World to roast by 2047, film at 11

the end is nearA new Vinerism has emerged:

“Within my generation, whatever climate we were used to will be a thing of the past.”.

No word on whether Harold Camping has approved the date yet…

From the University of Hawaii at Manoa

Study in Nature reveals urgent new time frame for climate change

Ecological and societal disruptions by modern climate change are critically determined by the time frame over which climates shift. Camilo Mora and colleagues in the College of Social Sciences’ Department of Geography at the University of Hawaii, Manoa have developed one such time frame. The study, entitled “The projected timing of climate departure from recent variability,” will be published in the October 10 issue of Nature and provides an index of the year when the mean climate of any given location on Earth will shift continuously outside the most extreme records experienced in the past 150 years.

The new index shows a surprising result. Areas in the tropics are projected to experience unprecedented climates first – within the next decade. Under a business-as-usual scenario, the index shows the average location on Earth will experience a radically different climate by 2047. Under an alternate scenario with greenhouse gas emissions stabilization, the global mean climate departure will be 2069.

“The results shocked us. Regardless of the scenario, changes will be coming soon,” said lead author Camilo Mora. “Within my generation, whatever climate we were used to will be a thing of the past.”

The scientists calculated the index for additional variables including evaporation, precipitation, and ocean surface temperature and pH. When looking at sea surface pH, the index indicates that we surpassed the limits of historical extremes in 2008. This is consistent with other recent studies, and is explained by the fact that ocean pH has a narrow range of historical variability and because the ocean has absorbed a considerable fraction of human-caused CO2 emissions.

The study found that the overarching global effect of climate change on biodiversity will occur not only as a result of the largest absolute changes at the poles, but also, perhaps more urgently, from small but rapid changes in the tropics.

Tropical species are unaccustomed to climate variability and are therefore more vulnerable to relatively small changes. The tropics hold the world’s greatest diversity of marine and terrestrial species and will experience unprecedented climates some 10 years earlier than anywhere else on Earth. Previous studies have already shown that corals and other tropical species are currently living in areas near their physiological limits. The study suggests that conservation planning could be undermined as protected areas will face unprecedented climates just as early and because most centers of high species diversity are located in developing countries

Rapid change will tamper with the functioning of Earth’s biological systems, forcing species to either move in an attempt to track suitable climates, stay and try to adapt to the new climate, or go extinct. “This work demonstrates that we are pushing the ecosystems of the world out of the environment in which they evolved into wholly new conditions that they may not be able to cope with. Extinctions are likely to result,” said Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution for Science’s Department of Global Ecology, and who was not involved in this study. “Some ecosystems may be able to adapt, but for others, such as coral reefs, complete loss of not only individual species but their entire integrity is likely.”

These changes will affect our social systems as well. The impacts on the tropics have implications globally as they are home to most of the world’s population, contribute significantly to total food supplies, and house much of the world’s biodiversity.

In predominately developing countries, over one billion people under an optimistic scenario, and five billion under a business-as-usual-scenario, live in areas that will experience extreme climates before 2050. This raises concerns for changes in the supply of food and water, human health, wider spread of infectious diseases, heat stress, conflicts, and challenges to economies. “Our results suggest that countries first impacted by unprecedented climates are the ones with the least capacity to respond,” said coauthor Ryan Longman. “Ironically, these are the countries that are least responsible for climate change in the first place.”

“This paper is unusually important. It builds on earlier work but brings the biological and human consequences into sharper focus,” said Jane Lubchenco, former Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and now of Oregon State University, who was not involved in this study. “It connects the dots between climate models and impacts to biodiversity in a stunningly fresh way, and it has sobering ramifications for species and people.”

While the study describes global averages, the authors have visualized their data on an interactive map displaying when climate will exceed historical precedents for locations around the world. “We hope that with this map people can see and understand the progression of climate change in time where they live, hopefully connecting people more closely to the issue and increasing awareness about the urgency to act,” said coauthor Abby Frazier.

The index used the minimum and maximum temperatures from 1860-2005 to define the bounds of historical climate variability at any given location. The scientists then took projections for the next 100 years to identify the year in which the future temperature at any given location on Earth will shift completely outside the limits of historical precedents, defining that year as the year of climate departure.

The data came from 39 Earth System Models developed independently by 21 climate centers in 12 different countries. The models have been effective at reproducing current climate conditions and varied in their projected departure times by no more than five years.

The study suggests that any progress to slow ongoing climate change will require a larger commitment from developed countries to reduce emissions, but also more extensive funding of social and conservation programs in developing countries to minimize climate change impacts. The longer we wait, the more difficult remediation will be.

“Scientists have repeatedly warned about climate change and its likely effects on biodiversity and people,” said Mora. “Our study shows that such changes are already upon us. These results should not be reason to give up. Rather, they should encourage us to reduce emissions and slow the rate of climate change. This can buy time for species, ecosystems, and ourselves to adapt to the coming changes.”

###

This paper is funded by a grant/cooperative agreement from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Project R/IR-25PD, which is sponsored by the University of Hawaii Sea Grant College Program, SOEST, under Institutional Grant No. NA09OAR4170060 from NOAA Office of Sea Grant, Department of Commerce. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or any of its subagencies.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

177 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
FrankK
October 9, 2013 9:01 pm


Global warming caused by 39 climate models!! Crikey!

pat
October 9, 2013 9:14 pm

for those who think UK Daily Mail is sceptical, here they are in full alarmist mode, with these excerpts ending the article. they even manage to make it seem Judith Curry is sort of endorsing the study:
10 Oct: UK Daily Mail: James Nye: Apocalypse Now: Unstoppable man-made climate change will become reality by the end of the decade and could make New York, London and Paris uninhabitable within 45 years says new study
Judith Curry, a Georgia Institute of Technology climate scientist who often clashes with mainstream scientists, said she found Mora’s approach to make more sense than the massive report that came out of the U.N.-sponsored Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change last month.
Pennsylvania State University climate scientist Michael Mann said the research ‘may actually be presenting an overly rosy scenario when it comes to how close we are to passing the threshold for dangerous climate impacts.’
‘By some measures, we are already there,’ he said.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2451604/Apocalypse-Now-Unstoppable-man-climate-change-reality-end-decade-make-New-York-London-Paris-uninhabitable-45-years-says-new-study.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

October 9, 2013 9:21 pm

Global Warming. Climate Change. Climate Disruption. Climate Shift.
Am I missing one?

u.k.(us)
October 9, 2013 9:29 pm

…..said coauthor Ryan Longman. “Ironically, these are the countries that are least responsible for climate change in the first place.”
“This paper is unusually important……..
================
What is really ironic is the fact that nobody is listening anymore, don’t wait too long cus the grant money is going elsewhere soon.

R. de Haan
October 9, 2013 9:32 pm

Al Gore effect to hit International Snow Science Workshop (ISSW) in Grenoble and Chamonix
http://climategate.nl/2013/10/09/al-gore-effect-to-hit-international-snow-science-workshop-issw-grenoble-and-chamonix/
70-80% less snow at 1.800m in 2100 and a 90% reduction of avalanche warnings. At 3000m 20-30% less in the northern Alps but 50-60% in the Southern French Alps.
Host Gérald Giraud, scientist at the Centre d’études de la Neige (Météo France/CNRS) in Grenoble adds: “We have to wait till 2030-2040 to get rid of the inter annual climate variabilty.”
“We have to wait till 2030-2040 to get rid of the inter annual climate variability”
They predict there will be no difference between summer and winter….Bwahahahahah
This is tale of “Mad Men” en Eco Nazi’s.
This is the devil at work.
These people provide our crazy overlords with the excuse to wreck our civilization in favor of UN Agenda 21 where human kind is micromanaged and controlled like chicken in a factory farm.
And these hacks call us flat earthers, exremists, even terrorists for debunking their pack of lies.
When do we switch from from civil debate to tar and feathers and end this incredible evil scam.
Time is running out.

Keith Minto
October 9, 2013 9:33 pm

The Mora article, I am afraid has exactly the scare factor, red burning globe images that the media will lap up to sell their publications on a slow news week.
For example , from the dailymail above

And while the doomsday clock is ticking, with the first signs of change expected at the end of this decade, researchers of the study claim that it is too late to reverse and mankind needs to prepare for a world where the coldest years will be warmer than what we remember as the hottest.

Hyperbole on steroids.
Here in SE Australia we are having a blast of inland heat today with Sydney expecting 39°C, just wait for the news organisation putting these two events together to fill their news hour.
It’s hard to be a sceptic, we lack the pretty pictures.

October 9, 2013 9:36 pm

Previous studies have already shown that corals and other tropical species are currently living in areas near their physiological limits.
=========
that is because most corals cannot live in cold water. so they are forced to live in a narrow band of warm water along the equator. Hawaii, where this paper was written, is at the outer range for most corals. The hottest ocean waters on earth, the Red Sea are home to fantastic corals. if things actually warmed up, then corals could expand worldwide.
so, yes corals are living in areas near their physiological limits – to cold. This paper is dishonest in its wording because it gives the impression that warming is a threat to corals, while the real threat to coral is cooling.

R. de Haan
October 9, 2013 9:40 pm

Are we going to recycle the some old same or has the time arrived for tar and feathers?

R. de Haan
October 9, 2013 9:47 pm

ferd berple says
‘so, yes corals are living in areas near their physiological limits – to cold. This paper is dishonest in its wording because it gives the impression that warming is a threat to corals, while the real threat to coral is cooling’.
We have corals for millions of years and they survived is ages, volcanic eruptions massive sea level changes, tectonic events and in the past century we even nuked only to find out they flourish 25 years later.
Just forget all about “high sensitivity” hog wash the eco nazi’s claim to turn you into a chicken in a chicken factory.
Because that;s exactly what UN AGENDA 21 is all about.

CodeTech
October 9, 2013 9:53 pm

I started reading this, and started laughing. Then I thought I should be more considerate of the mentally handicapped. But I was laughing even more at the realization that this was self-inflicted angst.

The index used the minimum and maximum temperatures from 1860-2005 to define the bounds of historical climate variability at any given location.

So, the index used a historical low point as a baseline. But the uneducated won’t realize that because it was a long time ago and people didn’t change things much before then, right?

The scientists then took projections for the next 100 years to identify the year in which the future temperature at any given location on Earth will shift completely outside the limits of historical precedents, defining that year as the year of climate departure.

Again, this just makes me laugh. Because, no matter HOW HORRIBLE they predict things will be, someone always seems to come along and realize IT’S EVEN WORSE!
Well, the fact is, it’s climate “science” that’s EVEN WORSE than we thought. Anyone who starts with the presumption of a climate “departure”, then bends and stretches reality in order to determine when it will happen has no business in “Science”. None.

R. de Haan
October 9, 2013 9:56 pm

The reality is that corals are the pestilence of the oceans.
You sink a ship, with or without greenies, and 10 years later it is colonized by corals.

Jeef
October 9, 2013 10:11 pm

“projected”. I stopped giving this article any credibility when I saw that word. As models are already proving to be useless at forecasting and hind casting, why would one project using them? A bit sad.

Taphonomic
October 9, 2013 10:45 pm

OMG, Bob Geldof was half right!!!
Your lips move but I can’t hear what you’re saying
When I was a child
I caught a fleeting glimpse
Out of the corner of my eye
I turned to look but it was gone
I cannot put my finger on it now
The child is grown
The dream is gone
And I have become
Comfortably numb.

L Logan
October 9, 2013 11:13 pm

2047? Can Camilo tell us if we should expect this catastrophe on a week day or weekend? I just want to make a note in my calendar.
Regrettably I couldn’t find a Comments box on the NY Times website for the story. So, “All the News that Fits One Side.”

u.k.(us)
October 9, 2013 11:15 pm

R. de Haan says:
October 9, 2013 at 9:56 pm
The reality is that corals are the pestilence of the oceans.
You sink a ship, with or without greenies, and 10 years later it is colonized by corals.
=============================
What of the sirens ?
http://deoxy.org/alephnull/sirens.htm
(one take on it).

pat
October 9, 2013 11:25 pm

Independent finds a stronger headline:
9 Oct: Independent: Steve Connor: Unprecedented shift in temperature will begin to hit tropics in less than a decade
Areas with highest densities of wildlife and most vulnerable human populations will be hardest hit, says study
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/unprecedented-shift-in-temperature-will-begin-to-hit-tropics-in-less-than-a-decade-8869608.html
——————————————————————————–

woz
October 9, 2013 11:34 pm

Right on cue, Australia’s ABC radio had “University of Hawaii researcher Abby Frazier” on its morning “AM” program today, shrilly proclaiming doom. “Sydney will hit its new extreme climate in 2038 and Brisbane four years after that.” We can only hope that the new Aust Government finds some intestinal fortitude to pull the ABC into line with its Charter, or – better still – defund it!!!

Espen
October 10, 2013 12:21 am

It’s a pity nobody will be around to check their claims, since all humans might die in 2030. At least according to Bob Geldof 😉

October 10, 2013 12:36 am

Just out of interest here are a list of words that ‘may’ have emotional impact that appear in this article:
reveals urgent, disruptions, critically, extreme (appears 3 times), surprising, unprecedented (appears 4 times), radically different, shocked, coming soon, thing of the past, urgently, rapid, unaccustomed, vulnerable, developing (appears twice), Rapid changes, concerns, infectious diseases, heat stress, conflicts, and challenges to economies, least responsible, stunningly, sobering ramifications, exceed historical precedents, urgency to act, historical precedents, developed countries, difficult, repeatedly warned, climate change (appears 9 times)
Anyway to be fair 2047 is a lot more precise than 2050.

October 10, 2013 12:51 am

Banks also take minimum and maximum over a given time and than try to predict the future of stocks and currency. We all know what a great job they did!!. They use things like ( macd, fibonaci etc). With banks, these predictions are sometimes right and sometimes wrong. Like a casino. Seems to me this study is doing the exact same thing. Banks know these are “lagging ‘ indicators and therefore not 100% reliable. Same with this study. Take past information and try to predict the future. It will not work of course. But it looks like real science. In fact this is pseudoscience. Mumbo Jumbo that’s what it is.

AB
October 10, 2013 12:54 am

The torrent of scornful comments on the dailymail.co.uk should cheer you all up!

John V. Wright
October 10, 2013 1:07 am

Disgraceful waste of my time! They should have put the paragraph beginning “The data came from 39 Earth System Models developed independently by 21 climate centers in 12 different countries.” at the top of the piece. Then I could have stopped reading earlier.

AndyG55
October 10, 2013 1:47 am

Quick,,
buy shares in sandwich boards !!!!

DirkH
October 10, 2013 2:05 am

“Camilo Mora and colleagues in the College of Social Sciences’ Department of Geography at the University of Hawaii, Manoa have developed one such time frame.”
““The results shocked us. Regardless of the scenario, changes will be coming soon,” said lead author Camilo Mora.”
They have develop a TIME FRAME and were SHOCKED by it?
Is that like a schizophrenic, the only kind of person that can tickle himself?

steveta_uk
October 10, 2013 2:11 am

GlynnMhor says: October 9, 2013 at 3:43 pm
“The data came from 39 Earth System Models…”
Models do not output data.
They output numbers of various sorts, but not actual data.

I don’t know if the terminology has changed since, but when I took information theory at college (in the early 70’s) this statement would have been OK.
Your statement would have been along the lines of “the models output data, not information.”
Information may, or may not, be contained within the data.