Middle East “Big Oil” funded media outlet buys Al Gore’s CURRENT TV with plans to infiltrate offer the English Al Jazeera channel into American homes – my Irony Meter pegged.
Will it be the “All Al” channel now?
Some details…
From NYT’s Media decoder
9:16 p.m. | Updated Al Jazeera, the pan-Arab news giant, has long tried to convince Americans that it is a legitimate news organization, not a parrot of Middle Eastern propaganda or something more sinister.
It just bought itself 40 million more chances to make its case.
Al Jazeera on Wednesday announced a deal to take over Current TV, the low-rated cable channel that was founded by Al Gore, a former vice president, and his business partners seven years ago. Al Jazeera plans to shut Current and start an English-language channel, which will be available in more than 40 million homes, with newscasts emanating from both New York and Doha, Qatar.
For Al Jazeera, which is financed by the government of Qatar, the acquisition is a coming of age moment. A decade ago, Al Jazeera’s flagship Arabic-language channel was reviled by American politicians for showing videotapes from Al Qaeda members and sympathizers. Now the news operation is buying an American channel, having convinced Mr. Gore and the other owners of Current that it has the journalistic muscle and the money to compete head-to-head with CNN and other news channels in the United States.
Al Jazeera did not disclose the purchase price, but people with direct knowledge of the deal pegged it at around $500 million, indicating a $100 million payout for Mr. Gore, who owned 20 percent of Current.
===============================================================
Al Jazeera apparently has been looking for ways to sneak in for some time. Al Gore provided them the key.
In thinking of what I’d like to say to Mr. Gore about this, I’m reminded of House Speaker Boehner’s missive to Harry Reid making the news today.
There’s a silver lining though, next time Gore bloviates about climate skeptics “being in the pay of big oil”, we can hit him upside the head with his own pathetic hypocrisy.
As for cable TV subscribers, I’d say the best way to exercise your rights of protest is to not pay your bill, and/or disconnect. That will be my choice should it show up in my home.
UPDATES: (via Tom Graves in comments)
“Glenn Beck Tried to Buy Current TV But Was Rejected”
http://news.yahoo.com/glenn-beck-tried-buy-current-tv-rejected-032853589–finance.html
“Time Warner Cable Drops Al Gore’s Current TV Due To Purchase By Al Jazeera”
“Wow. $500 MILLION for 47,000 viewers.
Big Al must have done someone a VERY special favor for that…”
That’s $500,000 for every 47 viewers. Clearly, this is payola to Al Gore. No business is worth that much per occasional TV viewer.
The real reason, of course, will only be discussed in private, behind closed doors. But Gore just got handed some big time loot by an America-hating Islamist regime [no matter what they might say in public]. So, what was the quid-pro-quo? Because for that much money there had to be one.
The Sex Poodle has demonstrated over the years that he is willing and able to be bribed, from Buddhist temple cash, to very lucrative seats on company Boards of Directors.
This country was damn fortunate that Gore lost the election. If he had been elected, is there any doubt that he would have sold out the country to the highest bidder?
Skeptical Science probably believes this is good news,
Skeptical Science: From Al Gore to Al Jazeera
Skeptical Science probably believes this is good news,
Skeptical Science: From Al Gore to Al Jazeera (Link fixed)
“Al Jazeera want[s] to feature SkS as the Site of the Week… Am sending them some info and pics now.” – John Cook [Skeptical Science], September 28, 2011
“Wow, that’s a new demographic.” – nealjking [Skeptical Science], September 28, 2011
“Great News! […] Wow! Dude! Excellent! ( Plays air guitar. )” – logicman [Skeptical Science], September 28, 2011
“Very cool. I’m a fan of Al Jazeera news.” – Rob Painting [Skeptical Science], September 28, 2011
“That’s good. […] I was wondering if WUWT had been site of the week, heh, heh, heh.” – Paul D [Skeptical Science], September 28, 2011
“Al Jazeera is actually one of the really good sources of journalism these days. […] I’d say they’re really taking over the mantle of NPR for doing hard news. Al Jazeera is providing a news product that all but disappeared in the US today: Unbiased news.” – Rob Honeycutt [Skeptical Science], September 29, 2011
“…if being on Al Jazera may help, …it’s great.” – Riccardo [Skeptical Science], September 29, 2011
“This great. Al Jazeera is an excellent news outlet …and only the truly bigoted will think that this taints SkS in any way.” – Andy S [Skeptical Science], September 28, 2011
“Watts et al will have a field day with this. […] I would tactfully suggest that they can link to content here (which they can do anyway), but not display any form of SkS logo.” – muoncounter (Dan Friedman) [Skeptical Science], September 29, 2011
“Frankly my dear, I don’t give a damn about what WUWT says about SkS.” – John Hartz [Skeptical Science], September 30, 2011
markx;
With all due respect, you are having a Skeptical Science moment there.
>>>>>>>>>>>
If you have any respect for my viewpoint, you might ask yourself why I am gently suggesting to you that you are off base? Do you think this is the forum to have a debate about the facts on the ground in the middle east? Do you really want me to start dropping some facts on you? I’m trying to avoid a confrontation here, but your assertions are ill founded, out of context, and in many cases simply wrong.
Terrorists hijacking planes in the 70’s? Here’s a fact for you. Jordan murdered 100,000 Palestinians in the 70’s in a period of just a few days. Did that make any headlines? Did anyone care? That map you linked to doesn’t have the names of the communities because the Jordanians bulldozed them into the desert and erased them forever. Where was the public outcry? Where was the press coverage? When Israel was evacuating Jews by airlift from Sarajevo and planned to take as many Muslim children as possible with them before the Serbs broke through into the city, did you know that the beloved leader of the Palestinians threatened to walk out of the Oslo accords if they did? Shame on Israel for buckling to the pressure. And shame on Arafat and all those champagne diplomats who caved to him because he’d rather that those children die than let a single muslim with a positive view of Jews into the country.
That fence you wail about? Did you know what a bargain the Israeli’s got on the building materials? Yasser Arafat took the materials donated by Egypt to rebuild Gaza and sold them at bargain prices to Israeli contractors. His wife and daughter are living on the hundreds of millions, possibly billions, that were stolen from them. While promoting the very terrorism that prompted the building of the fence in the first place, Arafat was profiting from the fence being built.
I wrote another ten paragraphs, and just deleted them. As I said, this isn’t the forum. But I am bluntly telling you that you are off base. Much propaganda is spouted to fan the flames of hatred and keep the conflict alive. You are, by repeating it, playing into the hands of those who hate peace and use the Palestinians as a proxy army to fight someone else’s war.
This is just up on Bloomberg:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-04/nobelist-gore-getting-70-million-from-qatar-funded-al-jazeera.html
Gore is getting $70 million, according to an inside source. The selling price is five times the price paid in 2004.
Thank you all for your comments. You know I have deliberately avoided the debate about the Palestine/israel conflict, to any extent that is. it was not the discussion i wanted to provoke. It is a fascinating story for those that care to follow it and it’s not even slightly indicative of the wider mid east political situation. The fact that the geo-political situation of today is a by-product of a wider, earlier war has little bearing on what goes on today. But I’m simply not going to get deeper into that as it has never been my intention and i don’t want to give a select few a reason to misconstrue my position further.
Let’s just say that some of you appear to know less of the truth than you no doubt believe you do and clearly have no intention of changing that. which to me merely illustrates the point i was initially making.
It’s disturbing to see what is supposed to be a skeptical group be so closed minded on a position because it messes with their pre-conceived conclusions. I will concede that many a name in this particular thread are new names and are just chest-beating and bloviating because they believe I have insulted their ‘team’.
Personally i try to avoid saying things to a man on the internet which i am unable or unwilling to say to his face. I’d suggest that some of you would not be so bold were you looking me in the eye.
I’m past caring if I’ve made enemies now. I explained myself in clear English, many of you accept that explanation and understand my position and where i was going, some even challenging me on the actual point I was making, which i thank you for but I’ve lost the will to debate it now. Some of you have still wilfully ignored my explanation and painted me as something i clearly am not.
I will ‘craw’ back into my hole’ now.
Once again my sincere apologies to Anthony and the mods if i have caused them any unwanted attention or work in this thread.
You know, it wasn’t spam. I was making a point. You deleted it. Here it is again:
شوكراً جزيلاً
davidmhoffer says: January 3, 2013 at 9:14 pm
“……… Jordan murdered 100,000 Palestinians in the 70′s in a period of just a few days.
…….When Israel was evacuating Jews by airlift from Sarajevo and planned to take as many Muslim children as possible with them before the Serbs broke through into the city, did you know that the beloved leader of the Palestinians threatened to walk out of the Oslo accords if they did? ……
……fence you wail about? Did you know what a bargain the Israeli’s got on the building materials? Yasser Arafat took the materials donated by Egypt to rebuild Gaza and sold them at bargain prices to Israeli contractors…….
……..this isn’t the forum. ……..Much propaganda is spouted to fan the flames of hatred and keep the conflict alive. …….. a proxy army to fight someone else’s war….”
Certainly there are some things there I have not heard of David. And certainly, I am not surprised by the story that Arafat was terribly self-serving and corrupt.
And they may well all be true, but none of them serve as any evidence that the Palestinians have not been grievously wronged from the start, and continue to be grievously wronged. These are just additional wrongs heaped upon them by their own and others.
I agree with the points as summarized in the last quoted paragraph above, especially that this is not the forum for it, and except to note that there are at least two proxy sides to that war and its propaganda, I will say no more of it here.
Regards, Mark.
OK, I’m going to take what is likely to be a controversial position here. Please bear with me…
I regularly watch Al Jazeera news. I have it on the Satellite dish. It’s on a timer for their daily news show. ( “Link TV” carries it. “Link TV” is an incredibly Progressive – liberal – socialists channel).
Their news is generally fairly ‘straight’. It does have a bit of ‘pro Arab’ bias in it, and you will not get any anti-Muslim coverage of anything on it. They will also have significant bias on anything related to Israel (often can’t even say the name… they use “The Occupied Territories” instead). Yet for things like “What is happening on the streets in Cairo”, it puts everything else to shame.
They also give the stuff our news shows won’t tell us about due to ‘political considerations’…
So, like eworrall1 said; there’s stuff you just don’t get on our news that shows up on theirs. How many places Obama bombed lately. What’s happening in the Arab Street in response to the Drone Wars. How Pakistan is getting a bit livid over it. Etc. etc.
I find that to get the most accurate total news, using a broad net and ‘compare and contrast’ works well. I first learned this on shortwave radio back in the ’70s. Radio Moscow AND Radio Havana AND BBC AND Voice Of America AND… When they all say “Hurricane hit”, it likely happened. When one is silent and several others have the ‘goods’ on something the first one wants to ignore, the story is likely right. If one is spouting ‘their party line’ and the others have nothing, or the opposite, it really stands out as The Big Lie. (Even the American Big Lies…)
So I had “on the street coverage” of the Benghazi Consulate raid damn near same day. I had a front row seat through most of the Egypt Rebellion and the rest of the Arab Spring. Pretty much all of it ‘checked out’.
FWIW, on Link they also have a program called “Mosaic” that has short, like 6 minute, excerpts from various national news outlets in the middle east. Jordan, Iran, etc. It includes Israeli nightly news. It is spectacularly clear that the various national news shows are highly loaded with propaganda content (though you get good at filtering out the real information and tossing the propaganda). Again, the “compare and contrast” of Jordan vs Israel vs Syria can be pretty clear as to who is making stuff up. Like the recent rocket attacks on Israel. The Israel news was pretty clean. Lots of real film and you decide. Palestinian film was all about how “the occupier” had slaughtered innocents by doing counterbattery fire against missile launch sites… clearly dressed up and staged AND demonstrated that they were housing missiles in civilian proximity.
So I regularly watch Mosaic too. Just keep those propaganda filters tuned up 😉
Oh, and Link is rabidly pro AGW while Al Jazeera seems only tepidly so. (Frankly, I don’t remember them having an editorial position on it, mostly reporting political / middle east news). Some of the oil funded shows on Link are clearly rabid pro-AGW though, so I think there’s some OPEC money trying to get coal killed as it is a cheap alternative. They (Opec Oil) are definitely pushing an anti-fracking agenda to try and stop cheap natural gas.
FWIW, I usually set up a ‘jump loop’ of news programs when I’m doing a news dredge. CNN, CNBC or CNBC World depending on time of day, Fox and Fox Business, and Al Jazeera / Mosaic. Sometimes the BBC, though in the last 1/2 dozen years I’ve mostly stopped watching them as it was clearly manicured agenda driven and not just news any more.
Every so often some D*mn Fool or other will accuse me of being in a ‘conservative echo chamber’ and, horrors, watching Fox News!!!! I then point out my “sweep” list of news shows and ask them just how “Right Wing” is Link TV and Al Jazeera and CNN anyway?…. Usually shuts them up.
Fox has their bias too. Mostly they like Right / Left food fights or “pundits” from the right. Their news shows are pretty much straight news, though, and they do divide editorial shows from news shows. Fox Business is better. CNBC is OK on news, CNBC World is better; and I’ve often gotten news first on the financial shows – where time literally is money and the basic facts have to be right – than on the ‘real news’ channels. CNN does a better job on major international issues – like the Benghazi coverage that was stellar. It just takes them a bit of time to ‘ramp up’ in odd places. In Egypt, they had to pull their folks back after some noses were punched… while Al Jazeera was sitting with the demonstrator interviewing them…. but don’t expect to see any Al Jazeera coverage of California brush fires…
Watching them all in rotation and tossing the junk works best.
So as a long time watcher of Al Jazeera, I’m just not seeing it as a problem.
What I could see being a problem, though, would be if they start filling the time between news shows with a load of Middle East Oil Centric ‘shows for effect’ as is the case on Link… then again, that’s why I don’t watch the other shows on Link 😉
markx;
Certainly there are some things there I have not heard of David. And certainly, I am not surprised by the story that Arafat was terribly self-serving and corrupt.
And they may well all be true, but none of them serve as any evidence that the Palestinians have not been grievously wronged from the start, and continue to be grievously wronged. These are just additional wrongs heaped upon them by their own and others.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You’ve missed my point. There is much more you don’t know. Every fence, check point, policy and community has a story behind it, A complicated story. If you don’t know that story, you cannot judge. That mapped you linked to is a frozen point in time. There are reasons for everything on that map, some of which I agree with and some of which I do not. The difference between you and me is that I know enough of the history to draw informed conclusions. Someone looking at that map and nothing else will draw the precise conclusions that map was intended to foster. It is a propaganda piece and was intended to mislead in the precise manner which you are using it.
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3525/uk-textbook-israel-map
So now England is publishing a textbook with a middle east map scrubbed of Israel. Interesting.
davidmhoffer says: January 4, 2013 at 6:57 am
“You’ve missed my point.”
And you have missed mine.
Lets forget the map. And all the disasters of history. It is in fact a very simple story:
Summary. If you walk into another man’s country behind someone else’s gun, then proceed to take it off him a piece at a time with the backing of the world’s most powerful friend, while all the time saying “If only he would be nice about this it would hardly hurt at all”, and then blame him for the absolute disaster you create within his society, by my standards you are in the wrong.
And while I am here again, a word to Rocky: RockyRoad says: January 3, 2013 at 7:44 pm
“…. If Israel had the same “foreign policy” towards the Palestinians that the Palestinians had toward Israel, there would be NO Palestinians….”
Just because you CAN do something does not make you right.
On second thoughts, this IS relevant to this discussion about Al Jazeera, because a helluva lot of people need to see more than one side to a lot of stories besides this one.
Coupla maps in here, from B’TSELEM:
http://www.btselem.org/maps
B’TSELEM – The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories was established in 1989 by a group of prominent academics, attorneys, journalists, and Knesset members. It endeavors to document and educate the Israeli public and policymakers about human rights violations in the Occupied Territories, combat the phenomenon of denial prevalent among the Israeli public, and help create a human rights culture in Israel.
Not sure whose “propaganda” you may say that is, but it is probably not Arab.
markx;
Summary. If you walk into another man’s country behind someone else’s gun, then proceed to take it off him a piece at a time with the backing of the world’s most powerful friend, while all the time saying “If only he would be nice about this it would hardly hurt at all”, and then blame him for the absolute disaster you create within his society, by my standards you are in the wrong
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
1947 => UN promised West Bank and Gaza to he Palestinians
1948 => Jordan seizes West Bank. Egypt seizes Gaza. They refuse to give them to the Palestinians
1967 => Arab war against Israel goes very bad for the Arabs, Israel winds up with the West Bank and Gaza
Subsequent to which:
Israel has turned governance of the West Bank and Gaza over to the Palestinians.
Roadmap agreements have been negotiated and signed that include land swaps. Overlay the map of the land swaps on the current map so that you can see why new communities are being built where they are.
Several peace deals in which the Palestinians got everything they asked for were negotiated and rejected by the Palestinian leadership.
The Israelis have given the Palestinians back the land their Arab “brothers” stole for them, land paid for with Israeli blood. They have withdrawn their troops, for which they were told they would get peace. Instead they got new levels of terrorism. So they built fences to keep the suicide bombers out, check points to stop the bombs and prevent materials used for terror from being acquired. Egypt, yes EGYPT is AS MUCH A PART OF THIS AS ISRAEL yet you say nothing about their role in the matter.
Who is doing what to who?
And you accuse me of being a Skeptical Science acolyte on the matter?
You sir, are a useful idiot who buys into the very misrepresentation of history that keeps the Palestinian people enslaved to conflict and bloodshed. You are helping to kill them with your ignorance.
Did anyone read the latest statements translated from AN ARABIC speech by Egyptian’s great hope, President Mohamed Morsi, ‘Israeli-Palestinian negotiations are “a waste of time and opportunities” as Arabs and Muslims get nothing out of engagement with “the descendants of apes and pigs,”.’
If one wants to know what the Arab nations really think, they must listen to the speeches, directed at their own people.
‘ “the Zionist and American enemies for the sole purpose of opposing the will of the Palestinian people.” Therefore, he stressed, “No reasonable person can expect any progress on this track.”
“Either [you accept] the Zionists and everything they want, or else it is war,” Morsi said, “This is what these occupiers of the land of Palestine know – these blood-suckers, who attack the Palestinians, these warmongers, the descendants of apes and pigs.”
If Al Jazeera reports these speeches, then they provide us with a better understanding, of who, we are really dealing with. GK
markx;
B’TSELEM – The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories was established in 1989 by a group of prominent academics, attorneys, journalists, and Knesset members. It endeavors to document and educate the Israeli public and policymakers about human rights violations in the Occupied Territories, combat the phenomenon of denial prevalent among the Israeli public, and help create a human rights culture in Israel.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I’ll tell you what Mark. I’ll sit for one day in the centre of Jerusalem with a sign hung around my neck saying that I hate Jews. You can spend the same day sitting at the centre of Gaza City with a sign around your neck saying you hate Muslims. We can meet afterward to compare notes about human rights violations.
Well I’ll be at the meeting. You I’m not so certain of.
davidmhoffer says: January 4, 2013 at 9:03 am
“……. keeps the Palestinian people enslaved ……” Perhaps they prefer some choices in which type of slavery they receive:
Israeli Settlements: Time Magazine (Three Days ago)
By Karl Vick Dec. 31, 2012
http://world.time.com/2012/12/31/the-west-banks-2012-the-year-of-the-israeli-settlement/#ixzz2H1g8EVdE
There is no intention by current Israeli government to leave the Palestinians anything. And I doubt there ever was.
Al Gorzeera didn’t just pick up his ball and go home in disgust at his failure to lead his fellow Americans into a green future, he decided Americans needed punishment for this lack of interest. Or maybe he thought the only green in his future was the 100M bucks for sale of the wreckage before it depreciated further along with his other investments.
markx;
At the start of 2012, the Israeli advocacy group Peace Now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You keep quoting the opinions of other people rather than becoming familiar with the facts themselves and drawing your own conclusions. And you accuse me of being a Skeptical Science acolyte?
markx;
Twelve months later, that pace has nearly quintupled. In one week of December alone, Netanyahu’s government pushed forward plans for 11,000 homes beyond the Green Line that marked Israel’s 1967 border
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
which part of the already negotiated and agreed to land swaps do you not understand?
davidmhoffer says: January 4, 2013 at 9:54 am
“…accuse me of being a Skeptical Science acolyte…?”. Sorry, that one must have really stung, you keep bringing it up: It was light hearted reference to their style of redirecting discussion. It was not meant as a wounding insult, but I now see it could be taken that way by someone who perhaps regards them even less favorably than I do. In that instance, I do apologize.
There is nothing light hearted about the rest of this discussion though:
davidmhoffer says: January 4, 2013 at 9:03 am
“….1948 => Jordan seizes West Bank…[a note, with British trained troops under the leadership of British officers…]…. Egypt seizes Gaza. …… ”
As is often said in here, you don’t get to make up your own facts, and nor should anyone get to start history where they see fit:
“Britain’s high commissioner for Palestine [from 1928 to 1931], John Chancellor, recommended total suspension of Jewish immigration and land purchase to protect Arab agriculture. He said ‘all cultivable land was occupied; that no cultivable land now in possession of the indigenous population could be sold to Jews without creating a class of landless Arab cultivators’…The Colonial Office rejected the recommendation.”
John Quigley, “Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice.” http://www.ifamericansknew.org/history/origin.html
David also said: “…..You keep quoting the opinions of other people rather than becoming familiar with the facts themselves and drawing your own conclusions….”
Well, I’m quoting from articles I have read over many years of reading up on the subject, and mainly the ones I think are in the right. You were expecting perhaps personal interviews?
davidmhoffer says: January 4, 2013 at 9:56 am
“…I’ll sit for one day in the centre of Jerusalem with a sign hung around my neck saying …. etc….
…..Well I’ll be at the meeting. You I’m not so certain of….”
David, in effect you are saying, “I don’t like them, I don’t understand them, and I don’t see what the hell they have got to be upset about, so therefore they MUST be wrong”. In fact the extreme nature of their current religious views while abhorrent to most, does not make any particular fact right or wrong.
And you have to wonder if we would so often see such extremist Islamic views had they not seen this injustice steadily unfold over a century.
Well, I’m quoting from articles I have read over many years of reading up on the subject, and mainly the ones I think are in the right.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Mainly the ones that come from bigoted sources that play directly into the hands of those who keep the conflict alive.
markx;
David, in effect you are saying, “I don’t like them, I don’t understand them, and I don’t see what the hell they have got to be upset about, so therefore they MUST be wrong”.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You bitched about human rights and I proposed a test to see which of the two groups would do a better job of respecting human rights. You have’t got the balls to take the test and instead rationalize that one side doesn’t respect human rights, but its OK for them not to.