I wonder if Gleick is invited?

Dr. Peter Gleick recently resurfaced at another water conference acting as if nothing had or is about to happen just 17 days after admitting he apparently engaged in wire fraud. One wonders if he’ll be seen at this big event or if he has been asked to quietly sit this one out.- Anthony

=============================================================

Experts: Integrate global water, food and energy policies to divert future conflict

Current and future solutions to the conflicts over the use of water resources discussed by public and private sector experts

This press release is available in French.

MARSEILLES, FRANCE March 11th — As food and energy production intensify around the world, their demands on dwindling water resources have prompted the search for an innovative and collaborative solution. On Friday, March 16, a High Level Panel convened by the EDF Group and the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) will gather in Marseilles at the Sixth World Water Forum (WWF6) to share experiences and results.

The panel will discuss how to embrace a “nexus” approach to water management, in which projects that tap water resources are planned and executed with input from stakeholders in the food, water and energy sectors. A key goal of the panel is to insert this approach into the agenda of the Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development that will be held in June 2012.

“We live in a world today where all too often development policies seem almost perfectly designed to produce conflict between multiple sectors, particularly energy and agriculture, over water resources,” said Alain Vidal, Director of CPWF, which is part of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR).

Uschi Eid, Vice Chair of the United Nations Secretary General’s Advisory Board on Water and Sanitation, will open the panel. Other participants include:

  • Alain Vidal, Director of CPWF;
  • Gérard Wolf, Senior Executive Vice President, International Development, EDF Group, one of the world’s largest electricity companies with 640 dams worldwide;
  • Yasar Yakis, Turkey’s former Minister of Foreign Affairs;
  • Ogunlade Davidson, Sierra Leone’s Foreign Minister of Energy and Water Resources;
  • Jane Madgwick, CEO of Wetlands International;
  • Gustavo Francisco Petro Urrego, Mayor of Bogota, Colombia; and
  • Anil B .Jain, Managing Director (CEO) of Jain Irrigation Systems, based in India.

The EDF – CPWF High Level Panel’s work is driven by the problems and tensions that emerge when officials in both the public and private sectors fail to consider how water management decisions simultaneously affect energy, drinking water and food production.

These complementary, but often clashing areas of interest were the subject of last year’s Bonn2011 Nexus Conference and are expected to be prominent at the 2012 World Water Week in Stockholm this fall. The concern among many water experts is that the nexus approach to water management is rarely applied today, and that increases the likelihood of water-related conflicts, particularly as economic development accelerates in rapidly changing areas of Asia, Africa and Latin America.

Vidal noted that with 1.1 billion poor people lacking access to safe water, 1 billion undernourished and 1.5 billion lacking electricity, demand for water resources for multiple uses will rise dramatically over the next decades.

“The world is now a very different place because addressing insecurities related to food, energy and water –particularly in the world’s least developed countries–is now at the forefront of development strategies around the globe,” Vidal said. “We know that in the next decade hundreds of dams are going to be built and the question is, how can we ensure that before the projects begin all of the potential beneficiaries sit down together and discuss the purpose of the dam and the pros and cons of various approaches?”

Laos, for example, is facing criticism that without a nexus perspective, efforts by the energy sector to build dams in the Mekong basin to become the “battery of Asia” could damage fish-dependent communities in the region and exacerbate the existing problem of saltwater intruding into farmlands in Vietnam.

The severity of last year’s floods in Thailand and elsewhere in Southeast Asia has raised fresh concern about the way water flows are controlled in the region. There are questions about whether water management decisions in the region’s network of dams intensified the flooding of agriculture lands—though there are also policies in Thailand for compensating farmers who lose their crops to flooding that could inform the broader nexus discussion.

The Panel will also examine India’s effort to expand drip irrigation projects as it confronts the daunting disparity between available water resources and future food, energy, clean water and economic development needs. A 2005 World Bank report warned that by 2050, absent a more focused and coordinated water management strategy, India’s various water demands will exceed “all sources of supply.”

Vidal said there is evidence that recognizing the multiple demands on water resources can lead to innovative efforts aimed at cooperation. For example, at the World Water Forum, the High Level Panel will examine a case study of the Andean region where numerous clashes between various sectors vying for the water resources in the Machángara River Basin prompted the creation of the Machángara River Basin Council, (the Consejo de la Cuenca del río Machángara or CCRM).

The council’s membership includes the regional water and sewerage authority, the irrigation management agency, the main electric power utility, the national water secretariat, the Ministry of Environment (which protects the forests that cover much of the basin) and small-scale farmers from the area. They are working together to facilitate cooperation among all of the water users in the basin for sustainable development that increases the water, food and energy productivity while also protecting the ecosystem’s services.

###

The CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) was launched in 2002 as a reform initiative of the CGIAR. The CPWF aims to increase the resilience of social and ecological systems through better water management for food production (crops, fisheries and livestock). The CPWF does this through an innovative research and development approach that brings together a broad range of scientists, development specialists, policymakers and communities to address the challenges of food security, poverty and water scarcity. The CPWF is currently working in six river basins globally: Andes, Ganges, Limpopo, Mekong, Nile and Volta (www.waterandfood.org).

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

63 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jim K
March 13, 2012 5:23 am

What skeptics need to do is what they have done. Join them, Divide them and Conquer them!

Gail Combs
March 13, 2012 6:35 am

Billy says:
March 12, 2012 at 9:40 pm
….Mike, I have no expertise in reactor design or engineering. I have not been able find any report that LFTR has been fully developed.
_______________________________
It is very very close! It is just waiting on the politicians before prototype plants are built. India is in the final stages of sellecting a site.

Thorium Energy, Inc’s Strategy: Opportunity;
· New thorium based nuclear reactors are approved and will be constructed in India and China within 2-3 years.
· Recently proposed legislation in the United States will mandate and regulate domestic thorium nuclear power generation and provide for oversight of demonstrations of thorium-based nuclear fuel assemblies. http://www.thoriumenergy.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=39&Itemid=62

India plans ‘safer’ nuclear plant powered by thorium

India has announced plans for a prototype nuclear power plant that uses an innovative “safer” fuel. Officials are currently selecting a site for the reactor, which would be the first of its kind, using thorium for the bulk of its fuel…They plan to have the plant up and running by the end of the decade…..
“The basic physics and engineering of the thorium-fuelled Advanced Heavy Water Reactor (AHWR) are in place, and the design is ready,” said Sinha.
Once the six-month search for a site is completed – probably next to an existing nuclear power plant – it will take another 18 months to obtain regulatory and environmental impact clearances before building work on the site can begin.
“Construction of the AHWR will begin after that, and it would take another six years for the reactor to become operational….

For more technical info see: Sub-critical Thorium reactors http://energy2050.se/uploads/files/rubbia2.pdf

Gail Combs
March 13, 2012 7:11 am

Gail Combs says:
March 12, 2012 at 9:06 pm
….. It is third world countries, where children are used as free labor in Subsistence Agriculture, who have sky high birth rates.
________________
Brian H says:
March 13, 2012 at 12:51 am
Historically true, dat, but it seems there’s something else at work, too. “Sky high birthrates” are actually rare as hen’s teeth now….
_________________
I am well aware of that. I have even read a UN population study where the author was puzzled by the drop in birthrate among subsistence farmers in Africa. But the possible reasons for the drop start getting into the DEEP Conspiracy Theory stuff. http://www.whale.to/m/sterile.html
Then there is the alleged development of spermicidal corn which is a bit close to home, like just down the road aways…. Biolex in Pittsboro NC

….A small California biotech company, Epicyte, in 2001 announced the development of genetically engineered corn which contained a spermicide which made the semen of men who ate it sterile. At the time Epicyte had a joint venture agreement to spread its technology with DuPont and Syngenta, two of the sponsors of the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault. Epicyte was since acquired by a North Carolina biotech company. Astonishing to learn was that Epicyte had developed its spermicidal GMO corn with research funds from the US Department of Agriculture, the same USDA which, despite worldwide opposition, continued to finance the development of Terminator technology, now held by Monsanto.
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/06/11/18650455.php

Second Source:

….The corn has been field tested in tests financed by the US Department of Agriculture along with a small California bio-tech company named Epicyte. Announcing his success at a 2001 press conference, the president of Epicyte, Mitch Hein, pointing to his GMO corn plants, announced, “We have a hothouse filled with corn plants that make anti-sperm antibodies.”14
Hein explained that they had taken antibodies from women with a rare condition known as immune infertility, isolated the genes that regulated the manufacture of those infertility antibodies, and, using genetic engineering techniques, had inserted the genes into ordinary corn seeds used to produce corn plants. In this manner, in reality they produced a concealed contraceptive embedded in corn meant for human consumption. “Essentially, the antibodies are attracted to surface receptors on the sperm,” said Hein. “They latch on and make each sperm so heavy it cannot move forward. It just shakes about as if it was doing the lambada.” Hein claimed it was a possible solution to world “over-population.” The moral and ethical issues of feeding it to humans in Third World poor countries without their knowing it countries he left out of his remarks….. http://www.rense.com/general94/gmos.htm </blockquote"
After the press release, the discussion of Epicyte’s breakthrough vanished. The company itself was taken over in May 2004 by a private Pittsboro, North Carolina bio tech company. Biolex acquired Epicyte Pharmaceutical. Nothing more was heard in any media about the development of spermicidal corn. Gee I wonder why? True? False? only Hein knows.
Purchase: http://www.cropchoice.com/leadstry22ba.html?recid=2570
Pittsboro, North Carolina bio tech company. Biolex: http://www.mitsui-global.com/en/portfolio/biolex.html

March 13, 2012 8:06 am

When I come across the phrase “an innovative and collaborative solution” I know I can stop reading.

Gail Combs
March 13, 2012 8:13 am

Richard C and Brian H,
The “Left” “Right” argument is only used to confuse and deflect us because there really isn’t a Left or Right power base. What the “Left” thinks of as the “Right” is the same group that is actually supporting them, promoting them and orchestrating their actions. They are pragmatists looking for the method that will allow them control of land, people and wealth so they have no real liking for “Capitalism” or “Socialism” only power.
This is substantiated by the book Tragedy and Hope 1966 by Bill Clinton’s mentor, Carroll Quigley. (Note Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar)

This radical Right fairy tale,…. like all fables, does in fact have a modicum of truth. There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the Radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other group, and frequently does so. I know of the operation of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records… but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.[6]:949-950
…It was this group of people, whose wealth and influence so exceeded their experience and understanding, who provided much of the framework of influence which the Communist sympathizers and fellow travelers took over in the United States in the 1930s. It must be recognized that the power of these energetic Left wingers exercised was never their own power or Communist power but was ultimately the power of the international financial coterie, and, once the anger and suspicions of the American people were aroused as they were in the 1950s, it was a fairly simple matter to get rid of the Red sympathizers. Before this could be done, however, a congressional committee, following backward to their source the threads which led from the admitted Communists like Whittaker Chambers, through Alger Hiss, and the Carnegie Endowment to Thomas Lamont and the Morgan Bank, fell into the whole complicated network of the interlocking tax-exempt foundations. The Eighty-third Congress set up in 1953 a Special Reece Committee to investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations. It soon became clear that people of immense wealth would be unhappy if the investigation went too far and that the “most respected” newspapers in the country, closely allied with these men of wealth, would not get excited enough about any revelations to make the publicity worthwhile. An interesting report showing the Left-wing associations of interlocking nexus of tax-exempt foundations was issued in 1954 rather quietly. Four years later, the Reece Committee’s general counsel, Rene A Wormser, wrote a shocked, but not shocking, book on the subject called “Foundations: Their Power and Influence.”[6]:954-955 ”

According to Quigley, the leaders of this group were Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carroll_Quigley

You can keep following the tangled strands of Quigley’s international Anglophile network back to the London School of Economics, Bill Clinton, Tony Blair and the Fabian Society.
Of special note is The Third Way philosophy from Professor Anthony Giddens, former director of the London School of Economics. The philosophy is heavily promoted by Tony Blair and Bill Clinton.
http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/centre-left-s-young-turks-seek-neo-conservative-inspiration/51890.aspx
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/298465.stm
http://www.workinfo.com/econhist/thirdway.htm

Mardler
March 13, 2012 9:39 am

Good grief, Jane Madgwick!!!
Readers may not know but the UK has one of the richest wetland areas in Europe: the Norfolk Broads. The Norfolk & Suffolk river system has hosted commercial craft and now leisure craft for hundreds of years and the latter is a thriving industry bringing much needed income to a relatively poor part of the country (average earnings are 50% of national average).
This women is a pariah in these parts: she worked for the organisation that supposedly looks after the “Broads” and made it clear to all that her aim was to close down the entire system to navigation (forgetting that an insuperable right to fishing and navigation were given in 1215 by Magna Carta).
Be very wary of any organisation with this woman involved.

peterhodges
March 13, 2012 11:35 am

Spend a week or three reading Bastiat. Here’s a good start:
http://bastiat.org/en/the_law.html#SECTION_G007

Great, defenders of the Nazis referring Bastiat. What has the world come to.
Gail Combs as usual tells you everything you need to know. I add that third waver Newt Gingrich wrote some kind of introduction for Toffler’s book…there is no left and right, all these guys are on the same program.
The same people that brought Hitler to power are the same people running America today. Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama…makes no difference.
Hitler said he had met the superman, and it scared him. He must have just come from a meeting with his corporate sponsors.
Wake the hell up people.

woodNfish
March 13, 2012 11:57 am

Seriously, why would liars frauds and crooks mind the company of one of their own?

Richard S Courtney
March 13, 2012 12:39 pm

Gail Combs:
re. your post at March 13, 2012 at 8:13 am
Thankyou.
Yes, when people of good will succumb to divide and rule then good will is lost.
Again, thankyou.
Richard

Werner Brozek
March 13, 2012 1:51 pm

A bit off topic, but speaking of Gleick, the Edmonton Journal finally mentioned the incident today (March 13) but did not mention his name. Some partial quotes:
Tories taciturn about funding of climate skeptics
“Two of the three Canadians mentioned in the internal records have confirmed they were getting paid by the Heartland Institute.
The think-tank was tricked into releasing its internal budget records to an environmental scientist and advocate who attempted to impersonate a board member with a fake email address in February.”
To see the whole article, see:
http://www.edmontonjournal.com/technology/Tories+taciturn+about+funding+climate+skeptics/6292565/story.html

CRS, DrPH
March 13, 2012 9:51 pm

If he wants to scare people, he should be harping about “peak phosphorus!” Courtesy of colleagues of mine from Univ of WI, Milwaukee:

The fact that so few countries have phosphorus mines stirs more concern. About 90 percent of the world’s known reserves are located in or are controlled by five countries: Morocco, Jordan, South Africa, the United States and China. And China, which recently raised its tariffs on phosphorus, is expected to keep more at home. The declining quality, or purity, of known phosphate rock sources is only heightening anxiety.

http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/pub/does-peak-phosphorus-loom

March 14, 2012 8:17 am

These organizations are breeding like fruit flys. I’m actually fearful that there is no mention of AGW and extreme weather and the like. This means there is little to falsify – a clear strategy change of the leftist sustainability (restrainability, detainability, refrainability, abstainability) guerillas.

Brian H
March 31, 2012 1:45 am

peterhodges says:
March 13, 2012 at 11:35 am
Spend a week or three reading Bastiat. Here’s a good start:
http://bastiat.org/en/the_law.html#SECTION_G007
Great, defenders of the Nazis referring Bastiat. What has the world come to.

I was defending the Nazis? By noting they were socialists with a hyper-nationalist gloss? What drivel. Please put it where Sol never illuminates.