In a new analysis published in Volume 8 Issue 2 of Environmental Science Dr. Nils-Axel Morner suggests global sea levels will rise only about 5 inches by the year 2100.
Axel Morner concludes that Australian government claims of a 1 meter sea level rise by 2100 are greatly exaggerated, finding instead that sea levels are rising around Australia and globally at a rate of only 1.5 mm/year. This would imply a sea level change of only 0.13 meters or 5 inches by 2100. Dr. Morner also finds no evidence of any acceleration in sea level rise around Australia or globally.
Morner’s findings are inline with the longest running sea-level measurements recorded at Amsterdam, in the Netherlands (think of it like the England CET record) beginning in 1700. Since 1850, the rise in Amsterdam has averaged 1.5 mm/year.
Figure and link to full paper follows.
Present-to-future sea level changes: The Australian case (PDF)
Nils-Axel Morner, Albert Parker
Abstract:
We revisit available tide gauge data along the coasts of Australia, and we are able to demonstrate that the rate may vary between 0.1 and 1.5 mm/year, and that there is an absence of acceleration over the last decades. With a database of 16 stations covering only the last 17 years, the National Tidal Centre claims that sea level is rising at a rate of 5.4mm/year.We here analyse partly longer-term records from the same 16 sites as those used by the Australian Baseline Sea Level Monitoring Project (ABSLMP) and partly 70 other sites; i.e. a database of 86 stations covering a much longer time period. This database gives a mean trend in the order of 1.5 mm/year. Therefore, we challenge both the rate of sea level rise presented by the National Tidal Centre in Australia and the general claim of acceleration over the last decades.
Figure 3 : Comparison among different sea level data sets; (1) the Official Australian claim (AFGCC, 2011; ABSLMP, 2011), (2a) the Australian 39 station record, (2b) the Australian 70 station record, (2c) the Australian 86 station record, (3a) the 2059 station PSMSL (2011) average, (3b) the 159 station NOAA (2011) average, (4) the reconstruction of sea level changes by Church and White (2011), and (5) the Topex/Jason satellite altimetry record (CU, 2011). All the data are shifted for a zero MSL in January 1990. The differences are far too large not to include serious errors in some of the records. The official Australian trend (1) lies far above all the other curves, indicating a strong exaggeration. The Australian (2a-c) as well as global (3a-b) curves vary between 0.1 and 1.5 mm/year. The satellite altimetry records (5) include “calibrations” previously questioned (Morner, 2004, 2011c, 2013). The record (4) of Church and White (2011) lies between the satellite altimetry curve (5) and all the graphs representing global (3a-b) and Australian (2a-c) tide gauge records. The acceleration in curve 4 is strongly contradicted by all the other records. The same absence of acceleration is found in many other records (further discussed in the text) indicating that the concept of acceleration ought to be revised.
Conclusions:
In view of the data presented, we believe that we are justified to draw the following conclusions:
(1) The official Australian claim [2,3] of a present sea level rise in the order of 5.4mm/year is significantly exaggerated (Figure 3).
(2) The mean sea level rise from Australian tide gauges as well as global tide gauge networks is to be found within the sector of rates ranging from 0.1 to 1.5 mm/year (yellow wedge in Figure 3).
(3) The claim of a recent acceleration in the rate of sea level rise [2,3,12] cannot be validated by tide gauge records, either in Australia or globally (Figure 3). Rather, it seems strongly contradicted [19,21,24,39-41]
The practical implication of our conclusions is that there, in fact, is no reason either to fear or to prepare for any disastrous sea level flooding in the near future.
================================================================
h/t to The Hockey Schtick
Here is a table of sea level measurements from NOAA from around the world, many are negative:
http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/MSL_global_trendtable.html
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Drew says:
April 27, 2013 at 6:47 pm
I live in a Northern New South Wales coastal town on an estuary(that narrows it down….),…..
Given projected changes in rainfall patterns(either natural or man made-it’s academic as to the cause) to a model ………
Add six inches in tidal raise…………..it starts to get hairy.
Not just to us townies, but to local farmers.
It is concerning.
Models get the lapse rate wrong in the atmosphere => their heat transfer in the atmosphere is wrong. So I don’t believe any modeled rain increase, until they learn to make it right, I trust measured data. That’s about the “projected changes in rainfall patterns”
About sea-level rise – I look at real data not calculations done based on satellite sea-level rise extrapolation. The satellite sea-level measurements is not showing sea level rise against shores. I don’t know what it measures, maybe the “scientist” who do it can shed light on it.
This is what tide gauges show for New South Wales. This is true sea-level against the shore as measured over long periods of time:
http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/799.php
http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/310.php
http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/1229.php
http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/1335.php
http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/320.php
http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/837.php
http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/549.php
http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/65.php
You can browse and check for all existing data there.
Do you see there anything that should concern you or the local farmers?