Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach
The last time I was in Alaska, I had the good fortune to stop by the town of Nenana, home of the Nenana River Ice Classic. Nenana sits at the junction of the Tanana and Nenana Rivers. The dates of the ice breakup at Nenana form one of the longest-term modern temperature proxies in the area, extending back unbroken to 1917. Figure 1 shows my photo of the tripod which is set out on the ice to determine the exact tim of the breakup.
Figure 1. The tower and the tripod. The tripod is placed out on the ice before the breakup. When the ice breaks up, the tripod falls, tripping the clock. These days the tripod is actually a quadripod, or perhaps a quadruped.
Every year people pay money to bet on the exact time of the breakup, with the winner taking the pot. At present, the pot is $318,500 …
There’s a recent WUWT post by Psalmon about the Ice Classic here. Although I’d written about it previously, there were a couple of things I didn’t understand about Nenana until I’d visited the place.The first was the reason the ice breakup was so important. It was critical because both then and now, the river is navigable, and becomes a main highway for people and supplies during the summer. Until the breakup, little villages and cabins and camps along the river can’t get their supplies or travel by water. Although this is less important now with the advent of highways, there still are many places along the river that can only be reached by traveling along the river. That made the breakup a huge event in the old days.
The second thing I didn’t understand was the reason why the breakup was so sudden and complete. The map shows the Tanana River and surroundings:
Figure 2. The Tanana River and its tributaries flow north to the Yukon River. The Yukon flows from the top center to the upper left of the figure, with a portion appearing dark blue.
The reason the breakup comes suddenly is that unlike most US rivers, the rivers around Nenana are flowing north. As a result, the more southerly upriver parts of the drainage would tend to melt earlier. At some point this increasing upstream meltwater will put pressure on the downriver ice, and as the ice at Nenana rots and melts, the whole thing will break and collapse at once.
Now, you’d think that the river breakup dates would be a perfect temperature proxy. After all, urban warming surely won’t be an issue. However, nature always sides with the hidden flaw, so of course there is a confounding factor—rain. Rain can hasten the breakup significantly by melting the ice from the top. In addition to starting out warmer than the ice, rainwater pools have less albedo than ice, so they warm more for a given amount of sunlight. Rain also increases the volume of water flowing in the river, so it puts additional pressure on the ice. As a result, the breakup dates form the usual imperfect proxy for temperature.
Given all of that, here are the inverse dates of ice breakup since the Classic was first run in 1917.
Figure 3. Nenana ice breakup dates since 1917. The result for 2013 will be equal to or greater than today, May 15th. Blue dots show the standard error of the Gaussian average at the endpoint in 2013.
For me, it is clear that what we are seeing are the effects of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation. This is a slow, decades long cycle in the heat distribution in the Pacific Ocean. In about 1945 the PDO shifted to the cool phase, then went back to the warm phase in about 1975, and has recently switched again to the cool phase.
Overall? I’d say there’s not a whole lot to see in the ice records. Temperatures went up a bit, down a bit, up a bit, and appear to be on their way back down again … be still, my beating heart, it’s all too exciting.
I leave you with the current photo from the Nenana Icecam, at 8:47 Alaska Daylight Time May 15, still no breakup, but goodness, it’s a lovely spring day in Alaska … makes my heart leap just to look at it.
Regards to all,
w.
DATA: the historical breakup days are available here.

The reflection of the top of the tripod in the water on the front edge of the river, has shifted about 3 feet down stream toward the right. It used to align with the left side fork lift slot in the concrete car stop now it is almost to the right slot. The cables are more slack than before so it made some progress toward the near bank as well as down stream, the ice is starting to plasticity deform as it softens up some.
There is a lot going on in those webcam pics, as RACook and Richard Holle point out.
The concrete blocks have been mysteriously moved, and they looked pretty heavy.
And in studying the lines going out to the Nenanapod, the middle pic looks like they’re connected lower on the pod than in the bottom pic. May be an optical illusion. Also, it looks like lines are completely missing in the last frame of the series. There is one single faint line in the lower right corner of the bottom pic; hard to see it.
Maybe it’s the wind. The bottom pic shows the flag unfurled, while the other pics show a limp flag.
And in the current live webcam, there are 4 lines at the moment, if you count the thick vertical one [these change when the picture is captured at different times, when someone clicks on the live webcam link].
No doubt there is a routine, ho-hum explanation for these discrepancies — and no doubt we will get a poetic explanation from Keith, who has a real talent. [You don’t talk like that in every day conversation, do you, Keith?☺ If I had to respond in verse, I would be limited to, “There once was a man from Nantucket…”]
The ice is looking skankier every day. I predict that we can’t tell when it will break up. That’s my prediction. But it wouldn’t suprise me if the 20th was the day. Or the 21st. Or the 22nd…
Me, I’m rooting for the ice! Go, ice! ☺☺☺
There once was some ice in Nonatucket,
Whose ropes did swing and sway from the bucket,
Where money got bet,
On when the tripod got wet,
So late in the leap year, Mann said “Ah F*ckit”
HenryP said “1964 was a leap year, and the equivalent time in days in 2013 would be 21 May?”, and has been praised for this analysis. But since minutes count for the Nenana sweepstake, so should they for the measurement of the record. So we should be measuring astronomically, with reference to the time since the vernal equinox.
A first cut would say that since 2013 is one year after a leap year, the equinox occurred about 6 hours later than in 2012, so instead of May 20th 11:41am we should set the target to be May 20th 5:41pm.
A second cut needs to actually find out when the equinox occurred in 1964 and in 2013. The wonders of Google (or other good search engines) reveal the site http://ns1763.ca/equinox/vern1788-2211.html where you can see that, surprising to some (but not me), the equinox was actually _earlier_ in 2013 than in 1964. Namely, both were on March 20th but 1964’s was at
1410UT and 2013’s was at 1102UT. Therefore we should subtract 3h08m from the target time.
I therefore declare that 2013’s ice break-up will be a record if it occurs later than May 20th 8:33am.
Rich.
dbstealey says:
May 19, 2013 at 1:14 am
There is definitely a wind blowing with the lines swinging around. ATM the tripod looks like it is sinking in the ice but after comparing it must be an optical illusion. What I do is look at the top pole in reference to a tree behind it. It is the same now as in the first of Willis’s pics.
In regards to Henry P, it doesn’t matter one zoot what the actual number of days, hours and minutes are different from 1964 to 2013, The Pool asks for date and time so if it lasts past 20th May at 9:17 then it is a record.
Steve B: for the calendar record, where do you get 9:17 from? The data I saw said 11:41am. But astronomically rather than calendrically, it is 8:33am as per my calculation above.
Meanwhile, moving to Europe, though warm in Sweden the big cycle race Giro d’Italia has been hit by snow. “Yesterday’s stage was diverted at the last minute before the start, to avoid the climb to Sestriere, which was under snow. Today’s leg into France remains in doubt as snow drifts and avalanche fears forced the organisers to cut out the Mont Cenis pass and curtail the finish on the Col du Galibier.”
Rich.
Rich says
Namely, both were on March 20th but 1964′s was at
1410UT and 2013′s was at 1102UT
Henry says
what is UT?
surely we are on PST in Alaska?
I am a bit confused.
Surely we count days from the 1st of the year?
Rich says
1) so instead of May 20th 11:41am we should set the target to be May 20th 5:41pm.
2) Therefore we should subtract 3h08m from the target time. I therefore declare that 2013′s ice break-up will be a record if it occurs later than May 20th 8:33am.
henry asks
the maths does not add up? 5:41 pm – 3h08 = 2:33 pm
henry@Steve Bodemann
where does your 09h17 come from?
Leap years add an extra day. Has this been considered in your analysis?
OK, I’ll explain again. Ignore my “first cut” which gave 5:41pm. This assumed that the vernal equinox in 1964 and 2012 was at the same time, since both were leap years, and that the equinox in 2013 would then have been about six hours later, hence 11:41am+6:00 = 5:41pm. That calculation was something one could do without access to actual data, other than knowing that the year is about 365.25 days long.
The second cut used actual data which showed that the equinox in 2013 was 3:08 hours _before_ that in 1964. There is a drift in equinox times which means that one can’t simply say “leap years add an extra day”. If there had not been a leap day in 2000, like there wasn’t in 1900 nor will be in 2100, then 2013’s equinox would have been 24-3:08 = 20:52h _after_ 1964’s. But as it stands the time-after-equinox comparison between 11:41am in 1964 and 2013 is 11:41am-3:08 = 8:33am.
“UT” is Universal Time, or Greenwich Mean Time (roughly), and is a standard for specifying date/times.
Rich.
I’m sure Willis didn’t say, and I have been then confused by some commenters, but which way is the river flowing? I think it is from right to left according to the Nenana city map, but as said, I thought I’d seen some comments suggesting the opposite.
Rich.
Flows right to left into the Yukon.
At first I thought that that widening black line in the center of the ice was a crack. But might it be a shallow water channel on top of the ice draining surface water in the direction of the river’s flow? If that is the case it will eventually carve its way through the ice. Can you folks who watch this ice break up every year tell us more about what the conditions are like just before the break up?
Rich says
But as it stands the time-after-equinox comparison between 11:41am in 1964 and 2013 is 11:41am-3:08 = 8:33am.
Henry says
thx. I think I get what you are saying.
you are saying that from 1 Jan 1964 to 20 May 1964 11h40 (141 days)
is the same as
1 Jan 2013 to 20 May 2013 08h33 am (140 days)
if you look at the amount of daylight exposure over the two periods of time.
Is this correct? Does everyone agree?
There’s ice on the line in Nenana
Tripods have four sides like a cabana
And the betting’s intense
But ignore leap year since
By tomorrow, we’ll be top banana
From a technical standpoint, it’s clear
One more day would account for leap year
But for “latest time ever”
Being equinox-clever
Won’t change any records, I fear
Imagine a scene three years hence
A new record set? We’re on the fence
Since we’d say “it’s still later
Leap year adds a day greater”
To outsiders, we’d seem rather dense
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
Still going.
the atmosphere is pregnant
when is the water going to break?
the melting ice was CAGW’s last remnant
they are going to claim the record is a fake
because there is a leap in the fold
but they cannot stop the coming cold
http://blogs.24.com/henryp/2013/04/29/the-climate-is-changing/
Tripod still up at moon rise! http://research.aerology.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/guy-mooning-nenana-ice-classic-2013.jpg
04h25
tripod is still standing up straight
but is there a puddle of water exactly underneath the tripod?
06h00
it is icing up again!
look at those icicles on the ropes!
go ice, go!!
i think this guy with the cam could have made a million bucks (>$315000) if they had put some advert in front of those bricks ….
Well, you called it just about right Willis. Today’s high here in North Pole was 70.4 °F, forecast for 75 °F through the weekend, with next Wednesday forecast to hit 85 °F. The sun is just setting, but as you know it won’t really get dark, a shame tonight as the POES Auroral Activity website ( http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/pmap/pmapN.html ) shows enough activity that we would have a pretty good light show tonight if it were dark…but I’ll forgo the light show and enjoy the warmth.
On another note, a local professor of forest ecology at the University of Alaska Fairbanks made a big issue of the leap year, disputing that this year’s breakup was record breaking. Dr. Kramm offered his usual insightful comments.
http://www.newsminer.com/news/local_news/professor-disputes-whether-new-nenana-ice-classic-record-set/article_06b291b2-c2b6-11e2-a622-001a4bcf6878.html#user-comment-area
Today the Fairbanks Daily News Miner ran an editorial titled “Ice record? Astronomical markers provide best measure”, showing that the debate simmers along.
http://www.newsminer.com/opinion/editorials/ice-record-astronomical-markers-provide-best-measure/article_96cd2724-c43e-11e2-8784-0019bb30f31a.html