NOAA "state of the climate" report: Contiguous US average temperature plummeted 2.9F in 2013

Hmmm, “the pause” seems to be stronger in the USA. Compare these two years.

NCDC 2012 Overview:

In 2012, the contiguous United States (CONUS) average annual temperature of 55.3°F

NCDC 2013 Overview:

In 2013, the contiguous United States (CONUS) average temperature of 52.4°F

Looks like California is in the minority, mostly due to the extended La Niña pattern:

201301-201312[1]

Of course they are still on about severe weather, no room for “normal” in this scary looking graphic, apparently:

2013 National Events Map

In 2013, the contiguous United States (CONUS) average temperature of 52.4°F was 0.3°F above the 20th century average, and tied with 1980 as the 37th warmest year in the 119-year period of record. The 2013 annual temperature marked the coolest year for the nation since 2009. The 2013 CONUS average temperature was 2.9°F cooler than the 2012 average temperature, which was the warmest year on record for the nation. Since 1895, when national temperature records began, the CONUS has observed a long-term temperature increase of about 0.13°F per decade. Precipitation averaged across the CONUS in 2013 was 31.17 inches, 2.03 inches above the 20th century average. This marked the 21st wettest year on record for the nation and the wettest since 2009. Compared to 2012, which was the 18th driest year on record, the CONUS was 4.50 inches wetter in 2013. Over the 119-year period of record, precipitation across the CONUS increased at an average rate of 0.17 inch per decade.

h/t to Tom Nelson

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

50 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gail Combs
January 16, 2014 2:03 pm

M Courtney says: January 16, 2014 at 12:15 pm
…. But their seems to be no part of the contiguous United States that isn’t suffering some extreme.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
North Carolina had a lovely year. It was not hot, only three days of 90°F (32°C) and one 91° F and one 95°F (95°C) We also had no drought and my grass and white clover stayed green all summer. (“Wet” does not mean floods) However it was a bit chilly breaking record low minimums.

Leon Brozyna
January 16, 2014 2:22 pm

So, let’s see if I got this right … the 20th century average temperature for the 48 contiguous states was 52.1°F, and the average temperature for the year 2013 was 0.3°F above that average, at 52.4°F. Wow!! It’s enough to make a person get soaked in sweat.
Wait … was that 0.30°F or was it 0.32°F or maybe 0.34°F warmer. Nothing impresses like an increasing number of digits displayed after the decimal point. Maybe it was 0.30715°F warmer … now that’s really looking impressive!!

Dr. John M. Ware
January 16, 2014 2:25 pm

Again the normal-vs.-average confusion: No one can say what “normal” weather is, since such a figure can’t be arrived at by experiment or observation or be decided upon by other factors. We know that normal human body temperature under certain conditions is 98.6 degrees F; we know that normal eyesight has been defined as 20/20; and there are other examples. But there is no normal weather or temperature, since it is a chaotic system, all of whose variables as yet cannot be known. All we have is average: the accumulated statistics (un-doctored, please!) from as long as they have been compiled, averaged over the number of years of the record (not just the selected 30 years, please!). We can certainly rank the periods under discussion if the records are substantially complete; but we cannot tell which, if any, of the periods is the “normal” one, because we are in no position to set a norm. Average is the correct, and justifiable, terminology.
All that said, 2013 in Virginia was a cool, wet year, with about 10″ above average rainfall, no long periods of 90-degree highs (and only a few in all), and an early and chilly fall. On the whole, a pleasant year, though much harder to work outside during it–too wet, much of the time.

u.k.(us)
January 16, 2014 2:30 pm

no room for “normal”
———–
Well said, Anthony.
Kind of curious, too.

January 16, 2014 2:30 pm

Uh Oh!
Maybe all those CGAW alarmist should take off those gas mask to sequester their own CO2 emissions for a month or two.

CodeTech
January 16, 2014 3:07 pm

Are you sure NOAA didn’t just use the last election map for that graphic? I mean, it might as well be showing left vs. right… where the farther left a state is the redder it is.
Maybe that incredible excessive heat is what is disrupting their thought processes.

rogerknights
January 16, 2014 3:17 pm

Crispin in Waterloo says:
January 16, 2014 at 12:28 pm
It is also important to consider what ‘extreme’ means. The word is used to describe nearly every ‘large’ event even if it has been known to occur at a similar scale before. Soon we will be hearing about ‘extremely mild’ conditions and ‘extremely average temperatures’ (having lost all major swings away from some long term average or some such). People are going to extremes to call something ‘extreme’.

About 18 (?) months ago a WUWT thread dwelt on the choice by one of out govt. climate agencies to count “unusually mild” winters and summers as “extreme,” by which standard “extreme whether” is increasing, which is a form of equivocation, IMO.

Keith
January 16, 2014 4:11 pm

And how did they arrive at this measure? In Vermont where our temperatures were ranked above average the Primary Local Climatological Data Site is BTV – Burlington International Airport. The thermometer sits on the end of a runway next to an expanding urban heat island surrounding the airport. http://www.nws.noaa.gov/climate/locations.php?wfo=btv

January 16, 2014 7:16 pm

jbird says:
January 16, 2014 at 1:47 pm
“…the 37th warmest year in the 119-year period of record.”
That’s quite a record – 37th. warmest! One wonders if (by 2016) we might be experiencing the 120th. “warmest” year in 121 years.
———————————————-
I share the same sentiment. My best guess is the 3rd winter, 2016/17.

Box of Rocks
January 16, 2014 7:17 pm

Yeah but the US is only like 1% OF THE earths surface.
Remember that warm spot over Russia….

January 16, 2014 7:39 pm

timetochooseagain says:
January 16, 2014 at 1:48 pm
This represents the largest drop of 12 month average temps from the previous 12 month average since the 1930′s. I constructed this chart last month:
—————————————————————————–
That graph shows great detail. Look at the phase changes it shows from one end to the other. From the early 40s till just past the mid 70s the climate registers as very stable. Then in the early 70s, the graph shows wider variations from year to year in temperature swings. This changes around 9 to10 years later and then both mini cycles repeat themselves again. You can see the very same set of minicycles prior to the early 40s period. What is causing that?

Brian H
January 16, 2014 9:21 pm

Needed: Extreme Average records.

James at 48
January 16, 2014 9:49 pm

The Rex Block has been incredibly persistent. The foot print is obvious, look at the map.

ren
January 16, 2014 11:49 pm

Jetstream on January 21 Northern Hemisphere. See the from where the air reach the Great Lakes in the U.S..
http://earth.nullschool.net/jp/#2014/01/21/0600Z/wind/isobaric/250hPa/orthographic=-342.75,96.57,319

Paul@herveybay
January 17, 2014 12:20 am

I saw a comment about Australia & our heatwave and it reminded me of our poetry and the works of Henry Lawson etc. There’s always been heatwaves and bushfires which gave inspiration to our outbreak poets.
As for birds dying, it’s the bats or flying foxes which have been dying, 100,000+ but there are literally millions!
Also, I went out & photographed the king tide couple of weeks ago. No sea level change here. Hervey Bay Queensland is in fine shape.

January 17, 2014 4:49 am

I have always been a AGW sceptic (English, and therefore correct, spelling) because I’m a pragmatist. I never had to be any kind of scientist to figure the thing out thus:
The planet has been here for millions of years, and man has been on the planet for a tiny fraction of that time. Furthermore, man has been recording and taking notice of the climate for a brief finger snap of that tiny fraction. Suddenly, people calling themselves climatologists are claiming that they can see trends in the world climate? Worse, the perceived culprit is a naturally occurring gas which is essential to the survival of every green growing thing in the world; and therefore essential to life itself!
I won’t ask who are they kidding, because they appear to be successfully kidding the majority of us. But not me.

Robert W Turner
January 17, 2014 9:36 am

I wonder what it’s like to live your life in fear of weather.

January 17, 2014 12:48 pm

Paul@herveybay says:
January 17, 2014 at 12:20 am
————————————–
Edgar Rice Burroughs set one of his ‘Tarzan’ series in Australia, if I remember right. In the story all of the natural forces of Australia come into play, a huge rolling flood crossing a plain, bushfires, and an extreme heat event.

rogerknights
January 17, 2014 3:11 pm

Derek Wood says:
January 17, 2014 at 4:49 am
I have always been a AGW sceptic (English, and therefore correct, spelling) . . . .

Not according to Britisher Fowler’s classic Modern English Usage :

“The established pronunciation is sk-, whatever the spelling; and with the frequent modern use of septic and sepsis it is well that it should be so for fear of confusion. But to spell sc- and pronounce sk- is to put a needless difficulty in the way of the unlearned, for sce is normally pronounced se even in words where the c represents a Greek k, e.g., scene and its compounds and ascetic. America spells sk-; we might pocket our pride and copy.”

(I have to post the above every four months or so.)

richardscourtney
January 17, 2014 3:22 pm

rogerknights:
At January 17, 2014 at 3:11 pm you say

(I have to post the above every four months or so.)

Really? Who is pointing the gun at you?
I would inform the police if that was happening to me.
Richard

rogerknights
January 17, 2014 4:07 pm

richardscourtney says:
January 17, 2014 at 3:22 pm
rogerknights:
At January 17, 2014 at 3:11 pm you say
(I have to post the above every four months or so.)
Really? Who is pointing the gun at you?
I would inform the police if that was happening to me.

I never correct anyone who just spells the word as “Sceptic”; that’s natural in many countries. I only do so to counter posters who claim their spelling is the correct one, as above, because that challenging (and misleading) statement invites a rebuttal.

aeroguy48
January 17, 2014 4:39 pm

All I know its been unseasonably cold here in North Texas.

timetochooseagain
January 17, 2014 6:54 pm

@goldminor-I have no idea, presumably it’s a natural phenomenon, though.