Live here now:
http://democrats.naturalresources.house.gov/hearings@id=0061.html
Windows Explorer recommended – it uses Windows Media Streaming format, plugins required for Firefox and Chrome etc.
Background here
Here’s the players at today’s hearing:
EFS_Junior says:
November 14, 2011 at 11:51 am
I’m sort of hoping that this can be downloaded after the fact ……………..
Any suggestions on (after the fact and posted at a *.gov website) downloadable options would be greatly appreciated.
Given that that this is a D’s show, will the R’s have a counterstrike (at some future date)?
=================================
From the linked page, “Video archives of each hearing are posted to that hearing’s page approximately 24-48 hours after the hearing concludes.”
As far as getting the content, it depends on what you’re using. The FF plugin is just click, click…. done.
I haven’t heard anything about a R counter, but, this D display probably isn’t going to gain much attention in the mainstream.
[SNIP: Steve, that sentiment is a bit over the top and premature. -REP]
Isn’t Waxman from California? Oh that explains everything.
I apologize to those few sane Californians that take offense there must be a few sane ones left.
John B says: November 14, 2011 at 2:32 pm
Prof. Selesgard is confusing CO2 residence time with adjustment time. …See, 4 years and 100 years. They [IPCC] have thought about this!
IPCC have “thought” about a lot of things. So has prof. SEGALSTAD. With the difference that IPCC is a spoiled brat accountable to nobody.
Given the obvious ability of the biosphere to sequester CO2, with annual turnover in spades greater than our emissions rate, and the oceans annual turnover likewise an order of magnitude greater than our emissions, I call BS on this IPCC “thought”. No, their isotope argument is not evidence either. I can’t be bothered to find more references at this point – though they are there and I’ve seen them. I think commonsense should be enough to alert us at this point.
Lucy/John B,
CO2 emissions from the “developed world” have dropped significantly since 2008 due to purely economic reasons, i.e. the recession.
This drop does not appear in the global CO2 levels.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mauna_Loa_Carbon_Dioxide-en.svg
If the rise in CO2 levels is purely anthropogenic, why is the drop not obvious?
Who is that sitting behind William Chamiedies? is it Mr Bean?
steveta_uk says:
November 15, 2011 at 3:58 am
> If the rise in CO2 levels is purely anthropogenic, why is the drop not obvious?
Because the drop is wiped out by the even greater increase in emissions from India and China.
The high priests of climate change and bad public policy will grant indulgences now and in a few hundred years there will be pardons for the unbiased climate scientists if any survive the current purges.