone, encroaches over the pole and is especially dominant at lower levels.”

“A vortex splitting event is associated with anomalously high wavenumber-2 planetary wave activity entering the stratosphere. During such an event the vortex barotropically splits into two ‘‘daughter’’ vortices that tend to align along the 90°E – 90°W axis, with one centered over Siberia and the other centered over northeastern Canada (Matthewman et al. 2009, hereafter M09).” Mitchell et al. 2011

Planetary Wave 1 activity can be see on this Zonal Wave #1 Amplitude Jan, Feb, March Time Series showing strong Wave 1 activity in January;

Mitchell et al. 2011 – Climate Prediction Center – Click the pic to view at source

but in February we are seeing more Planetary Wave 2 activity:

Mitchell et al. 2011 – Climate Prediction Center – Click the pic to view at source

So if the Northern Stratospheric Polar Vortex splits and does not break up, and if  Mitchell et al. 2012 are correct, we should begin see “positive temperature anomalies over eastern North America of more than 1.5 K” and “negative anomalies over Eurasia of up to −3 K” in the coming weeks. We shall see.

For an array of real time Northern Stratospheric Polar Vortex graphs and graphics please visit the WUWT Northern Polar Vortex Reference Page.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 1 vote
Article Rating
125 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
4TimesAYear
February 8, 2014 11:06 pm

“Sudden Stratospheric Warmings and an earlier transition from winter to summer circulations. Relatively small flux amplitudes will result in a more stable polar vortex and will extend the winter circulation well into the Spring.”
Then we’re in for an early spring?

Arfur Bryant
February 8, 2014 11:27 pm

justthefacts,
Thank you for an interesting and informative article.
I have a couple of questions:
1. What is the difference between ‘Polar Vorticity’ and ‘Coriolis Effect’? The diagram from Lyndon State appears to be of the Coriolis Effect.
2. From the Universe Today link: [“Polar Vortices are “caused when an area of low pressure sits at the rotation pole of a planet. This causes air to spiral down from higher in the atmosphere, like water going down a drain.”]. Normally, an area of low pressure will cause an inflow at the surface which will cause the air to rise, not fall from higher altitude. What makes this polar vorticity different?
Thanks,
AB

ferdberple
February 8, 2014 11:28 pm

jorgekafkazar says:
February 8, 2014 at 5:26 pm
I can guarantee you this vortex system will never be modeled. Academics may try, and fail, and then claim they’ve been successful, but it will all be lies.
=============
truth has never stood in the way of cliamte modelling,

ferdberple
February 8, 2014 11:35 pm

Brant Ra says:
February 8, 2014 at 8:50 pm
The Polar Vortex is not caused by the mechanical rotation of the earth like a set of gears. It is at the foot print of the magnetosphere(magnetic fields) and the rotation/convection is an ionic wind…
========
a previous post proposed a similar mechanism to explain the super rotation of the atmosphere of venus.
http://phys.org/news194504586.html
of course we are told by scientists that the gravitational force of earth on venus is too small to affect the rotation of venus, yet venus has a retrograde rotation, such that the same face of venus always faces earth at closest approach.
any time a scientists cannot explain something they observe, their explanation is that it must not be happening.

ren
February 9, 2014 12:03 am

This interconversion process co converts UV radiation into thermal energy, heating the stratosphere. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/28/Ozone_cycle.svg/1052px-Ozone_cycle.svg.png
Ozone absorbs the cosmic radiation, which can be seen on the monitor. Where there is more ozone, less radiation reaches the Earth.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/strat_a_f/gif_files/gfs_t70_nh_f00.gif
http://oi57.tinypic.com/1znrker.jpg

ren
February 9, 2014 12:06 am

Ozone in the stratosphere undulates, especially in winter.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/intraseasonal/temp10anim.gif

ren
February 9, 2014 12:30 am

The stratosphere is the second layer. It starts above the troposphere and ends about 31 miles (50 km) above ground. Ozone is abundant here and it heats the atmosphere while also absorbing harmful radiation from the sun. The air here is very dry, and it is about a thousand times thinner here than it is at sea level. Because of that, this is where jet aircraft and weather balloons fly.
http://www.space.com/17683-earth-atmosphere.html

William Astley
February 9, 2014 12:58 am

The recent solar magnetic cycle change is the cause of the polar vortex change and is the reason why there is suddenly an increase in La Niña events. The recent solar magnetic cycle change is also the reason why in the summer of 2013 there was suddenly an increase in low level cloud cover over the Arctic region which is the reason for the sudden recovery of Arctic sea ice in the summer of 2013.
There was a solar change post 2005 that has been inhibiting the solar modulation of planetary cloud cover. The mechanism that was inhibiting the galactic cosmic ray modulation of planetary cloud cover has abated which explains why in 2013 GCR modulation of high latitude clouds is suddenly observed.
As announced at the November, 2013 AGU meeting, the solar heliosphere pressure has decreased 40%. As also announced at the November, 2013 AGU meeting due to the reduction in the solar heliosphere pressure the magnetic intensity of solar wind bursts caused by coronal mass ejection and by coronal holes has been significantly reduced. Solar wind burts create a space change differential in the ionsphere which strongly affects the frequency of El Niño events. (The reduction in magnetic field strength of solar wind bursts hence causes an increase in La Niña events.)
Also as announced at the November, 2013 AGU meeting due to changes in the solar heliosphere the intensity and the number of GCR that strikes the earth is much higher at this point in time of the solar cycle as opposed to other solar cycles.
This chart shows neutron counts vs time, at high latitude. Neutrons are produced by the high speed galactic particles which are called cosmic ray flux (CRF) or galactic ray flux rather than high speed galactic particles as the first discovers of the phenomena thought the cause was high energy photons rather than particles. As shown in this chart CRF flux is must high at this point in the solar cycle as compared to past solar cycles.
http://cosmicrays.oulu.fi/webform/query.cgi?startday=09&startmonth=01&startyear=1986&starttime=00%3A00&endday=09&endmonth=02&endyear=2014&endtime=23%3A30&resolution=Automatic+choice&picture=on

ren
February 9, 2014 1:14 am

William Astley mówi:
The recent solar magnetic cycle change is the cause of the polar vortex change and is the reason why there is suddenly an increase in La Niña events.
I have of the same opinion.
Cosmic rays GCR works exactly in the area of the polar vortex.
http://oi57.tinypic.com/jha2qe.jpg

William Astley
February 9, 2014 1:15 am

The majority of the warming in the last 70 years was caused by solar magnetic cycle changes. There are cycles of warming and cooling in the paleo climate record which are called Dansgaard-Oeschger cycles. During the warming period of a Dansgaard-Oeschger cycle the Arctic sea decreases and there is slight cooling of the Antarctic ice sheet which causes an increase in Antarctic sea ice. This phenomena is the reason why the majority of the warming in the last 70 years has been in the Northern hemisphere at high latitudes. (See Bob Tisdale’s graph.)
http://bobtisdale.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/figure-72.png
During the cooling phase of a Dansgaard-Oeschger cycle which we are now experiencing there is both an increase in Arctic sea ice and Antarctic sea and there will be slight warming of the Antarctic ice sheet.
Svensmark’s attached paper uses ice core temperature measure (the ice sheet retains temperature data when the ice formed for a few thousand years which is used to show the cyclic out of phase temperature change of the Greenland ice sheet from the Antarctic ice sheet.)
As Svensmark’s paper explains the albedo of the Antarctic ice sheet is higher than low level clouds so the Antarctic ice sheet cools when there is an increase in cloud cover. (The very, very high velocity Antarctic winds break the snow crystals which then form an ice like substance that has a high albedo.)
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0612145v1
The Antarctic climate anomaly and galactic cosmic rays
Borehole temperatures in the ice sheets spanning the past 6000 years show Antarctica repeatedly warming when Greenland cooled, and vice versa (Fig. 1) [13, 14]. North-south oscillations of greater amplitude associated with Dansgaard-Oeschger events are evident in oxygenisotope data from the Wurm-Wisconsin glaciation[15]. The phenomenon has been called the polar see-saw[15, 16], but that implies a north-south symmetry that is absent. Greenland is better coupled to global temperatures than Antarctica is, and the fulcrum of the temperature swings is near the Antarctic Circle. A more apt term for the effect is the Antarctic climate anomaly. Attempts to account for it have included the hypothesis of a south-flowing warm ocean current crossing the Equator[17] with a built-in time lag supposedly intended to match paleoclimatic data. That there is no significant delay in the Antarctic climate anomaly is already apparent at the high-frequency end of Fig. (1). While mechanisms involving ocean currents might help to intensify or reverse the effects of climate changes, they are too slow to explain the almost instantaneous operation of the Antarctic climate anomaly.
Figure (2a) also shows that the polar warming effect of clouds is not symmetrical, being most pronounced beyond 75◦S. In the Arctic it does no more than offset the cooling effect, despite the fact that the Arctic is much cloudier than the Antarctic (Fig. (2b)). The main reason for the difference seems to be the exceptionally high albedo of Antarctica in the absence of clouds.

William Astley
February 9, 2014 1:26 am

This paper by Tinsley and Yu explains the mechanisms by which solar magnetic cycle changes modulate planetary cloud cover and change the properties of clouds. As noted in Tinsley and Yu’s other papers the mechanisms change both the amount of cloud cover, the albedo of the clouds, the amount of precipitation, the number of high precipitation events, and wind velocity of winter storms. i.e. Every ‘weather’ change event that we have recently experience can be attributed to the solar magnetic cycle modulation of ‘climate’.
http://www.agu.org/books/gm/v141/141GM22/141GM22.pdf
Atmospheric Ionization and Clouds as Links Between Solar Activity and Climate
Observations of changes in cloud properties that correlate with the 11-year cycles in space particle fluxes are reviewed. The correlations can be understood in terms of one or both of two microphysical processes; ion mediated nucleation (IMN) and electroscavenging. IMN relies on the presence of ions to provide the condensation sites for sulfuric acid and water vapors to produce new aerosol particles, which, under certain conditions, might grow into sizes that can be activated as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Electroscavenging depends on the buildup of space charge at the tops and bottoms of clouds as the vertical current density (Jz) in the global electric circuit encounters the increased electrical resistivity of the clouds. Space charge is electrostatic charge density due to a difference between the concentrations of positive and negative ions. Calculations indicate that this electrostatic charge on aerosol particles can enhance the rate at which they are scavenged by cloud droplets. The aerosol particles for which scavenging is important are those that act as insitu ice forming nuclei (IFN) and CCN. Both IMN and electroscavenging depend on the presence of atmospheric ions that are generated, in regions of the atmosphere relevant for effects on clouds, by galactic cosmic rays (GCR). The space charge depends, in addition, on the magnitude of Jz. The magnitude of Jz depends not only on the GCR flux, but also on the fluxes of MeV electrons from the radiation belts, and the ionospheric potentials generated by the solar wind, that can vary independently of the GCR flux. The roles of GCR and Jz in cloud processes are the speculative links in a series connecting solar activity, the solar wind, GCR, clouds and climate. This article reviews the correlated cloud variations and the two mechanisms proposed as possible explanations for these links.

ren
February 9, 2014 1:28 am

Galactic radiation is also modulated by the Earth’s magnetic field, which means that its operation inside the Polar Circle is not equally spread out.

William Astley
February 9, 2014 1:48 am

This graph, Greenland ice sheet temperature, last 11,000 years (roughly determined from ice core analysis, Richard Alley’s paper shows nine (9) Dansgaard-Oeschger (D-O) cycles of warming and cooling. The D-O warming and cooling cycles have an interval between occurrence of 950 years, 1350 years, and 2000 years.
The warming that we observed in the 20th century has occurred before.
http://www.climate4you.com/images/GISP2%20TemperatureSince10700%20BP%20with%20CO2%20from%20EPICA%20DomeC.gif
http://www.climate4you.com/
The following is a link to the late Gerald Bond’s paper “Persistent Solar influence on the North Atlantic Climate during the Holocene”. Bond published this paper in 2001. As Bond’s paper notes past warming and cooling cycles correlate with solar magnetic cycle changes. See Tinsley and Yu’s paper linked to above for an explanation of the mechanisms.
http://www.essc.psu.edu/essc_web/seminars/spring2006/Mar1/Bond%20et%20al%202001.pdf
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2003/2003GL017115.shtml
Timing of abrupt climate change: A precise clock by Stefan Rahmstorf
Many paleoclimatic data reveal a approx. 1,500 year cyclicity of unknown origin. A crucial question is how stable and regular this cycle is. An analysis of the GISP2 ice core record from Greenland reveals that abrupt climate events appear to be paced by a 1,470-year cycle with a period that is probably stable to within a few percent; with 95% confidence the period is maintained to better than 12% over at least 23 cycles. This highly precise clock points to an origin outside the Earth system; oscillatory modes within the Earth system can be expected to be far more irregular in period.
In support of:
ren says:
February 9, 2014 at 1:28 am
I concur with your comment.

February 9, 2014 2:35 am

I wonder if the dust tail from comet ison that we are passing through has an effect.
Below is a link to Noctilucent clouds from Spaceweather.com
http://www.spaceweather.com/DAISY_PICS/current_daisy.png?PHPSESSID=dqkk71oo27lr55lgb8r1slmo13

ren
February 9, 2014 4:33 am

William Astley.
You can to think about what will happen next. Forecast Vukcevic verified. The sun will be less active?
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/PF-latest.gif

Gkell1
February 9, 2014 5:04 am

[snip – too far off topic, and Mr. Kelleher has a habit of disrupting threads with things that are inconsequential to the post. When we have a post on planetary motions, that will be the place to post your dislike of the 24 hour period rotation of the Earth – Anthony]

February 9, 2014 7:19 am

“At very small values of Pdyn, a secondary maximum appears, which is even more pronounced for the correlation with solar wind proton density.”
Secondary maximum….. The vortex “splits”….

Steve Keohane
February 9, 2014 8:22 am

ren says:February 9, 2014 at 12:30 am
The stratosphere is the second layer. It starts above the troposphere and ends about 31 miles (50 km) above ground. Ozone is abundant here and it heats the atmosphere while also absorbing harmful radiation from the sun. The air here is very dry, and it is about a thousand times thinner here than it is at sea level. Because of that, this is where jet aircraft and weather balloons fly.

No, jets fly at 35,00 feet or 5-6 miles, not 31 miles, altitude.

Pamela Gray
February 9, 2014 8:39 am

Both Ren and William fail at the most fundamental level of science yet people are gathering round to add their “aye”. Is it really the case that such people are not schooled in science critique or are they just willing to ride new thought without care of proper scientific thought, method and discourse?

ren
February 9, 2014 8:41 am

Steve Keohane !
Stratosphere over the pole starts from an altitude of about 8 km.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/strat-trop/gif_files/time_pres_TEMP_MEAN_JFM_NH_2014.gif
We have a sharp temperature jump at a height of 30 km.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/temperature/10mb9065.gif
This means a strong polar vortex turbulence.

ren
February 9, 2014 8:45 am

Pamela !
Is Wikipedia is not a science?

ren
February 9, 2014 8:49 am

People not understand that we are entering a period many decades of low solar activity. Vary the basic parameters of the sun.

daddylonglegs
February 9, 2014 8:50 am

Just
Considering the sharp reduction in air pressure and mass at stratospheric and higher altitudes, how can this cold thin air affect surface temperature by vortexing down to the surface? is there enough air mass in the stratosphere to affect surface weather?

Pamela Gray
February 9, 2014 8:54 am

There is a well known oceanic/atmospheric teleconnection that can set up polar vortices. By far, the stronger source of energy necessary to move and shake polar vortices would be that teleconnection, not solar parameters (of whatever kind you hang your hat on). Notice the location of SST anomaly and the locations of the split polar vortex.
http://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/sst/ophi/color_anomaly_NPS_ophi0.png
http://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/isobaric/10hPa/orthographic=3.21,86.34,197

TomRude
February 9, 2014 8:56 am

Tail wags dog… so the 1% of pressure at 10hPa determines what’s happening in surface at 1000hPa… I know it’s very popular to blame the 1% these days 😉
but we all know only the 0.01% own newspapers that can blame it on the 1%… So next I expect spinning the space station may also affect flooding in Britain…