We already are well familiar with the shape of the hockey stick, so familiar in fact it has become an icon.
Josh writes:
It has already been concluded by Marcott et al that their results should now show no modern uptick i.e. no Hockey Stick blade. As Richard Drake notes at Climate Audit the new look graph is like a scythe. An appropriate metaphor for those who are now reaping what they sowed for so many years.
Then of course there is the specter of what happens to humanity when the world cools.
I’m waiting for John Parsons to answer Sam the First’s (April 3, 2013 at 5:45 am) questions.
Apparently, John Parsons isn’t willing or able to, which points directly to his and The Team’s lack of integrity as described by Sam.
Such is the sorry state of the CAGW cult.
John–I don’t visit RealClimate because it is nothing more than self-aggrandizing propaganda by Genocidal Warmistas. They do that because they are egotistical advocates of something that’s a false assumption and are blinded by pay exceeding their integrity (every man has his price).
Or do you have any proof CO2 is bad for the climate or biosphere? (You’re not putting your CO2 footprint above those dying daily because you’ve been brainwashed, too, have you?)
“Simply denying mainstream science based on flimsy, invalid and too-often agenda-driven critiques of science is not skepticism at all. It is contrarianism … or denial,” Mann told LiveScience.
The specific man in denial is the one who still advocates a fraudulent hockey stick. (Mann’s another guy whose ego and pay has destroyed his integrity. Such is the fate of many self-serving “saviors” of mankind.)