The Icy Nenana River

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

The last time I was in Alaska, I had the good fortune to stop by the town of Nenana, home of the Nenana River Ice Classic. Nenana sits at the junction of the Tanana and Nenana Rivers. The dates of the ice breakup at Nenana form one of the longest-term modern temperature proxies in the area, extending back unbroken to 1917. Figure 1 shows my photo of the tripod which is set out on the ice to determine the exact tim of the breakup.

nenana ice classicFigure 1. The tower and the tripod. The tripod is placed out on the ice before the breakup. When the ice breaks up, the tripod falls, tripping the clock. These days the tripod is actually a quadripod, or perhaps a quadruped.

Every year people pay money to bet on the exact time of the breakup, with the winner taking the pot. At present, the pot is $318,500 …

There’s a recent WUWT post by Psalmon about the Ice Classic here. Although I’d written about it previously, there were a couple of things I didn’t understand about Nenana until I’d visited the place.The first was the reason the ice breakup was so important. It was critical because both then and now, the river is navigable, and becomes a main highway for people and supplies during the summer. Until the breakup, little villages and cabins and camps along the river can’t get their supplies or travel by water. Although this is less important now with the advent of highways, there still are many places along the river that can only be reached by traveling along the river. That made the breakup a huge event in the old days.

The second thing I didn’t understand was the reason why the breakup was so sudden and complete. The map shows the Tanana River and surroundings:

ge nenana ice classicFigure 2. The Tanana River and its tributaries flow north to the Yukon River. The Yukon flows from the top center to the upper left of the figure, with a portion appearing dark blue.

The reason the breakup comes suddenly is that unlike most US rivers, the rivers around Nenana are flowing north. As a result, the more southerly upriver parts of the drainage would tend to melt earlier. At some point this increasing upstream meltwater will put pressure on the downriver ice, and as the ice at Nenana rots and melts, the whole thing will break and collapse at once.

Now, you’d think that the river breakup dates would be a perfect temperature proxy. After all, urban warming surely won’t be an issue. However, nature always sides with the hidden flaw, so of course there is a confounding factor—rain. Rain can hasten the breakup significantly by melting the ice from the top. In addition to starting out warmer than the ice, rainwater pools have less albedo than ice, so they warm more for a given amount of sunlight. Rain also increases the volume of water flowing in the river, so it puts additional pressure on the ice. As a result, the breakup dates form the usual imperfect proxy for temperature.

Given all of that, here are the inverse dates of ice breakup since the Classic was first run in 1917.

ice breakup dates at nenanaFigure 3. Nenana ice breakup dates since 1917. The result for 2013 will be equal to or greater than today, May 15th. Blue dots show the standard error of the Gaussian average at the endpoint in 2013.

For me, it is clear that what we are seeing are the effects of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation. This is a slow, decades long cycle in the heat distribution in the Pacific Ocean. In about 1945 the PDO shifted to the cool phase, then went back to the warm phase in about 1975, and has recently switched again to the cool phase.

Overall? I’d say there’s not a whole lot to see in the ice records. Temperatures went up a bit, down a bit, up a bit, and appear to be on their way back down again … be still, my beating heart, it’s all too exciting.

I leave you with the current photo from the Nenana Icecam, at 8:47 Alaska Daylight Time May 15, still no breakup, but goodness, it’s a lovely spring day in Alaska … makes my heart leap just to look at it.

ice cam 945 am pdt

Regards to all,

w.

DATA: the historical breakup days are available here.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
172 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Greg Goodman
May 15, 2013 8:42 pm

OK, it’s a PITA but I parsed it all by hand including silliness like 12:04 AM (duh) and I have a plot remarkably similar to yours Willis. And you know what I think we have a volcano effect !
Mt Agung and Mt P seems well marked by a sharp neg. spike. El Chichon has big trough but perhaps attribution is a bit more dubious.

Greg Goodman
May 15, 2013 8:49 pm

Thanks for the thought Willis but I’d already done it, including the hour.
[sourcecode]
1917 120.479
1918 131.398
1919 123.606
1920 132.449
1921 131.279
1922 132.556
1923 129.083
1924 132.632
1925 127.772
1926 116.669
1927 133.238
1928 127.684
1929 125.653
1930 128.794
1931 130.391
1932 122.427
1933 128.812
1934 120.588
1935 135.564
1936 121.54
1937 132.836
1938 126.843
1939 119.56
1940 111.644
1941 123.076
1942 120.561
1943 118.807
1944 125.589
1945 136.403
1946 125.694
1947 123.744
1948 134.467
1949 134.527
1950 126.676
1951 120.746
1952 133.711
1953 119.662
1954 126.751
1955 129.592
1956 122.975
1957 125.396
1958 119.622
1959 128.476
1960 123.8
1961 125.48
1962 132.974
1963 125.767
1964 141.487
1965 127.792
1966 128.508
1967 124.497
1968 129.393
1969 118.519
1970 124.442
1971 128.897
1972 131.497
1973 124.499
1974 126.656
1975 130.576
1976 123.452
1977 126.532
1978 120.638
1979 120.638
1980 120.553
1981 120.781
1982 130.733
1983 119.776
1984 130.648
1985 131.608
1986 128.951
1987 125.633
1988 118.385
1989 121.843
1990 114.219
1991 121.03
1992 135.268
1993 113.542
1994 119.959
1995 116.557
1996 126.522
1997 120.436
1998 110.704
1999 119.908
2000 122.449
2001 128.542
2002 127.894
2003 119.765
2004 115.594
2005 118.501
2006 122.728
2007 117.658
2008 126.953
2009 121.862
2010 119.379
2011 124.177
[/sourcecode]

Greg Goodman
May 15, 2013 9:02 pm

RACookPE1978 says: “So, is minimum Arctic sea ice extents really indicative of any “temperature proxy” anywhere else in the Arctic at all?”
No, minimum ice area/extent is a propaganda tool. Why focalise on one day per year when there is 365 days worth of data?
Warmists like the Sept min since it is more dramatic now there is a bigger annual variation. However, if you want to look at how Arctic melting / freezing is varying in time use all the daily data, not one dot per year. And best try looking at rate of change if you are interested in the change.
http://climategrog.wordpress.com/?attachment_id=226
http://climategrog.wordpress.com/?attachment_id=216
And, no, ice area is not a temperature proxy. It may be a crude measure of ice volume which is an total thermal energy proxy. Area is also important directly since it determines the feedbacks from open water (whichever way they may be working: more exposed water is more evaporation, more radiative loss as well as more solar input. )
http://climategrog.wordpress.com/?attachment_id=160
Not much sign of “run away melting” there so I guess it must be a net negative feedback.

Greg Goodman
May 15, 2013 10:27 pm

” In other words, autocorrelated series (like say satellite temperatures) are naturally trendy, but those trends mean nothing—they are just random fluctuations.”
How can you be so sure of that? Of course temperature records are autocorrelated , that is what happens when you add energy to a system.
Random and “stochastic” are often just used excuses for what we have not understood or to dismiss everything apart from AGW as “noise”.
Nychka: Never treat as unintelligible noise what you could otherwise treat as an intelligible signal.

Greg Goodman
May 15, 2013 11:11 pm

http://climategrog.wordpress.com/?attachment_id=228
Both Mt Agung and Mt Pinatubo are notable deviations from the surrounding data. It could be coincidental but it merits consideration.
Some caution is needed with using statistical arguments to throw everything out. It is fine if something can be shown to ‘statistically significant’ to whatever level of confidence by comparison to random noise, or red noise of whatever your favourite colour is.
However, the opposite is not a proof that the observed effect IS random variation, simply that it is not strong enough to be certain that it is not without further study. Some real effects can be smaller than the 95% confidence level . That does not mean they are not real.
One thing seems clear is that if those spikes are attributable to volcanism, they do not induce any permanent offset in this as a temperature proxy.

Greg Goodman
May 15, 2013 11:42 pm

Let’s throw d/dt(CO2) into the mix:
http://climategrog.wordpress.com/?attachment_id=229
Now correlation is not causation but there is some wide ranging effect there if it’s affecting AK river melting and MLO CO2 conc.
The other interesting thing about Ice Classic as a temp proxy is that it shows a strong WWII bump. The one that Folland’s folly tried to remove half of. ie AK does show an early rise roughly equal to the post war drop.

May 16, 2013 12:13 am

Henry & Willis
Come on you guys.
Have a look at the second graph here.
http://blogs.24.com/henryp/2012/10/02/best-sine-wave-fit-for-the-drop-in-global-maximum-temperatures/
I had good data from the Elmendorff weather station in Anchorage.
We are cooling. Globally. That has implications. It will get both drier and cooler up north. Less weather.
On my scale we are now in 1925. So we can predict that for the next 5 years it will be the same as it was from 1925 to 1930. Perhaps I should place a bet? How do I do that from a foreign country.
If I were living in Alaska I’d pack my bags and move south (below 40)!
btw what happened in 2012? Is 2012 on your graph, Willis? Is that the last reading?
If so, we had a similar spike up and down 1925 -1926
the plot thickens.
1923 129.083
1924 132.632
1925 127.772
1926 116.669
1927 133.238
2010 119.379
2011 124.177
2012 ? looks like 136?
2013 >136
The cooling trend from 2010 looks frightening to me.
If I were living in Alaska I’d pack my bags and move south (below 40)!

Karl
May 16, 2013 12:21 am

Torne river ice break up dates extending back to 1693:
http://www.metla.fi/uutiskirje/mil/2012-01/uutinen-1.html
The Torne River is a river in northern Sweden and Finland.

May 16, 2013 3:07 am

With 7 hours to go to reach the 2nd latest breakup date, there are pools of water forming on the top of the ice near the Tripod. Can’t be far away now. Can it last 7 hours?

Greg Goodman
May 16, 2013 3:49 am

W: “Sorry for the confusion, let me try again.
Perfectly random autocorrelated series are more trendy than perfectly random non-autocorrelated series. It’s the nature of the beast.
Because autocorrelated series are naturally trendy, a trend that would be statistically significant in a random non-autocorrelated series may be fairly common in an autocorrelated series.”
Thanks, put like that it makes sense.

Greg Goodman
May 16, 2013 4:02 am

Karl says: Torne river ice break up dates extending back to 1693:
http://www.metla.fi/uutiskirje/mil/2012-01/uutinen-1.html
That would be another interesting series but the link does not work , could you check that it got posted correctly?

Kelvin Vaughan
May 16, 2013 4:27 am

Matthew W says:
May 15, 2013 at 2:55 pm
Bob says:
May 15, 2013 at 12:12 pm
Hey! That ice-cam is a terrific thing. I’m thinking about inviting neighbors over to watch for the ice-free moment. This is what life comes to when you retire.
========================================================
If you need some more excitement, I can send you a can of paint to watch dry !!
(only 25 years until I “retire”)
When you retire you will probably be able to paint your roof tiles and run all you electrical appliances from it.

Greg Goodman
May 16, 2013 4:35 am

hey, it’s official with NOAA. Wish I’d found that page last night , it’ve saved me a couple of hours eye strain and time wasting.
http://aprfc.arh.noaa.gov/php/brkup/brkupall.php?searcharea=Tanana&searchtermriv=Tanana&searchtermloc=Nenana

Bruce Cobb
May 16, 2013 5:13 am

It’s a bit after 4 AM there, 29F, light winds. Temp by 10AM would be around 42F with partly cloudy skies. It looks pretty safe to beat the old 2nd-place record of 9:41. With a high in the low 50s predicted today, and some showers tonight (changing to snow showers later), it probably won’t make it to tomorrow, but if it does, colder temps are coming in – only in the 30s tomorrow, so could last til the weekend.

Greg Goodman
May 16, 2013 5:38 am

Ice Classic vs AO index:
http://climategrog.wordpress.com/?attachment_id=230
Shifted AO index seems to correlate quite well with ice classic during cooling periods. A different lag may be appropriate for the warming period.
Early cooling fits well until about 1967-68 then there’s a shift. It comes back to this same lag between 1994 and 1997.
That would indicate, at least as far as this region is concerned that the late 20th global warming ended around that time.
cf Phil Jones’ ” no significant warming since 1997″
It seems that these back-road climate indicators are telling us the same thing. They have not been ” adjusted ” yet.
Wait ’til next year they’ll be a [strike] hit squad [/strike] consensus of “scientists” from SkS out there “adjusting” the ice with sledge hammers.

May 16, 2013 5:42 am

The increase from 2012 (113) to 2013 (136?) is definitely significant.
A similar thing happened from 1926 to 1927, namely from 116 to 133.
It is a large difference. It means less moisture is now available for the higher latitudes, in line with global cooling….
As the temperature differential between the poles and equator grows larger due to the cooling from the top, very likely something will also change on earth. Predictably, there would be a small (?) shift of cloud formation and precipitation, more towards the equator, on average. At the equator insolation is 684 W/m2 whereas on average it is 342 W/m2. So, if there are more clouds in and around the equator, this will amplify the cooling effect due to less direct natural insolation of earth (clouds deflect a lot of radiation). Furthermore, assuming equal amounts of water vapour available in the air, less clouds and precipitation will be available for spreading to higher latitudes. So, a natural consequence of global cooling is that at the higher latitudes it will become both cooler and drier.
As the people in Anchorage (Alaska) have noted,
http://www.adn.com/2012/07/13/2541345/its-the-coldest-july-on-record.html
the cold weather in 2012 was so bad there that they did not get much of any harvests. And it seems NOBODY is telling the farmers there that it is not going to get any better.
Global cooling is happening, starting to show more at the top of the world.

Greg Goodman
May 16, 2013 5:43 am

BTW the lag is nice , it gives a short term prediction tool. Next year will be well on its way back. The peak is in 2015.

May 16, 2013 5:46 am

Henry
You misspelled Nenana

Greg Goodman
May 16, 2013 5:50 am

http://climategrog.wordpress.com/?attachment_id=229
Or perhaps not so regional if MLO CO2 concentrations are saying the same thing.

May 16, 2013 5:51 am

btw
I think we all forgot to make a correction for leap years?

Greg Goodman
May 16, 2013 5:52 am

“You misspelled Nenana” , thanks.