By Paul Homewood

It has been variously described as “The Storm of the Century”, “Unprecedented”, “Superstorm” and “A repeat of 1987”. I refer, of course, to the St. Jude storm that passed through early this morning and is now headed off into the North Sea.
Let’s have a look at the impact, and see how it compared to other recent storms in the UK. We have not yet got confirmed figures from the Met Office, but it is unlikely they will be much different to the provisional data below.
The Daily Mail have this useful map, which seems to sum up things nicely.
The Telegraph report that the highest windspeed recorded on the mainland was 82mph at Langdon Bay in Kent. The next highest, 79mph, was in Essex.
Winds of this speed are not unusual in the UK, albeit less common in the south. It was only last year that Scotland experienced a similar storm, as the Met Office report.
The worst affected area was southern Scotland – particularly the Central Belt – where winds gusted at well over 70 knots (81 mph). In this area, this storm was judged as the most severe for 13 years – since 26 December 1998, with wind speeds exceeding those of the recent storm of 8 December 2011. Very strong winds were also experienced across much of England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, with winds here also widely gusting at 50 to 60 knots (58 to 69 mph).
In England, you have to go back to January 2005 for a comparable storm, this time in the North of England. Again, from the Met Office:
January 7/8 – as a very deep depression (reaching 962 mb) tracked north-eastwards across southern Scotland, strong winds battered England and Wales particularly northern areas. Gusts in excess of 70 knots (81 mph) were recorded from the Isle of Man and north Wales across to the coast of north-east England. 88 knots (101 m.p.h.) was recorded at St Bees Head (Cumbria) and 89 knots (102 m.p.h.) at Aberdaron on the Lleyn peninsula (Gwynedd).
In southern England, the St Jude storm was the strongest since October 2002, when highest gusts of 102mph were recorded at the Needles,( as against 99mph this year). In 2002, the storm hit the west of England and Wales hardest, but, nevertheless, winds over 80mph hit inland areas, such as Cottesmore, in Rutland, which recorded 70 knots (80mph).
The map below suggests that more of the country was affected. (Remember that 60 knots is at least 70mph).
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/interesting/27oct2002storm.html
Neither the storm of 2002 or this year’s come anywhere close to the Burn’s Day storm of 1990, or the Great Storm of 1987.
Burns’ Day Storm – January 1990
From the Met archives:
Burns’ Day Storm – 25 January 1990
However, in many places wind speeds were comparable to or higher than October 1987. January 25th is the day when many Scots remember the birthday of their national poet Robert Burns.
Impacts
The strong winds affected a much larger area than in October 1987 and they struck during the day so consequently there were more deaths and injuries, with 47 lives lost. The wind speeds were comparable to those in 1987, but higher over parts of southern England and Wales. Once again there were disruptions to power supplies and to transport, particularly to road transport because of fallen trees and overturned vehicles. There was also considerable damage to buildings, particularly to housing and to the south of a line from west Wales to Suffolk. The loss of trees was less than in October 1987 since the strongest winds occurred in less wooded areas and deciduous trees were bare of leaves.
Weather Data
The synoptic chart for 12 GMT, 25 January 1990.
The strongest winds were in the late morning and afternoon, with hourly mean speeds in excess of 40 kn (46 mph) across a large part of southern England and Wales and over 50 kn (58 m.p.h.) at exposed places along the coast. Gusts of over 80 kn (92 m.p.h.) were reported along coasts in west Wales and from Cornwall to Kent. The highest gusts recorded were 93 kn (107 m.p.h.) at Aberporth in west Wales and at Gwennap Head in Cornwall. The return period (average frequency of occurrence) of the maximum gusts was estimated at more than 100 years at places from Dorset to west London.

The Great Storm of 1987
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/t/5/October_87_Storm_-_16_October_1987.pdf
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Orkan_Christian says:October 29, 2013 at 2:24 am
“UK media is so hysteric about a still normal storm and Denmark and N-Germany is relaxed”
So wall to wall TV coverage is relaxed? A subjective view, surely!
http://www.dmi.dk/en/vejr/tjenester/varsler/vagtchefens-rubrik/
Google Translation:
Strongest measured hurricane in Denmark
The very high winds yesterday was a real hurricane with 4 stations , as measured mean wind of hurricane force , which is of 32.6 m / s Highest average wind speed was measured at Roesnaes on Zealand with a mean wind speed 39.5 m / s (142 km / h ) . This is the highest measured average wind speed since the first measurements began in 1874. The previous record was 38.1 m / s (137 km / h ), which was measured during the December storm in 1999.
The strongest winds were observed yesterday afternoon on Als , where the measuring station in Kegnaes measured entire 53.5 m / s (193 km / h ) . It is the strongest gust ever measured in Denmark . The previous record also comes in December hurricane in 1999, when measured 51.4 m / s (185 km / h ) . Compared with December 1999 hurricane , was measured to all winds stronger yesterday. The strong wind field was quite fast to pass , while hurricane in 1999 had a somewhat more protracted course .
Daniel Vogler says:
October 29, 2013 at 2:04 am
Since I dont describe to Piers’s posts, I did find the public post where he shows the Sept 17 issue.
It was issued 26 October. Where is the Sept. forecast?
I recall the 1987 storm, Michael Fish on the news, that night, forecasting a storm, but not much else. And what a storm it was. Seven Oaks became One. The washing I hung out the afternoon before was spread all over the housing estate I lived in. On the way to work, I did not have to drive, the number of 2m girth trees downed and being cut up. This storm was nothing of the sort in terms of “extreme” for pre-winter weather for the wast coast of England/Wales then. It is now.
***
Robert Brown says:
October 28, 2013 at 3:23 pm
The really interesting thing is that the weather now LOCALLY seems to greatly resemble the patterns last seen in the 1950s and 1960s, yet the claim is made that global temperatures are substantially warmer now than they were then.
Perhaps. But not outside my door. 2013 has been definitely and systematically cooler in NC than, say, 1980 or 1988.
***
Similar here in the mid-Appalachians. Mid-1950s to late 60s featured dry yrs w/hot, dry summers & cold winters (some w/alot of snow — 1961). I’ve measured less than 30″ rain so far this yr, but not even showing drought on the drought monitor! The reason I believe was well-spaced rains, but also due to the lack of 50s-60s-style heat/evaporation — the highest temp here was a mere 91F & it only got to 90F three days the whole summer! For comparison, July 1934 reached a state record 109F near me, and July 1966 produced 104F (I remember as a kid playing on burnt lawns). And those yrs had similar rainfalls as this yr.
The notable aspect of 1990s-to-present climate here isn’t temperature at all, but that avg annual rainfall locally increased 10% from the 1930s — mid-1970s averages (back to what they were previously around 1900). If the local climate reverts to 50s-60s style, rainfall will generally decrease & climate will become more continental/extreme.
Yes – absolutely.
However, there is room for joy, that there were only 4 deaths… NOT 40, or 400, nor 4000 and especially not the 15,000 of 1703. We must mourn and bury our dead, but keep in mind – It could have been much worse without early warning and wealth available for recovery. GK
lsvalgaard says:
October 28, 2013 at 12:11 pm
Piers Corbin had, of course, predicted this one 🙂 or did he?
Leif, I think we have to wait and see for sure, when October prediction will be archived 😉
– – –
Piers Corbyn forecast Archive!>
http://www.weatheraction.com/pages/pv.asp?p=wact46
Piers Corbyn Storm Causes UK Chaos as Predicted – 6 Weeks Ahead!>
http://principia-scientific.org/latest-news/360-piers-corbyn-storm-causes-uk-chaos-as-predicted-6-weeks-ahead.html
Comments from Piers!>
http://www.weatheraction.com/displayarticle.asp?a=594&c=5
Header page!>
https://twitter.com/ClimateRealists/status/394557682801057793/photo/1
A 6-month analysis of the weather forecasts of Piers Corbyn!> http://www.themaverickman.com/#/weatheraction-analysis/4574723723
Hey, Paul?
You brits are such wimps – why right here in sunny southern Alberta we’ve enjoyed “the flood of the century” roughly every 12 tyears since 1895. Well, at least according to the official organs: Environment Canada and The Calgary Herald. -:)
Tonyb,
looks like Dr. Spencer got it right huh?
graphicconception says:
October 28, 2013 at 12:43 pm
I live about 130 miles from London and we saw nothing of it here.
It is big news because it affected the south east where most of the national media are based.
-=-=-=-=
Auto agrees, in spades – but, too, a lot of the population live here [Yeah, I’m in London.] too.
London population – depending on who you believe – is 8.3 to 13+ million – or, looking at the ride to work area [which, necessarily, includes bits of Wales, France & Scotland, perhaps NI, plus chunks of England too] – some 20 plus million – at least.
London was the sixth biggest city for French voters last time round for President.
it’s magic to work with determined, talented, folk – whatever their hailing .
It’s probably about there for other nations world-wide.
see
http://www.citypopulation.de/world/Agglomerations.html
Thanks.
Auto
.@ur momisugly rbg …..snow in NC is a rare treat, a holiday.
……………………………………..
Come and visit higher elevations in the Blue Ridge Mountains of Western NC, professor, :). School kids from New Orleans were amazed by snow flurries last week on Black Balsam Mountain, 6200 ft. Apparently they had never seen snow!
The SquibStorm bothers the UK! Bother!
That has to be one of the stupidest statement seen on here in a long while.
More people died on the continent and the winds measured in DK breached previous long standing records.
Today, 3 days after, there are still 4000 people without power in the border region of St Petersburg.
Yesterday it was the turn of 20 000+ in southern Estonia.
Just because you can’t see further than your nose on the island, doesn’t mean this wasn’t an exceptionally violent storm, particularly on continental Europe, bringing shipping to a standstill.
I suppose you will say those experienced sea faring peoples of Northern Europe and Scandinavia are whimps as well?
The significance of this storm for the UK was its track not its intensity. This time of year these storms normally occur much further north.
I went through the Rendlesham Forest near RAF Woodbridge, Suffolk, in mid-1989. The effect of the 1987 storm made the forest look like a great bomb had blown it down.
This was a potentially very dangerous storm. By luck it hit in the middle of the night. If it had not, then many more people would have been killed. These autumn storms occur every 2 or 3 years and have done since recorded history. Nothing unusual…. but newsworthy for sure !