Now, alarmists are making the public believe in the extreme weather boogeyman

The history of the messaging meme

A new survey has been released by Yale in cooperation with George Mason University. In it, 74% surveyed say “global warming is affecting weather in the United States”.

Personally, I blame Seth Borenstein, Kevin Trenberth, Bill McKibben, Joe Romm and Brad Johnson for elevating and continually propagating this lie.  As readers may recall, the journal Nature came out with a strong editorial against this sort of thinking, saying it is unsupportable by the current science.

Nonetheless, these propagandists are going full steam ahead in pushing it anyway. They are preying on the psychological weakness of short term weather memory coupled with the normal human fear of storms, part of our makeup. Almost everyone has astraphobia (fear of lightning and thunder) to some degree until we are reassured there is nothing to fear. Now, these people are turning that fear back on even though the data shows otherwise. This tactic really isn’t any different than making people in the middle ages believe witches caused bad weather. We think we’ve come so far, yet there are still those propagandists who prey on primal fears for the advantage they bring.

Here are some of the talking points, followed by the press release and questions:

• Asked about six recent extreme weather events in the United States, majorities say global warming made each event “worse.” Americans were most likely to connect global warming to the record high temperatures in the summer of 2012 (73%).

• Americans increasingly say weather in the U.S. has been getting worse over the past several years (61%, up 9 percentage points since March).

• A majority of Southerners (56%) say the weather in their local area has been getting worse over the past few years. Half of Midwesterners (50%) say this as well.

• Half of Americans recall unusual weather events in their local area over the past year (52%).

• Six in ten Americans (61%) recall unusual weather events occurring elsewhere in the United States in the past year (other than their own local area), perhaps reflecting extensive media attention to the record-setting drought, high temperatures, and strong storms in the summer of 2012, as well as the unusually warm winter of 2011-2012.

• Half of Americans (51%) say that droughts have become more common in their local area over the past few decades, an increase of 5 points since last spring. This national change was driven primarily by a major shift of opinions in the Midwest (66%, up 25 points since March), which was hit hardest by the summer drought.

• A majority of Americans (58%) say that heat waves have become more common in their local area over the past few decades, up 5 points since March, with especially large increases in the Northeast and Midwest (+12 and +15, respectively).

• More than twice as many Midwesterners say they personally experienced an extreme heat wave (83%, up 48 points since March) or drought (81%, up 55 points) in the past year.

• Northeasterners are more likely to say they personally experienced an extreme heat wave (52%, up 10 points since March) or drought in the past year (23%, up 6 points).

• Southerners who say they personally experienced an extreme heat wave increased to 61 percent, from 50 percent in March.

• An increasing number of Americans in the West say they experienced either an extreme heat wave (49%, up 13 points since March) or drought (41%, up 10 points).

• One in five Americans (20%) says they suffered harm to their health, property, and/or finances from an extreme heat wave in the past year, a 6 point increase since March. In addition, 15 percent say they suffered harm from a drought in the past year, up 4 points.

GROWING MAJORITY SAYS GLOBAL WARMING IS AFFECTING U.S. WEATHER

Poll Shows Americans Believe Global Warming Is Making Extreme Weather Worse

October 9, 2012 – (New Haven, CT) A new national survey finds that 74 percent of Americans say “global warming is affecting weather in the United States” – up five percentage points since March 2012. Likewise, 73 percent of Americans say that global warming made the record-high temperatures of the summer of 2012 worse, while 61 percent say weather in the U.S. has been getting worse over the past several years, up nine points since March.

“Americans have just experienced two years of record-setting extreme weather events, and are increasingly connecting extreme weather in the United States to global warming,” said Dr. Anthony Leiserowitz of Yale University.

Half of Americans (52 percent) recall unusual weather events that have occurred in their own local area over the past year, while 61 percent recall unusual weather events that have occurred elsewhere in the U.S. Half of Americans (51 percent) say that droughts have become more common in their local area, an increase of five points since March, 2012. This national change was driven primarily by a major shift of opinions in the Midwest where two out of three respondents said droughts have become more common (66 percent, up 25 points since March).

58 percent of Americans also say heat waves have become more common in their own local area, up five points since this March. In addition, 20 percent of Americans say they personally suffered harm to their health, property, and/or finances from an extreme heat wave in the past year, a six-point increase since March.

“Extreme weather is clearly having a serious impact on millions of Americans, though the impacts are different in different parts of the country,” said co-investigator Dr. Edward Maibach at George Mason University.

In the Midwest, a large majority (71 percent, up 21 points since March) says extreme weather has caused more harm to crops over the past few decades. In addition, large majorities of Midwesterners say they personally experienced an extreme heat wave (83 percent, up 48 points since March) or drought (81 percent, up 55 points) in the past year.

In the South, a majority (56 percent) says the weather in their local area has been getting worse over the past few years, while a majority of Southerners (61 percent) say they personally experienced an extreme heat wave in the past year, up 11 points since March.

In the Northeast, 40 percent say that droughts have become more common in their local area (up 15 points since March), while a majority of Northeasterners (52 percent) say they personally experienced an extreme heat wave in the past year, a 10-point increase since March.

In the West, 49 percent say that extreme weather is causing more forest fires (up seven points since March). Forty-nine percent of Americans in the West also say they personally experienced an extreme heat wave in the past year (up 13 points since March), or a drought (41 percent, up 10 points).

The data are from a nationally representative survey of 1,061 American adults, ages 18 and older, conducted from August 31 – September 12, 2012. Respondents are members of GfK Knowledge Networks’s KnowledgePanel®, an online panel of members recruited using probability-based sampling methods (random digit dial and address-based sampling). Key demographic variables were weighted to match US Census Bureau norms. Margins of error (at the 95 percent confidence level) for the populations discussed are as follows: Total: +/- 3 percentage points; Northeast: +/- 7 percentage points; Midwest: +/- 6 percentage points; South: +/-5 percentage points; West: +/- 6 percentage points.

The report: Extreme Weather and Climate Change in the American Mind comes from an ongoing national study, Climate Change in the American Mind, by the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication and the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication. The study is funded by the Surdna Foundation, the 11th Hour Project and the Grantham Foundation.

In addition to Dr. Leiserowitz, principal investigators included Geoff Feinberg and Peter Howe of Yale University and Drs. Edward Maibach and Connie Roser-Renouf of George Mason University.

==============================================================

Here’s the survey:  http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/Extreme-Weather-Public-Opinion-September-2012.pdf

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

64 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
October 9, 2012 2:29 pm

Someone mentioned archived records. I know that some records have been “adjusted”. The internet makes it easier to get away with that. Look up the records for your area and the only numbers you see are the most recent “adjusted” ones. Of course you can copy/paste them into a program on your PC every few years to see what’s been changed. I’d advise that. But there are also records in print. (Remember, books?) Perhaps some of you with more time and skills than I do should scan some of those records for your area?

Ian H
October 9, 2012 3:17 pm

Young people tend to think the weather is much worse than normal recently. Old people on the other hand will usually tell you that the weather was much worse when they were young.

October 9, 2012 5:01 pm

#### BEGIN Transmission ####
Does this also mean they believe Humans are the cause of all the beautiful storm free days that are free from extreme weather events? Extreme weather events are the exception that’s why they are called ‘extreme’. Sure, there are extreme events happening everyday somewhere at any time around the planet, but favorable weather outnumbers extreme weather, Human activity can create a clear blue sky no more than it can cause a tornado or even a hurricane, How about Snowstorms and freezing cold temperatures that leave lakes and rivers frozen with ice during a harsh winter? is this believed to be the cause of human activity too? Why stop there! how about the rise and fall of oceans? El Niño/La Niña? Arctic Sea ice variability, Antarctic Record Ice growth, wind speed, moister levels, heavy rains and floods, Ozone variability, frequency and intensity of Aurora? frost, fog and the size of hail stones?
I call BS, I think for an oxygen and nitrogen based atmosphere with a trace amount of CO2 already present in it (since it was formed), Human activity in reality does not effect the planet on the massive scales suggested by these CO2 based climate change cults, I’m actually quite disturbed and shocked that so many people have been persuaded of this political masquerade of science (who, I’m sure are very honest and normal hard working people). The simple act of the orchestrated suppression of scientific opinions say’s a lot in it’s self, it really is over and above the norm for any other scientific theory.
Lately I’ve also become extremely annoyed with the British MET Office and their awesome disregard of the public’s opinion on their spectacular failures lately, and I have become very disillusioned with the standard of reporting in the media who appear to have taken up a role of being outlets of repetitious nonsense of a one-sided debate, instead of objectively reporting the honest arguments from all sides.
But why should anyone listen to what I have to say? I’m not a climate scientist! I may as well burn all my hard earned qualifications, experience and knowledge gained through years of study and practice to conform and believe in a hypothesis that I have not once seen any hard facts about, convince me!. Well, I wont be doing that anytime soon, to me it would be like drinking punch laced with poison handed out by a cult leader.
#### END Transmission ####

October 9, 2012 5:31 pm

October 9, 2012 – (New Haven, CT) A new national survey finds that 26 percent of Americans say “global warming is a load of bull”, and have refused to drink the kool-aid.
Teams of marauders have been seen, bearing pitchforks and flaming torches made with hockey sticks, seeking out the non-believers.
/sarc – as if it’s needed.

David A. Evans
October 9, 2012 5:42 pm

Back in the late ’60s I witnessed a really heavy rainstorm. The quadrangle of the school I attended was flooded in minutes.
If I was 18 then, I would probably have said it was unprecedented, it certainly was for me aged about 15.
A couple of years ago, there was a similar rainstorm where I live now, about 12 miles from where I lived then. 40ish years later. a 30 year old would probably say it was unprecedented, it wasn’t for me being nearly 60.
DaveE.

Robbo
October 9, 2012 5:58 pm

I happened to attend a seminar by professional alarmist Dr Paul Williams, University of Reading, UK, at the Aspen Center for Physics last June. He said that their group’s new climate models now included stochastic variability in addition to long-term trends, and added that one the main advantages of including that variability was that it allowed them to predict more extreme weather events for the future, “which is what the public is really concerned about, not average trends”. So I guess that’s really the new battle front. In fact, I am surprised it took them so long to jump onto this argument. Doomsday preachers of every other religious cult in history have always resorted to that strategy for thousands of years.

lurker passing through, laughing
October 9, 2012 7:07 pm

At this point it is just for their power and glory.
Truth left the scene a long time ago for these guys.

October 9, 2012 8:40 pm

John West says:
October 9, 2012 at 12:33 pm
That Bob Hope clip had me buckled over in stitches.

Ian L. McQueen
October 9, 2012 8:53 pm

The purpose of surveys is:
1. to determine what people think
2. to determine what people think
I tried this out on some friends and nobody caught my double meaning and thought it amusing. The trick is that “determine” can have two diametrically opposite meanings.
IanM

Chuck Nolan
October 9, 2012 9:25 pm

The survey asks:
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements: “Global warming is
affecting weather in the United States”
Agree
Strongly agree
Somewhat agree
Disagree
Somewhat disagree
Strongly disagree
Don’t know/no answer
——————
The #1 answer should be “don’t know”
I think we all know why it wasn’t?
After all the propaganda, all the tax money spent and it’s up 5 points. That’s not much bang for our tax buck. After our long, hot, forest fire summer it should be 97%. Maybe they need to cull the herd. Ask more experts.
cn

D. Patterson
October 10, 2012 6:18 am

How many lights do YOU see? How many storms do YOU see?

October 10, 2012 12:10 pm

The extremists are entering the frenetic stage one can expect as their fantasies die . Reminds me of 50 years ago mapping geology by canoe and compass traverses for the Manitoba Geological Survey. At noon, we stopped and boiled up tea – the water often the colour of tea already, coming from a bog if your farthest traverse point didn’t have a lake or river to scoop from (a few times the water was bailed out of moose tracks). The pond bugs in the water would begin to swim faster and faster and allign themselves in patterns outlining cooler regions of the heating water until they finally expired. The tea was added, allowed to flip over a few times and then taken off to cool. Fitting that extremists are now desperately clutching at extremes whirling faster and faster at the end of it all.

Lars P.
October 10, 2012 2:03 pm

They have nothing else left. The world is not warming, the seas are not rising – even with added GIA adjustment, the ice is not melting at both poles, whilst the Arctic has record lows the Antarctic has record highs, so what do they have left to sound alarm?
This is pushing them even further away from science, but did the zealots ever cared for science? It is catching with the masses and will be in vogue for maybe 1 year, then they need to come with something new, earthquakes caused by CO2 maybe? Or ozone holes?
I worry for the kids not that they might grow up as climate zealots. With the time they get so fed in school with the garbage that I fear they will get allergy to any kind of environmentalism…

October 10, 2012 7:36 pm

This exercise is at prime time for a group of senior USA respecteds to write a letter to the current President, saying that extreme weather is a forecast that does not match past data. The President should make it clear to the people that he has seen the figures for the frequency of severe storms, earthquakes, drought, whatever (as provided with the letter) and that he is satisfied that American people can rest easy, knowing that such climate change as there is merely poor science dressed as propaganda when it predicts an increased frequency of severe weather events.
I can’t imagine a better time for this tactic.