NASA got tired of answering doomsday questions, so issued a statement and FAQs to deal with the nonsense.
Comet Elenin Poses No Threat to Earth

Often, comets are portrayed as harbingers of gloom and doom in movies and on television, but most pose no threat to Earth. Comet Elenin, the latest comet to visit our inner solar system, is no exception. Elenin will pass about 22 million miles (35 million kilometers) from Earth during its closest approach on Oct. 16, 2011.
Also known by its astronomical name C/2010 X1, the comet was first detected on Dec. 10, 2010 by Leonid Elenin, an observer in Lyubertsy, Russia, who made the discovery “remotely” using an observatory in New Mexico. At that time, Elenin was about 401 million miles (647 million kilometers) from Earth. Since its discovery, Comet Elenin has – as all comets do – closed the distance to Earth’s vicinity as it makes its way closer to perihelion, its closest point to the sun.
NASA scientists have taken time over the last several months to answer your questions. Compiled below are the some of the most popular questions, with answers from Don Yeomans of NASA’s Near-Earth Object Program Office at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., and David Morrison of the NASA Astrobiology Institute at the NASA Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif.
Most Popular Questions About Comet Elenin
When will Comet Elenin come closest to the Earth and appear the brightest?
Comet Elenin should be at its brightest shortly before the time of its closest approach to Earth on Oct. 16, 2011. At its closest point, it will be 22 million miles (35 million kilometers) from us.
Will Comet Elenin come close to the Earth or between the Earth and the moon?
Comet Elenin will not come closer to Earth than 22 million miles (35 million kilometers). That’s more than 90 times the distance to the moon.
Can this comet influence us from where it is, or where it will be in the future? Can this celestial object cause shifting of the tides or even tectonic plates here on Earth?
There have been incorrect speculations on the Internet that alignments of comet Elenin with other celestial bodies could cause consequences for Earth and external forces could cause comet Elenin to come closer. “Any approximate alignments of comet Elenin with other celestial bodies are meaningless, and the comet will not encounter any dark bodies that could perturb its orbit, nor will it influence us in any way here on Earth,” said Don Yeomans, a scientist at NASA JPL.
“Comet Elenin will not only be far away, it is also on the small side for comets,” said Yeomans. “And comets are not the most densely-packed objects out there. They usually have the density of something akin to loosely packed icy dirt.
“So you’ve got a modest-sized icy dirtball that is getting no closer than 35 million kilometers [about 22 million miles),” said Yeomans. “It will have an immeasurably minuscule influence on our planet. By comparison, my subcompact automobile exerts a greater influence on the ocean’s tides than comet Elenin ever will.”
I’ve heard about three days of darkness because of Comet Elenin. Will Elenin block out the sun for three days?
“As seen from the Earth, comet Elenin will not cross the sun’s face,” says Yeomans.
But even if it could cross the sun, which it can’t, astrobiologist David Morrison notes that comet Elenin is about 2-3 miles (3-5 kilometers) wide, while the sun is roughly 865,000 miles (1,392,082 kilometers) across. How could such a small object block the sun, which is such a large object?
Let’s think about an eclipse of the sun, which happens when the moon appears between the Earth and the sun. The moon is about 2,500 miles (4,000 kilometers) in diameter, and has the same apparent size as the sun when it is about 250,000 miles (400,000 kilometers) away — roughly 100 times its own diameter. For a comet with a diameter of about 2-3 miles (3-5 kilometers) to cover the sun it would have to be within 250 miles (400 kilometers), roughly the orbital altitude of the International Space Station. However, as stated above, this comet will come no closer to Earth than 22 million miles.
I’ve heard there is a “brown dwarf” theory about Comet Elenin. Would its mass be enough to pull Comet Honda’s trajectory a significant amount? Could this be used to determine the mass of Elenin?
Morrison says that there is no ‘brown dwarf theory’ of this comet. “A comet is nothing like a brown dwarf. You are correct that the way astronomers measure the mass of one object is by its gravitational effect on another, but comets are far too small to have a measureable influence on anything.”
If we had a black or brown dwarf in our outer solar system, I guess no one could see it, right?
“No, that’s not correct,” says Morrison. “If we had a brown dwarf star in the outer solar system, we could see it, detect its infrared energy and measure its perturbing effect on other objects. There is no brown dwarf in the solar system, otherwise we would have detected it. And there is no such thing as a black dwarf.”
Will Comet Elenin be visible to the naked eye when it’s closer to us? I missed Hale-Bopp’s passing, so I want to know if we’ll actually be able to see something in the sky when Elenin passes.
We don’t know yet if Comet Elenin will be visible to the naked eye. Morrison says, “At the rate it is going, seeing the comet at its best in early October will require binoculars and a very dark sky. Unfortunately, Elenin is no substitute for seeing comet Hale-Bopp, which was the brightest comet of the past several decades.”
“This comet may not put on a great show. Just as certainly, it will not cause any disruptions here on Earth. But, there is a cause to marvel,” said Yeomans. “This intrepid little traveler will offer astronomers a chance to study a relatively young comet that came here from well beyond our solar system’s planetary region. After a short while, it will be headed back out again, and we will not see or hear from Elenin for thousands of years. That’s pretty cool.”
This comet has been called ‘wimpy’ by NASA scientists. Why?
“We’re talking about how a comet looks as it safely flies past us,” said Yeomans of NASA’s Near-Earth Object Program Office. “Some cometary visitors arriving from beyond the planetary region – like Hale-Bopp in 1997 — have really lit up the night sky where you can see them easily with the naked eye as they safely transit the inner-solar system. But Elenin is trending toward the other end of the spectrum. You’ll probably need a good pair of binoculars, clear skies and a dark, secluded location to see it even on its brightest night.”
Why aren’t you talking more about Comet Elenin? If these things are small and nothing to worry about, why has there been no public info on Comet Elenin?
Comet Elenin hasn’t received much press precisely because it is small and faint. Several new comets are discovered each year, and you don’t normally hear about them either. The truth is that Elenin has received much more attention than it deserves due to a variety of Internet postings that are untrue. The information NASA has on Elenin is readily available on the Internet. (See http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2011-135) If this comet were any danger to anyone, you would certainly know about it. For more information, visit NASA’s AsteroidWatch site at http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroidwatch/.
I’ve heard NASA has observed Elenin many times more than other comets. Is this true, and is NASA playing this comet down?
NASA regularly detects, tracks and characterizes asteroids and comets passing relatively close to Earth using both ground- and space-based telescopes. The Near-Earth Object Observations Program, commonly called “Spaceguard,” discovers these objects, characterizes a subset of them and predicts their paths to determine if any could be potentially hazardous to our planet. For more information, visit the NASA-JPL Near Earth objects site at http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ .
However, neither NASA nor JPL is in the business of actively observing Elenin or any other comet. Most of the posted observations are made by amateur astronomers around the world. Since Elenin has had so much publicity, it naturally has attracted more observers.
I was looking at the orbital diagram of Comet Elenin on the JPL website, and I was wondering why the orbit shows some angles when zooming? If you pick any other comet, you can see that there are no angles or bends.
Many people are trying to plot the orbit of the comet with the routine on the JPL website, without realizing that this is just a simple visualization tool. While the tool has been recently improved to show smoother trajectories near the sun, it is not a scientific program to generate an accurate orbit. Yeomans explains that the orbit plotter on the Near-Earth Object website is not meant to accurately depict the true motion of objects over long time intervals, nor is it accurate during close planetary encounters. For more accurate long-term plotting, Yeomans suggests using the JPL Horizons system instead: http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.cgi?find_body=1&body_group=sb&sstr=C/2010%20X1 .
kwik says:
“August 17, 2011 at 11:53 pm
eco-geek says:
August 17, 2011 at 10:27 pm
Hey, eco-geek, I suggest you have a glass of wine, and relax with a good sci-fi book instead.
May I suggest “The Mote in Gods Eye” by Larry Niven?”
You obviously like good science fiction. Try “Tau Zero” by Paol Anderson, if you have not already read it.
Tenuc,
Er, Jupiter is not in the picture. It has come from the inner solar system where it has been in orbit for millions of years (probably) and if we can use a Van der Graph generator to repel its billions of tons so much the better.
Also (whomsoever) I read “Mote in God’s eye” years ago. I gave up sci-fi thereafter as in excess it turns the brains to mush. Unfortunately the Dark Headed Meteor makes mushy brains seem like an enviable state.
Its gonna gets us. Well you lot ‘cos I got my baco-foil on!
I’m surprised that if all this electrical stuff can stop an asteroid when it is unable to stop shooting stars and boggo incandescent meteors. What is the theory behind this? The small ones do but the big ones don’t (although it already has four times in 26 years min)?
I know it’ s really not worth the effort. I keep hoping there is someone out there on open loop,
Nah! That was your last chance. Enjoy….
Jeff Alberts says:
August 18, 2011 at 6:37 am
It is true: Comets have historically scared populations to death. My grandfather told me of people jumping out of buildings when the Great May Comet of 1910 came by. Even then, with all the scientific explanations in daily print, it made no differece. The physical aside, there is a metaphysical aspect to these things, a panic button waiting to be pressed. No amount of reasoning will ever explain away such things. Those who have seen a bright comet in a dark sky (like Hale Bopp) should know why.
eco-geek says:
August 18, 2011 at 12:13 pm
“I’m surprised that if all this electrical stuff can stop an asteroid when it is unable to stop shooting stars and boggo incandescent meteors. What is the theory behind this? The small ones do but the big ones don’t (although it already has four times in 26 years min)?”
Remember Eco-Geek, the E/M field works in the opposite way to gravitational field as regards centripetal forces. Gravity increases with the inverse square law, but the E/M field increases with the inverse quad, so a large highly charged mass near to Earth feel a greater repulsion from the charge field the closer it gets. From your observations the orbit of the body doesn’t seem to be decaying.
Smaller bits of material, like meteoroids, carry much less charge (which is a function of the mass-density). They also travel much quicker than more massive objects and are harder to deflect. However, the majority tend to vaporise in the upper atmosphere.
It is an extremely rare event for a large object to hit the Earth.
Eco-geek, you wouldn’t be pulling our legs, would you? I’m not impressed when you don’t know how to spell “Van de graaff”, as in the static electricity generator.
Oops. Van de Graaff.
eco-geek:
Imagine yourself sitting quietly, in your armchair. Enjoying a warm, cozy fire.
Suddenly, the phone rings, and it is your best friend, excitably describing how he has just been kidnapped by beautiful female aliens, who proceed to extract sperm in various fantastical ways, then entered a dimensional portal, and disappeared!
What would your response be???
Would you:
a) Immediately call a press conference, and notify the defense department?
b) Launch an immediate scientific program to investigate?
c) Quietly, calmly, suggest that he consult a medical professional immediately?
d) All of the above
Just asking and wondering: what YOU would say? GK
This may be the funniest post and comments ever on WUWT.
NASA is pulling the wool over your eyes ,AGAIN!!It’s what they are NOT telling you,They are telling you lies by omission.
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=378n-oHfm1E&w=640&h=390%5D
“ELE” eleven 11 – “NIN” nine 9
ELE=Extinction Level Event,…..NIN= Nibiru Is Near
“dissipative phenomena”
Moon Orbit Wrong Cornell University
Newly discovered detailed report on the recent “anomalous eccentricity” of the moon
http://arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+EXACT+dissipative_phenomena/0/1/0/all/0/1
http://tableofspindex.blogspot.com/2011/03/nasa-knows.html
NASA knows.Harvard knows.Cornell knows.Stanford knows.
Now YOU have
a chance to maybe know.
This PhD in Quantumm Physics presents this paper on an apparent unexplainable anomaly that has been hushed up concerning the moon’s erratic orbit as of late. Here’s the abstract of said paper. Link follows.
On the anomalous secular increase of the eccentricity of the orbit
of the Moon
Lorenzo Iorio
1
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Universit`a e della Ricerca (M.I.U.R.). Permanent address for
correspondence: Viale Unit`a di Italia 68, 70125, Bari (BA), Italy.
lorenzo.iorio@libero.it
Received ; accepted– 2 –
ABSTRACT
A recent analysis of a Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) data record spanning
38.7 yr revealed an anomalous increase of the eccentricity e of the lunar orbit
amounting to ?emeas = (9 ± 3) × 10
-12
yr
-1
The present-day models of the .
dissipative phenomena occurring in the interiors of both the Earth and the Moon
are not able to explain it. In this paper, we examine several dynamical e?ects, not
modeled in the data analysis, in the framework of long-range modi?ed models of
gravity and of the standard Newtonian/Einsteinian paradigm. It turns out that
none of them can accommodate ?emeas
Many of them do not even induce longterm changes in e; other models do, instead, yield such an e?ect, but the resulting .
magnitudes are in disagreement with ?emeas
In particular, the general relativistic .
gravitomagnetic acceleration of the Moon due to the Earth’s angular momentum
has the right order of magnitude, but the resulting Lense-Thirring secular e?ect
for the eccentricity vanishes. A potentially viable Newtonian candidate would be
a trans-Plutonian massive object (Planet X/Nemesis/Tyche) since it, actually,
would a?ect e with a non-vanishing long-term variation. On the other hand,
the values for the physical and orbital parameters of such a hypothetical body
required to obtain the right order of magnitude for ?e are completely unrealistic.
Moreover, they are in neat disagreement with both the most recent theoretical
scenarios envisaging the existence of a distant, planetary-sized body and with
the model-independent constraints on them dynamically inferred from planetary
motions. Thus, the issue of ?nding a satisfactorily explanation for the anomalous
behavior of the Moon’s eccentricity remains open
In a nutshell this report is the best put forth explanations for the apparent unexplainable shifts in where the moon is supposed to be and REALLY is as of late. Noted in the abstract is the terms trans-Plutonian massive object (Planet X/Nemesis/Tyche)
Even though no other plausible current understanding of science explanations can be given as to why the moon is all of the sudden behaving this way, they do admit other things in between the lines.
No One dares be the bearer of this news.
Lest they bear the consequences of breaking
rank with herd and get singled out.
This link to the full report pdf can for now be found, but is expected to be
wiped once found, so make a copy before it does disappear
Posted by spinladen at 12:24 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Google Buzz
Labels: anomaly, moon, nibiru, planet-xshift, report
Extraterrestrial contact at Neumayer Station Antarctica
NIBIRU shadows over Antarctica landmass & Personnel witness BROWN Dwarf and
UPDATE!!! Neumayer Station Antarctica witness BROWN Dwarf strange shadows over
Neumayer Station Antarctica Web Cam
http://www.awi.de/NM_WebCam/
e) “Why didn’t you call me sooner???”
So this one is a miss. But one of them will get us sooner or later. We’re doomed.
eco-geek says:
August 17, 2011 at 10:27 pm
Elenin is not an issue however there is one space rock that may well be: The Dark Headed Meteor. This monster is one of the main curses of my life. Having seen the damned thing a few times
============================================================
I believe you entirely.Could this explain “seen the damned thing a few times”
PLANET X- NIBIRU SPOTTED by NASA! JULY 2011 AMAZING PROOF!
Buy your meteorites here.
“NASA got tired of answering doomsday questions, so issued a statement and FAQs to deal with the nonsense.”
========================
Then”deal with the nonsense.”here NASA!
Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
Abraham Lincoln
eco-geek;
1-8 miles high? Visually the size of a football? Horizon to horizon in a few seconds?
I thang knot. The atmosphere is not that accommodating. Not even for one pass, much less 4 or so.
I won’t call you a liar, but am convinced of your mendacity.
Mark,
Sorry, I meant Vin de Grape generator. I was using one last night.
Tenuc,
Mmmnnn. I might just look into that when I get the Baco-foil off. I am a bit suspicious about what you say ‘cos I think that big rocks do get down to Earth from time to time. I’m wondering whether Ramsgate have a secret asteroid repellent based on these E/M fields Maybe we can use searchlights to repel these big rocks?
Barry Day….excellent job doing your homework. thanks for the footage. The star’s name is Wormwood, and we’ll all know about it soon. Here’s a good video link…David http://www