JPL: Japan Quake May Have Shortened Earth Days, Moved Axis

This view of Earth comes from NASA's Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer aboard the Terra satellite.
This view of Earth comes from NASA's Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer aboard the Terra satellite.

From NASA’s Jet Propulsion Lab: The March 11, magnitude 9.0 earthquake in Japan may have shortened the length of each Earth day and shifted its axis. But don’t worry-you won’t notice the difference.

Using a United States Geological Survey estimate for how the fault responsible for the earthquake slipped, research scientist Richard Gross of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., applied a complex model to perform a preliminary theoretical calculation of how the Japan earthquake-the fifth largest since 1900-affected Earth’s rotation. His calculations indicate that by changing the distribution of Earth’s mass, the Japanese earthquake should have caused Earth to rotate a bit faster, shortening the length of the day by about 1.8 microseconds (a microsecond is one millionth of a second).

The calculations also show the Japan quake should have shifted the position of Earth’s figure axis (the axis about which Earth’s mass is balanced) by about 17 centimeters (6.5 inches), towards 133 degrees east longitude. Earth’s figure axis should not be confused with its north-south axis; they are offset by about 10 meters (about 33 feet). This shift in Earth’s figure axis will cause Earth to wobble a bit differently as it rotates, but it will not cause a shift of Earth’s axis in space-only external forces such as the gravitational attraction of the sun, moon and planets can do that.

Both calculations will likely change as data on the quake are further refined.

In comparison, following last year’s magnitude 8.8 earthquake in Chile, Gross estimated the Chile quake should have shortened the length of day by about 1.26 microseconds and shifted Earth’s figure axis by about 8 centimeters (3 inches). A similar calculation performed after the 2004 magnitude 9.1 Sumatran earthquake revealed it should have shortened the length of day by 6.8 microseconds and shifted Earth’s figure axis by about 7 centimeters, or 2.76 inches. How an individual earthquake affects Earth’s rotation depends on its size (magnitude), location and the details of how the fault slipped.

Gross said that, in theory, anything that redistributes Earth’s mass will change Earth’s rotation.

“Earth’s rotation changes all the time as a result of not only earthquakes, but also the much larger effects of changes in atmospheric winds and oceanic currents,” he said. “Over the course of a year, the length of the day increases and decreases by about a millisecond, or about 550 times larger than the change caused by the Japanese earthquake. The position of Earth’s figure axis also changes all the time, by about 1 meter (3.3 feet) over the course of a year, or about six times more than the change that should have been caused by the Japan quake.”

Gross said that while we can measure the effects of the atmosphere and ocean on Earth’s rotation, the effects of earthquakes, at least up until now, have been too small to measure. The computed change in the length of day caused by earthquakes is much smaller than the accuracy with which scientists can currently measure changes in the length of the day. However, since the position of the figure axis can be measured to an accuracy of about 5 centimeters (2 inches), the estimated 17-centimeter shift in the figure axis from the Japan quake may actually be large enough to observe if scientists can adequately remove the larger effects of the atmosphere and ocean from the Earth rotation measurements. He and other scientists will be investigating this as more data become available.

Gross said the changes in Earth’s rotation and figure axis caused by earthquakes should not have any impacts on our daily lives. “These changes in Earth’s rotation are perfectly natural and happen all the time,” he said. “People shouldn’t worry about them.”

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

64 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
jb
March 17, 2011 12:59 am

Hooray for the NASA scientitst not using fear for funding.

MangoChutney
March 17, 2011 1:54 am

Does this mean the UK is now in the tropics?
🙂
/Mango

Bulldust
March 17, 2011 2:09 am

Interestingly a program I watched on Tuesday (How Earth Made Us – Water episode) in which it was stated that the huge volumes of stored water in dams in the northern hemisphere has altered the earth’s rotation as well (I forget when they said the bit about the dams):
http://www.abc.net.au/iview/?gclid=CNSZtrGd1acCFc2DpAodfTiq8w#/view/728666
The first show is also worth watching (Deep Earth) for the amazing gypsum crsytals in a mine in northern Mexico:
http://www.abc.net.au/iview/?gclid=CNSZtrGd1acCFc2DpAodfTiq8w#/view/728662
See from 2 minute mark onwards, or skip to the magical part at 5 minutes and on. I wish there were more shows like this to get kids interested in scientific fields like geology.

TFN Johnson
March 17, 2011 2:16 am

Slowing the Earth’s rotation causes the moon to move away a little bit, in order to preserve angular momentum of the whole Earth/Moon system.

Alan the Brit
March 17, 2011 2:45 am

So, he is telling us that the measured shift amounts to diddly-squat when all is taken into account – why did he bother?

Patrick Davis
March 17, 2011 2:46 am

Reports now are turning from the death and destruction of the quake, tsunami and threat from radiation to extreme cold. No power, many at risk from hypothermia.
Talking of the moon, now that it is closest to earth, it does appear brighter, and I can see more detail than usual. Amazing really, can’t say I have ever noticed before.

UK Sceptic
March 17, 2011 3:08 am

I’m with Alan the Brit. Why bother?

David L
March 17, 2011 3:12 am

Based on a Model.

JDN
March 17, 2011 3:15 am

So is GPS off by about 6′ in Japan, or, is everything else off by 6′?

Myrrh
March 17, 2011 3:21 am

Do these changes in wobbles affect the wind patterns?

John Marshall
March 17, 2011 3:28 am

And increased ice mass at the South Pole will increase rotation speed a tad. Or at least reduce the rate of rotational degradation due to ocean and atmospheric tidal friction.

steveta_uk
March 17, 2011 3:32 am

Every morning, lots of people commute into cities, and every evening they go home again. As a result, city centres will gain the mass of many people, cars, and other stuff, and so get heavier, and flex downwards, then revert in the evening. Since this is cyclic, the cities may start to oscillate up and down in a 24-hour rhythm. If some city somewhere happens to have an 11.574 uHz resonant frequency (that’s 24 hrs), this could be catastrophic!
Has anyone at NASA looked into this yet?

March 17, 2011 4:07 am

Alan the Brit and UK Sceptic;
Because it is interesting.
Isn’t that what science and research are SUPPOSED to be about?

amabo
March 17, 2011 4:43 am

oldseadog:
Not necessarily, but it’s certainly a bonus.

martin brumby
March 17, 2011 4:49 am

“People shouldn’t worry about them”
Eh?
The hypothermalists won’t like that.
What would happen if every scientist went around talking about natural cycles and saying there was nothing to worry about?
This guy had better watch out.
Joe Romm and Bob Ward will be on his case in a heartbeat.

Joe Lalonde
March 17, 2011 5:11 am

Anthony,
I always wondered where they kept getting these figures.
Off of a model and not actually measurements from the planet.
How do they check if they are correct to the model?

Mark Wagner
March 17, 2011 5:21 am

why did all the reported shifts work to shorten the days? coincidence? would not some seismic events work to lengthen days as well?
TPN: the moon/earth system is moving the moon moves a couple of inches farther away every year. the moon pulls tides, which are pushed ahead of the moon by the rotation of the earth. the slightly off-axis gravitational pull works to pull the moon along faster, and therefore a higher orbit, every year. This also works to slow the earth day. In some billions of years the earth/moon will become locked in position with the moon directly over some position on earth, and a ~40 hour day.
or something like that.

Bill Illis
March 17, 2011 5:28 am

As noted, even the ENSO affects the length of day by about 1,000 times more than this earthquake. A large El Nino will shorten the rotation by up to 1 millisecond (slower equatorial winds and stronger mid-latitude winds in an El Nino slow the rotation).
There is a pretty strong correlation as shown in the numbers up to February 2011.
http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/6569/ensovsaamfeb11.png

ew-3
March 17, 2011 5:41 am

There is an upside to shorter days – we get to live to an older age 😉

TFN Johnson
March 17, 2011 5:48 am

Thanx, Mark Wagner.
I’ve been wondering how the Moon gets to know the Earth is rotating more slowly.

Wade
March 17, 2011 6:00 am

To Alan the Brit:
I find this very interesting. This is true science!

March 17, 2011 6:15 am

TFN Johnson says:
March 17, 2011 at 2:16 am
Slowing the Earth’s rotation causes the moon to move away a little bit, in order to preserve angular momentum of the whole Earth/Moon system.
No, as the angular momentum didn’t change.

RockyRoad
March 17, 2011 6:21 am

My daughter is currently in Japan and she sent me the following link, which lists all the earthquakes they’re having–they post new temblors just a few minutes after they happen. They’ve had nine in the last hour and 17 minutes alone–four of which registered 5.8 on the Richter scale. (Occurred at: 20:41 JST 17 Mar 2011 to 21:55 JST 17 Mar 2011)
http://www.jma.go.jp/en/quake/quake_local_index.html

Rod
March 17, 2011 6:29 am

Changes in the length of day mean changes in earth’s rotation and thus its angular momentum. Over the years of looking at global weather satellite imagery, I observed what appear to be periods of time when cyclonic motion across the globe (i.e. storminess) is more prevalent than at other times. There is likely to be some correlation here between these change events and the degree or prevalence of cyclonic motion in the atmosphere. Perhaps also on anticyclonic motion and the degree of blocking patterns in the atmosphere. This would seem to be a fruitful area for research.

Pamela Gray
March 17, 2011 6:38 am

It is this atmospheric/oceanic phenomenon that prompted that other paper-reviewer to suggest that AGW causes rotational change. Yet in the same paper, ignored by the reviewer, it was clearly stated that the modeled AGW portion of atmospheric change is not powerful enough to show up in measurable rotational changes.
However, I trust climate scientists to eventually splice together a graph that shows it does, theoretically.

1 2 3