From the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Greenhouse gases: The measurement challenge
The continuing increase in the level of carbon dioxide and other “greenhouse gases” in the Earth’s atmosphere has been identified as a cause for serious concern because it may radically accelerate changes in the Earth’s climate. Developing an effective strategy for managing the planet’s greenhouse gases is complicated by the many and varied sources of such gases, some natural, some man-made, as well as the mechanisms that capture and “sequester” the gases. A new report sponsored by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) focuses on one of the key challenges: defining and developing the technology needed to better quantify greenhouse gas emissions.
The new report, “Advancing Technologies and Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Quantification,” is the result of a special workshop in the NIST Foundations for Innovation series, convened in June 2010, to bring together greenhouse gas experts from government, industry, academia and the scientific community to address the technology and measurement science challenges in monitoring greenhouse gases.
A wide variety of techniques are used for measuring greenhouse gas emissions and, to a lesser extent, the effectiveness of “sinks”—things like the ocean and forests that absorb greenhouse gases and sequester the carbon. The problem is that developing an effective global strategy for managing greenhouse gases requires a breadth of measurement technologies and standards covering not only complex chemical and physical phenomena, but also huge differences in scale. These range from point sources at electric power plants to distributed sources, such as large agricultural and ranching concerns, to large-scale sinks such as forests and seas. Satellite-based systems, useful for atmospheric monitoring, must be reconciled with ground-based measurements. Reliable, accepted international standards are necessary so governments can compare data with confidence, requiring a lot of individual links to forge an open and verifiable chain of measurement results accepted by all.
The report identifies and discusses, in detail, four broad areas of opportunity for technology development and improvement:
- Advanced science and technology for reliably quantifying greenhouse gas emissions, regardless of geography, sector or source;
- Accurate and reliable quantification of distributed carbon sources and sinks;
- Consistent, standardized methods for measurable, reportable and verifiable greenhouse gas emissions data; and
- Integration of ground-based (bottom-up) and remote atmospheric observation (top-down) methods.
Copies of the new report are available at the Website for the 2010 June meeting, “Greenhouse Gas Emissions Quantification and Verification Strategies Workshop” at http://events.energetics.com/NISTScripps2010/downloads.html, along with additional materials from the workshop.
This Lazy Teenager person uses the basic tools of of doubt and propaganda as a weapon. He is obviously trained in this by some nefarious green group or government department.
I do hope he enjoys his twenty pieces of silver, as his AGW nonsense falls on its own sword.
This is a cry to all the politicians with whom the NIST guys went to University to come to the rescue and stump up a few billion tax dollars to help, because it seems to make sense.
FUBAR
LazyTeenager says:
August 17, 2011 at 3:59 pm
…
Yes I am incredibly impressed by your amazing ability to read the minds of people you have never met. So why did you keep your prior knowledge of the Enrob scam to yourself?
—…—…
Odd statement (insult, actually) to try to make.
Al Gore’s entire cap-and-tax, carbon-cap-and-trade and all of Soro-Hansen’s private funding from CAGW-induced political-financial causes stems from an Enron idea begun back when Gore was vice-president, and while he (and his family) was receiving a very large income from their oil holdings in South America. That is, if Enron had not found a source of massive real profits by inventing their carbon-based fear schemes in the late 1990’s, there would be no global depression due to false and hyped carbon scares now.
I like the typo: “En-rob”.
It was indeed.