Another billboard about bogus climate claims

For those who voted for Obama beware of the exact phrase used. He states,’…any particular event…’, that leaves him the option of still being able to claim a trend in weather can be pinned on global warming.
Watch these people, they are slippery.

If Al Gore told me that night follows day, I’d be stood on the highest hill at sunset to check for myself.

Mark Bofill says: @ur momisugly February 9, 2013 at 11:54 am
…..Why is it that the only politicians I think are basically honest come across as complete nut cases (yes I’m referring to Ron Paul)?…..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Because it is an intentional and deliberate method of side-lining the opposition. See WUWT, the medicalization of dissent. Look at what Lewandowsky is doing to skeptics or what was done in the Soviet Union. The International Association on Political Use of Psychiatry
George Santayana wrote in 1905
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
Therefore I suggest reading:
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Banks/Tragedy_Hope_excerpt.html
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/New_World_Order/Anglo_American_Estab.html
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/New_World_Order/Naked_Capitalist.html
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Fascism/Wall_Street_Rise_Hitler.html
(Prof. Carroll Quigely was Bill Clinton’s mentor)
Illustration of the above in action since 1945 with 5 pages of references to support the text.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/History-HACCP-and-the-Foo-by-Nicole-Johnson-090906-229.html
Insider information:
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/IMF_WB/Budhoo_IMF.html
The long term goals are spelled out by director of the World Trade Organization. Pay attention to the fact this started as a worldwide agreement in the 1930’s and Lamy’s repeated emphasis of ‘legitimacy’ or the buy-in of the people to be ruled.
http://www.theglobalist.com/storyid.aspx?StoryId=9174
http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/sppl_e/sppl220_e.htm
http://www.theglobalist.com/storyid.aspx?StoryId=8216
Lamy, Clinton and Blair all teach at the London School of Economics. (Founded by the Fabian Society) Anthony Giddens, Director of the London School of Economics came up with The Third Way
Last checkout these LSE graduates, Fabians and Eugenicists.
(see Pointman’s essay )
Francis Galton
Beatrice Webb
Sydney Webb
H.G. Wells
“The real George Bernard Shaw”
Margaret Mead
Margaret Sanger
Julian Huxley
John Maynard Keynes
John Dewey see AMERICAN FABIANISM and Dumbing Down America
It is fitting to end with another 1905 George Santayana quote.
“Fanaticism consists in redoubling your effort when you have forgotten your aim.”

Chris G says:
February 9, 2013 at 11:47 am
….In this case, both are correct. The increasing level of energy in the system is creating more frequent unusual weather events…..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And where is your PROOF?
This is from Chris Landsea a world expert on Hurricanes, IPCC author and believer in Global Warming. However he is also an honest scientist with integrity.

What is Wrong with Embellishing Science?
Yesterday, before heading back to the National Hurricane Center to help deal with Sandy, Chris Landsea gave a great talk here at CU on hurricanes and climate change….he explained that he has no doubts that humans affect the climate system through the emission of greenhouse gases,…. Chris argued that any such influence is expected to be small today, almost certainly undetectable, and that this view is not particularly controversial among tropical cyclone climatologists. He concluded that hurricanes should not be the “poster” representing a human influence on climate.
After his talk someone in the audience asked him what is wrong with making a connection between hurricanes and climate change if it gives the general public reason for concern about climate change. Chris responded that asserting such a connection can be easily shown to be incorrect and thus risks some of the trust that the public has in scientists to play things straight….

The infighting:
Climategate e-mail Correspondence with Chris Landsea

Chris Landsea Leaves IPCC
This is an open letter to the community from Chris Landsea.
Dear colleagues,
After some prolonged deliberation, I have decided to withdraw from participating in the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). I am withdrawing because I have come to view the part of the IPCC to which my expertise is relevant as having become politicized. In addition, when I have raised my concerns to the IPCC leadership, their response was simply to dismiss my concerns.
……The IPCC is a group of climate researchers from around the world that every few years summarize how climate is changing and how it may be altered in the future due to manmade global warming. I had served both as an author for the Observations chapter and a Reviewer for the 2nd Assessment Report in 1995 and the 3rd Assessment Report in 2001, primarily on the topic of tropical cyclones (hurricanes and typhoons). My work on hurricanes, and tropical cyclones more generally, has been widely cited by the IPCC. For the upcoming AR4, I was asked several weeks ago by the Observations chapter Lead Author – Dr. Kevin Trenberth – to provide the writeup for Atlantic hurricanes. As I had in the past, I agreed to assist the IPCC in what I thought was to be an important, and politically-neutral determination of what is happening with our climate.
Shortly after Dr. Trenberth requested that I draft the Atlantic hurricane section for the AR4’s Observations chapter, Dr. Trenberth participated in a press conference organized by scientists at Harvard on the topic “Experts to warn global warming likely to continue spurring more outbreaks of intense hurricane activity” along with other media interviews on the topic. The result of this media interaction was widespread coverage that directly connected the very busy 2004 Atlantic hurricane season as being caused by anthropogenic greenhouse gas warming occurring today. Listening to and reading transcripts of this press conference and media interviews, it is apparent that Dr. Trenberth was being accurately quoted and summarized in such statements and was not being misrepresented in the media. These media sessions have potential to result in a widespread perception that global warming has made recent hurricane activity much more severe.
I found it a bit perplexing that the participants in the Harvard press conference had come to the conclusion that global warming was impacting hurricane activity today. To my knowledge, none of the participants in that press conference had performed any research on hurricane variability, nor were they reporting on any new work in the field. All previous and current research in the area of hurricane variability has shown no reliable, long-term trend up in the frequency or intensity of tropical cyclones, either in the Atlantic or any other basin. The IPCC assessments in 1995 and 2001 also concluded that there was no global warming signal found in the hurricane record.
Moreover, the evidence is quite strong and supported by the most recent credible studies that any impact in the future from global warming upon hurricane will likely be quite small….

Some ‘scientist’ have made it clear that “to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination…. we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements
From Dr Stephen Schneider, of Stanford University. Schneider was a coming ice age proponent in the 1970s
~ On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination. That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. ~
In other words we are being intentionally LIED TO for political reasons.
Heck the IPCC was never about the climate in the first place. The IPCC mandate is not to figure out what factors effect the climate but to dig up the facts needed to scare humans. Humans were tried and found guilty BEFORE the IPCC ever looked at a scientific fact. I do not care if you are socialist, capitalist or any other flavor, the fact that the UN, a collection of dictators is holding conferences on “Global Governance” and also putting together something like the IPCC and the Earth Summits to convince us into handing THEM control is what is REALLY SCARY.
The IPCC mandate states:

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established by the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) in 1988 to assess the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant for the understanding of human induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for mitigation and adaptation.
http://www.ipcc-wg2.gov/

it has not occurred to anyone here the folly of those playing with ha(a)rps? in that case both assertions would be correct. yes?

it was no bogus to be compared with some massmurderer on the billboard owned bij the Heartland Institute;

we cannot vote that both (Gore and Obama) are right,
cfact, if you make that choicepossible, I will vote

President Zero’s actions speak far louder than any brief truism. Deception/diversion as usual.

The people who post here are the greatest !
When I first looked at this I said it is a trick like
“have you stopped beating you wife”.
The posts here should be required reading before voting.
Thank you Anthony !
Alfred