PUNTA ARENAS, CHILE – After discovering an emerging crack that cuts across the floating ice shelf of Pine Island Glacier in Antarctica, NASA’s Operation IceBridge has flown a follow-up mission and made the first-ever detailed airborne measurements of a major iceberg calving in progress.
NASA’s Operation Ice Bridge, the largest airborne survey of Earth’s polar ice ever flown, is in the midst of its third field campaign from Punta Arenas, Chile. The six-year mission will yield an unprecedented three-dimensional view of Arctic and Antarctic ice sheets, ice shelves and sea ice.
Pine Island Glacier last calved a significant iceberg in 2001, and some scientists have speculated recently that it was primed to calve again. But until an Oct. 14 IceBridge flight of NASA’s DC-8, no one had seen any evidence of the ice shelf beginning to break apart. Since then, a more detailed look back at satellite imagery seems to show the first signs of the crack in early October.
While Pine Island has scientists’ attention because it is both big and unstable – scientists call it the largest source of uncertainty in global sea level rise projections – the calving underway now is part of a natural process for a glacier that terminates in open water. Gravity pulls the ice in the glacier westward along Antarctica’s Hudson Mountains toward the Amundsen Sea. A floating tongue of ice reaches out 30 miles into the Amundsen beyond the grounding line, the below-sea-level point where the ice shelf locks onto the continental bedrock. As ice pushes toward the sea from the interior, inevitably the ice shelf will crack and send a large iceberg free.
“We are actually now witnessing how it happens and it’s very exciting for us,” said IceBridge project scientist Michael Studinger, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. “It’s part of a natural process but it’s pretty exciting to be here and actually observe it while it happens. To my knowledge, no one has flown a lidar instrument over an actively developing rift such as this.”
A primary goal of Operation IceBridge is to put the same instruments over the exact same flight lines and satellite tracks, year after year, to gather meaningful and accurate data of how ice sheets and glaciers are changing over time. But discovering a developing rift in one of the most significant science targets in the world of glaciology offered a brief change in agenda for the Oct. 26 flight, if only for a 30-minute diversion from the day’s prescribed flight lines.
The IceBridge team observed the rift running across the ice shelf for about 18 miles. The lidar instrument on the DC-8, the Airborne Topographic Mapper, measured the rift’s shoulders about 820 feet apart (250 meters) at its widest, although the rift stretched about 260 feet wide along most of the crack. The deepest points from the ice shelf surface ranged 165 to 195 feet (50 to 60 meters). When the iceberg breaks free it will cover about 340 square miles (880 square kilometers) of surface area. Radar measurements suggested the ice shelf in the region of the rift is about 1,640 feet (500 meters) feet thick, with only about 160 feet of that floating above water and the rest submerged. It is likely that once the iceberg floats away, the leading edge of the ice shelf will have receded farther than at any time since its location was first recorded in the 1940s.
| In October, 2011, NASA’s Operation IceBridge discovered a major rift in the Pine Island Glacier in western Antarctica. This crack, which extends at least 18 miles and is 50 meters deep, could produce an iceberg more than 800 square kilometers in size. IceBridge scientists returned soon after to make the first-ever detailed airborne measurements of a major iceberg calving in progress. Credit: NASA/Goddard/Jefferson Beck |
Veteran DC-8 pilot Bill Brockett first flew the day’s designed mission, crisscrossing the flow of the glacier near the grounding line to gather data on its elevation, topography and thickness. When it came time to investigate the crack, Brockett flew across it before turning to fly along the rift by sight. The ATM makes its precision topography maps with a laser than scans 360 degrees 20 times per second, while firing 3,000 laser pulses per second. When flying at an altitude of 3,000 feet, as during this flight, it measures a swath of the surface about 1,500 feet wide. As the crack measured at more than 800 feet wide in places, it was important for Brockett to hold tight over the crevasse.
“The pilots did a really nice job of keeping the aircraft and our ATM scan swath pretty much centered over the rift as you flew from one end to the other,” said Jim Yungel, who leads the ATM team out of NASA’s Wallops Island Flight Facility in Virginia. “It was a real challenge to be told…we’re going to attempt to fly along it and let’s see if your lidar systems can map that crack and can map the bottom of the crack.
“And it was a lot of fun on a personal level to see if something that you built over the years can actually do a job like that. So, yeah, I enjoyed it. I really enjoyed seeing the results being produced.”
While the ATM provided the most detailed measurements of the topography of the rift, other instruments onboard the DC-8 also captured unique aspects. The Digital Mapping System, a nadir-view camera, gathered high-definition close-ups of the craggy split. On the flight perpendicular to the crack, the McCORDS radar also measured its depth and the thickness of the ice shelf in that region.
Catching the rift in action required a bit of luck, but is also testimony to the science benefit of consistent, repeated trips and the flexibility of a manned mission in the field.
“A lot of times when you’re in science, you don’t get a chance to catch the big stories as they happen because you’re not there at the right place at the right time,” said John Sonntag, Instrument Team Lead for Operation IceBridge, based at Goddard Space Flight Center. “But this time we were.”
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/icebridge/news/fall11/pig-break.html
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
![600808main_pig-break2-orig_full[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/600808main_pig-break2-orig_full1.jpg?resize=640%2C305&quality=83)
Umm –
wouldn’t the melting iceberg need a huge amount of heat for the transition from ice to liquid water which it would draw from the ocean around it, and hence COOL the waters surrounding it substantially…?
Zac says:
November 3, 2011 at 4:52 pm
By the way, why does the article feel the need to convert all measurements into Euros?
—————————————————————————————————————–
Because the “european” metrics have become the metering standard in science long since.
Welcome to the 21st Century, my friend.
Occupy the Ice Berg now!!!!
Zac says:
November 3, 2011 at 7:02 am
As well as the “Wales” (Wa), a smaller and more useful MSM unit of measurement used in the UK, the “Isle of Wight” (IoW). This is a small island off the south coast of England that is a short ferry ride from Southampton and Portsmouth that has just three small centres of population (Newport, Ryde and Cowes) and a lot of nice beaches near the villages of Sandown, Shanklin and Ventnor.
1 Wa = 54 IoW. The new iceberg is roughly 2.3 IoW so not actually that big in the whole scheme of things. An IoW in the UK is used in much the same way as a “Martha’s Vinyard” (MV) in the US although it is slightly bigger (1 IoW = 1.6 MV).
This stuff even has a conversion web site, although it does not use the IoW.
http://www.simonkelk.co.uk/sizeofwales.html
WHAT’S NEW. GEE SEVERAL YEARS AGO, A HUGE SLICE OF SEA ICE BROKE OFF IN ANTARCTICA THAT WAS 150 KMS LONG. Because another ice berg bashed into it. This recent happening is not new. In the former one, no sea alerts were issued to shipping around New Zealand. Not climate change, just natural – and don’t worry. Also, Antarctica is subject to seismic
activity, and also there are active volcanoes near by on Herd Island. (Australian territory)
G. Karst says:
November 3, 2011 at 7:51 am
I particularly liked the following line from wiki:
“their wind god is actually just a wind bag; that is to say, he’s just another lying, deceiving, untrustworthy member of the species homo sapiens”
Sound like anybody we know, GK?
Yes. The Wizard of Oz. In the Emerald City. Where everything looks GREEN…
@ur momisugly Robert Bertino,
I cannot see much scientific discussion at all in these comments. Mostly reactionary hyperbole; and most of the hype is in response to previous hype until hysteria has taken hold.
A scientific theory may be shown false by a few observations. The anti-global-warming hysteria seems to need to disprove the theory thousands of times and pat themselves on the back over and over.
The science is, and always was simple: either the average global temperature is rising, staying the same, or falling. The original theory was just that, a theory. If anyone made absolute statements beyond they theory they were making political statements, not scientific. All this snide arm-chair froth has become mindless, is just more politics, and only adds to the confusion.
The pursuit of science has not changed. Theories are posited and wait to be either improved or disproved. All the global-warming worst-case warning and anti-global-warming hysteria is political dross.
The tendency to bash the real science in the haste to shout down the politics is counter-productive.
The blogger himself seems to have transformed skepticism into an agenda. Lets get back to the science shall we?
This may come as a shock to many, but during an Interglacial Warmup, such as, the one we are in that is 10,500 years old and near it’s very end, glaciers continue to melt!
Charles at Nov.4 10.57 am. The glaciers, are they breaking up, that is normal or melting? Or are they just sea ice, there’s a distinct difference, as you know. Land glaciers or sea ice.
bushbunny, see my comment above. Glaciers don’t “break up” when they recede. They just melt and drain.
As someone who is ignorant of geology and science to this degree, really what does it mean? A 1/3 of Antartica may break away? It sounds terrible but is it? Reading the posted comments, it seems like people are point scoring and using poor sarcasm rather than fact. When will the scientific community accept that some of ‘us’ unscientific people just want a bit of straight talking rather than seemingly pointless speculation that results in irrational fear or irrational complacency. If anyone feels confident in doing so, please respond in a straight talking, unpretentious and yet unpatronising manner. It would make a most refreshing change if supported with fact. I am yet to have my faith in Science restored even though I am passionate about my planet.
Panache;
Say what? 1/3 of Antarctica? Where did you hallucinate that?
Not 1/3 of 1/3 of 1/3 of 1/3 of 1/3 of 1/3 of 1/3 of 1/3 of 1/3 of Antarctica’s ice. You can relax.
Science? My Irish second cousin in the Irish Navy was commissioned I think about 10 years ago, to take a group of university people to Antarctica. They docked somewhere, and took pictures of big lumps of ice floating near the harbour. His mum said this was evidence of global warming?
OK no Irish jokes. But she was sincere when she told us that they had floods after heavy rain.
Actually Cork did have bad floods, because they released water from their dam after heavy rain.
to stop it breaching without warning people. Climate change they said as an excuse. Fair Dinkum! If I recall correctly a US navy submarine attempted a submerged crossing under the Arctic ice and had terrible trouble finding spaces to surface. I don’t think some warmists understand that the Arctic circle and Antarctica are subjected to months of darkness in winter, and months of sunshine in their summer months. Even in the Hebrides they boast about having
22 hours of sunlight during their summer, but forget they have equal amounts of darkness in their winter. AH well, that’s just basic geography I suspect. Well even I knew that at high school in UK.