PUNTA ARENAS, CHILE – After discovering an emerging crack that cuts across the floating ice shelf of Pine Island Glacier in Antarctica, NASA’s Operation IceBridge has flown a follow-up mission and made the first-ever detailed airborne measurements of a major iceberg calving in progress.
NASA’s Operation Ice Bridge, the largest airborne survey of Earth’s polar ice ever flown, is in the midst of its third field campaign from Punta Arenas, Chile. The six-year mission will yield an unprecedented three-dimensional view of Arctic and Antarctic ice sheets, ice shelves and sea ice.
Pine Island Glacier last calved a significant iceberg in 2001, and some scientists have speculated recently that it was primed to calve again. But until an Oct. 14 IceBridge flight of NASA’s DC-8, no one had seen any evidence of the ice shelf beginning to break apart. Since then, a more detailed look back at satellite imagery seems to show the first signs of the crack in early October.
While Pine Island has scientists’ attention because it is both big and unstable – scientists call it the largest source of uncertainty in global sea level rise projections – the calving underway now is part of a natural process for a glacier that terminates in open water. Gravity pulls the ice in the glacier westward along Antarctica’s Hudson Mountains toward the Amundsen Sea. A floating tongue of ice reaches out 30 miles into the Amundsen beyond the grounding line, the below-sea-level point where the ice shelf locks onto the continental bedrock. As ice pushes toward the sea from the interior, inevitably the ice shelf will crack and send a large iceberg free.
“We are actually now witnessing how it happens and it’s very exciting for us,” said IceBridge project scientist Michael Studinger, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. “It’s part of a natural process but it’s pretty exciting to be here and actually observe it while it happens. To my knowledge, no one has flown a lidar instrument over an actively developing rift such as this.”
A primary goal of Operation IceBridge is to put the same instruments over the exact same flight lines and satellite tracks, year after year, to gather meaningful and accurate data of how ice sheets and glaciers are changing over time. But discovering a developing rift in one of the most significant science targets in the world of glaciology offered a brief change in agenda for the Oct. 26 flight, if only for a 30-minute diversion from the day’s prescribed flight lines.
The IceBridge team observed the rift running across the ice shelf for about 18 miles. The lidar instrument on the DC-8, the Airborne Topographic Mapper, measured the rift’s shoulders about 820 feet apart (250 meters) at its widest, although the rift stretched about 260 feet wide along most of the crack. The deepest points from the ice shelf surface ranged 165 to 195 feet (50 to 60 meters). When the iceberg breaks free it will cover about 340 square miles (880 square kilometers) of surface area. Radar measurements suggested the ice shelf in the region of the rift is about 1,640 feet (500 meters) feet thick, with only about 160 feet of that floating above water and the rest submerged. It is likely that once the iceberg floats away, the leading edge of the ice shelf will have receded farther than at any time since its location was first recorded in the 1940s.
| In October, 2011, NASA’s Operation IceBridge discovered a major rift in the Pine Island Glacier in western Antarctica. This crack, which extends at least 18 miles and is 50 meters deep, could produce an iceberg more than 800 square kilometers in size. IceBridge scientists returned soon after to make the first-ever detailed airborne measurements of a major iceberg calving in progress. Credit: NASA/Goddard/Jefferson Beck |
Veteran DC-8 pilot Bill Brockett first flew the day’s designed mission, crisscrossing the flow of the glacier near the grounding line to gather data on its elevation, topography and thickness. When it came time to investigate the crack, Brockett flew across it before turning to fly along the rift by sight. The ATM makes its precision topography maps with a laser than scans 360 degrees 20 times per second, while firing 3,000 laser pulses per second. When flying at an altitude of 3,000 feet, as during this flight, it measures a swath of the surface about 1,500 feet wide. As the crack measured at more than 800 feet wide in places, it was important for Brockett to hold tight over the crevasse.
“The pilots did a really nice job of keeping the aircraft and our ATM scan swath pretty much centered over the rift as you flew from one end to the other,” said Jim Yungel, who leads the ATM team out of NASA’s Wallops Island Flight Facility in Virginia. “It was a real challenge to be told…we’re going to attempt to fly along it and let’s see if your lidar systems can map that crack and can map the bottom of the crack.
“And it was a lot of fun on a personal level to see if something that you built over the years can actually do a job like that. So, yeah, I enjoyed it. I really enjoyed seeing the results being produced.”
While the ATM provided the most detailed measurements of the topography of the rift, other instruments onboard the DC-8 also captured unique aspects. The Digital Mapping System, a nadir-view camera, gathered high-definition close-ups of the craggy split. On the flight perpendicular to the crack, the McCORDS radar also measured its depth and the thickness of the ice shelf in that region.
Catching the rift in action required a bit of luck, but is also testimony to the science benefit of consistent, repeated trips and the flexibility of a manned mission in the field.
“A lot of times when you’re in science, you don’t get a chance to catch the big stories as they happen because you’re not there at the right place at the right time,” said John Sonntag, Instrument Team Lead for Operation IceBridge, based at Goddard Space Flight Center. “But this time we were.”
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/icebridge/news/fall11/pig-break.html
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
![600808main_pig-break2-orig_full[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/600808main_pig-break2-orig_full1.jpg?resize=640%2C305&quality=83)
Global Warming Crack!!!
Send us some…
Scarlet Pumpernickel – November 3, 2011 at 2:11 am
“ummmm don’t NASA do space anymore?”
No. NASA has been reoriented. The main aim now to is to make the Muslim world feel proud of their past achievements of about 1,200 years ago (i.e. translating a few Greek texts about mathematics and astronomy, which could be used in navigation & the like, instead of burning them like the rest of the library of Alexandria).
So far, they’re doing a good job.
So why NASA? This has nothing to do with Aeronautics or Space. This is more closely associated with NOAA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. NOAA has their own planes they can fly to acquire the data. They have computers to crunch the data. But NASA probably needs avenues to acquire more funding.
Read the rest of the piece here:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/oct/26/obama-readies-to-blast-nasa/
/Mr Lynn
Wow. That’s about 440 cubic km. (106 cu. mi.) of ice, nearly three times the amount of Antarctic ice lost between 2002 – 2005. James “coal-trains-of-death” Hansen and Alarmo-scientists worldwide must be salivating over this “catastrophe”. Just in time for the big upcoming party for worldwide climate caterwauling, too. How convenient.
Gee cantilever stress causes fractures who would have thought that.
Jim’s finally cracked has he.
While Pine Island has scientists’ attention because it is both big and unstable – scientists call it the largest source of uncertainty in global sea level rise projections – the calving underway now is part of a natural process for a glacier that terminates in open water.
Isn’t this ice floating on the water? If it is, then there is NO uncertainty. This would not be a source for sea level rise.
Hmmm…. They’re already saying this one’s about the size of NYC. By comparison, though, the largest recorded one, back in 1956 was 35 times as big, larger than Belgium. How will they spin this? Smaller icebergs due to (manmade) climate change? Should be interesting.
Waste…of…MY…money. 2012 cannot come soon enough.
NASA and NOAA budgets SHOULD be cut. As in cut the duplication. NASA should focus on space exploration. NOAA should focus on Earth exploration. If anything, increase NOAA budgets to provide better weather services here. Decrease NASA to focus just on sending stuff up there.
If that iceberg is in shipping lanes, yes, NOAA should study and track it. If it isn’t, ignore it. We know why it calves, how it calves, why it floats, and why it does NOT increase sea levels should it melt. This is not rocket science. NASA needs to continue to study the Sun because we DON’T know why it does some things. Calving icebergs into the ocean is not some kind of mystery.
Occupy Wall Street??? Hell and damnation, those crowds are occupying the wrong real estate.
Glaciers calve. Good to know. Now can we get onto finding out if the Pope is Catholic???
Sorry, let me try that again! I just don’t seem to be able to post video GK
There is a crack, a crack in everything
That’s how the light gets in. – Leonard Cohen
http://youtu.be/W-vSfwIJkjY
Good to see the US has its own area standard, the NYC. Here in the UK we use the Wales.
G. Karst: November 3, 2011 at 6:57 am:
Combining “crack” with “space” results in “The Crack in Space”.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crack_in_Space
So with NASA we’re in Philip K. Dick territory.
But we already knew that, didn’t we?
The six-year mission…
How about a tax cut instead of funding a six year project that doesn’t help people in every day life. It must be just me that thinks the economy is in bad shape and getting worse.
“PUNTA ARENAS, CHILE – After discovering an emerging crack that cuts across the floating ice shelf of Pine Island Glacier in Antarctica, NASA’s Operation IceBridge has flown a follow-up mission and made the first-ever detailed airborne measurements of a major iceberg calving in progress.”
The fact this ice is floating means there will be little affect on sea rise. The useful idiots (aka MSM) will publish this event as a catastrophe for the residents of low lying areas and the Maldives.
Scarlet Pumpernickel says:
November 3, 2011 at 2:11 am
ummmm don’t NASA do space anymore?
___________________
NO. The last mission has been flown
Since then Obama gave NASA the mission of making Muslims feel better about themselves. I kid you not: http://frontpagemag.com/2010/07/12/nasas-final-frontier/
What a colossal waste of taxpayer money. NASA long ago stopped doing cutting edge stuff. They are just milking the taxpayer now. Studying cracks in ice sheets &*^%!
What will they think of next?
How about scuba diving holidays in Puerto Rico with hand held sensors to study threatened coral reefs? (the ones that have been around over half a billion years but are suddenly hanging on by a thread!)
…..oops they already thought of that!
Must be nice if you can get taxpayer funded trips for research into all these “catastrophes” our planet is facing!
Hmmm….just Googled – NASA Icebridge – in the “news” – got 32 results, then added “global warming” to NASA Icebridge, and the results were reduced to just 5. Does that mean global warming alarmism is slowing down, or just that alarmists haven’t haven’t figured out how to get by all of the “natural event/process” characterization of the calving yet?
I particularly liked the following line from wiki:
Sound like anybody we know? GK
NASA can determine what is happening out there from observations here on earth and knowing how ice moves is important but it is looking like the agency is more involved here than there.
The question is how much duplication of research is being done or is it a matter of available resources? My take is the best buck is spent at NASA for work out there, after all the greatest resources are out there and the third word in NASA is Space.
I’m with Warren on this one, if it is already floating then is has already displaced any melt off.
If – Radar measurements suggested the ice shelf in the region of the rift is about 1,640 feet (500 meters) feet thick, with only about 160 feet of that floating above water and the rest submerged.
Then it seems about right that about ten percent is above the water.
If the concern is the ice which will replace this glacier is not currently displaced in the ocean, then it should be stated.
Right now, the only thing significant about this is a huge chunk of ice that we could camp on and ships should steer clear of…
That;s what glaciers do…
NASA is cracking up
According to the National Snow and Ice Data Center, the Arctic has some 9.3 million Km2 of sea ice (1979-2000 average), 6.8% melts per decade. The Antarctic has some 18.3 million Km2 of sea ice (1979-2000 average), growing 0.8% per decade.
Sea ice is formed when ocean water freezes.
Because the oceans are salty, this occurs at about -1.8ºC.
Arctic sea ice extent is directly dependent on winds and currents, not just on temperatures.
“the_Butcher says:
“What’s the point of watching this? Do these people get paid for watching ice break?”
Bingo!
That’s the game. Raise the alarms of something “happening” and it’s contrived into needed “research” to get funding so professional hobbyists can go watch stuff.
The model of this sham (and an untold story) is the fabricated AGW link to Oregon Ocean dead zones that has led to $400 million in research grants, 5 marine reserves and whole research teams equippped with a fleet and devices for watching, measuring & sampling ocean water off the coast.
It’s ridiculous. They are monitoring sea water and checking for hypoxia and upwelling as if their is some developing crisis while normal cycles have produced no dead zones, a healthy & thriving marine eco-system, near record dungenus crab harvest and near record fish runs.
So what does the public, goverment or science get from the costly water watching? Nothing that a tiny fraction could not have provided. They have proven it is an ocean. An amazing discovery!
And as their own “research” exposes their own lie of AGW dead zones it’s supressed and covered up to keep the funding flowing and prevent any consequences.
After all the distinguished Jane Lubchenco, head of NOAA, was the chief fabricator while at Oregon State University. Her fabricated link and embellishments reached a crescendo with her claiming these global warming dead zones had reached a tipping point with larger and growing AGW caused hypoxia events happending every year for the first time in history.
None of which was true at all. They didn’t even have any historic record to use.
But boy did this fabrication serve her and her peers well.
She got the NOAA job and her university peers got millions to play with.
All from milking the the AGW movement by cooking up AGW =dead zones.