99% of species and humans are ill served by the 0.1% UN and environmentalist elites
Guest post by Paul Driessen and David Rothbard
The UN Conference on Sustainable Development is underway in Rio de Janeiro. This time, 20 years after the original 1992 Rio “Earth Summit,” thousands of politicians, bureaucrats and environmental activists are toning down references to “dangerous man-made climate change,” to avoid repeating the acrimony and failures that characterized its recent climate conferences in Copenhagen, Cancun and Durban.
Instead, “Rio+20” is trying to shift attention to “biodiversity” and alleged threats to plant and animal species, as the new “greatest threat” facing Planet Earth. This rebranding is “by design,” according to conference organizers, who say sustainable development and biodiversity is an “easier sell” these days than climate change: a simpler path to advance the same radical goals.
Those goals include expanded powers and budgets for the United Nations, UN Environment Programme, US Environmental Protection Agency and other government agencies, and their allied Green pressure groups; new taxes on international financial transactions (to ensure perpetual independent funding for the UN and UNEP); and more mandates and money for “clean, green, renewable” energy.
Their wish list also includes myriad opportunities to delay, prevent and control energy and economic development, hydrocarbon use, logging, farming, family size, and the right of individual countries, states, communities and families to make and regulate their own development and economic decisions.
Aside from not giving increased power to unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats and activists, there are two major reasons for stopping this attempted biodiversity-based power grab.
1) There is no scientific basis for claims that hundreds or thousands of species are at risk
Up to half of all species could go extinct by 2100, asserts astronomer and global warming alarmist James Hansen, because of climate change, “unsustainable” hydrocarbon use, human population growth and economic development. At Rio+20 activists are trumpeting these hysterical claims in reports, speeches and press releases. Fortunately, there is no factual basis for them.
Of 191 bird and mammal species recorded as having gone extinct since 1500, 95% were on islands, where humans and human-introduced predators and diseases wrought the destruction, notes ecology researcher Dr. Craig Loehle. On continents, only six birds and three mammals were driven to extinction, and no bird or mammal species in recorded history is known to have gone extinct due to climate change.
The massive species losses claimed by Hansen, Greenpeace, WWF and others are based on extrapolations from the island extinction rates. Some are just wild guesses or rank fear-mongering, with nothing remotely approximating scientific analysis. Other extrapolations are based on unfounded presumptions about species susceptibility to long or short term climate shifts – fed into clumsy, simplistic, non-validated virtual reality computer models that assume rising carbon dioxide levels will raise planetary temperatures so high that plants, habitats, and thus birds, reptiles and animals will somehow be exterminated. There is no evidence to support any of these extinction scenarios.
Indeed, there is no empirical evidence to support claims that average global temperatures have risen since 1998, or that we face any of the manmade global warming or climate change cataclysms proclaimed by Hansen, Gore and others.
2) The greatest threats to species are the very policies and programs being advocated in Rio.
Those policies would ban fossil fuels, greatly increase renewable energy use, reduce jobs and living standards in rich nations, and perpetuate poverty, disease, death and desperation in poor countries.
Today, over 1.5 billion people still do not have electricity, or have it only a few hours each day or week. Almost 2.5 billion people live on less than $2 a day. Millions die every year from diseases that would be largely eradicated by access to reliable, affordable electricity for cooking and refrigeration, clinics and hospitals, clean water, sanitation, and businesses and industries that generate jobs, prosperity and health.
Opposition to large-scale electricity generation forces people to rely on open fires for cooking and heating – perpetuating lung diseases and premature death, from breathing smoke and pollutants. It also destroys gorilla and other wildlife habitats, as people cut trees and brush for firewood and charcoal.
Wind turbines slice up birds and collapse bat lungs, exacting an unsustainable toll on eagles, hawks, falcons, and other rare, threatened and endangered flying creatures.
Turbine and solar arrays cover and disrupt millions of acres of farmland and wildlife habitat, to provide expensive, intermittent power for urban areas. They require backup generators and long transmission lines, and consume millions of tons of concrete, steel, copper, fiberglass, polymers and rare earth minerals – extracted from the Earth, often in countries whose pollution control regulations and technologies are substantially below US, Canadian, European and Australian standards.
Corn-based ethanol requires tens of millions of acres, billions of gallons of water, millions of tons of fertilizer and insecticides, and enormous quantities of hydrocarbon fuels.
And yet, President Obama told Ghanaians in 2010 that poor, electricity-deprived, malnourished Africans should rely on biofuel, wind and solar power – and not build even gas-fired power plants.
Hunting, subsistence living and poverty are among the greatest risks to species. Denying poor families access to reliable, affordable electricity is a crime against humanity
The Rio+20 biodiversity and sustainability agenda means artificially reduced energy and economic development. It means rationed resources, sustained poverty and disease, and unsustainable inequality, resentment, conflict, and pressure on wildlife and their habitats.
Simply put, 99% of humans and wild kingdom species are being ill served by the 0.1% UN and environmentalist elites gathered in Brazil, and purporting to speak for mankind and planet.
Our Creator has endowed us with a world rich in resources, and even richer in intelligent, hard-working, creative people who yearn to improve their lives and be better stewards of our lands, resources and wildlife. The primary obstacles to achieving these dreams are the false ideologies, anti-development agendas and suffocating regulations being promoted at the Rio+20 Summit.
If we can eliminate those obstacles, the world will enjoy a rebirth of freedom and opportunity, voluntarily stable populations, and vastly improved health, welfare and justice for billions. We will also bring far greater security to Earth’s wondrous multitudes of wild and scenic areas, and plant and animal species.
That would be an enormous gain for our planet and people.
__________
Paul Driessen is senior policy advisor for the Washington, DC-based Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power – Black death; David Rothbard serves as CFACT’s president.
Related articles
- From Rio + 20: The future we dread (wattsupwiththat.com)
- Rio+20: Prince Charles sends warning to Earth summit (guardian.co.uk)
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
To summarize another way: If you want to see heavy pressure on plant and animal species, and ravaging of ecosystems, make the local human populations hungry and desperate. They will proceed to rip the environment to shreds in an effort to survive.
The phrasing is as stupid as the idea. How can a “global” tax be on Americans only? By definition it’s on everyone.
As a Canadian ex-anti-American, I now regard anti-Americanism as deeply petty, destructive, and self-defeating. An alternate history without America is very dark and the playground of tyranny. IMO.
These people see someone who appears to be doing better and they want to tear them down. It doesn’t occur to them to raise others up. If that idea did seep into their brains somehow, they wouldn’t know how to raise others up. They only know how to take, not how to create.
Henry Clark says: @ur momisugly June 22, 2012 at 12:16 am
I think it was deliberate. Think of what then House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said “We have to pass the bill [Health Care] so you can find out what is in it”
Legal writing is precise writing. Sometimes the missing hyphen, misplaced word or extra comma can change the meaning of a sentence. In one case a single comma in the 14-page contract… is worth 1 million Canadian dollars ($888,000). So I have a great deal of trouble thinking that the writing was not very deliberately obtuse to keep the general public from figuring out what is going on.
An example of how “they” LIE:
When the Senate ratified the World Trade Organization treaty in 1995 protections were put in place before the Senate would agree to the ratification. According to the Act, if there is a conflict between U.S. and any of the Uruguay Round agreements, U.S. law will take precedence regardless when U.S. law is enacted. § 3512 (a) states: “No provision of any of the Uruguay Round Agreements, nor the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance, that is inconsistent with any law of the United States shall have effect.” Specifically, implementing the WTO agreements shall not be construed to “amend or modify any law of the United States, This did not stop the Ag Cartel that wrote the Agreement on Agriculture and controls the FDA. The FDA went ahead and acted as if the Act did not exist. ” …Failure to reach a consistent, harmonized set of laws, regulations and standards within the freetrade agreements and the World Trade Organization Agreements can result in considerable economic repercussions.” Since farmers were aware of the Act and refused to go along with WTO mandates on Ag, a new law was passed during the 2010 Lame Duck Session including a clause making US regulations conform to the wishes of the WTO. Text of Law
………
It has already been done and the results are heartbreaking. No teacher, but every textbook, left behind. More articles on Education link
………..
Someone did and videotaped it Who Is JOE BIDEN?! He also ast students at University of California at Berkley your essay questions link Given the recent threads on California this video on Calpurg is also of interest link (Disclaimer – I am NOT a republican)
For that large a percentage of species to be lost would require one heck of a lot of beetles to expire.
So any idea why all those beetles would be “at risk”? Last I looked, bugs do better in the heat…
From:
https://www.amazon.com/Inordinate-Fondness-Beetles-Arthur-Evans/dp/product-description/0520223233
Denying the present mass extinction event is as stupid, idiotic, and ideologically brain-dead as denying man-made global warming. But the fact you idiots now choose to deny it proves that, at minimum, you’re consistent.
Dana Blankenhorn says:
June 22, 2012 at 7:55 am
Denying the present mass extinction event is as stupid, idiotic, and ideologically brain-dead as denying man-made global warming.
Please name two species that are part of this “present mass extinction event” …. Other than liberty and independent thought that is. (Thought that may differ from the state-endorsement of the state-control ABCNNBCBS and the state-funded universities and national labs. )
Name ANY species that is actually threatened by a increase in global average temperature of 2 degrees. 3 degrees.
Provide ANY evidence that the global average earth temperature will actually continue to increase by 3 degrees. Or 2 degrees. Or even 1 degree.
Flagrant Hypocrisy how can the rio conference save carbon??
http://joannenova.com.au/2012/06/rio-50000-people-flock-to-a-flop-but-that-is-success-in-its-own-right/
Dana, computer models do not output facts. Now, tell us about the present mass extinction event. What species just went extinct? I’m not sure of the timeline, so let’s start at 1979, when AGW supposedly started. How many species have gone extinct since 1979? Is there a list somewhere?
It’s mostly those countries that have already overpopulated their country; and now see places like America, as unpopulated empty space, for them to come to and continue to emulate flies.
Seems like Rio is in the country with the highest population growth rate on the planet.
And then there is that underwater place; the Mal-Dives, which is in a stagnant super deep part of the Indian ocean, so the water is a bit hotter than places with circulation, so ocean evaporation is lowering the sea level there faster than the dopes can dig up the islands to build more runways so tourist dopes can come and give them their money. So where the hey do they think all the Asian Monsoon rain water comes from; it gets dug out automatically from the sea side parts of the Mal-Dives, like where their parliment meets in scuba clothing.
As for land based mammal extinctions; there’s the Eastern Elk, which is either extinct or banished to the remaining unexplored regions of Manhattan Island.
Of course the Eastern Eelk was just a loner elk that failed to meet up with a western elk, so no-one ever saw them mating. Elks, are not extinct !
Heard a speech last evening from a person who got invited to Rio C++ but decided not to go since she is now a capitalist running a green recycling corporation, and trying to raise OPM for herself; worked well for that Faceache kid, so she might as well give it a go. My AM gave her an award for being an entrepaneur. I can’t complain as she pulled MY card out of the bowls so I won the door prize of my AM’s coffee mug; pretty nice !
If enough people recycle donut shop grease to make bio diesel, we will have to immigrate a heck of a lot more Cambodians to start donut shops, to keep the biodisel coming.
The startup lady’s investors may want to think up a plan B for when we cut all the e-waste back to where recycling is no longer viable. It’s the cigarette tax model of self limiting enterprize
Whenever a person mentions “mass extinction events” I cringe. I love Birds and , as a hobby, study them. Except for a place like Hawai’i and some other island areas, extinctions aren’t happening. Indeed even on Hawai’i there are species bucking the trend, predominently the Amakihi. As for continental areas, most of those extictions were late 19th century or early 20th century. The stressers that caused most of those extictions, like market hunting, don’t exist any more. By the way I own a species of parrot that was thought extinct back in 1914 in its home country of Australia. Its a Turquoise Parrot, neophema pulchella, it was rediscovered in 1920. So please bear in mind that at that time in the early 20th century that many species rather common today, like the Snowy egret, California Quail, White Tailed Kite, and even in the eastern USA the Mourning Dove were considered headed towards extiction. So there is plenty of reason to doubt “Mass Extictions” in our day.
Gail Combs:
I’ll be looking at those links, thank you. Indeed that bill and its regulations reaching thousands of pages is an utter example. The number of people, if any, who would pick up on and remember all subtleties in anything with that much superfluous verbiage would be even fewer than the number who entirely read it once through.