
Roger L. Simon writes on PJ Media:
Starting this year, PJ Media, in conjunction with our good friends at The New Criterion, will be awarding the first annual Walter Duranty Prize for Journalistic Mendacity.
Walter Duranty – it will be recalled — was the New York Times’ Moscow correspondent in the 1920s and 1930s who whitewashed Joseph Stalin’s forced mass starvation of the Ukrainians (the Holodomor) and many other aspects of Soviet oppression.

Duranty was awarded the Pulitzer Prize in 1932 for his efforts.
Despite numerous attempts by Ukrainian organizations and others, the prize has never been revoked. Duranty’s photograph remains in its honored place on the New York Times’ wall along with the newspaper’s other Pulitzer winners.
The first annual Duranty Prize will be given for what our readers consider the most egregious example of dishonest reporting for the fiscal year 2011-2012 (July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2012).
We will be officially accepting nominations from PJM and TNC readers starting May 1, 2012, at Duranty@pjmedia.com (but if you want to go ahead now, no one’s going to stop you – the email address is functioning).
A Duranty Prize Committee of seven journalists and writers will then sift the nominations and decide the winner (or winners) to be announced at a ceremony in New York in the Fall.
===============================================================
While I considered Dr. Michael Mann for his recent book contributions, it seemed inappropriate since this was about dishonest journalism, not delusional self-promotion.
That of course leaves Dr. Peter Gleick, of the Pacific Institute and his “Fakegate” crimes, duping reporters at Newspapers and other media (Guardian and BBC, plus Revkin at NYT for example) that should have known better, into reporting a trumped up story based on Gleick’s self admitted deception to steal documents from the Heartland Institute, plus a “fake” document, to give an otherwise mundane set of documents “legs” for a compliant press.
Leo Hickman, Suzanne Goldenberg, and company at the Guardian, plus Richard Black at the BBC thought they had a bona fide leak of incriminating information on the funding of climate skeptics by the Heartland Institute. Turns out they were played for fools by Gleick and when he was cornered by skeptics following the evidence, admitted to his phishing and dishonest impersonation to create a false news story, in a Huffington Post confession here.
I doing so, Gleick has broken both state and Federal Laws. I’m told that actions are pending.
Here’s a review of some salient points:
Some notes on the Heartland Leak
Notes on the faked Heartland document
If the sceptics’ conspiracy was real, why fake the evidence?
NCSE accepts Gleick’s resignation
Dr. Peter Gleick may have run afoul of a new cyber-impersonation law in California
Gleick removed from AGU Task Force on Scientific Ethics page
Heartland Institute Releases Peter Gleick Emails Detailing Fraud, Identity Theft
Peter Gleick requests leave of absence from Pacific Institute
Koch takes the NYT and Revkin to task
Gleick declares in Mann’s book review (after phishing Heartland) – “there IS a war on”
Gleick and America’s Dumbest Criminals
Gleick and Federal Law 18 U.S.C. 1343
Gleick and the HP “Pretexting” Scandal
Gleick and the Watergate Burglars
=========
Given the uproar and that journalistic train wrecks Dr. Gleick has spawned with his dishonesty, and since he has played the role of science journalist in the past, writing for Forbes, Huffington Post, as well as other opinion pieces in science magazines and journals, I think he more than qualifies for the first annual Walter Duranty award.
For those that may think Gleick doesn’t qualifies as a journalist, I add this update from his Wikipedia Page, which shows him acting in that capacity:
Gleick is the editor of the biennial series on the state of the world’s water, called The World’s Water,[4] published by Island Press, Washington, D.C., regularly provides testimony to the United States Congress and state legislatures, and has published many scientific articles. He serves as a major source of information on water and climate issues for the media, and has been featured on CNBC, CNN, Fox Business, Fresh Air with Terry Gross [18], NPR, in articles in The New Yorker,[19] and many other outlets. He has also been featured in a wide range of water-related documentary films, including Jim Thebaut’s documentary “Running Dry”[20], Irena Salina‘s feature documentary Flow: For Love of Water,[21], accepted for the 2008 Sundance Film Festival, and and Jessica Yu and Elise Pearlstein’s 2011 feature documentary Last Call at the Oasis from Participant Media.[22] In 2010 his book Bottled and Sold: The Story Behind Our Obsession with Bottled Water was published by Island Press.[23] He served on the scientific advisory boards of Thirst, Grand Canyon Adventure: River at Risk, and other water-related films.
And let’s not forget his numerous articles on Forbes and Huffington Post.
As PJ Media says in their posting:
We will be officially accepting nominations from PJM and TNC readers starting May 1, 2012, at Duranty@pjmedia.com (but if you want to go ahead now, no one’s going to stop you – the email address is functioning).
I’ve sent in mine, WUWT readers are of course welcome to second that nomination.
h/t to WUWT reader Kelly Haughton
This may be the most contested award… ever. To stand out among your peers in the MSM as most unabashed liar is no small feat.
There are so many worthy candidates, deciding who to nominate is very difficulty. But given Gleick’s lying and (more than likely) fabrication of the smoking gun document, this might put him at the top of the list. Only problem is, he’s not a journalist (or a scientist, or ethical, or….).
Yes it’s time to give some prices to alarmists who over-exaggerate the climate alarm or conduct fraud or misconduct to promote their case.
Any email, written letter, tweet, or Instant message from Mr. Michael Mann should secure a nomination.
The problem is that while Gleick has been pretty much proved to be an egregious liar, he’s not a journalist. I don’t think he’s eligible.
Krugman has been nominated for a lifetime achievement Duranty Award.
Maybe we could nominate Romm for the Duranty Award for Environmental Journalism. Or Philip Campbell, “editor” of Nature.
Regarding those who don’t think Gleick qualifies as a journalist, read this from his Wikipedia entry:
Gleick is the editor of the biennial series on the state of the world’s water, called The World’s Water,[4] published by Island Press, Washington, D.C., regularly provides testimony to the United States Congress and state legislatures, and has published many scientific articles. He serves as a major source of information on water and climate issues for the media, and has been featured on CNBC, CNN, Fox Business, Fresh Air with Terry Gross [18], NPR, in articles in The New Yorker,[19] and many other outlets. He has also been featured in a wide range of water-related documentary films, including Jim Thebaut’s documentary “Running Dry”[20], Irena Salina’s feature documentary Flow: For Love of Water,[21], accepted for the 2008 Sundance Film Festival, and and Jessica Yu and Elise Pearlstein’s 2011 feature documentary Last Call at the Oasis from Participant Media.[22] In 2010 his book Bottled and Sold: The Story Behind Our Obsession with Bottled Water was published by Island Press.[23] He served on the scientific advisory boards of Thirst, Grand Canyon Adventure: River at Risk, and other water-related films.
And let’s not forget his numerous articles on Forbes and Huffington Post.
My nomination is Justin Gillis of the New York Times, who wrote what Roger Pielke, Jr. called The Worst NYT Story on Climate Ever.
http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2011/12/worst-nyt-story-on-climate-ever.html
If this award is for bad journalism generally then the competition is intense. This blog:
http://tabloid-watch.blogspot.co.uk/
Is mainly about the pathetic UK dead tree press. Their track record for printing stuff that they just made up is very impressive.
If Gleik is the “Stalin” in this then it would be anybody that covered this fiasco as being the “Walter Duranty.”
Now…who did their best to white wash what Gleik did, for a gullible readership? Might we keep the award in house and give it to Revkin? Seth Borenstein would certainly be a finalist for his continued quoting of the faked document, even after finding out the document was a fake! Talk about the spirit of Duranty. Wazhisname, that BBC guy, also.
Nominating Gleik is not a good idea if there are actions pending, imho
let the law take its course
I think this is the wrong tack. There are many true journalists who fit the category better and deserve a Duranty. What we OUGHT to do is start our own Gleich Award, given to the scientist who shows the greatest disregard for honesty, morality, or ethics in their pursuit of pushing a non-scientific agenda through their work.
I always wondered who schnozzle Duranty was when I was a kid.So this Pinocchio award fittingly goes to Peter Gleick. I bet his brother can do another chapter on chaos theory. Excellent book by the brother.
I think Leo Hickman should get the Walter Duranty award and Peter Gleick should get the Walter Mitty award.
Sent and seconded 🙂
“WHCY’s” Wikipedia …was my first choice though.
I think having an annual Pinnochio award would be much more recognisable
http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://caveofknowledge.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/pinocchio.jpg&imgrefurl=http://caveofknowledge.com/on-this-day/lies/&h=500&w=713&sz=116&tbnid=CjWt3ecr0qOTYM:&tbnh=80&tbnw=114&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dpinocchio%26tbm%3Disch%26tbo%3Du&zoom=1&q=pinocchio&docid=J9pddJZn96QabM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=eVSYT8TON6ik0AXcra3mBQ&sqi=2&ved=0CGcQ9QEwBw&dur=0e
tonyb
And while we are thinking about awards. What about the tireless efforts of a certain frequent poster here to cleanse Wikipedia of all truth on the climate question? That should earn him some sort of recognition.
I nominate Nicholas Stern for:
The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change is a 700-page report released for the British government on 30 October 2006 by economist Nicholas Stern, chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and also chair of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) at Leeds University and LSE. The report discusses the effect of global warming on the world economy. Although not the first economic report on climate change, it is significant as the largest and most widely known and discussed report of its kind.[1]
Anthony: For some reason, this reminded me of the Flying Fickle Finger of Fate Award.
I’m going to nominate William Connolley. We can’t have the legions of MSM liars being unchallenged their online counterparts.
I think Gleick is an excellent candidate and voted for him.
Anthony:
I am not nominating ANYBODY until Steve McIntyre of Climate Audit weighs in. If anyone can top your recommendations it will be him, Then I will see if it’s still worth the thought to catalog all those miscreants…
In the meantime surely you have nailed possibly the most deserving recent candidate.
Then there is Warwick Hughes’ little blue book of climatologists I could never love.
Then there is the crop of “reporters” and “commentators” on MSNBC…
Get out the popcorn!
That effusive self-important geek, Gleick, shouldn’t be nominated for any award, however dubious. What he should be nominated for is going to jail, please. Or for record rank incompetence for this unkempt bearded Berkeley leftist. What a clown.
I think you meant to write “compliant press”, not “complaint press”. Although they do complain a lot.
This might be limited to journalists so the sad case of Dr Trick might not qualify. Mind you he did blog and that is a form of journalism. He’s got my vote although I think he will be in tough with the Phony Kony bunch.
I don’t know – Gleick as ‘journalist’. Hmmm…..gives him cover for scientific escapaes …?
Krazykiwi
I agree – William Connolley should be the nominee. As the gatekeeper from Wikipedia, he has probably done more than any other individual to keep the truth about ‘climate change’ from the general public.
In comparison, Peter Gleick is a harmless, albeit cranky, lightweight.