
From the University of California – Los Angeles
How did a third radiation belt appear in the Earth’s upper atmosphere?
Since the discovery of the Van Allen radiation belts in in the Earth’s upper atmosphere in 1958, space scientists have believed that these belts consisted of two doughnut-shaped rings of highly charged particles — an inner ring of high-energy electrons and energetic positive ions, and an outer ring of high-energy electrons.
However, in February of this year, a team of scientists reported in the journal Science the surprising discovery of a previously unknown third radiation ring. This narrow ring had briefly circled the Earth between the inner and outer rings in September 2012 and then almost completely disappeared.
How did this temporary radiation belt appear and dissipate?
In new research, the radiation belt group in the UCLA Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences explains the development of this third belt and its decay over a period of slightly more than four weeks. The research is available in the online edition of the journal Geophysical Research Letters and will be published in an upcoming print edition.
By performing a “quantitative treatment of the scattering of relativistic electrons by electromagnetic whistler-mode waves inside the dense plasmasphere,” the investigators were able to account for the “distinctively slow decay of the injected relativistic electron flux” and demonstrate why this unusual third radiation belt is observed only at energies above 2 mega-electron-volts.
Understanding the processes that control the formation and ultimate loss of such relativistic electrons is a primary science objective of the NASA Van Allen Probe Mission and has important practical applications, because the enormous amounts of radiation the Van Allen belts generate can pose a significant hazard to satellites and spacecraft, as well to astronauts performing activities outside a spacecraft.
The current research was funded by the NASA, which launched the twin Van Allen probes in the summer of 2012.
The lead author of the research is Richard Thorne, a UCLA professor of atmospheric and oceanic sciences, who was a co-author of the Feb. 28 research paper in Science. Co-authors of the new research include Wen Li, a graduate student who works in Thorne’s laboratory; Binbin Ni, a postdoctoral scholar who works in Thorne’s laboratory; Jacob Bortnik, a researcher with the UCLA Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences; Daniel Baker, a professor at the University of Colorado’s Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics and lead author of the February Science paper; and Vassilis Angelopoulos, a UCLA professor of Earth and space sciences.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Causation? A temporary change in output of charged particles from the Sun, eg a Coronal Mass Ejection! Or the most likely explanation; AGW!!
How did this temporary radiation belt appear and dissipate? I cannot help myself: It has to be anthropogenic CO2.
Not only caused by CO2 but it’ll be catastrophically bad for us, no doubt. Tax the People!
/sarc
I would surmise it was part of a CME or solar flare, but yeah, the above regarding CO2 and AGW are a likely cause to be blamed initially by those running on a depleting gravy train.
It’s George Bush’s fault.
I have to agree with WWS, “It’s George Bush’s fault.” After all he gets blamed for everything else.
Truly, the take home is how little we know. The models are treated as sacrosanct as they fail, and our knowledge is miniscule in context. The earth is old, the universe is mostly dark matter about which we are almost clueless. And we get that we need to reduce co2? Really?
I wonder how often this third belt appears/disappears.
AWG it appears is also transient. I wonder if it will disappear also. It seems like whack a mole, however, perhaps a bout of cooling will do it in.
The following is more information concerning the transient third Van Allan belt. For a period of time there was only one Van Allan belt and then back to two. The cause is apparently related to solar particle ejections. The observations cannot be explained by the current Van Allan belt theory.
http://www.nature.com/news/ephemeral-third-ring-of-radiation-makes-appearance-around-earth-1.12529
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/340/6129/186
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/06/climate-change
“A cooling consensus
if … temperatures are likely to rise by only 2°C in response to a doubling of carbon emissions (and if the likelihood of a 6°C increase is trivial), the calculation might change. Perhaps the world should seek to adjust to (rather than stop) the greenhouse-gas splurge. There is no point buying earthquake insurance if you do not live in an earthquake zone. In this case more adaptation rather than more mitigation might be the right policy at the margin. But that would be good advice only if these new estimates really were more reliable than the old ones. And different results come from different models.”
It saw the month long anomaly within 6 months of it getting to space? Perhaps we should wait at least a few years for more data, so correlations can be sought. Why jump the gun on yet another topic?
Of course this is consistent with AGW predictions…………
And it worse than projected……..
I would suggest that “belts” is not the appropriate term. I would further suggest the proper term would be “fields”.
How did it appear? We were looking for it this time.
Makes you wonder if Earths internal motor is about to get very active. If you follow seismic activity it peeked about the same time this appeared and went away as it calmed..
Earths dynamo of molten fluid.. creating a new (or at least new to us) gravitational band…
hmmmmmmm….
To many people crushing the earth… Or CAGW… Or…..I really dont know…
That’s kind of exciting. Fun to see new things discovered and look forward to hearing more about it.
It’s an energy field caused by the US peoples outrage about the IRS, NSA, Benghazi, etc. scandals. Sadly, this will slowly decay with no lasting effects.
Daniel Baker gives the “Van Allen Lecture” at the AGU fall meeting, last December 2012.
If you want to learn a little history of the Van Allen Belts, a little history on Van Allen himself and the recent data from the new Van Allen belt probes, give the lecture a looky see.
oops double players..
The solar system is awesome!
Ya think climate is a complex discussion?
Considering this find is very young (2012),does anyone think we fully understand the energy projected upon this planet from afar is known?
Let’s see,,,,,,,,,,,,,exactly where are we in known space?
I hope some enjoy this version, I did! 🙂
Can somebody here deal with this radiation?
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-10-dumbest-things-ever-said-about-global-warming-20130619
More correctly, it would seem to be the Van Allen Sansabelt
By performing a “quantitative treatment of the scattering of relativistic electrons by electromagnetic whistler-mode waves inside the dense plasmasphere,” the investigators were able to account for the “distinctively slow decay of the injected relativistic electron flux” and demonstrate why this unusual third radiation belt is observed only at energies above 2 mega-electron-volts.
Offhand it sounds like the highest-energy particles could escape the forces creating the individual rings, but not the larger field keeping the rings existing and in place. So they wound up not in the normal two but in the area, where they formed a new ring in the space between, which naturally degraded until only the normal two remained.
Thus nothing to worry about, it’s still not the time to fire off the nuclear-tipped ICBM’s from the submarine to rupture the Van Allen Radiation Belts and eject them away from the planet. Which is a shame, would have made a nice light show.
So how much energy is ‘used’ by the third field, where did it come from, and where did it go?
The usual two belts also disappear at times and a 3rd has never been looked for, so with new studies comes new funding and that seems to be the flavor of the day:)
Great film, O Superstar Qua Superstar [;)]. (could have done without Sagan’s being the narrator (ugh), like Gordon Lightfoot — great lyrics and music, LOUSY voice and expression)
“When I consider your heavens the work of your fingers, … what is humanity that you are mindful of them… ?” Psalm 8:4
Yet, we are it. We are the centerpiece of all creation. Why is the earth in the “juuuust right” orbit with a “juuuust right,” amazingly stable, global temperature range suitable for life, etc, etc? Because God made it just — for — us.
And that powerful Intelligence loves me. I am important. And so are you!
Even the very hairs of your head are numbered… .
“In the beginning God created the heavens
and
the earth.”
Genesis 1:1