Sparsely attended. Usual ethics suspects are not here.
Lots of what if scenarios, such as what to do if you find your sponsor is fudging data and as a student you feel trapped by the “smoking gun” (their label).
Sparsely attended. Usual ethics suspects are not here.
Lots of what if scenarios, such as what to do if you find your sponsor is fudging data and as a student you feel trapped by the “smoking gun” (their label).
For those commenters asking how many were in the audience for the ethics workshop, I counted ~ 25 to 26 people just before we broke into 4 groups. Several more people may have showed up after that.
John
Why does the AGU has a session on something they clearly do not believe in?
So, how many Gleick jokes can we come up with?
To suggest AGU and ethics are compatible is like suggesting the actions (as evident in the Climategate emails) of the cabal of scientists involved with IPCC AR3 and AR4, and clearly “guilty” of scientific malfeasance, were saints.
“I have my principles — and if you don’t like them, I have others!”