Observing Arctic ice-edge plankton blooms from space

False-colour satellite image of ice-edge phytoplankton blooms
Ongoing climate-driven changes to the Arctic sea-ice could have a significant impact on the blooming of tiny planktonic plants (phytoplankton) with important implications for the Arctic ecosystem, according to new research conducted by scientists at the UK’s National Oceanography Centre (NOC).
“Ice-edge phytoplankton blooms in the Arctic Ocean provide food for planktonic animals called zooplankton, which are in turn exploited by animals higher up the food chain such as fish,” explained Dr Andrew Yool, one of the team of NOC researchers.
During the Arctic spring and summer, sea-ice melts and breaks up. Freshwater from melting ice forms a blanket over the denser, saltier water below. This stratification of the water column, along with seasonal sunshine, triggers the appearance of phytoplankton blooms, which often form long but narrow (20–100 km) bands along the receding ice-edge.
Arctic ice-edge blooms have in the past been studied largely during research cruises. These studies have often focused on regions such as the Barents Sea between Norway and the Svalbard Archipelago, and the Bering Shelf bordering Alaska, where blooms are thought to account for 50% or more of biological production.
However, advances in modern satellite technology now offer the opportunity to observe and monitor ice-edge blooms at high spatial resolution over large areas and extended periods of time from space.
“Our aim was to use satellite data to get a synoptic view of ice-edge blooms across the whole Arctic region,” said Dr Yool.
To do this, the research team used daily data from the NASA’s SeaWiFs satellite, which was launched in 1997. SeaWiFs continuously observes ocean colour (sea-ice, cloud and fog cover permitting), sampling the whole globe every two days. To provide an alternative estimate of bloom occurrence, and an independent check on their findings, the researchers also used data from the MODIS satellite.
Ice-edge blooms are identified from the spectral signature of the photosynthetic pigment chlorophyll, after correction for contamination by other coloured organic matter in surface waters.
So as better to understand the relationship between phytoplankton blooms and seasonal changes in sea ice, the researchers also used information on sea ice concentrations obtained from the US National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC). Their study covered the period 1998–2007.
They found that ice-edge blooms occurred in all seasonally ice-covered areas and from spring to late summer. They observed ice-edge blooms in 77–89% of locations for which they had adequate data. The blooms usually peaked within 20 days of ice retreat, sometimes forming long belts along the ice edge (greater than 100 km).
“The bloom peak is most often located close to the ice edge,” said Dr Yool, “We observed blooms propagating in a wave-like fashion behind the receding ice edge over hundreds of kilometres and over several months, while others remained stationary.”
Because of the geography of the Arctic Ocean, sea ice does not always retreat northwards. For example, in Baffin Bay and Davis Strait, west of Greenland, ice shrunk both westward and south-eastward from the north in spring and summer, with phytoplankton blooms propagating along the ice edge as it receded.
“Our findings demonstrate strong biophysical linkage between bloom propagation and sea-ice melt back, which is independent of the actual direction of retreat,” said Dr Yool.
These findings are important because they indicate that future change in Arctic sea- ice resulting from climate change could significantly impact the occurrence of phytoplankton blooms as well as the animals further up the food chain that ultimately depend upon them, including fish.
Ice-edge phytoplankton blooms also play an important role in the Arctic carbon cycle. Through photosynthesis, phytoplankton blooms draw large amounts of carbon dioxide down from the atmosphere, some of which is exported to the deep ocean.
What effects future shrinkage in sea-ice will have on the ecology and biogeochemistry of the Arctic Ocean are still largely unclear, as Dr Yool explained:
“It is quite possible that ongoing climate change will lead to ice-free summers in the Arctic within the next few decades. As the melt season becomes longer, ice-edge blooms may propagate over larger distances, stripping out surface nutrients as they go. However, whether the Arctic becomes more or less productive will ultimately depend on complex factors affecting ocean stratification and mixing, and thus the availability of nutrients in sunlit surface waters.”
Dr Yool and his colleagues hope that their findings will contribute to a better conceptual understanding of the ecology of the Arctic Ocean, which should help computer modellers forecast future changes under global warming.
The researchers are MahéPerrette, Andrew Yool, Graham Quartly and Ekaterina Popova of the National Oceanography Centre. The research work began as part of MahéPerrette’s Masters degree undertaken within the University of Southampton’s School of Ocean and Earth Sciences.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Aside from the obligatory references to climate change (funding has a price), this is pretty interesting.
“Dr Yool and his colleagues hope that their findings will contribute to a better conceptual understanding of the ecology of the Arctic Ocean, which should help computer modellers forecast future changes under global warming.”
=============
Did Dr. Yool just say he is only giving data to the computer modelers, and is not responsible for their actions??
Through photosynthesis, phytoplankton blooms draw large amounts of carbon dioxide down from the atmosphere, . . .
Wonder how they do that.
Newtonian ‘action at a distance’?
Presumably the phytoplankton and the fish survived the shrunken and thin ice back in the fifties as well as other episodes of ice retreat over time…
Indeed Doug in Seattle,
“Dr Yool and his colleagues hope that their findings will contribute to a better conceptual understanding of the ecology of the Arctic Ocean, which should help computer modellers forecast future changes under global warming.”
which means, we are proper scientists who use observed data to test hypotheses but we got our Climate Change meme in at the last moment to secure our future funding and stop us being viewed as pariahs by the rest of the “clan”
Dr Yool is as canny a businessman as any of us.
Clearly, the phytoplankton are causing the retreat of the ice.
I’m not qualified to comment but UK Sceptic has a valid point. What happened in the 50s? and every other time the summer ice disappeared or is this unprecedented as is every other natural occurrence of late?
I want to be snarky (“It is quite possible that ongoing climate change will lead to ice-free summers in the Arctic within the next few decades….” … then again, maybe not!) but feel I should first read the whole article (pdf).
For example, ummm, under section
But no time to digest it tonight.
It’s a blooming Yool tide – he’ll be there till Christmas 🙂
I’ll get my parka….
Phytoplankton blooms at the ice edge should not be a surprise. It is their first sight of the sun for 3 months or so and so start to grow again. There is also a lot of phytoplankton entrapped in the ice and are now melting out.
which means, we are proper scientists who use observed data to test hypotheses… i love it!
They have omitted to say that ice-edge phytoplankton blooms may well in large part originate from that fraction which had been frozen within the sea ice and then released during the thaw. Some years ago in the Antarctic, Dr John Bunt (don’t know year) showed that sea-ice incorporated phytoplankton survived being frozen until the summer thaw, when this fraction helped initiate a bloom – nutrients are in plentiful supply in the Antarctic. In fact, it was this discovery that helped to explain the rapid growth of phytoplankton biomass through the thaw, despite the very low Antarctic surface water temperatures, even in summer (around minus 0.5 degrees C).
Does this mean we’re entering another Ice Edge?
Here is one of my favourite satellite photos of a plankton bloom.
You could fit every human being on the planet an arms length apart on that island (Nunivak) off the coast of Alaska. Kind of puts things into perspective.
but Greenland is melting!
http://wxmaps.org/pix/temp2.html
This is another bit of evidence that the freeze/thaw cycle is the factor that controls the annual atmospheric CO2 cycle, rather than trees in the mid latitudes. Will someone quantify which consumes the most CO2 and when? As to an ice free summer, I’m betting it will never happen. http://www.kidswincom.net/arcticseaice.pdf.
No worries, Arctic sea ice is recovering. Anthony told us so many times.
Ref – Doug in Seattle says:
March 4, 2011 at 10:48 pm
“Aside from the obligatory references to climate change (funding has a price), this is pretty interesting.”
DITTO!!!
(500+ years ago, “scientists” had to get a bishop’s Imprimator, today it’s a curtsy to the Lord’s Of Global Warming. Nothing ever really changes. There’s always going to be someone to tell everyone else how to genuflect.)
Satellite photo from paulhan very interesting. You would think commercial fisherman would use such images to their benefit.
You could fill a library with the stuff that I don’t know about melting/freezing water.
IIRC, when water freezes slowly, the H2O freezes selectively, concentrating what was previously dissolved, in the remaining volume.
Assuming that there are already sufficient nutrients in the salt water; and the right nutrients, the fresh melt-water would provide a more-varied range of concentration of such for the plankton. There would be greater opportunity for optimum conditions for plankton growth, should it be sensitive to concentrations of various dissolved substances; nutrient and otherwise.
And then there is the assumption that there is already enough dissolved in the salt water for optimum growth of plankton; and that the waters that flow into the oceans from the ice don’t contain substances which’d improve metabolism.
You’d have to build another 3 libraries to hold what I don’t know about biology.
Fred H. Haynie says:
March 5, 2011 at 5:32 am
This is another bit of evidence that the freeze/thaw cycle is the factor that controls the annual atmospheric CO2 cycle, rather than trees in the mid latitudes. Will someone quantify which consumes the most CO2 and when? As to an ice free summer, I’m betting it will never happen. http://www.kidswincom.net/arcticseaice.pdf.
Except that phytoplankton is part of the biosphere, even if it is in the oceans, not on land. And less is left if the ice is shrinking, thus less CO2 uptake. That is the opposite of what you assumed.
What a bunch of morons……
the ice really is “dirty”, dust, pollen, etc, that’s why there’s plankton around it, it’s food
What about that other study showing plankton has decreased 40%? /sarc
See recent publications by Odd Helge Otterå showing associations of Arctic & global changes with the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation.
Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation as seen in models, observations and paleo data
Odd Helge Otterå, et al., G.C. Rieber Climate Institute, NERSC, Bergen & Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen
External forcing as a metronome for Atlantic multidecadal variability
Odd Helge Otterå, Mats Bentsen Helge Drange and Lingling Suo, Nature Geoscience Letters 12 SEPTEMBER 2010 | DOI: 10.1038/NGEO955
Ferdinand,
“Except that phytoplankton is part of the biosphere, even if it is in the oceans, not on land. And less is left if the ice is shrinking, thus less CO2 uptake. That is the opposite of what you assumed.”
That’s my point. It is another strong sink mechanism in the Arctic that I believe is stronger that the mid-latitude tree mechanism.
I don’t see how you can expect CO2 uptake to decrease in summer as a result of more melting. Those buggers thrive in relatively fresh water with a ready supply of sunlight and CO2. The bloom will more likely grow as more fresher water is produced.
Wouldn’t this be good news, since prior to this we were warned about the dangers of global warming causing a decline in phytoplankton?
From the article, “It is quite possible that ongoing climate change will lead to ice-free summers in the Arctic within the next few decades. As the melt season becomes longer, ice-edge blooms may propagate over larger distances, stripping out surface nutrients as they go…”
Am I reading this wrong or is the reference to “stripping out surface nutrients” implying a negative consequence of phytoplankton blooms in the Arctic?