USA Today's breathless CO2 announcement – not quite there yet

From the Oh noes, we’re almost doomed department:

For the first time in roughly 5 million years, the amount of carbon dioxide in the Earth’s atmosphere could top 400 parts per million in the Northern Hemisphere next month.

Full story at USA Today.

What Doyle Rice is writing about is this Tweet from Scripps:

Interesting how a single Tweet can become an entire news story, especially since Mauna Loa data still has a ways to go. It’s almost as if Doyle can’t wait for this to happen.

Expect a plethora of gloom and doom stories next month or maybe the month after when MLO hits 400.

MLO_Data_head MLO_CO2_3-2013

Note that the seasonally corrected trend number has a ways to go and Doyle in his article cites the unofficial number, not yet released, and often corrected later:

As of Tuesday, the reading was 398.44 ppm as measured at Mauna Loa.

At Scripps, they are already gearing up for the announcement, trying to visualize what 400 PPM looks like. Apparently, it looks like a fossil skull (see their story below). For the average person, they won’t notice anything, pre 400 CO2 will look exactly to them like post 400 CO2, and just like the Y2K bug, it is nothing more than a number, and nothing will happen when that threshold is crossed. Though, if there is any severe weather anywhere in the world within that month, you can bet some fool (like Joe Romm) will try to link the two events.

From Scripps:

What Does 400 ppm Look Like?

April 25, 2013

Richard Norris holds a cast of a Pliocene-era walrus skull found in San Diego, Calif.

As atmospheric carbon dioxide levels rise, scientists look back four million years for answers on what to expect from climate

The Pliocene is the geologic era between five million and three million years ago. Scientists have come to regard it as the most recent period in history when the atmosphere’s heat-trapping ability was as it is now and thus as our guide for things to come.

Recent estimates suggest CO2 levels reached as much as 415 parts per million (ppm) during the Pliocene. With that came global average temperatures that eventually reached 3 or 4 degrees C (5.4-7.2 degrees F) higher than today’s and as much as 10 degrees C (18 degrees F) warmer at the poles. Sea level ranged between five and 40 meters (16 to 131 feet) higher than today.

As for what life was like then, scientists rely on fossil records to recreate where plants and animals lived and in what quantity. Pliocene fossil records show that the climate was generally warmer and wetter than today.  Maps of Pliocene vegetation record forests growing on Ellesmere Island in the Canadian Arctic, and savannas and woodlands spreading over what is now North African desert. Both the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets were smaller than today during the warmest parts of the Pliocene.

In the oceans, fossils mark the spread of tropical and subtropical marine life northward along the U.S. Eastern Seaboard.  Both observations and models of the Pliocene Pacific Ocean show the existence of frequent, intense El Niño cycles—a climatic oscillation that today delivers heavy rainfall to the western U.S. causing both intense flooding but also increasing the river flows needed to sustain salmon runs. The absence of significant ocean upwelling in the warmest part of the Pliocene would have suppressed fisheries along the west coasts of the Americas, and deprived seabirds and marine mammals of food supplies.  Reef corals suffered a major extinction during the peak of Pliocene warmth but reefs themselves did not disappear.

Richard Norris, a geologist at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, said the concentration of CO2 is one means of comparison, but what is not comparable, and more significant, is the speed at which 400 ppm is being surpassed today.

“I think it is likely that all these ecosystem changes could recur, even though the time scales for the Pliocene warmth are different than the present,” Norris said.  “The main lagging indicator is likely to be sea level just because it takes a long time to heat the ocean and a long time to melt ice. But our dumping of heat and CO2 into the ocean is like making investments in a pollution ‘bank,’ since we can put heat and CO2 in the ocean, but we will only extract the results (more sea-level rise from thermal expansion and more acidification) over the next several thousand years.  And we cannot easily withdraw either the heat or the CO2 from the ocean if we actually get our act together and try to limit our industrial pollution–the ocean keeps what we put in it.”

Scientists can analyze the gases trapped in ice to reconstruct with high accuracy what climate was like in prehistory, but that record only goes back 800,000 years. It is trickier to estimate carbon dioxide levels before then, but in 2009, one research team reported finding evidence of carbon dioxide levels ranging between 365 and 415 ppm roughly 4.5 million years ago. They based their finding on the analysis of carbon isotopes present in compounds made by tiny marine phytoplankton preserved in ancient ocean sediments.

That estimate made Earth’s last experience of 400 ppm a much more recent event than scientists have commonly thought. There has been broader consensus that carbon dioxide concentrations have been much higher than today’s but not for tens of millions of years. The assertion that Earth passed the 400 ppm mark a mere 4.5 million years ago has been supported by other analyses, many of which also concluded that the temperatures at that time were higher than previously estimated.  These studies suggest that the traditional way scientists currently rate Earth’s long-term sensitivity to extra doses of CO2 might not sufficiently take into account the slower effects of climate change on the sunlight-absorbing properties of the planet, such as ice sheet melt and changes in plant cover on land.

What that means is that Earth might react even more strongly to the increases in CO2 measured by the Keeling Curve. Several prominent questions remain to be answered, though, before accurate scenarios can be created. The extreme speed at which carbon dioxide concentrations are increasing is unprecedented. An increase of 10 parts per million might have needed 1,000 years or more to come to pass during ancient climate change events. Now the planet is poised to reach the 1,000 ppm level in only 100 years if emissions trajectories remain at their present level.

“Our grandchildren will inhabit a radically altered planet, as the ocean gradually warms up in response to the buildup of heat-trapping gases,” said Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego geoscientist Jeff Severinghaus.

– Robert Monroe

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

230 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
R. Craigen
May 3, 2013 10:31 pm

In other news, 37 trillion plants breathe a sigh of relief.

Ferdinand Engelbeen
May 4, 2013 1:45 am

richardscourtney says:
May 3, 2013 at 3:48 pm
Richard, the dispute is if the acidification is the cause of the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere. Any decrease in pH will decrease DIC and increase CO2 in the atmosphere, until a new equilibrium is reached. That is the only way that an exogenic acidification can be responsible for an increase in the atmosphere. But as you confirm, the current CO2 flows are from the atmosphere into the oceans, as can be seen in sparce measurements since 1957 and increasing number of measurements since 1984.
That effectively refutes your argument that acidification is a possible cause of the increase, because at no moment over the past 50+ years there is any indication of the reverse trend. Not in direct measurements of pCO2, DIC, neither in 13C/12C ratio as found in coralline sponges (since 1600) until 200 m depth and in the atmosphere. 3 million measurements that confirm the CO2 flows from the atmosphere into the oceans, zero that confirm the reverse. Good enough for me.
Of course, there are differences in DIC and pH from place to place and from season to season or even within hours, esoecially near estuaria and upwelling places, I never said that the pH (or DIC) doesn’t vary. But this is about trends, which show an increase in DIC everywhere in all oceans over time, including at upwelling places.

richardscourtney
May 4, 2013 2:16 am

Ferdinand Engelbeen:
re your post at May 4, 2013 at 1:45 am.
No! Simply, No!
Argument by assertion in contravention of the evidence simply will not do.
Your post only contains two assertions and in this thread I have repeatedly refuted each of them by presenting evidence that your assertions are not true.
The carbonate buffer does NOT return ocean pH to the DIC equilibrium state when additional dissolved sulphur is injected into the ocean surface layer.
The dissolved sulphur alters the equilibrium state (this is similar to temperature change which also alters the equilibrium state). And sulphur from undersea volcanism centuries ago may have provided the sulphur injection, with the result of the observed rise in atmospheric CO2 concentration.
Your post does not mention sulphur ions which are the putative cause of the rise in atmospheric CO2 concentration according to the volcanism hypothesis!
You do NOT falsify the hypothesis by not considering the hypothesis.
There is NOT sufficient data to determine whether or not the dissolved sulphur has changed in the ocean.
I know you believe the cause of the rise in atmosphertic CO2 concentration is the cause of the recent rise in atmospheric CO2 concentration. But your complete failure to refute the volcanism hypothesis demonstrates that your belief is exactly that: i.e. it is a matter of faith and not evidence.
The anthropogenic CO2 emission may be the cause of the recent rise in atmospheric CO2 concentration, but other possible causes exist (e.g. the volcanism hypothesis) and at present it is not possible to know which if any of the existing possibilities is the actual cause.
Richard

Ferdinand Engelbeen
May 4, 2013 3:37 am

richardscourtney says:
May 4, 2013 at 2:16 am
The carbonate buffer does NOT return ocean pH to the DIC equilibrium state when additional dissolved sulphur is injected into the ocean surface layer.
Richard, now you are changing the subject: the original subject was that a change in pH would change the equilibrium in the oceans and between the oceans and the atmosphere, thus a possible cause of the rise in the atmosphere. Now it is the increase in sulpur (sulphide, sulphite, sulphate?) ions that does the job? Even if there are no observations for such an increase at all?
Nevertheless, whatever the change in the oceans (salt content, pH, temperature), the fact that the CO2 flow is from the atmosphere into the oceans simply proves that the increase in the atmosphere is larger than the change in equilibrium caused by any or all of these probable causes. Thus these variables are not the cause of the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere, at least not over the past 50+ years with an increase of 80 ppmv, that is 80% of the increase over the past 160 years.

1 8 9 10